DOKUMEN123.COM

In Wikipedia, the lead section is an introduction to an article and a summary of its most important contents. It is located at the beginning of the article...

"WP:MOSINTRO (not over-specific and context familiar to normal reader), WP:NPOV, WP:V, WP:RS; greater detail saved for body of article per WP:MOSINTRO."[60]...

Feel free to ignore some or all of these if you think I'm wrong. Per WP:MOSINTRO, the lead needs to be an accessible overview. Most of the lead seems accessible...

WP:LEAD. Originally, I think they were only intended to supplement WP:MOSINTRO, but in practice they conflict with WP:LEADSENTENCE and possibly Wikipedia:Manual...

from a review. Re-added a sentence to the intro[203] that violates WP:MOSINTRO; this sentence was recently added without consensus by a disruptive user...

structures, but seems to indicate that they haven't yet been constructed. WP:MOSINTRO#Relative_emphasis notes that "Significant information should not appear...

linked above, is currently recommended by the manual of style, see WP:MOSINTRO and Wikipedia:Make technical articles understandable. Unfortunately many...

articles that Noleander wrote, I think he has some trouble following WP:MOSINTRO. I do share the feeling that Noleander was sugarcoating the book article...

articles include: Clive Sinclair – I've since seen that this violates WP:MOSINTRO, and will rectify this after closure of the RfA; Newton OS – whereas this...

including a contentious label such as "controversial" goes against WP:MOSINTRO which specifically advises against the use of "peacock terms" and by extension...

leads are meant to summarise the main points raised in the article per WP:MOSINTRO, which inevitably leads to material being worked together a bit. A better...

this information in the lead. Inclusion is indicated in WP:LEAD and WP:MOSINTRO, and it is strongly suggested in WP:OPENPARAGRAPH. The bestowal of the...

WP:V.--SGCM (talk) 22:50, 25 August 2012 (UTC) It is unacceptable per WP:MOSINTRO, WP:V and WP:RECENT: we shouldn't quote sources in misleading way. — Dmitrij D...

due to its promotion of discrimination against LGBT people," based on WP:MOSINTRO and WP:MOSBEGIN. While there may be support for Still's version further...

structures, but seems to indicate that they haven't yet been constructed. WP:MOSINTRO#Relative_emphasis notes that "Significant information should not appear...

group by several organizations." [12] 3. I reorganized the lead per WP:MOSINTRO, preserving the new sentence, without disturbing anything else: [13] However...

Feel free to ignore some or all of these if you think I'm wrong. Per WP:MOSINTRO, the lead needs to be an accessible overview. Most of the lead seems accessible...