Search Results: Wikipedia:MERGECLOSE
Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Wikipedia:Proposed article mergers
Minggu, 2026-06-07 20:47:10to comment before the discussion is closed. Shortcuts WP:MERGECLOSEWP:MERGECLOSE WP:M4WP:M4 During discussion, a rough consensus may emerge to proceed...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swamp Democrats
Rabu, 2025-12-10 13:28:35merge proposal was entirely uncontested and indeed undiscussed (see WP:MERGECLOSE and WP:MERGETEXT). But since we're here, have some support. Bakazaka (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChatGPT Plus
Jumat, 2025-12-19 01:27:2316:46, 8 June 2023 (UTC) Redirect and close for me, per WP:NOTBURO and WP:MERGECLOSE. But yeah, sure, let this run for the full 7 days and disallow recreation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campaign for a Wales cricket team
Selasa, 2025-12-16 02:50:572022 (UTC) @Titus Gold, seven days is largely the normal minimum per WP:MERGECLOSE. But there was no clear/unanimous consensus yet for a merge, with others...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Humanities/2016 May 24
Minggu, 2017-07-23 08:18:2225 May 2016 (UTC) Appropriate tags have been added to the articles. WP:MERGECLOSE is rather contradictory about the minimum time required before the merge...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niche adaptation
Rabu, 2025-12-10 10:37:28Chiswick Chap said that he was closing and he was one of them. But WP:MERGECLOSE states that "the determination that a consensus to merge has been achieved...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2018 July 4
Kamis, 2025-01-09 02:25:15is not true that ANYONE at any time may close a merger request. See WP:MERGECLOSE specifically the part saying In contentious cases, the discussion should...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 139
Minggu, 2024-10-20 04:22:03!voting as my only strong feelings there are about process. While WP:MERGECLOSE appears to suggest a default duration of 30 days, a A move to close was...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive914
Kamis, 2025-09-25 00:21:40editor discussing the matter, in absolute blatant violation of WP:MERGECLOSE. WP:MERGECLOSE states that "if enough time (normally one week or more) has elapsed...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2024 November 9
Rabu, 2024-11-13 10:10:55(talk · contribs) 18:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)) Quick reminder that WP:MERGECLOSE suggests that the length of discussion is "7 days or more", ten days isn't...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1040
Kamis, 2025-10-09 04:03:00don't close them they sit idly open for years, my interpretation of WP:MERGECLOSE is I as the nominator are permitted to close a discussion. A notice of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive323
Rabu, 2023-05-17 08:55:59assessing consensus and was done by an involved user, contrary to Wikipedia:MERGECLOSE. Fences&Windows 22:27, 30 July 2020 (UTC) Ah, didn't see it was an involved...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive302
Rabu, 2025-09-24 21:36:46with no discussion and no objections, the discussion was closed per WP:MERGECLOSE. - Radiphus (talk) 07:02, 15 September 2018 (UTC) How is any of this issues...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive938
Sabtu, 2026-02-07 15:46:44this article.If you relate my decision to close & merge your article, WP:MERGECLOSE is appropriate!Aru@baska❯❯❯ Vanguard 09:19, 18 November 2016 (UTC) Note:If...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive990
Senin, 2025-06-02 23:52:44article talk page in the merge discussion pointing out the guidance at WP:MERGECLOSE and requesting that he seek an uninvolved closer at ANRFC[51] Francis...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 146
Jumat, 2023-03-03 10:21:1808:21, 26 August 2018 (UTC) The consensus to merge was determined per WP:MERGECLOSE, as there had been no discussion in eight days, and there was unanimous...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 140
Minggu, 2026-02-22 01:09:43only for deletion). – Uanfala (talk) 02:11, 10 January 2018 (UTC) WP:MERGECLOSE suggests that you can merge if nobody objects within 30 days. It doesn't...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2023 October 9
Jumat, 2023-10-13 09:33:08are from my hand. The Banner talk 22:13, 9 October 2023 (UTC) See WP:MERGECLOSE, which says wait until a week has passed since the last comment. TSventon...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 February 7
Rabu, 2023-03-01 12:20:44merge proposal was entirely uncontested and indeed undiscussed (see WP:MERGECLOSE and WP:MERGETEXT). But since we're here, have some support. Bakazaka (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 September 18
Selasa, 2022-09-27 00:22:302022 (UTC) @Titus Gold, seven days is largely the normal minimum per WP:MERGECLOSE. But there was no clear/unanimous consensus yet for a merge, with others...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 864
Minggu, 2020-12-06 07:31:04I suppose this is where I should request for it to be closed, per WP:MERGECLOSE? I'm not entirely sure. Thanks! :bloodofox: (talk) 22:46, 20 November...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1142
Sabtu, 2022-07-23 23:36:33more then a week since it was started.. consensus seems to merge. Per WP:MERGECLOSE, anyone can close a merge discussion, even the nominator, which depending...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1045
Rabu, 2025-10-15 04:56:18Sirfurboy (talk) 21:44, 19 January 2020 (UTC) Just go ahead with it. See WP:MERGECLOSE and WP:SILENCE - X201 (talk) 22:15, 19 January 2020 (UTC) Ah, thanks :)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1026
Selasa, 2020-12-29 23:41:50would look like, thanks AJSteer (talk) 12:03, 21 October 2019 (UTC) WP:MERGECLOSE says "(normally one week or more)". The rest of WP:Merging tells you the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 October 8
Jumat, 2023-03-03 18:46:58Chiswick Chap said that he was closing and he was one of them. But WP:MERGECLOSE states that "the determination that a consensus to merge has been achieved...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 20
Jumat, 2024-08-16 00:28:06July 2016 (UTC) That question is answered in the last bullet point at WP:MERGECLOSE in the "General advice". WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:17, 7 July 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 42
Sabtu, 2022-09-24 12:24:22discussions can be closed after 1 week, even by the original proposer, per WP:MERGECLOSE. So, the real value in initiating a merge discussion is to check for subject-matter...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Closure requests/Archive 30
Selasa, 2025-11-18 17:53:06I think a consensus is pretty clear, I would close it myself per WP:MERGECLOSE but as this has been dragged to ANI (link here) a neutral close is requested...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Closure requests/Archive 28
Minggu, 2024-12-29 11:29:09the merge proposals. Requesting closure by an uninvolved party per WP:MERGECLOSE. Wikiacc (¶) 02:51, 13 May 2019 (UTC) {{done}} --DannyS712 (talk) 03:10...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard/Archive 63
Minggu, 2024-12-15 21:11:44:bloodofox: (talk) 21:37, 20 November 2018 (UTC) I guess it would be WP:MERGECLOSE: "In more unclear, controversial cases, the determination that a consensus...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Closure requests/Archive 38
Selasa, 2025-08-26 20:43:20this Soni (talk) 10:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC) @Soni: Thanks. Contrast WP:MERGECLOSE ("Closing of merge discussions differs from closing of requested move...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Closure requests/Archive 39
Rabu, 2025-07-30 21:14:27have already assessed that there is no consensus and moved on.. Per WP:MERGECLOSE, a contested merge discussion cannot be closed by involved participants...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Closure requests/Archive 37
Jumat, 2026-06-05 22:08:02(talk) 03:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC) {{Not done}} is not needed per WP:MERGECLOSE. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 17:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC) Done...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Merging merge discussions with AfD
Minggu, 2026-05-03 08:44:02are less strict restrictions on who can close merge proposals, per WP:MERGECLOSE: (emphasis in original) Any user, including the user who first proposed...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 8
Jumat, 2023-06-23 13:59:4416:46, 8 June 2023 (UTC) Redirect and close for me, per WP:NOTBURO and WP:MERGECLOSE. But yeah, sure, let this run for the full 7 days and disallow recreation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1227
Kamis, 2024-06-27 02:31:00(talk) 09:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC) Yes, by following the instructions at WP:MERGECLOSE. I've taken the liberty of closing the merge for you; seems straightforward...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 188
Minggu, 2024-01-07 20:45:01doesn't attract a lot of attention. And if no one else participates then WP:MERGECLOSE allows Any user, including the user who first proposed the merge, may...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1123
Rabu, 2025-09-24 21:56:30administrative tools is generally not required in those processes. Furthermore, WP:MERGECLOSE expressly allows for involved closures of merger discussions. NAC doesn't...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1258
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 06:30:57non-notable police unit. I have now closed the merge discussion per WP:MERGECLOSE, merged the two articles and replaced the source article with a redirect...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1286
Selasa, 2026-03-24 12:10:23plenty of support now, possibly because people saw your post here. WP:MERGECLOSE suggests you should wait about a week before closing. Mike Turnbull (talk)...
Click to read more »