DOKUMEN123.COM

important controversies, if there are any. Shortcuts WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODYWP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY WP:LFBWP:LFB The sequence in which you edit should usually be: body...

actually disputed amongst different sources. I tried to adhere to WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY and summarize in a neutral way, skipping things like his mental illnesses...

different thing, then which consensus gets the lede? I'm aware of WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY, but it seems like this is often a chicken and egg issue where there...

order any time they describe persecution against trans people, and LEADFOLLOWSBODY Snokalok2 (talk) 22:43, 15 May 2026 (UTC) Just FYI, I have modified...

paragraphs...." See, in particular, WP:LEAD#Introductory text. See also WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY. -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:41, 18 November 2013 (UTC) SYNOPSIS Really good...

of the article, and your adding it to the lead was compliant with LEADFOLLOWSBODY. If that claim meets WP:V, though (as it does), what is it that supposedly...

in the body of the article, which is not good article style, see WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY. And note as well that, according to the Wikipedia:Banning policy,...

gave me some helpful guidance on my talk page I have tried to bear WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY in mind and explain my edits to TERF on the talk page. Lmatt (talk)...

Jokestress was rightly reverted by Genericusername57 who said Rv per WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY. Please discuss these changes on talk. She then went to the talk page...

October 2021: "your proposed future course of action seems to violate WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY principles, as your practice of dismissing highest-quality, more specialized...

Germany. Another related policy tension I have noticed is that WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY mandates that the body of an article impacts the lead section, while...

find out by discussing. Also, please have a look at MOS:INTRO and WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY. Good luck finding a consensus. When you find common ground with an...

consensus. For one thing it seems like your edits clearly went against WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY, which to me is often a red flag that they were WP:UNDUE (since if...

is an acceptable source for it. bd2412, please see WP:INTRO and WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY. What do you think? —Ben Kovitz (talk) 01:22, 1 August 2016 (UTC) I...

criticism. [15][16] This material is long-standing. This is against WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY and the beginning of WP:LEAD where it says, It should be written in...

addressing other changes in that edit which is meant to comply with WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY, but seemingly hung-up on single terminological-change as “POV vandalism”...

Brexit. This was problematic because it would be a violation of WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY - Mr. Dawson is well-known for his pro-Brexit activism and, even if...

long as the content is repeated and cited within the body (see WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY).) As far as I am aware, we do not have any active Aboriginal or Torres...

actually disputed amongst different sources. I tried to adhere to WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY and summarize in a neutral way, skipping things like his mental illnesses...

disappearance" should remain in the lede. Most of the support comes from WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY, with the article dedicating several paragraphs to the topic. Another...

paragraphs...." See, in particular, WP:LEAD#Introductory text. See also WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY. -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:41, 18 November 2013 (UTC) SYNOPSIS Really good...

(medical vs non-medical POVs) is the main dispute. However, because WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY, I suggest that it would be more appropriate to re-write the body first...

note, it does not seem that the IP editor really cares to follow WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY in this instance. - Amigao (talk) 00:25, 29 December 2024 (UTC) Add...

unachievable.): 1) It's not a reflection of the body of the article per WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY 2) It's a close paraphrase of the source 3) It's a close paraphrase...

06:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC) NOPE per WP:FRINGE, WP:MEDRS and WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY. We go with the scientific consensus. Bobby is an HIV/AIDS denialist...

the criticism. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 12:28, 1 October 2025 (UTC) See WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY. FactOrOpinion (talk) 12:43, 1 October 2025 (UTC) That can be arranged...

and advice on editing Wikipedia. So I updated the body first per WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY. Since then I did things fairly self-directedly and without input from...

was in [278]. Matt Goodwin: removed Matt Goodwin's criticism per WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY [279]. Update: The following bullet points were added after the report...

that PTI intra-party elections case ruling was controversial (per WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY) and was influenced by the military of Pakistan. They dismiss all the...

contentious topic x3. The initial reverts of the IP's edits were for WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY, since the IP included all the material in question in the lead with...

22 February 2025 (UTC) This whole dispute is very silly. Read WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY. We have a whole section of the article about his conspiracy theories...

with these edits (verifiability, construction of a "wide regard", WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY etc), only for them to add similar content back still not backed by...

edits, he uses it quite often). From what is mine understanding, WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY; the lead is the summation of the article body. Any information there...

response to each point raised 1) In regards to the KJK article Per WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY and WP:RS, her notability is incredibly tied to her affiliations to...

the lead by another editor (however, whether that is appropriate per LEADFOLLOWSBODY and the fact there is a gender section is a separate matter). As a...

voided WP:NEUTRAL, especially for lead content and didn't adhere to WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY as well as WP:OR/WP:SYNTH in so far as claims that are made which are...

what seems to be Simon's main point is I have not been following WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY (spelled as it should be, 'lede' is improper English), however LFB...

the lead of Weaponization of antisemitism as being a violation of WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY. After Oiaw restored it with a new piece of body text, I reverted his...

(medical vs non-medical POVs) is the main dispute. However, because WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY, I suggest that it would be more appropriate to re-write the body first...