DOKUMEN123.COM

usually notable enough to deserve a separate section. Shortcut WP:IPCVWP:IPCV "In popular culture" sections should contain verifiable information with...

same trivial content by various single-purpose accounts in violation of WP:IPCV, WP:TRIVIA and WP:NOTADVERT. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php...

actually applies here. Jclemens (talk) 01:14, 25 September 2017 (UTC) Per WP:IPCV - "Exhaustive, indiscriminate lists are discouraged". I guess it might just...

song, television show, or other cultural item." See also WP:NOTPLOT, WP:IPCV and this 2015 RFC on the topic. I find it very unlikely that most of the...

about a half dozen of them. GMGtalk 20:25, 24 January 2018 (UTC) I think WP:IPCV, and more specifically the RfC referenced in the footnote, makes it clear...

Nil🥝Talk 02:45, 4 August 2025 (UTC) Redirect. None of the content meets WP:IPCV. Doctorhawkes (talk) 09:05, 4 August 2025 (UTC) Keep, passes WP:GNG with...

cultural item which merely mentions the subject." See also WP:NOTPLOT, WP:IPCV and this 2015 RFC on the topic Cakelot1 (talk) 12:54, 18 April 2022 (UTC)...

October 2024 (UTC) I'm mostly thinking of the arguments discussed at WP:IPCV. We wouldn't expect a book specifically written about Babylon 5 not to discuss...

Despite IP being told multiple times to review WP:IPCV and then being told explicitly that, per IPCV, they are required to provide a source, they have...

practical result? As far as concerns about the content, I would say that WP:IPCV and the associated RfC were a godsend as they provided bright-line guidance...

noted by third-party sources in any significant manner, as discussed at WP:IPCV. I suspect if the article does leave Draft it's going to need eyes on it...

non-trivial coverage in multiple secondary sources. We might look to WP:IPCV as a template for distinguishing between trivial and non-trivial coverage...

flow of the paragraph. I wanted to revert the edit with the reason of WP:IPCV, but the user had also added an image to the section. I'm not certain about...

actually applies here. Jclemens (talk) 01:14, 25 September 2017 (UTC) Per WP:IPCV - "Exhaustive, indiscriminate lists are discouraged". I guess it might just...

and the (brief) discussion on the talkpage, it looks like the "merge" of IPCV into NVIC was really just blanking and redirecting. Moreover, the content...

about a half dozen of them. GMGtalk 20:25, 24 January 2018 (UTC) I think WP:IPCV, and more specifically the RfC referenced in the footnote, makes it clear...

a source that establishes some level of significance, as discussed at WP:IPCV. The text doesn't make it clear to me that his appearance on the album is...

song, television show, or other cultural item." See also WP:NOTPLOT, WP:IPCV and this 2015 RFC on the topic. I find it very unlikely that most of the...

cultural item which merely mentions the subject." See also WP:NOTPLOT, WP:IPCV and this 2015 RFC on the topic Cakelot1 (talk) 12:54, 18 April 2022 (UTC)...

worldcomp (tracks of worldcomp include: ERSA, PDPTA, BIOCOMP, SERP, ICAI, ICWN, IPCV, ... in case you wish to search for them in various databases such as DBLP)...

Nil🥝Talk 02:45, 4 August 2025 (UTC) Redirect. None of the content meets WP:IPCV. Doctorhawkes (talk) 09:05, 4 August 2025 (UTC) Keep, passes WP:GNG with...

October 2024 (UTC) I'm mostly thinking of the arguments discussed at WP:IPCV. We wouldn't expect a book specifically written about Babylon 5 not to discuss...

non-trivial coverage in multiple secondary sources. We might look to WP:IPCV as a template for distinguishing between trivial and non-trivial coverage...

sources that establish its significance to the article's subject from WP:IPCV; DFlhb (talk) 12:12, 9 October 2023 (UTC) Whether there should be "In popular...

question. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:35, 3 March 2024 (UTC) For what it's worth, WP:IPCV already discusses the need for sources that establish significance, and while...

If this is about sourcing for "in popular culture"-style items, then WP:IPCV would seem to sufficiently cover the matter, including a footnote to the...

same trivial content by various single-purpose accounts in violation of WP:IPCV, WP:TRIVIA and WP:NOTADVERT. DonCalo (talk) 08:15, 4 September 2025 (UTC)...