DOKUMEN123.COM

standard that all editors should normally follow. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. Shortcuts WP:IARWP:IAR WP:IGNOREWP:IGNORE...

Petition against IAR abuse Ignore all rules (IAR) is one of Wikipedia's core policies. It states: If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining...

changing times and cannot afford to solely abide by static policies. In a way, IAR devalues the other rules simply by existing. It is the Catch-22 to a place...

Articles for deletion/Iar Elterrus Articles for deletion/Iar Elterrus (2nd nomination) Articles for deletion/Iar Elterrus (3rd nomination) Iar Elterrus (edit |...

— Group Captain Sir Douglas Bader Ignore all rules, often referred to as IAR, is one of the five pillars of Wikipedia. It's remarkable in its brevity...

Articles for deletion/Iar Elterrus Articles for deletion/Iar Elterrus (2nd nomination) Articles for deletion/Iar Elterrus (3rd nomination) Iar Elterrus (edit |...

deletion arguments (non-admin closure) czar ♔ 01:03, 17 August 2014 (UTC) Iar Elterrus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs |...

rules in a contentious topic. In short: If you're inexperienced, don't use IAR - and if you're not sure whether you're experienced, you're not. Wikipedia:"Ignore...

likely to be in favour of IAR abuse, I wonder), and a magnet for drama as people have wildly different opinions of what IAR means and what it's for: however...

(UTC) comment. Daniel 03:59, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 2007 Romanian Air Force IAR-330 SOCAT crash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...

isl.iar.kit.edu: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links...

Air Force IAR-330 SOCAT crash Articles for deletion/2007 Romanian Air Force IAR-330 SOCAT crash (2nd nomination) 2007 Romanian Air Force IAR-330 SOCAT...

isl.iar.kit.edu: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links...

22 January 2010 (UTC) This is the most policy wonkery I've seen in ages. IAR is a policy that tells any editor that if a rule gets in your way of properly...

master said, "It does not matter." And the elder brother was enlightened. IAR is not a kōan. Knowing the rules is more important than following them. Stay...

mechanism called "Ignore all rules" (WP:IAR) for officially sanctioned rule breaking. The researchers have considered IAR's impact within the scope of deletion...

JSTOR · TWL) IAR is a cornerstone Wikipedia policy. But is it notable enough for a stand-alone article? None of the sources included discuss IAR in depth...

think). Question from Malber (talk · contribs) 4. What do the policy of WP:IAR and the essay WP:SNOW mean to you and how would you apply them? A: Ignore...

User:Danger. (non-admin closure) KTC (talk) 11:05, 6 November 2012 (UTC) Wikipedia:IAR. → Wikipedia:Incorporate all rules (links to redirect • history •...

(UTC) The right to invoke IAR is policy, per WP:IAR. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 03:48, 1 February 2020 (UTC) @Mark viking: WP:IAR does not give free license...

of IAR—"if a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it". That's policy. There are very few legitimate invocations of IAR (I...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was IAR delete. Most "keep" arguments hinge on WP:IAR(?!) and textbook examples of WP:ATA. I close this...

good example of IAR? No, it is not. But don't let us start eroding IAR because one misguided admin has used IAR awkwardly. Poor use of IAR should result...

follow all the rules Ignoring all rules – a beginner's guide Understanding IAR What "Ignore all rules" means Alternative versions of the policy itself The...

how policy (besides IAR) seems less important than Jimbo's view that this really isn't what wikipedia is all about. I guess that IAR is there is funny and...

sense reason to employ WP:IAR. It's already clear that I can't find reliable sources about this reliable source. That's why IAR is being used. Tavix, I'm...

fine, I IAR the policy WP:IAR. =) Can we even do that? Ignore IAR? TALKIN PIE EATER REVIEW ME 18:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC) Sure, you can IAR the IAR rule,...

sources, the notability of the subject is disputed. I chose to ignore WP:IAR. Owen× ☎ 13:28, 11 May 2011 (UTC) MajorMUD (edit | talk | history | protect |...

they may be complaining about. This statement may seem to conflict with WP:IAR and the fifth "pillar" of Wikipedia. However: As a part of the Terms of Service...

the technical metadata of another page. I have boldly implemented this (WP:IAR) as this functionality has been broken for the past three months after the...

Be Bold WP:IAR One of the key beliefs of Wikipedia is that when the going gets tough, the tough don't get caught up in red tape. Although the structure...

Visual version of WP:IAR...

2017 (UTC) Is this a WP:IAR argument?  If so, what is it?  Unscintillating (talk) 02:27, 11 January 2017 (UTC) There is no IAR appeal here. Relevant parts...

interpretation of IAR, and do you think that common sense should automatically overweigh policies in any area on Wikipedia? A. IAR was crafted with good...

WP:IAR states that you should ignore a rule if it prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia. The question is, what is "improving" Wikipedia...

User not notified. WP:IAR. This was users only contribuition. --MECU≈talk 01:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC) Incorrect usage of WP:IAR - user notified of nomination...

rules (WP:IAR) may be helpful, although that is not usually accepted as permission to disregard other policies and justification for applying IAR may be...

refer to: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules, a core policy whose shortcut is WP:IAR Wikipedia:Break all rules, an ironic and humorous commentary Wikipedia:WikiProject...

kitten abuse Wikipedia:BLP semiprotection petition Wikipedia:Petition against IAR abuse Wikipedia:Petition against kitten abuse Wikipedia:Petition for a printed...

should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was: delete per WP:IAR.[April Fools!] (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 01:28, 2 April...

candidacy due to me not subscribing to the belief of WP:IAR. I acknowledge the fact that IAR exists for a reason, and would like to emphasise that while...

suggesting that WP:IAR is not a policy? Selery (talk) 15:52, 31 December 2011 (UTC) No, but an attempt by any admin to delete this under WP:IAR would probably...

you should just point out WP:IAR to them. Often, policies are red tape. They are there for when they are necessary. WP:IAR is there to cut red tape without...

uncyclopedia by deleting WP:IAR, so I am ignoring it as per WP:IAR. However, once WP:IAR is deleted, the rationale for deleting WP:IAR will no longer be valid...

was keep. The consensus here is clearly to keep this article, either on WP:IAR grounds or because the participants truly believe the article now meets WP:GNG...

way. You'll probably learn a lot from how they reply! Do you understand WP:IAR? If you are an admin, can you enforce policy without use of your admin tools...

Short, stubby essay that does little more than restate the main points of WP:IAR and WP:BOLD, but in far less detail. Created in 2013 but then never expanded...

by DarkFalls 4. What is your opinion on WP:IAR, and when will you invoke it? A: A great example of the WP:IAR is the 3RR policy. Let us say we have a neophyte...

made to this page.‎ The result was keep. This is a decision not based on IAR (which to me is a slippery slope) but on improvements to the article during...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Valid invocation of WP:IAR. j⚛e deckertalk 14:21, 5 February 2015 (UTC) Canadian Libraries (edit | talk |...

any speedy deletion criteria, so I am listing it here. I was tempted to IAR delete it, but I guess it doesn't really hurt to have it linger around another...

deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was IAR/nominator concurred speedy redirect. (NAC - note: I am an involved editor...

guidelines and policies, and should not be seen as contradicting WP:BOLD or WP:IAR. In order for it to be generally accepted that the Wikipedia encyclopedia...

06:54, 12 November 2011 (UTC) HRRRRRGH Keep Delete per IAR. I really, really want to invoke WP:IAR and just delete this but I agree with Cullen's sentiments...

14:48, 20 June 2012 (UTC) Keep  Good How-to manuals can be kept as per WP:IAR when they are useful to editors.  Unscintillating (talk) 05:44, 26 June 2012...

Jones and Mark Mercedes being the other two) and definitely notable. WP:IAR also applies in this case due to the limited size of the Australian database...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was WP:IAR keep. I am going to WP:IAR close this as keep to avoid drama and name throwing. Appears...

result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#U1, with a dash of WP:IAR. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:01, 28 July 2011 (UTC) User talk:2bobburns (edit...

one "keep" !voter for saying "yea it's not notable but keep it anyway per IAR". If somebody were to make a good logical argument for keeping an article...

Malber (talk · contribs) 4. What do the policies WP:IAR and WP:SNOW mean to you? A: To me, WP:IAR means that ignoring rules is justified if the integrity...

encyclopedic, regardless of the rules. Even it got down to nothing but WP:IAR, then IAR would apply in this case. You are free to disagree. I am not saying...

(UTC) As always, I have expressed an opinion and would cite WP:BURO and WP:IAR to counter those who incorrectly continue to believe that Wikipedia is bound...

substantively rebutted. Several people advocate retention on the basis of WP:IAR, but that too is a weak argument in light of that policy's wording, which...

amuses me how when a rule suits you you follow it and when it doesn't its IAR or Commonsense. Mztourist (talk) 03:01, 22 July 2020 (UTC) It amuses me how...

page. The result was keep. No sense in keeping this open any longer, per IAR NW (Talk) 03:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC) The Most Hated Family in America...

outside this topic. There really needs to be a strong reason for invoking WP:IAR, I don't think slash fanfiction on a Disney cable channel character is important...

it. Rouge Editor Cabal motto incantation All hail LOLcat!  And long live IAR!  To identify yourself as a rouge editor, just act like one and go about...

created in 2010 by [two kids]". Would anybody seriously object to this being IAR speedied? Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:22, 18 August 2010 (UTC) Note: This...

certain rules, you will be banned. You can see this in the essays explaining IAR. "Feel free to consciously make exceptions, but don't ignore community consensus";...

round and round and round in circles at the moment, and is becoming a WP:IAR talk page part 2 --PopUpPirate 21:49, 18 September 2006 (UTC) Urge withdrawl/keep...

deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was IAR to speedy close as delete. WP:OR like other articles created by author.....

very little useful in the Keep votes here, the first one admits to being WP:IAR, the second one is per the first one, and the third is merely "here's what...

prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it",. see WP:Iar You do not need to know the rules before you contribute. -*- see * at Wikipedia:What...

determine, WP:IAR was declared a policy on 23 April 2005, about a week after Jimbo made an edit where he stated in the comments that IAR is policy and...

and IAR can be used to override policy. Second, it's IAR, not IAREN (ignore all rules except notability). Third, if there is a rule saying that IAR is...

(Talk) 14:17, 2 June 2014 (UTC) Sorry, but your nomination is a WP:IAR argument, and WP:IAR is a policy.  Unscintillating (talk) 22:22, 2 June 2014 (UTC) Comment:...

acknowledge this). A couple of editors also brought up an "IAR keep", but there was not consensus that an IAR exception is warranted in this case. Seraphimblade...

blogs/forums, I failed to find any RS mentioning this song. DRosenbach, WP:IAR does not override WP:5P - Wikipedia is not about The TruthTM, its about verifiability...

Me-123567-Me (talk) 02:19, 6 October 2016 (UTC) Please read WP:Understanding IAR. IAR is not just a license to do any random thing you want without regard to...

don't think this subpage is needed anymore. This may be eligible for an IAR G6, but I'm not sure, so I'm listing it here. Chess enjoyer (talk) 05:03...

the sourcing; call it WP:IAR if you want. Modernponderer (talk) 10:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC) Modernponderer, you know invoking IAR to keep an article with...

discussion at WT:CSD before. IAR deletions should be an exception. The need to delete something is not an unexpected situation. IAR deletion should be reserved...

to the addition of the image, I'd vote IAR in that case. — raekyt 09:35, 6 April 2012 (UTC) As long as we're IAR-ing, Support "original" (prefer the colours)...

Merge with Rice Krispies. DanielPenfield (talk) 08:39, 15 July 2016 (UTC) IAR Keep. Sorry, some things you just need to keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:36...

(UTC) WP:IAR is a guideline, and people are following it by trying to improve wikipedia --UltraMagnusspeak 21:16, 19 October 2009 (UTC) WP:IAR is a policy...

Hiding talk 14:53, 19 February 2006 (UTC) Support for "inbuilt hatred of IAR". Impressive wiki-career, admirable nominator. Xoloz 17:04, 19 February 2006...

administrator Porturology (talk) 05:30, 16 June 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:IAR. It is remarkably clear that this is not suitable for its own encyclopedia...

consensus. Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means Wikipedia:Understanding IAR Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point Wikipedia:Exceptions...

misleading is because you don´t even agree that IAR may be used when it violates a rule and (paraphrased) IAR is only for actions that are uncontroversial...

advertisement and completely unusable as encyclopedic content so I invoked WP:IAR and nominated it for G11 deletion.- MrX 15:13, 19 June 2017 (UTC) Note: This...

not supported by the evidence summed up in this one link. Jossi's claimed IAR removal of Full Protection was incorrect and harmful to a BLP article given...

should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. IAR/G1. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 19:24, 8 May 2020 (UTC) Draft:ESTIMATED DISTANCE...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contested prod. Non-notable house WP:IAR speedy delete.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:33, 5 January 2010...

actions by IAR (w:simple:Special:Diff/9871392 and w:simple:Special:Diff/9871405, protection requests for pages made by the new user) shows that IAR is working...

the meantime we must simply ignore them per IAR, a pillar policy. —В²C ☎ 16:16, 27 November 2021 (UTC) IAR is not a free "get out of ever actually having...

picayune rules when we know that WMF Chairs are notable to our readers (WP:IAR if you need to follow a formal rule). Well there are lots of sources now...

earlier version of IAR can just check the page's edit history, and Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means already details what IAR stands for. The essay...

fairly complicated discussion, including various guidelines, some reasoned IAR, and a number of changing !votes, as well as the subject's request for deletion...

Rule-based morality is beneath the concern of Wikipedia, as expressed by WP:IAR. Wikipedia should become an überenzyklopädie. By its will to power, manifested...

and maybe a little WP:POINTy, but it's really just an elaboration on WP:IAR, and certainly not a threat to the Wiki. --Tryptofish (talk) 00:12, 9 February...

with the exception of ignoring the consequences of ignoring all rules. WP:IAR feigns a pragmatism that only serves to highlight its contradictory nature...

now been copied into the user's page. I am tempted to delete it under WP:IAR as entirely inappropriate but for the moment I am leaving it to others to...

Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:11, 5 August 2017 (UTC) Delete, WP:DEL6 with WP:IAR  I looked at the article and the McAfee reference.  I do not see a NPOV in...

assert pass GNG and bare assertions do not carry weight. Non policy based and IAR arguments do not carry much weight against the professed will of the community...

doesn't sound like IAR, particularly when the user is discussing coverage of the subject in reliable sources. What really sounds like IAR is your "I can't...

Tropical Cyclone 20:07, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Delete, possibly speedily. (IAR?) –xeno (talk) 20:08, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Delete, but waiting a few more...

detail. If you disagree with this, I think it is a good place to apply WP:IAR since we can write a decent article based on the sources available. ~EDDY...

not saying I would use IAR as an excuse to promote. Anyway, we could debate IAR for a long time, but I think the concept of IAR is not really related to...

support This user should make a good admin, but does not seem to understand IAR. It is not for ignoring other people, but for making non-controversial actions...

notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC) Keep per WP:IAR and our pillars WP:5P5. If embassies are not inherently notable they should...

much opposed to IAR to remove notable content. I am also very much opposed to IAR to leave POV content. Basically, I am opposed to IAR as the sole or main...

significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 02:13, 22 November 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:IAR and WP:CREEP. I’m unable to see how the encyclopedia or reader experience...

but apparently inspired by the deletion controversy, a petition against IAR abuse was started this week and has garnered over 75 signatures. Also related...

editors should familiarise themselves with WP:CONSENSUS, WP:NAME and WP:IAR. On Wikipedia, usually anyone logged in can rename a page from its current...

guidelines such as WP:GNG can be suspended by IAR, but only in exceptional circumstances. What is your IAR argument, and what is it about these circumstances...

nearly ended up redirected to House-building [1] - What the hell happened to IAR on this place? .... Common sense clearly lacking here!.... –Davey2010Talk...

(UTC) Comment @FAR coordinators: Yes, please, per TenPoundHammer. Let's IAR and delist this. It's so far from modern standards as to be almost comical—I'd...

2007 (UTC) OK, and WP:N is a guideline, not a policy, which, I may add, WP:IAR is, so the premise of your argument doesn't hold water. More to the point:...

review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was NUKE per IAR is a good option @起司狗:. April fools nom close. TheSandDoctor Talk 01:59,...

was redirect to Carlos Antonio Meléndez. Closing something I nominated is IAR, but I think in this case there's agreement that I missed an obvious redirect...

should be made to this section. The result of the discussion was: keep per WP:IAR. April fools is over. (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions •...

No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Keep as WP:IAR, considering not only has the author started mass-AfDs with vague explanations...

78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:14, 24 November 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:IAR and WP:CREEP. I’m unable to see how the encyclopedia or reader experience...

article per WP:IAR. QuackGuru (talk) 03:03, 29 June 2019 (UTC) Keep Seems inevitable there will be additional stories. Also agree re IAR.--Wehwalt (talk)...

importance of the BLP policy in your answer. What is your opinion on WP:IAR? The first thing to realise is, that Wikipedia:Ignore all rules does not...

improvement, but I'm satisfied that notability is established (more through WP:IAR than WP:N though) Waggers (talk) 07:58, 30 May 2008 (UTC) AfDs for this article:...

copyrights, except under very particular circumstances. Ignore all rules (IAR): Rules on Wikipedia are not fixed in stone. The spirit of the rule trumps...

the rules to delete a page, cite WP:IAR in the deletion rationale. This is both compliant with policy (since IAR is a policy) and honest with people viewing...

NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 04:55, 21 January 2010 (UTC) I'm tempted to WP:IAR and tag this for speedy as an attempt to circumvent the wording of speedy...

GNG, but in any case I would justify keeping it by IAR. WP:N is a guideline, not a policy, and IAR specifically applies in such cases. It might be desirable...

or guideline. I would also bring attention to this which clarifies that IAR is only to be used in "uncontroversial ... situations", which this MFD is...

07:13, 25 January 2015 (UTC) Policy WP:IAR disagrees with your narrow restriction of a notability guide. IAR disagrees with everything the person who...

Remember IAR. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 08:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC) Speedy deletion has a very specific meaning, and relates to WP:CSD, not any IAR deletion...

goal-scorer in the semi-pro Trinidad & Tobago league), this could be a case for IAR. Jogurney (talk) 14:32, 16 August 2022 (UTC) this source mentions the subjects...

WP:IAR. SineBot was nominated for adminship. Closed as unsuccessful. Moses was nominated for adminship. Closed by non-crat as successful, citing WP:IAR....

created nonsense pages, and cleared his own talk page using edit summary WP:IAR. As this summary matches that of Hel Hufflepuff and his socks, this seems...

WP:IAR) because this is ridiculously bitey. Chzz  ►  17:08, 26 February 2011 (UTC) {{adminhelp|Please consider the request in my !vote and IAR here...

think anyone would mind in this case if an admin excersized the right to IAR. J-ſtanTalkContribs 18:22, 23 October 2007 (UTC) Speedy Delete...yes but...

invoke IAR in exceptional cases, and have done so my self a couple of times, I believe that such should be done with extreme care. My approach to IAR is,...

community memory, not in article space, and IAR. DuncanHill (talk) 16:58, 4 September 2008 (UTC) Speedy keep - IAR. D.M.N. (talk) 16:59, 4 September 2008 (UTC)...

Optional questions from Malber (talk · contribs) 4. What do the policy of WP:IAR and the essay WP:SNOW mean to you and how would you apply them? A: It is...

What do the policy of WP:IAR and the essay WP:SNOW mean to you and how would you apply them? A: To me, the reason WP:IAR exists to avoid wasting people's...

expect to be in a comprehensive encyclopedia. File this under the Policy of IAR if you must. Elected city council member as well so there is valid grounds...

further edits should be made to this page. The result was Speedy keep per IAR and SNOW. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 15:25, 26 March 2008 (UTC) On a side note...

Anti-Bosniak sentiment in the name of symmetry, brotherhood and unity, and WP:IAR. Those were poorly referenced, troll magnet, POV-exchange and hopelessly...

there is no other policy basis for a deletion, are you arguing for a WP:IAR deletion?  We assume the good faith of our content contributors, for one...

Optional questions from Malber (talk · contribs) 4. What do the policy of WP:IAR and the essay WP:SNOW mean to you and how would you apply them? A: I view...

the article currently stands, this is a case where WP:COMMONSENSE and WP:IAR need to be used. Frank Anchor 13:22, 19 October 2022 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

yeah, I justify that by the GNG, so I'm left with IAR. Hobit (talk) 18:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC) WP:IAR only applies when unnecessary rules are impeding...

notability. If someone wanted to argue for an IAR exception, I'd be tempted to support it. But I have already made an IAR argument recently and that's my six month...

contribs) 4. What do the policy of WP:IAR and the essay WP:SNOW mean to you and how would you apply them? A: IAR is not a big stick to hit objectors with...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy delete. per IAR, snow on the main AfD and common sense. Albums/singles from a non-notable...

interest of the project. Comment by Arbitrators: Mildly, which of the several IAR actions leading to this case is this principle pointing at? -- Euryalus (talk)...

impact (in response to Dhartung asking "What policy requires this?": WP:IAR, quite simply. Let's not get bogged down in legalisms. We're trying to build...

No further edits should be made to this page. The result was keep per WP:IAR. (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 23:43, 1 April...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was: Speedied. This is an IAR situation. Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:30, 15 July 2025 (UTC) User:Starfall2015/The...

the principle of Primum non nocere, "first, do no harm". Here is the WP:IAR interpretation of BLP--violations of this subset of core BLP principles should...

Support. Wally 00:23, 10 January 2006 (UTC) Support in substantial part for IAR views. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Simetrical (talk • contribs)...

delete them when not. --Lord Belbury (talk) 15:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC) IAR keep. I hate things like this and feel it's a place where our inclusion rules...

WP:IAR. JoshuaZ 01:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC) Delete. It definitely doesn't seem to be used on Wikipedia, and JoshuaZ is right that "IARDEE IAR IAR" seems...

questions from Doc Quintana 4. When is IAR appropriate? A: Pardon if this is a long statement, but I just find IAR one of the most interesting parts of...

should have a better explanation than per IAR. Lara❤Love 22:10, 10 April 2008 (UTC) The meme of "citing" IAR follows from a misunderstanding; adding an...

Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:IAR and WP:CREEP. I’m unable to see how the encyclopedia or reader experience...

Unscintillating (talk) 02:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC) Delete WP:DEL7 with WP:IAR. An 85-year-old Boy Scout camp sounds like a topic of enduring interest,...

question from Naconkantari: 5. When is it appropriate to implicitly invoke WP:IAR? Explicitly? Are there times when it should not be invoked? Naconkantari...

Mogism's suggestion that WP:IAR. should be deleted: "However, since the underling theme of my efforts deliberately contrast WP:IAR, I will instead ignore the...

this were to be seen as failing SIGCOV, I think it should be kept on WP:IAR grounds as a company worth documenting due to its early role in shifting...

January 2023 (UTC) Keep. IAR. In my opinion eight games (which was the majority of the season, +3 as a starter) should be enough to IAR keep. I don't think...

withholding my !vote for now. PDCook (talk) 16:09, 4 March 2010 (UTC) See WP:IAR. I am attempting to improve Wikipedia by getting rid of this worthless article...

impunity under the WP:IAR clause. A key thing that is missing is the essential notion of 'consensus' in the WP:IAR policy. WP:IAR is an important part...

apply, nor does G4, and (though greatly tempted) I do not want to do an IAR speedy. JohnCD (talk) 20:19, 1 December 2012 (UTC) SPEEDY Delete as deleted...

run, and seems to be a good use of WP:IAR. ~ mazca t|c 12:12, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Or the WP:SNOW subset of IAR, specifically. —C.Fred (talk) 12:53,...

this might never be more than a stub per guideline WP:WHYN. However, an WP:IAR argument could be made to complete this otherwise ~99% completed list of...

though, practice may not deviate from it except in rare cases Nope. See WP:IAR and WP:PGE. I suspect that you're thinking about real-world policies, like...

terms of WP:DEL-REASONs, this is WP:DEL7 with an IAR for the source search, where the reasons for the IAR are both the statement in the administrator's guide...

on-hand, but I'm fairly certain there have been past IAR-related principles that make the point that IAR is critical but is expected to be invoked in balance...

deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) I've desysoped Fred Bauder per WP:IAR in light of two self-unblocks today. As it's a Sunday and frankly we (or...

improperly trying to invoke the "ignore all rules" (WP:IAR) principle without the justification IAR requires. IAR is the last resort, after process has failed,...

namespace page but then there's a directory of essays about IAR. I get this is the point of IAR but I can see the unintentional confusion here. The article...

overwhelmingly lined up to delete. Even if against consensus, the principles of IAR, speedy, snow, and everything that Wikipedia stands for would support the...

for process's sake. See also WP:IAR. --Farix (Talk) 02:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC) Comment: If you hadn't added the IAR link I would say it isn't SNOW because...

basis for deciding , still the fundamental policy of IAR and according to fundamental policy of IAR would provide for such exceptions. It serves the purpose...

necessary escape valve. Some uses of IAR have been justified (even if we disagree on which). Frivolous claims of IAR are ignored (or, like Godwin's Law...

but sometimes high risks end up significantly underperforming. While WP:IAR has been invoked before (that will be talked more about later), it's important...

should have an article. This is one of the very few times that I use WP:IAR. Joe Chill (talk) 00:32, 9 October 2009 (UTC) If you look at the {{UK regional...

helpful either in articles or in AfDs. Regarding WP:IAR, the only example I can think of an IAR keep is this, which is much more understandable than...

April 2011 (UTC) Delisted --Makeemlighter (talk) 20:13, 29 April 2011 (UTC) Both delisted per WP:IAR. Makeemlighter (talk) 20:13, 29 April 2011 (UTC)...

time to revamp notability and Afd accordingly. In the meantime we can WP:IAR them to minimize the damage they cause. —В²C ☎ 14:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)...

(UTC) Keep – The last I saw, WP:IAR is not an essay, and "exercising common sense" is most certainly an aspect of IAR. –MuZemike 16:55, 25 January 2011...

discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:57, 12 January 2019 (UTC) Namespace shift or IAR? - it's a very un-google-friendly name, but various searches didn't come...

February 2007 (UTC) Keep per WP:IAR. 12.218.156.49 01:39, 3 February 2007 (UTC) Comment How about delete per WP:IAR, wiseguy? JuJube 02:43, 3 February...

September 2006 (UTC) Well, I give it a list of links. Well, I used Wikipedia:IAR and ran a first batch of 475 redirects. :-) bogdan But where does this list...

further edits should be made to this page. The result was Snow keep (non-admin IAR close). Insomesia (talk) 00:01, 7 October 2012 (UTC) Fred Karger (edit |...

would be bitting a newbie. That is not good. We can temporarily use WP:IAR here. IAR states that if a rule keeps you from improving wikipedia, then ignore...

on WP:IAR. What are your general thoughts on the appropriate use of it? Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:07, 10 January 2006 (UTC) If strictly speaking, IAR isn't...

WP:NOT, WP:NPOV, WP:GFDL and WP:WQT, with the fifth being WP:IAR. The way I interpret WP:IAR is that if any rules are getting in the way of the betterment...

Another optional question from Hdt83 5. How do you interpret WP:IAR (Ignore all rules)? A: IAR allows us to open up new ideas that we never thought of. The...

and discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 Romanian Air Force IAR-330 SOCAT crash (2nd nomination). There doesn't seem to be an obvious merge...

Wikipedia:Product,_process,_policy (only a short section is about IAR directly) Wikipedia:Advice_for_new_administrators (again, only a short section)...

past and there are a number of on-line versions of the game on the web. IAR keep on the theory that it appears to be a real and significant game, but...

11:56, 1 June 2011 (UTC) Speedy Delete as clearly this is a case where WP:IAR can (and should) apply.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 12:13, 1 June 2011 (UTC) Speedy...

ut_methods_and_usage) When objections have come up before, appeals to WP:IAR, with the caveat that editors need to follow the guidelines mentioned above...

ArcAngel 7. What is your interpretation of WP:IAR and when are you willing to use it? A: I use WP:IAR when it comes to species and geographical places...

(PS -- Saw the IAR complaint after typing this up, and as someone who thinks IAR is a good thing, I actually thought your views on IAR made sense and...

WP:NETRUMP like this lyric...Donald Trump is human syphilis. Sometimes WP:IAR is a good option. Lightburst (talk) 14:06, 18 July 2020 (UTC) None of that...

readers it deserves to stay. This is an important principle & I believe WP:IAR applies. JRPG (talk) 16:18, 7 April 2015 (UTC) @JRPG: See WP:PPOV. Even if...

wants to withdraw or an admin wants to do an IAR close. I'm not comfortable doing a close that is both IAR and NAC, but I'd be fine if someone else, or...

information at another source when we have the information right here? WP:IAR allows us to use good judgement here and not stick to the letter of the law...

(paraphrasing Rklawton's argument) and finally a however contested request for WP:IAR. Finally, the merge case is that this appears to be a simple police operation...

would had failed to meet GNG and WP:ORG, I would had kept this one for WP:IAR, because of the impressive number of notable films and TV-series they produced...

truly outstanding journalists, so inherent notability isn't the answer. WP:IAR is a last resort and there is no reason to skip to it, and this is not a...

WP:OTHERSTUFF. miealaraisa perhaps suggests an WP:IAR argument with "I see high value" but with no support to IAR other than it being a competitor to a notable...

would be appropriate to mention IAR in any debates that came as a result of this. I think that in the majority of cases, IAR shouldn’t be “invoked”, because...

of IAR, user pages, Huggle, discussions, BOLDism, a Main Page and so forth are all saved by WP:IAR because they are helping to build Wikipedia. IAR will...

enough to know when to apply IAR and when not to. However, I believe that admins should be more cautious about using IAR than regular users, since the...

for the article, should you decide to delete it, I will restore it per WP:IAR. ackoz 22:36, 18 June 2006 (UTC) Comment upon which the article will be deleted...

to this page.‎ The result was redirect to Bestiary#Modern bestiaries,. WP:IAR certainly gives the participants in an AfD the authority to ignore a guideline's...

would be a more suitable target it's a cheap redirect and I'll just invoke IAR because my argument is not policy based. TartarTorte 01:20, 15 April 2022...

we should start with IAR and a few dozen other pages first. Collect (talk) 12:56, 2 January 2009 (UTC) How is this "similar" to IAR? This template basically...

one, are fundamentally promotional, there is sufficient reason to apply WP:IAR. Since there is a product description which might be considered encyclopedic...

2005 (UTC) Cite WP:IAR and be done with it. :) howcheng {chat} 22:55, 22 December 2005 (UTC) If it meets the Spirit of G7, then IAR instructs a speedy...

like eg WP:HOAX#Dealing with hoaxes. I fail to see the connection with WP:IAR Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 16:23, 5 September 2011 (UTC) Delete speedily. The...

be made to this page.‎ The result was Defer to merge discussion. per WP:IAR. No rationale for deletion (as opposed to merge, redirect, keep, etc.) was...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Speedy keep. IAR and SNOW invoked, clearly. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 05:31, 19 March 2008 (UTC)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy delete. WP:IAR closure as snow/speedy/hoax. tedder (talk) 00:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)...

Some Wikipedia koans to ponder: Only the use of IAR that is unnoticed is a true use of IAR. If you see Wikipedia:Ignore all rules on the road, delete it...

in violation of their ban. 5. What do you interpret IAR to mean? When will you invoke IAR? A: IAR is not, as some would like to believe, a free ticket...

celebrate the crime and further victimize the victim. I would support an IAR immediate deletion. —JBL (talk) 19:13, 17 February 2020 (UTC) Comment. I'm...

Have another look at WP:IAR and quote us the section which says a "justification" must be provided. Then reflect on what IAR actually means and the irony...

let alone a living person. Owen× ☎ 16:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC) That's why IAR / common sense exists. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC) Of course...

(UTC) Can probably be covered under the spirit of WP:A11, WP:U5 using WP:IAR and WP:NOTBURO. This is not an attempt at making an encyclopedia article...

further edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was IAR Speedy Delete. — xaosflux Talk 14:58, 6 July 2014 (UTC) User:Zizolux (edit...

Collaboration Bureaucracies" explains "Wikipedia’s unusual policy, ignore all rules (IAR)" as a "tension release mechanism" that is "reconciling the tension between...

effort, and because of the clear intent even I'd be comfortable following WP:IAR. Oh yeah - I reviewed this when it was under prod, and chose not to salvage...

this instance. I think this might be the kind of situation imagined by WP:IAR, where the rules, while normally useful, are, in this instance, preventing...

clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 05:44, 27 August 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete per IAR. Let's not drag this through AFD for five days. The band is clearly nn, so...

misunderstanding how wp:iar actually works. North8000 (talk) 14:54, 17 April 2013 (UTC) Oppose. As North8000 noted, you've misunderstood IAR. You referred to...

further edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was IAR Speedy Delete. — xaosflux Talk 01:12, 6 November 2014 (UTC) User:Dana Taib (edit...

No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Keep, WP:IAR close (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 20:37, 31 December 2015 (UTC) Rocky De La...

No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Delete, WP:IAR. BJTalk 03:57, 27 August 2008 (UTC) Rantisode (edit | talk | history | protect |...

ever do. Per the 5 Pillars and IAR. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.255.164.25 (talk) 09:44, 6 July 2010 (UTC) IAR and 5 pillars are not the criteria...

Wikipedia:Snowball clause indirectly references WP:IAR.  I don't see that Wikipedia editors should take a WP:IAR stand against trivial awards, nor do the sources...

further edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was IAR Speedy Delete. — xaosflux Talk 14:59, 6 July 2014 (UTC) User:Malkopolo (edit...

page. The result of the debate was keep (clear consensus; closing per WP:IAR). howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 22:44, 19 December 2005 (UTC)...

full protection to semiprotection, with the log summary "WP:IAR - There are times in which IAR is a necessity. This is a highly trafficked page AND a current...

contribs) 4. What do the policy of WP:IAR and the essay WP:SNOW mean to you and how would you apply them? A: IAR was aptly described by another candidate...

eligible for G4. Nonetheless, if another admin wants to SNOW this or invoke WP:IAR, I would not be averse. Qwyrxian (talk) 21:38, 20 October 2011 (UTC) Delete...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW and/or WP:IAR, no need for this to run any longer. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:13, 29 July...

would. WP:IAR is one of my pet peeves. I see it bandied about by people who are basically saying "I know it's against the rules, but I like it!" IAR is not...

be made to this page. The result was Delete as total made-up nonsense. WP:IAR and WP:SNOW refers.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  00:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)...

further edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was IAR Speedy Delete. — xaosflux Talk 14:57, 6 July 2014 (UTC) User:Theirshadshaikh (edit...

within the scope of our mission. I appreciate the sentiment made above for an IAR Keep and quickly ran a Google search for SUICIDE+HELP+LINE, which returned...

--Sabri76message 21:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC) Support. Maybe bring it to FP and mention IAR? Or revert to [1]? TheWeakWilled (T * G) 16:46, 27 January 2010 (UTC) Support...

concrete reason why the content should be retained. Yup, we're going to IAR as ThemFromSpace said. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:23, 15 December 2009 (UTC) List...

problems, etc.) and seems like something we should have. This is probably an IAR !vote... Hobit (talk) 07:31, 2 September 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

spell-checker. -- Shunpiker 03:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:IAR. As a Zionist in real life, I find the article offensive. I didn't bother...

(talk) IAR-93 (talk) IAR_316 (talk) IAR_330 (talk) Done, --Benedict of Constantinople (talk) 22:56, 10 May 2008 (UTC) IAR_80 (talk) IAR_95 (talk) IAR_99 (talk)...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. per WP:SKCRIT#3 and IAR. Nominator doesn't seem to have read the article properly and has neither...

was that covered this, you replied only that it was anyway deletable by IAR. I suspect you mean V, but V as a pillar does not specify what counts as...

case-by-case. My gut reaction is that if you have to explain an invocation of IAR, then you probably ought not to have applied it in that situation. That is...

2012 (UTC) But WP:IAR says we can ignore those rules and delete it anyway. Smartyllama (talk) 12:47, 1 April 2012 (UTC) But WP:IAR says we can ignore...

is one of those few times were WP:IAR makes sense. Shadowjams (talk) 08:58, 14 February 2010 (UTC) No need for IAR, WP:DEL#REASON is quite clear: "Vandalism...

That's what WP:IAR is for! -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:58, 15 May 2023 (UTC) On second thought, you're right Necrothesp. Keep on the basis of WP:IAR Jack4576 (talk)...

part based on the comments in the discussion section, and the rest per WP:IAR. This RFC is a confusing way of proposing that we change policy to overturn...

admin to do something they feel is in the best interest of the project and IAR without fearing that ArbCom will take away their tools. SilkTork (talk) 17:53...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW and/or WP:IAR, no need for this to run any longer. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:12, 29 July...

2023 (UTC) This is the most wide-spread "WP:IAR" claim I have ever seen on Wikipedia to a point where WP:IAR doesn't apply anymore. Either get a policy...

it's probable at all that we'll see a GFDL image anytime soon. Besides, WP:IAR: the policy (as you are attempting to enforce it) is clearly wrong and needs...

handling this issue, as it should have been done from the start. I invoke WP:IAR ignore all rules to ignore the nomination rules and pass the matter to wikipedia...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy delete. IAR closure. This is clearly NOT an article, and it never will be (it is a blog...

further edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was IAR Speedy Delete. — xaosflux Talk 14:55, 6 July 2014 (UTC) User:Eshanakasilva/sandbox (edit...

this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. (SPI clerk hat) IAR speedy deleted as G7. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:55, 22 January 2021 (UTC)...

suppose, besides the fact that the nom gives no reason whatsoever; I'll IAR for that. Per TenPoundHammer, which is normally what I say with articles...

Relevant essays/guidelines/policies: WP:IAR and the millions of things written about it. And yes, I am using IAR to fragrantly violate the whole "don't...

I have provided an opinion, which is perfectly sufficient at AfD. Per WP:IAR (a policy!), common sense (e.g. state awards are notable) overrides dogma...

discussion, it might be best to stay out of the discussion. Do not cloud WP:IAR with WP:ILIKEIT. Basically, if you want to make a list about a certain subject...

is useful, and if it violates any rule thenWP:IAR.--Holdenhurst 12:28, 9 November 2006 (UTC) Comment IAR doesn't apply to everything! We can't just say...

Perhaps, if you are speaking from consensus, that it is an example of WP:IAR? My nomination merely reflects my hesitation to see an article with little...

would be no need to invoke IAR. Likewise, a rule that bureaucrats may never rely upon IAR would presumably also be subject to IAR... WJBscribe (talk) 11:49...

Wikipedia--Pheonix15 10:34, 1 September 2007 (UTC) Weeell, if I had my druthers, WP:IAR would go the way of the dodo really fast. There is far too much wishy-washy...

renominate just because you don't like the outcome. IAR is policy, you can't just declare any IAR close an "outlier". An AfD is not a vote, but this was...

for failure of notability is to merge to a suitable target.  Is there a WP:IAR reason to delete this topic as a redirect?  Perhaps, but it is weak, and...

of his preferences, I suggest he give a rationale for the invocation of IAR or point out a flaw in the rule, as I do, rather than attempt to categorize...

was "Wikepedia hardly needs an article on its own editing tools". However, IAR, I will draft an article and submit it, later. L3X1 (distant write) 01:55...

simply makes them angrier. clarified 11. What is your opinion on WP:IAR? A: IAR is meant to enforce the spirit of the rules here, and these rules are...

April 2020 (UTC) Delete now that we are here. Not G6, IAR is not a reason to break rules, and IAR deletions should be reserved for only serious things...

change your orientation towards IAR. I may also have perhaps misread your reply (specifically, that you don't believe in IAR). If you could clarify that sentence...

than comfortable with an IAR speedy delete on a page like this. ‑Scottywong| express _ 22:30, 13 November 2012 (UTC) Not even IAR, and privacy and outing...

November 2012 (UTC) Speedy Delete*, WP:NOTHOWTO/etc. *Let's have a little WP:IAR... —Theopolisme 22:02, 10 November 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

this topic passes WP:NONPROFIT, albeit barely perhaps. Others make an WP:IAR argument that denominations of this scope are inherently notable, regardless...

per WP:IAR and the assertions of notability in the article (cf above). ----moreno oso (talk) 05:14, 30 July 2010 (UTC) How exactly does WP:IAR apply here...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Speedy delete. IAR application of A7, articles without assertion of notability. Fram 21:33,...

further edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was IAR Speedy Delete. — xaosflux Talk 14:54, 6 July 2014 (UTC) User:Joefiljocson (edit...

use of the template). That aside, WP:IAR is for immediate situations where a discussion is not possible. After an IAR action, a discussion should be started...

WP:EXCEPTIONS specifically points out, WP:IAR should only be applied if it leaves the rule in place, and cites using WP:IAR as a way to never apply WP:N as an...

Draft:Jisoo; redirect is implausibly likely to ever be used, so I'm gonna IAR and delete this in favor of the draft. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:48, 10 July 2018 (UTC)...

argument per WP:IAR. I note as well that a source has been added by Djflem since your nomination. NemesisAT (talk) 18:51, 28 July 2022 (UTC) IAR is for rare...

either delete this article or put a disclaimer on this article alone per WP:IAR. This is not a typical censorship case and I urge Wikipedians to understand...

think 2a and 2b are irrelevant here and largely unactionable. Sometimes WP:IAR applies. Colin°Talk 22:40, 25 January 2008 (UTC) I would have to agree with...

thus very useful and rare. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:15, 6 October 2014 (UTC) IAR Support - Agree with Crisco. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:55, 10 October 2014 (UTC)...

collection. The ultimate principle of inclusion in Wikipedia is not WP:N, but WP:IAR. Including this will make the encyclopedia better & more informative, and...

able to handle it. There may be cases where consensus determines that WP:IAR applies to the general rule to not use flag icons in these templates. I'm...

further edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was IAR Speedy Delete. — xaosflux Talk 14:54, 6 July 2014 (UTC) User:Joefiljocson/sandbox (edit...

for 15 years. Izno (talk) 14:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC) Keep because WP:IAR and WP:FLEXIBILITY, and mostly because this is what Wikipedia is supposed...

encyclopedia" — you're citing IAR as if it meant "I can do anything I want just because I want to, and don't need any real reason because IAR", which isn't what...

the bolded votes being stricken, but as this user is an obvious sock, WP:IAR and everything... Joefromrandb (talk) 17:41, 8 December 2018 (UTC) Duplicate...

(UTC) Academic sources on the matter are rare enough that we can invoke WP:IAR on this one, and let readers judge for themselves whether the phenomena are...

inarguably count toward WP:N is like finding a needle in a haystack. So IAR keep is my !vote as given the huge resurgence of D&D ([1]), this is a notable...

page. The result of the discussion was: speedy delete as U5 with a touch of IAR. Yes the user had contribs to mainspace but they were almost all disruptive...

should be made to this page. The result of the debate was Delete - per WP:IAR and this (MySpace memorial page). Will delete the images as well. I will...

Thanks, Fuhghettaboutit 22:15, 17 April 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:IAR. It's just stupid. YechielMan 19:26, 20 April 2007 (UTC) The above discussion...

chasms are beginning to show. Of course, IAR is by its nature in conflit with all the policies and rules. IAR is popular because it is cute and irreverent...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy delete. per IAR, snow on the main AfD and common sense. Albums/singles from a non-notable...

seen IAR cited as a justification for ignoring the notability guidelines in AfD discussions; this is not the purpose for which IAR was intended. IAR should...

be made to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy delete . IAR speedy. We should not have to waste our time debating whether or not we should...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy close Per WP:SNOW and WP:IAR, though the article is notable. Non-admin closure. ApprenticeFan talk contribs...

assumptions, novel interpretations or WP:IAR. While there is nothing inherently wrong with such arguments (IAR is policy, after all), it is difficult to...

further edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was IAR Speedy Delete. — xaosflux Talk 15:02, 6 July 2014 (UTC) User:Parmjit Gill (edit...

invoking WP:IAR, just like every policy/guideline on Wikipedia, but I do not consider this an extraordinary circumstance worthy of invoking IAR. {{u|Sdkb}} talk...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was Moved to userpace. A bit of IAR. Since the article creator is a new user + the article was clearly not ready...

little room for interpretation in WP:G15. Perhaps I could've gone via WP:IAR if the reinstatement of the CSD tag had mentioned the socking, but if we're...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW and/or WP:IAR, no need for this to run any longer. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:11, 29 July...

StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 01:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC) Keep per IAR. James Taylor is so high-profile that as far as I'm concerned all of his...

discussion was: redirect to Five Nights at Freddy's: Security Breach. WP:IAR speedy close. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:33, 15 November 2021 (UTC) Draft:Five Nights...

discussion here, but the DAB page seems so unnecessary that I am going to IAR to a small extent and delete to save everyone time and trouble. If there's...

this page was funny, and you can prove it with a policy. ...you cite WP:IAR in a discussion. ...you insist that editors/administrators provide proof...

should be made to this page. The result of the debate was speedily deleted - IAR-ing on this one a little, seems pretty obvious to me that it's a test page...

doesn't seem like a valid deletion reason. I assume it is a type of IAR nomination, but IAR only applies when the encyclopedia benefits. Proofreader77 is blocked...

deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was IAR to speedy close as delete. WP:OR like other articles created by author.....

discussion was speedy move to draft space. Forgive me for being a little IAR but the article looks reasonably well written, so I've moved it to the draftspace...

contribs) 4. What do the policy of WP:IAR and the essay WP:SNOW mean to you and how would you apply them? A: WP:IAR is an essential policy, but one which...

‎ The result was keep. SNOW keep as a withdrawal by nominator and closed IAR by him. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:59, 14 August 2016 (UTC) Kelly's of Cornwall...

Talk 06:31, 21 February 2010 (UTC) SUPREME SPEEDY DELETE as nonsense. WP:IAR if we must, let us not waste any further time here. Delete as it violates...

prod; I put the prod template there despite the red text in the spirit of IAR. --NE2 04:46, 22 December 2007 (UTC) Delete. Unused. I do feel that going...

when someone quickly found at least one substantial source. And IAR is policy. Invoking IAR is hardly contrary to operating on consensus. Rlendog (talk)...

policy of WP:IAR and the essay WP:SNOW mean to you and how would you apply them? A: The first thing to remember, I think, is that WP:IAR is not something...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Early close per IAR due to volume of noms. Article is significantly expanded. (non-admin closure)...

No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. WP:IAR; let's not have a main page entry at AfD please. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:02...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Keep. I am no big fan of IAR at all. However, I agree with DGG and cannot imagine that there would not...

be made to this page.‎ The result was Defer to merge discussion. per WP:IAR. No rationale for deletion (as opposed to merge, redirect, keep, etc.) was...

killed over 100 (something known the day after, so IAR is obviously invokeable), and Enderlin is another IAR case as I explained in the original starting edit...

an AFD. Under no circumstances does WP:IAR apply to WP:NOT. WP:NOT is not a rule, it is a definition. WP:IAR is not a free pass to do whatever you want...

guidelines, this is a good case for WP:IAR. --Bduke (Discussion) 00:11, 29 December 2008 (UTC) Keep per WP:IAR and WP:OUTCOMES. Bearian'sBooties (talk)...

taken under IAR should be relatively non-controversial, meaning that few or no informed users would be likely to make a good faith objection. IAR isn't free...

remove the copyvio, merge, and redirect. If the best b=name for that is IAR, call it IAR and do it. DGG (talk) 04:42, 20 March 2009 (UTC) Yeah, except the general...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Delete as an WP:IAR speedy. Fram (talk) 09:10, 28 November 2008 (UTC) Sobbylegism (edit | talk |...

Pain? (talk) 22:10, 22 September 2010 (UTC) An actual universal rule is WP:IAR. A !vote cast in the interest of improving the encyclopedia should darn well...

can't retract my nomination but this does seem like an IAR case. I've never been a fan of IAR and think it's overused but I'm sold. OlYellerTalktome 01:02...

one for speedy deletion under WP:G6 and am just going to close this per WP:IAR. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Pinehouse...

made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Closing early per WP:SNOW and WP:IAR. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:22, 13 July 2009 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles...

WP:CRYSTAL balling? пﮟოьεԻ 57 18:28, 10 March 2008 (UTC) Um, I cited WP:IAR for the sake of common sense. Would it KILL you to wait a few weeks before...

Keep - The lowest possible bar for scholarly journals, under the policy of IAR — use common sense to improve the encyclopedia. Footnotes often link to a...

Talk 02:53, 18 February 2006 (UTC) I have speeded this. I'm probably WP:IAR here, but I'm concerned that with a high-traffic site focusing attention...

Created by 4meter4 (talk). A wp:iar nom by User:Ohiostandard at 06:48, 31 March 2012 (UTC) Comment: I submit this as a wp:iar possibility, in the event good...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. with a side of IAR as is reflected in the consensus. The election is this week, draftifying...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy delete. Per WP:IAR yandman 16:03, 30 June 2009 (UTC) Monorangeosis (edit | talk | history |...

deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was iar delete on the grounds that this can't end well no matter who does what. Policy-based...

revert, discuss cycle Wikipedia:Don't ignore all rules if your decision is biased Wikipedia:Understanding IAR Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW and/or WP:IAR, no need for this to run any longer. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:13, 29 July...

possible circumstances do you think it be acceptable to cite IAR when using an Sysop tool? A. WP:IAR, along with WP:UCS, is important to the goal of Wikipedia...

further edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was: IAR speedy as misuse of Wikipedia as a webhost, not remotely a good-faith attempt...

(UTC) Keep - This page actually helps put WP:IAR in context by parodying it. It could be better (and link to IAR from the body of text rather than a see also...

delete vote can be redacted, and the delete vote can be overridden with WP:IAR.  Finally, "Procedural closure" is not affected by the delete vote in any...

CSD'ers. Not that they IAR, but rather that they have incorporated IAR as a right to do so on a repeated basis. When CSD'ers use IAR to justify the deletion...

further edits should be made to this page. The result was no consensus. IAR close as no consensus/stale/abandoned/incomplete AFD. No conclusions to the...

citations of his works, and his apparent influence I am going to invoke IAR and recommend Keep. If someone can investigate the citation numbers that...

" "NOSPADE!" pleads the wikilawyer. The judge shakes her head: "SPADE." "IAR!" the wikilawyer shouts. The judge shakes her head: "DROPTHESTICK." "NOTBUREAUCRACY...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:IAR. Thanks to the efforts of A Man in Black, the nominator's rationale (no assertion...

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Hagman, I am closing this as a merge per WP:IAR. – sgeureka t•c 07:29, 2 March 2011 (UTC) Harry Price (fictional character)...

any coverage in reliable sources or any evidence to justify pulling an WP:IAR. --Cybercobra (talk) 20:21, 30 November 2009 (UTC) Delete No sources, no...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. WP:SNOW, WP:IAR. Nobody has disagreed the article should be deleted. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)...

policy on your user page. I must say zero-tolerance goes against our WP:IAR policy, so please reconsider that. This isn't a public school district, we...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. I'm going to IAR a bit here and close this, as the creator has now set this to a redirect...

left red. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 02:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC) Delete as an IAR delete. Pie is good (Apple is the best) 20:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC) Delete...

as some sort of anarchy. I hope to apply IAR as the essay on common sense advises. Certainly the letter of IAR could be taken to mean "delete anything...

but maybe it should. Without even a single reference, I can't support a WP:IAR argument to keep this article. I PROD'd the article to try and get the author...

cases such as this where we need to have some common-sense and apply WP:IAR rather than apply black-and-white thinking. Nfitz (talk) 02:07, 24 August...

Resolute 02:19, 28 November 2010 (UTC) Reply: The reason I'd be against any IAR invocation is that there's been at least one Can't Miss Sure To Be Top Five...

to this page.‎ The result was merge to Mediacorp. I'm going to do a rare IAR and ask that if there is any relevant content, it be Merged as an ATD. If...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Delete. Following WP:IAR & closing/tagging myself seeing as no one's turned up (non-admin closure)...

No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. WP:IAR v/r - TP 01:54, 11 November 2011 (UTC) Douglas Davis (electronic sports player)...

this useful or interesting content per WP:IAR, I do not think that these arguments hold up under scrutiny. IAR asks us to ignore rules that prevent us from...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Early close per WP:IAR; result is clear. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:57, 27 August 2019 (UTC) [Hide this...

criteria this breaks (I'm sure there is some). So I've got to go with WP:IAR until some other people way in. Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:26, 12 September 2008...

December 2010 (UTC) Delete as a non-notable book; I almost tried for an IAR speedy, but I PRODded it instead. Does not even come close to meeting notability...

on emulation. Keep because Wikipedia per WP:IAR --Cs california 07:22, 2 December 2007 (UTC) Comment: WP:IAR is not a valid defense. That said, the emulator...

be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. KEEP as a combination of WP:IAR and WP:SNOW: the nominated article no longer exists, the copyvio properly...

be made to this page. The result of the debate was speedy keep - per WP:IAR. FCYTravis 22:58, 24 January 2006 (UTC) This page is about a subject that...

was Delete Clearly a delete per WP:NOTABILITY even with no discussion, WP:IAR Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 14:39, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Muhammad Awais (edit | talk |...

made to this page. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. See WP:IAR. (Also, WP:MFD#Before nominating a page for deletion says "established pages...

of the debate was speedily deleted and redirected as utter junk, per WP:IAR and WP:NOT. FCYTravis 22:32, 15 January 2006 (UTC) notability not established;...

everything is a policy or guideline. That's why we have such policies as WP:IAR and WP:BURO (very unpopular with the more rules-bound editors, who like to...

result was nomination withdrawn. Closing over outstanding delete !vote per WP:IAR. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:46, 17 April 2011 (UTC) A. T. Powers (edit | talk |...

article not in human interest stories, WP:ANYBIO, WP:VANITY & also if neede WP:IAR. To me this article is not notable nor does it meet policies/guidelines....

this page.‎ The result was Speedy Delete. Actually, I'm going with A7, per IAR. No reason to waste time on this. Randykitty (talk) 14:56, 2 July 2014 (UTC)...

further edits should be made to this page. The result was Delete. WP:SNOW/WP:IAR close. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:35, 27 May 2018 (UTC) Trevor Scott FitzGibbon...

than your claim? There is nothing in IAR that states what you've just added. As you can see there is not much in IAR. If the consensus on the talk page...

masquerading as a portal. MBisanz talk 20:26, 11 March 2008 (UTC) Speedy P2 or IAR - this just doesn't belong here, there, or anywhere on Wikipedia.--Doug.(talk...

of ease. J Milburn (talk) 17:16, 10 July 2010 (UTC) As clear a case of WP:IAR that can be. — raeky (talk | edits) 17:19, 10 July 2010 (UTC) Ok, so me,...

discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 03:29, 3 August 2008 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:IAR. The artist in question doesn't have a page (note there's a Ben Joyce but...

review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was WP:IAR deleted as guff. ➨ REDVERS in a car - no brakes? I don't mind 11:27, 6 August...

can and should be sensibly ignored in cases such as these. We also have WP:IAR for which this is a textbook example. Nick (talk) 18:54, 12 November 2014...

NSPORTS specifically requires GNG to also be met, and there isn't a clear IAR exemption case made here, and there is a very clear consensus that GNG is...

Trainwreck. I know there have technically been !votes on this but per WP:IAR I'm closing this as it's clear bundling them was a bad idea. I will renominate...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. IAR. Obvious bad faith nomination. Issues with article can be solved editorially...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. IAR keep, as this passes the notability guidelines. (non-admin closure) Kevin...

being G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban: IAR.(non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor (talk) 16:17, 13 March 2018 (UTC) Draft:Haami (edit...

and never had a match. Nikki♥311 01:44, 27 January 2010 (UTC) Weak keep as IAR to WP:ENT, this actor/model/arm-candy celebrity is simply one role/scandal/famous...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy delete. IAR/DENY/SNOW. Take your pick. Consensus is clear Star Mississippi 14:52, 8 October...

this page. The result of the debate was speedily deleted per WP:NOT and WP:IAR. No sense wasting AFD space on this. FCYTravis 09:43, 15 December 2005 (UTC)...

plain vandalism --Scoobycentric (talk) 20:10, 4 May 2009 (UTC) I've invoked IAR to remove the copyvio tag, since there's no evidence whatsoever of copyeright...

What do the policy of WP:IAR and the essay WP:SNOW mean to you and how would you apply them? A: I'm not a big fan of WP:IAR. The instances where ignoring...

deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was IAR speedy delete with a sprinkling of salt. Author blocked as a promotion-only...

result was nomination withdrawn. Closing over outstanding delete !vote per WP:IAR. Will reopen if Armbrust asks me to. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:39, 24 September...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy delete. per IAR, snow on the main AfD and common sense. Albums/singles from a non-notable...

delete. One of the two keep !voters argues that this shuld be kept under IAR, if nothing else. I don't find that a reason to keep this article, and consensus...

to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy close and blank. IAR closure per WP:DELTALK and the content. (non-admin closure) VQuakr (talk)...

result was nomination withdrawn. Closing over outstanding delete !vote per WP:IAR. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 25 April 2011 (UTC) 2015 Major League Baseball...

"What is the meaning of WP:IAR?" how would you answer? A If someone new to Wikipedia asked me what the meaning of WP:IAR, then this is how I would answer:...

countries that have such relations are per se notable (WP:NBILATERAL, WP:IAR (mentioning this policy since someone will probably argue that the preceding...

essentially reminds the reader of WP:IAR". No, Rob, that's not it at all; this is not an IAR argument, and it can't be "IAR" when the GNG guideline itself expltcitly...

doesn't fit the speedy deletion criteria" (and it should) please remember WP:IAR for the good of the project. JBsupreme (talk) 21:42, 1 August 2009 (UTC)...

result was Speedy Deleted, now at Animal Crossing: Wild World#Boondox. WP:IAR at its finest. GarrettTalk 21:33, 31 August 2006 (UTC) Fancruft and original...

January 2006 (UTC) WP:IAR has turned into a long policy gob for reasons that I only partially understand. The main issues are: IAR is an awful title for...

admins. But IAR is not a free pass or a shield, in my opinion, a more suited name would be "Ignore all rules, and face the consequences". IAR is not a toy...

single from some garage band that’s never going to go anywhere. Suggest WP:IAR to allow for some common and constructive sense. (in fact, I suggest this...

be made to this page.‎ The result was Speedy deleted per WP:CSD#G1 and WP:IAR. At best this lives in user space. Not that this is a reason to recreate...

06:13, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Nommed for G10 speedy. Hopefully an admin will IAR/stretch the definition; this is ridiculous. //roux   06:32, 17 February 2009...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. I'm going to IAR here and close this early. This is a pretty close copy of a deleted article...

No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was deleted. IAR, rouge, etc. As Mgm says, most likely a non-controversial delete: the article...

claim of notability. --Slashme (talk) 20:18, 9 July 2016 (UTC) Keep per WP:IAR, and likely the first criterion of WP:NFO. This was a five-reeler, a feature...

this page.‎ The result was speedy delete. I'm deleting this early under WP:IAR as utter crap beyond any hope of salvation. The entire thing is a mindless...

struggle to balance their desire for order with the spirit of key policies like IAR. Users in this category nurture a delicate balance between enforcing our...

I think I'm right. Msnicki (talk) 06:08, 1 April 2012 (UTC) Keep per WP:IAR. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:09, 1 April 2012 (UTC)...

appropriate. HalfShadow 01:40, 28 January 2016 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:IAR, as it would never belong in a dictionary or encyclopedia. Dictionary definition;...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Speedy delete through WP:IAR. A hoax this obvious deserves no more attention. Fram 11:10, 28 September...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW and/or WP:IAR, no need for this to run any longer. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:12, 29 July...

made to this page.‎ The result was keep. I will close this early per WP:IAR since the rationale of the nominator's good faith nomination of a disambiguation...

of the discussion was Redirected to User:Ncox - yes, it's a supervoting IAR close, but I can't imagine anyone will object. WilyD 09:10, 20 November 2012...

this page. The result of the debate was speedily delete per WP:NOT and WP:IAR. No sense leaving this up 5 days. FCYTravis 01:47, 3 December 2005 (UTC)...

with your idea to merge even if this isn't how its normally discussed. (IAR) ThemFromSpace 18:29, 20 June 2009 (UTC) Redirect to movie Best to try merging...

instruction creep Practical process – procedures are good, to a point. WP:IAR – Fundamental basis of this essay. WP:ENC – the "red tape" will only get...

time. IAR is necessary because it is impractical to foresee every loophole and exception. That said, I have never seen a successful argument for IAR. Marcus...

is disputing an action for which you would invoke IAR, you're probably not using IAR correctly. IAR is not a synonym for "I can do whatever I want and...

him? Possibly separately, what is your view on administrative use of WP:IAR as a justification for action? A. To quote RadicalBender, "we MUST stop accomodating...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. WP:SNOW, WP:IAR. The tagger, CatFly86 (talk · contribs) has been indefinitely blocked as...

is opposing on procedural grounds that I should take to AfD. I cited WP:IAR but here we are. Please delete this stub so I can move in a real article...

most of next week. Much as I'll probably be criticised for referring to WP:IAR, in this case (and in the absence of further sources being presented during...

AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 15:59, 13 July 2009 (UTC) There is. It's called WP:IAR. -GTBacchus(talk) 20:50, 13 July 2009 (UTC) Redirect to Scott Adams. Redirects...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy delete. IAR. This is not and never will be an article. We do not need seven days of bureaucracy...

enables the theoretical possibility of deletion.  There is something of a WP:IAR argument here, but shuffling useless pages over to adminspace does not make...

deleting this under A10. I see this as basic housekeeping and appropriate under IAR, but since this is slightly contraversial (I'm kind of involved), I'm happy...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. WP:SNOW, WP:IAR. Nobody else wants the article kept. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:55, 29 November...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy delete. WP:IAR application of WP:A3: No content other than links to the participating teams...

Bauder. The case was opened after Maxim did an emergency IAR desysop of Fred Bauder after Bauder removed an edit-warring block of himself...

2016 (UTC) You really don't like this consensus thing do you? WP:BURO. WP:IAR (that's a policy, you know! Given your obvious love of guidelines, you should...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Delete, per WP:IAR, no need to keep this hoax around for a week. Tim Vickers (talk) 19:55, 28...

Being an unequivocal case, this GAR can probably be closed promptly, per WP:IAR if necessary. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC) Delist can't...

No further edits should be made to this page. The result was keep per WP:IAR. (non-admin closure) Armbrust WrestleMania XXVII Undertaker 19–0 00:49, 2...

be made to this page.‎ The result was Speedy keep per consensus, snow and iar. — MaggotSyn 13:10, 8 July 2008 (UTC) List of Eyeshield 21 characters (edit |...

The result of the discussion was: bold speedy delete with a dash of WP:IAR. The filter got but two few hits over it's six-month lifespan, and the thing...

early by usual metrics, but given the clarity of the case I'm applying SNOW/IAR. joe deckertalk 19:55, 9 December 2017 (UTC) Adnan Gabeljić (edit | talk |...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Invoking WP:IAR to close early. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:55, 19 July 2009 (UTC) Wikipert (edit |...

♬ talk 16:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC) Oppose on both counts (IAR and re-appearance). On IAR, the instructions specifically mention items like this should...

been found to establish notability nor is there sufficient consensus for IAR.  JGHowes  talk 21:55, 7 October 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

--SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:IAR and User talk:Banga1984. Enough is enough. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:35, 27...

(UTC) Keep Major breakfast cereal from major cereal manufacturer; invoke IAR if necessary just this once since cereals don't generally get a lot of media...

WP:FICTION. RMHED (talk) 19:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC) Keep. Satisfies WP:IAR.--Doubtdone (talk) 08:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom and RMHED...

All Rules. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:13, 1 April 2019 (UTC) Keep – I ignore IAR. J947's public account Merry Christmas (it is Christmas, right?) 20:35, 1...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy deleted per WP:IAR by Keegan. Esquivalience t 03:26, 30 May 2015 (UTC) Kola Mass (edit | talk |...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. IAR . There is no way this article would or should be deleted, coupled with questions...

discussions. jlwoodwa (talk) 07:10, 22 December 2025 (UTC) Keep, perhaps slightly IAR. If there was a second undoubted valid dab page entry, then we could have...

and the very strong consensus here I think this is a justifiable use of WP:IAR Mark Arsten (talk) 15:58, 7 September 2012 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was Fixed per WP:IAR. (non-admin closure) Tazerdadog (talk) 05:09, 23 April 2014 (UTC) Huda Sha'arawi...

update. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:18, 2 June 2019 (UTC) Speedy delete G13 WP:IAR, fails spirit if not letter of CSD G13 —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 21:11...

Easily passes WP:MEDRS. Also per WP:COMMONNAME, WP:CONCISE, WP:PRECISE, WP:IAR, and WP:LULZZ. –Novem Linguae (talk) 00:17, 1 April 2021 (UTC) Strongest...

notable. We shouldn't keep an article because of a loophole. That's why WP:IAR exists. --SmashvilleBONK! 22:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC) I'd like to reiterate...

standards for hotels. Bearian (talk) 18:56, 6 June 2022 (UTC) So that's an IAR !vote, is it? :) Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 04:57, 7 June 2022 (UTC) Relisted...

edits should be made to this page. The result of the discussion was Keep, WP:IAR - archive non WP:USERPAGE content to page history, also on User_talk:. —...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was no consensus. WP:IAR isn't a reason for keeping or deleting unless there is special circumstances...

edits should be made to this page. The result was Procedural close per WP:IAR. Not a traditional nomination on the grounds of WP:N etc., the AfD was not...

rules: If applying IAR to itself "prevents [me] from improving or maintaining Wikipedia", then I must make an exception and ignore IAR in that particular...

May 2008 (UTC) IAR does not mean everything. If consensus agrees that IAR doesn't apply, it doesn't apply. If one could just invoke IAR to do whatever...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was draftify. I'm IAR-closing as draftify - it appears the page's creator made a good-faith attempt...

No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. WP:IAR. Paid editing sock farm. NeilN talk to me 05:46, 19 February 2017 (UTC) Robert...

User:Ahthga YramTalk with me! 01:17, 4 May 2021 (UTC) Clearly joke draft. WP:IAR and delete. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 01:41,...

yielded a clear consensus for deletion. I see no particular reason to invoke IAR in spite of notability guidelines, which are not met, as per widespread agreement...

deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was IAR speedy delete as a GFDL violation. Blueboy96 00:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Indrit...

The result was speedy delete. speedy delete per snow, original author, and IAR tedder (talk) 16:53, 24 December 2010 (UTC) 2010 basketball referee battery...

his talk page [10]] [11]] [12]. His reply has consistently been that WP:IAR trumps the requirements to block for violations and that it is within the...

reliable sources. SummerPhD (talk) 02:57, 18 December 2010 (UTC) Weak keep per IAR. Redirect per below. I'd !vote to redirect to Hale or to the Creativity Movement...

which are designed to supplement commonsense rather than replacing it (WP:IAR). Policies and guidelines are living documents, which change according to...

Is this one of those rare situations where I should say keep because WP:IAR and WP:5P5...I'm reluctant to say that...maybe I will. I'll wait for now...

language wiki. --tjstrf talk 21:18, 30 May 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:IAR. Not useful. YechielMan 22:32, 30 May 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete as G2, looks...

deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was IAR Draftify. Disruptive move removes us from processes around draftification...

Wikipedia and is not a violation of any rules. In addition, WP:BEBOLD, WP:IAR, and WP:NOTABUREAUCRACY doesn't require a discussion to take place to split...

Crawford 20:35, 31 March 2006 (UTC) But it seems that, perhaps because of WP:IAR or because of the common use of this and other related phrases in (at least...

consensus. I know this is probably in violation of all sorts of rules, but WP:IAR. Look, this obviously isn't going anywhere and there is no point to dragging...

and "I am a fish", clearly a WP:HOAX. Also, in the best practices of WP:IAR, revenge must be had.Mkdwtalk 16:19, 1 April 2014 (UTC) Send back to school...

apply to User Talk, but DBaK is the only one in the history, so I think IAR applies here. A2soup (talk) 06:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC) The above discussion...