DOKUMEN123.COM

legitimate interest in reviewing your contributions. Shortcuts WP:GHBHWP:GHBH WP:HANDWP:HAND WP:DUMBSOCKWP:DUMBSOCK "Good hand" and "bad hand" accounts...

- Thank you for taking the time. In response, I would say evidence of WP:GHBH activity has been provided by me already, and further corroborated by "O...

miles away, which is within error limits of IP geolocation WP:ILLEGIT: WP:GHBH,WP:SPASOCK Puppeteer only edits Puppeteer's user page (Special:Contributions/Kp3te)...

to respond and has not responded. P4.UK appears to be using the IP for WP:GHBH uses. TorriTorri(talk/contribs) 20:21, 24 May 2010 (UTC) See Defending yourself...

Yes, there does appear to be a WP:GHBH interaction between likes and WJS. I'd like a crosscheck given the apparent GHBH going on here so I've set to endorsed...

User:Satoshi Kondo and User:LenguaMapa at commons). Third, WP:GHBH (please see "WP:GHBH" here) revisions by various newly created IDs and IPs, when they...

WP:AN discussion in the bottom of the page. They'll sometimes create a WP:GHBH account to revert themselves. They have poor command of English and poor...

WP:DISRUPTNAME would be squarely within the purview of WP:GHBH. Of course, we can't typically catch a GHBH situation when the BH is immediately username-blocked...

probably on the same wireless hotspot. Since this doesn't appear to be a WP:GHBH situation, closing this report. If there are ongoing NPA/CIVIL or vandalism...

and normal ones with another account (known as "good hand, bad hand" or GHBH). Identifying sock puppetry is not always a simple matter. There is often...

cuwiki · SI) Looks like a certain about of GHBH going on; blocking all. Girth Summit (blether) 17:24, 29 October 2024 (UTC) - looks like some GHBH going on...

against claims. Checked per Special:Permalink/1280631324#Some help?. Confirmed GHBH nonsense; also noting that Donutsff was created by C809. Blocked and tagged...

Possible Troll. [1] Comments This case appears to fall squarely within the WP:GHBH policy.GSTQ (talk) 06:38, 18 April 2008 (UTC) Lord Foppington has requested...

accounts are related (i.e. WP:VALIDALT), they are also being used in WP:GHBH style and so both are blocked, master for a week and sock indef. Halloweenpartyseo...

in tandem with them. While it's possible that this could be some sort of GHBH, I'd need to see much stronger evidence of that. Closing without action....

Urdad67 to ANI [1], but they both have overlapping interests to the point that GHBH has been suggested - I have a feeling this may be correct. JLN2026 confirmed...

this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. So this was a GHBH case; I blocked User:Horsemeister for a week, but if the next clerk/admin...

data, I would say these are the same person and they're trying to pull a GHBH. Izno (talk) 01:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC)  Sounds like a duck quacking into...

(I mean, who vandalizes HMHS Britannic?), but it seems like a case of WP:GHBH. I was convinced of the connection after seeing this. Good find! ―Matthew...

GooberGorbachev42 is a vandalism-only account, and that lends some credence to the WP:GHBH notion. I think a checkuser should have a look at this one. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits)...

17 May; CF 9, 11, & 17 May; Badeh 17 May), I see a strong likelihood of GHBH here. As THE is currently only tempblocked, would you mind taking a look...

topic area, including removals of sourced text and edit warring. Possible GHBH. Sockmaster/Confirmed: diff, edit warring. Accused: diff, diff, diff, edit...

However it was IP1 who remove reverted vandal by Iaraq [8] indicating WP:GHBH. IP2, IP3 and Iaraq vandal this page [9] to create an illusion of support...

about movie genres, and uploading copyvio posters to Commons. Possible WP:GHBH with the Akariprescott being registered in November 2024, at a time when...

log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) This looks like WP:GHBH to me, which is incredibly sad. Normally, I would not indefinitely block...

separate editors with similar interests and unfortunate timing, could be GHBH nonsense. CU will be useful to understand the relationship between the accounts...

TiemposDuros are clearly at least working together: they're an obvious WP:GHBH act in the AfD whether they're actually the same person or not. SoCalKing...

between, User:SheepNotGoats... the name is similar. Now, it could be 1) WP:GHBH, or just a very witty sockmaster. Comments? —DuncanWhat I Do / What I Say...

names and both indicate they're from Shreveport, Louisiana. The user does WP:GHBH between accounts and logged out edits (see 139.180.54.211 (talk · contribs ·...

~2026-16094-19 ~2026-16111-36 ~2026-16083-50 ~2026-16221-49 (may be a WP:GHBH) ~2026-16275-52 ~2026-16347-08 ~2026-16198-96 ~2026-16314-27 ~2026-16350-49...

the competitor's work and replace with your own), or just straight-up WP:GHBH activity. Either way it's disruptive editing and likely in violation of Wikipedia's...

this is a very unusual case of GHBH, or it's a false positive due to shared devices. I say "very unusual" because GHBH is typically much more blunt than...

is using Lboids (and initially 94.192.10.40) to keep User:Hodg clean, WP:GHBH. Both Hodgson's blog and Lboids reference the other and sadly have similar...

- Probably worth a check to confirm as it appears to potentially be a WP:GHBH situation. Also worth a look to see if they are playing with any other socks...

investigate · cuwiki · SI) is an unfortunate friend of LeeWhittaker or a WP:GHBH sock. Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention Please confirm whether...

sockfarm untagging articles, I wouldn't be surprised if they were doing some GHBH thing. The IP itself isn't actionable at this point; range- or single IP...

CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) YmmasinWiki is doing some sort of GHBH thing. Moved, Blocked and tagged. Closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 12:27, 4 July...

created shortly after admin warning from User:Drmies to User:Jstrongshaw; WP:GHBH Role account: User:Public Information CCC username implies shared use; WP:ROLE...

and timing of editing, I believe there may be some sleeper accounts to do GHBH editing. Bhivuti45 (talk) 21:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC) Update: Both DIVINE[10]...

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RobbieN007 which may be a rival user/group or WP:GHBH. They also appear to be using IPs. Cabayi (talk) 16:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)...

hour. Editor interaction utility Seems like a fairly obvious case of WP:GHBH discussion editing by either a single person or small group of people involved...

11:45, 3 September 2022 (UTC) I've also pulled rollback from $tar Anonymous; GHBH socking (possibly, as Femke notes, with the intention of collecting hats)...

of a common POV between sock and master, due to the fundamental nature of GHBH. On a side note, it is possible that Leugen has at least some knowledge of...

adversarial cluster on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gibby1242 or WP:GHBH. Cabayi (talk) 16:23, 2 April 2020 (UTC)  Unlikely. They're using different...

are indeed one group; Neerejor and Neerajor were both pro-Hexnode. And the GHBH mystery is narrowed down to Neerejor and this deleted edit from the history...

illusion of support for his own position, and to play good hand - bad hand (WP:GHBH). Kalidasa 777 (talk) 22:45, 7 May 2011 (UTC) Diffs... Long statement by...

this worst is that he is a Administrator and should be blocked indef WP:GHBH See Defending yourself against claims. ClosedMouth (talk · contribs) has...

investigate · cuwiki · SI) I don't think Group 2 is master unless we're going full GHBH (rare for such obvious connection), see [1] as well as the clear edit warring...

think that I was engaging in some sort of next-level, 200 IQ, long-con WP:GHBH behavior, I strongly urge you to withdraw your report. 35.139.154.158 (talk)...

yet another sockpuppet of User:DeadSend4. I believe DS4 is violating WP:GHBH when I say "evading a ban." Obviously, I'll abide by whatever is decided...

a potential LTA account adding "on wheels" to various ledes and found a GHBH socking situation. The list above are Confirmed. I note that "LOVE FROM FRANCE"...

investigate · cuwiki · SI) are all  Technically indistinguishable. There is blatant GHBH going on here, and I see no reason to believe these accounts are operated...

investigations/Dragoon17cc. I have made this request to check if there're WP:GHBH issue. Note TEntEn4279 have commented the previous SPI. GZWDer (talk) 22:02...

explain things like WP:NBAND. It also would indicate ain intentional WP:GHBH attempt to deceive based on this and this posted in response to the two aforementioned...

flimsy, but given that improbable coincidence I have to agree with the WP:GHBH speculation. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC) In progress...

policy, regardless of if they're editing in the same area or not. See WP:GHBH. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:45, 19 January 2018 (UTC) One alternative to...

as well as the more recent use of the anonymous IP edits that violate WP:GHBH by being the "good guy" who protested the connection on Wikipedia:Suspected...

Ulluly {{confirmed}}? If so, I'm very confident that this is some sort of GHBH thing, given the countervandalism interest of the others and the fact that...

Jonathan can POV-Push Samuel theories over all opposition: Meatpuppetry, WP:GHBH and Strawman Socking... All this plays only into JJ’s hands (the originator...

subject area interest. Since E.i.T. has more or less said this is just a WP:GHBH sock, I don't think the human being in question would be hurt, but the badgering...

There's overlap in the deleted history of Tad Damron, which could possibly be GHBH, or could be competing UPEs trying to get each other's work deleted. At this...

with each other to claim creatorship of the page, which might indicate WP:GHBH or it might indicate competitive paid editing which could link them to the...

to the discussion, but as I discussed earlier in the thread, "Where in WP:GHBH does it say that you have to stick to your original declared purpose with...

Whhu22 (talk · contribs). Whhu22 is a confirmed WP:GHBH sock of WorldCreaterFighter. These edits look like classical GHBH that would have favored WorldCreaterFighter's...

alternative accounts, in particular the bullet point with direct shortcuts WP:GHBH & WP:HAND. Google test Running sections or titles of articles through the...

Auto-generated every hour. Editor interaction utility Perhaps the most obvious WP:GHBH attempt I have ever seen. The article Freeboard (skateboard) has been a constant...

making the edits she declared them had the intent to do." Why? Where in WP:GHBH does it say that you have to stick to your original declared purpose with...

the same ip range. And i accuse Dgtdddsx123 using WP:LOGOUT by playing WP:GHBH to enforce the controversy that i really canvassing people offsite. Since...

being linked to Tigril34. WorldCreaterFighter's new strategy seems to be WP:GHBH, as revealed to me by @Austronesier:. He's causing lots of trouble and wasting...

evidence we normally require, that this was not a different person, but another GHBH sock. FT2 (Talk | email) 16:48, 4 May 2008 (UTC) (ec - with below)Which begs...

original reporter blocked, and bad faith assumed? The various variations on WP:GHBH being suggested are not yet policy. Relata refero 19:06, 10 November 2007...

alternate account goes, is there any evidence that it's in violation of WP:GHBH? I don't believe Vivian has publicized the name of the original account (although...

November 2007 (UTC) (ec) Block of this one account was appropriate per WP:GHBH. As Jehochman stated, this long-time editor is free to contribute to this...

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:07, 14 July 2020 (UTC) @Callanecc: WP:GHBH variant, of course – same reason any sock has one account talk to the other...

over at WT:SOCK with Will Beback and Jehochman on the interpretation of WP:GHBH, I'd say that this is certainly a case where avoiding scrutiny is central...

completely different? I'm not suggesting that this is actually allowed (see WP:GHBH), but I am suggesting that we shouldn't necessarily go looking for violators...

Googlean ? . Concuring -Relata refero's statement above, kindly read WP:GHBH , was he operating a "bad hand" account for the purpose of disruption or...

explanation. North8000 (talk) 16:35, 18 June 2011 (UTC) I just reviewed WP:GHBH and it is silent on the issue of whether it is only talking about "undeclared"...

checkuser. So it's likely to be a highly desired flag by wiki-abusers for its WP:GHBH and WP:SOCK deniability potential. Fortunately most uses will not be for...

accounts/users in effect making them a good-hand, bad-hand account combination (WP:GHBH). This allowed the IP to get all the warnings and one block so far, yet MarkAlexisGabriel...

conflict) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mcenroeucsb, suspected WP:GHBH.--Cerejota (talk) 20:11, 5 April 2009 (UTC) As if calling legitimate edits...

Jayemd has not pursued. Then there was a sockpuppet investigation for WP:GHBH which was confirmed. After that, some dispute resolution suggestions at Talk:Kashmir...

persons. Even if he is not a banned user, his behavior still violates WP:GHBH, considering that virtually all of Goldorack's edits consist of disruption...

hand" account? ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:33, 31 May 2009 (UTC) See WP:GHBH. hmwithτ 23:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC) Aha. I've never run across that terminology...

(UTC) @Austronesier: I agree. But they made so many changes, utilizing WP:GHBH tactics while I was gone, that it is kind of difficult. Anyway, I'd try to...

users are the same (though pretty likely), CU clearly indicates massive WP:GHBH sockpuppetry, and some behaviourial evidence is pretty typical: compare [89]...

15:13, 9 December 2008 (UTC) I think an admin should do the Obvious per WP:GHBH. See Special:Contributions/Stating the Obvious for details. --Hans Adler...

template placing in general. Anyway, I'm going to keep digging into the GHBH puppet. That would end all the separate incident reports at once. ♪ daTheisen(talk)...

vandalism from the same devices on these addresses, interspersed with WP:GHBH edits as obfuscation; no comment on possible connections to accounts: 74...

Salvio 09:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC) Some sockmasters and LTA cases use WP:GHBH and friend and foe tactics; debating, arguing, and edit warring with their...

the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:53, 24 May 2022 (UTC) Template:GHBH (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Redundant warning template...

the block if a mistake has been made. As I don't see any evidence of WP:GHBH, I feel the block is unjustified, but would like more opinions before lifting...

non-partisan edits. But this may be the case of "good hand - bad hand" (WP:GHBH). If we were to respect the wikipedia rules the data should be removed immediately...

use multiple accounts abusively again, including using VOA accounts and WP:GHBH accounts. I'll focus on the work I used to do previously like content creation...

Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC). I'm sure he's a WP:GHBH-type editor ("Good hand" and "bad hand" accounts). If it's possible to check...

names from the Korean Wiki. If they don't exist, well then we have a case of GHBH or something weird like that. Drmies (talk) 03:30, 8 February 2022 (UTC)...

be used to segregate combative edits or conflict, per WP:SCRUTINY and WP:GHBH. I've therefore blocked Is not a (talk · contribs) indefinitely; the owner...

which i has stumbled in the SPI, unsure is genuine believe the ips , or WP:GHBH to try to enforce the controversy. Special:Diff/1051012890 A more generic...

blocked because there's a chance it's a logged-in editor using it for WP:GHBH editing, new users would not be able to make rapid edits without the necessary...

happens. Dreth 21:57, 26 December 2013 (UTC) It's impossible to tell with WP:GHBH accounts, because it could be a family member or a dynamic IP. Unless there...

socks violated the sock policy, specifically aspects like WP:SCRUTINY and WP:GHBH (the latter with respect to an edit of User:Jake Wartenberg's talk page)...

making the edits she declared them had the intent to do." Why? Where in WP:GHBH does it say that you have to stick to your original declared purpose with...

Interestingly the reporting TA has been blocked for evasion by Asilvering- GHBH perhaps? They've decided to appeal.. Blue Sonnet (talk) 00:39, 18 April 2026...

using them in ways that were already forbidden by WP:SOCK (apparently WP:GHBH and WP:STRAWSOCK). It's not Arbcom's place to invent policy and they should...

other users with a similar pattern after a lot of Wikistalk searching. WP:GHBH I think would be glorifying its purpose a bit much. This make me realize...

older's block log and the creation time of the new account, plus their WP:GHBH interactions with this and other UPE sockfarms. Also blocked. I very briefly...

frequently reported Dorothygordz socks. Two of the accounts have also played WP:GHBH on Vinny Troia, although this particular group was more focused on Patrick...

classic case of WP:GHBH. See contribs by 39.51.74.218, 39.51.96.206, 39.51.17.37 (among other sock IPs in the range [with non GHBH edits], e.g. 39.51...

between GAVERushaMiciNGSlANG and Carbon/Potato, as well as the possibility of GHBH, is in order. Clerk endorsed -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 01:58...

their heart these actions above conflict with WP:ILLEGIT, WP:SCRUTINY and WP:GHBH and make it impractical to assume good faith here. -- TerryE (talk) 18:17...

contributions look like. I might raise that at WT:WPOP when I have a minute. GHBH is one option (and I'd say a likely one given the occasional self-reverting...

shared issues with spelling) is sufficient to justify a check as a suspected GHBH. I note that WikiFlame is exclusively editing from mobile, which I haven't...

with unrelated LTAs. UnderMyHead has also been doing a lot of logged-out WP:GHBH editing and so I have blocked them.  Behavioural evidence needs evaluation...

explained in previous revisions of my talk page, but, okay; I did the whole WP:GHBH thing and I know it wasn't the best of decisions. However, I invite you to...

closing this with no action taken - there would have to be some serious GHBH going on, as each account has at some point contradicted one of the others;...

this account to participate here with a clear rationale, or 2/ enforce WP:GHBH or WP:SOCK#SCRUTINY against it. Comment by Arbitrators: Comment by parties:...

vindication and so on. And yes, there will always be "criminals" who operate GHBH accounts; this is certainly something we need to consider, but whatever happens...

for obvious reasons.) This appears to be as a quintessential case of WP:GHBH. If anyone can explain to me why Penyulap should not be sanctioned, I would...

I don't have a great answer for you. Looking at this again, I'd say WP:GHBH is another possibility, maybe a more likely possibility than a competing...

regurgitates the very same thing [45] about me and Nitinmlk. Also, playing a little GHBH. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:52, 8 October 2023 (UTC) Again you are blaming...

edit-warring against are likely a different user, but I also haven't ruled out WP:GHBH. Good blocks, anyway. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:06, 13 April 2018 (UTC)...

obvious. We cannot rule out the possibility that DeFacto is playing the WP:GHBH game using User:Pother and [[User:Ornaith] as his Good Hands and that some...

yes, but I can't really say any more. I would say it was sophisticated WP:GHBH except that HughD's evidently not very well versed in good-hand behaviour...

Probably not enough for CheckUser, but enough to suspect there might be some WP:GHBH going on here. Vjmlhds may or may not have done this once before at Media...

them all suspected and move on. Also blocking ChambeChambeBoy as either WP:GHBH or sock-on-sock abuse. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:32, 30 April 2022 (UTC)  Global...

bot-assisted EC gaming, but in my opinion this is a frankly sad attempt at a WP:GHBH account. Blocked and tagged. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 22:38, 5 October 2021...

CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) Gaudypoets is a classic WP:GHBH sleeper: they were created a few years ago but just activated recently, and...

Possible Troll. [107] Comments This case appears to fall squarely within the WP:GHBH policy.GSTQ (talk) 06:38, 18 April 2008 (UTC) Lord Foppington has requested...

page in question. Otherwise, I would advise you to review the following: WP:GHBH. Isingness (talk) 09:11, 2 November 2018 (UTC) @Isingness: I don't see how...

2018 (UTC) This last one I've added looks like we may be dealing with some GHBH socking. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:45, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Accused parties...

more evidence regarding Zxcv6666, RichardHornsby has a history of using WP:GHBH IP socks that originate from different continents. E.g. see the contribution...

valid use of a second account, but then they spent most of this morning WP:GHBH tag-teaming with the third account, and now all are Blocked and tagged. Ivanvector...

as well as the more recent use of the anonymous IP edits that violate WP:GHBH by being the "good guy" who protested the connection on Wikipedia:Suspected...

But I do have to admit that I'm a bit skeptical that this is a case of GHBH based on the broader activity of the /64—is there something I'm missing from...

block user · block log) was recently blocked after this discussion for using WP:GHBH to disrupt Wikipedia and prove a WP:POINT. They are have returned to editing...

articles and reported their opponents as socks, akin to the aforementioned GHBH situation. OFC I can't find an example for the life of me right now, but...

activities, and as far as I can tell they aren't. A case could be made for WP:GHBH but I don't think we're quite there. That's why I've landed on just asking...

accounts have commented in this thread, all will be blocked indef per WP:BE, WP:GHBH, and WP:PROJSOCK. I'll create an SPI shortly. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:56...