DOKUMEN123.COM

event of a dispute, start a new deletion discussion. Shortcut WP:GCSDWP:GCSD These apply to every type of page with exclusions listed for specific criteria...

WP:TROLL. SocialRanger (talk) 03:32, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Speedy Delete per WP:GCSD criterion G3 -- it's a blatant hoax. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 18:30, 22 March 2013...

sherdog. Papaursa (talk) 20:10, 30 May 2013 (UTC) Speedy Delete - Per WP:GCSD G1 (Patent Nonsense) and G3 (Blatant Hoax). Event doesn't exist and IMO the...

Delete This article seems to be self promotional and could fall under WP:GCSD G11. Its most significant contributors are Judehassan and an IP editor that...

realise now this doesn't quite meet any of the criteria in WP:ACSD or WP:GCSD for speedy deletion but it's still a clear delete. Orange sticker (talk)...

Rathfelder and Orville1974. Ultimately I don't think it meets WP:ACSD or WP:GCSD; specifically, I feel that A7 isn't satisfied because the article claims...

{{GenericCountryStub}}, {{GenericCountryStubDetail}} and the redirects {{GCS}}; {{GCSD}} Stub-type redirection *R: {{royal-stub}}; {{euro-royal-stub}}; {{peer-stub}}...

can be formed that it meets WP:CSD#G11 or anther of the criteria within WP:GCSD or WP:CSD#User pages. If the user indeed has a coi, they may choose to submit...

different name for their articles. (only a few has this problem) {{GCSD|Us|United States}}:{{GCSD|Us|United States}} {{GenericCountryStubDetail|Us|United...

for CSD G5? CoolSkittle (talk) 12:51, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Yes, see WP:GCSD. --David Biddulph (talk) 14:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC) I am not a frequent...

missed it because I was looking under WP:RCSD and so didn't look under WP:GCSD. As this discussion is already in progress, I believe it's too late to add...

wording not quite fitting? Johnuniq (talk) 22:38, 28 January 2020 (UTC) WP:GCSD specifies that the general speedy criteria apply to all types of pages, explicitly...

fun, rather than malicious misinformation? I know that at the top of WP:GCSD it says that the General criteria do apply to user pages (among other places);...

deletion of non-notable drafts that otherwise didn't meet any of our extant WP:GCSD. But I would like to support something that will make impact. Many proposals...

as merely loading the file page. I'm tempted to delete it under Commons:GCSD#1, but before that I'd like input from someone with a different computer...

serious problems which mean they can never be accepted as an article (see WP:GCSD); otherwise, they are usually left alone so that their creators can continue...

Delete This article seems to be self promotional and could fall under WP:GCSD G11. Its most significant contributors are Judehassan and an IP editor that...

applies to rejected AfCs that have not been edited in over a year. See WP:GCSD. It should also put some sort of message on the creator's page similar to...

sherdog. Papaursa (talk) 20:10, 30 May 2013 (UTC) Speedy Delete - Per WP:GCSD G1 (Patent Nonsense) and G3 (Blatant Hoax). Event doesn't exist and IMO the...

Rathfelder and Orville1974. Ultimately I don't think it meets WP:ACSD or WP:GCSD; specifically, I feel that A7 isn't satisfied because the article claims...

WP:TROLL. SocialRanger (talk) 03:32, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Speedy Delete per WP:GCSD criterion G3 -- it's a blatant hoax. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 18:30, 22 March 2013...

userspace ... --Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:52, 8 December 2012 (UTC) From WP:GCSD G4 A sufficiently identical and unimproved copy, having any title, of a page...

20:57, 17 December 2022 (UTC) Watch out there. It's going to have to meet WP:GCSD or WP:ACSD. I think you meant strong delete? Sungodtemple (talk • contribs)...

links | watch | logs) (diff  !top) - Link: www.greenville.k12.sc.us/pr/2016/#GCSD/page1 (R/Xmeta/L) 2016-11-24 11:32:43 (UTC): User GoOKC t • c • dc • l •...

20:57, 17 December 2022 (UTC) Watch out there. It's going to have to meet WP:GCSD or WP:ACSD. I think you meant strong delete? Sungodtemple (talk • contribs)...

are both internal (non-reader facing) process pages covered only by the GCSD, your point is irrelevant anyway because it is trivial to find even better...

This template is a stub. Feel free to expand it until it has become an acceptable size. Then you may remove this tag and start adding it to template stubs...

known about the 2009 discussion, I would have speedy'd the new article under GCSD no. 4. I have discussed the issue with Beeblebrox, and even he has said "I...

Andrew🐉(talk) 14:52, 6 August 2020 (UTC) @Andrew Davidson: G4 is governed by WP:GCSD which states (with my emphasis): These apply to every type of page with exclusions...

Andrevan@ 21:38, 31 December 2012 (UTC) Your action was legitimate (per WP:GCSD#G4) but your above rationale is very poor. First of all, this is not AFD#2...

Andrevan@ 21:38, 31 December 2012 (UTC) Your action was legitimate (per WP:GCSD#G4) but your above rationale is very poor. First of all, this is not AFD#2...

known about the 2009 discussion, I would have speedy'd the new article under GCSD no. 4. I have discussed the issue with Beeblebrox, and even he has said "I...

Andrew🐉(talk) 14:52, 6 August 2020 (UTC) @Andrew Davidson: G4 is governed by WP:GCSD which states (with my emphasis): These apply to every type of page with exclusions...

2026 (UTC) What's your basis for saying no redirect qualifies for G1? At WP:GCSD, the policy states: These apply to every type of page with exclusions listed...

the draft per the request. However, the G4 absolutely applies here. Per WP:GCSD, general speedy delete criteria applies to "every type of page with exclusions...

realise now this doesn't quite meet any of the criteria in WP:ACSD or WP:GCSD for speedy deletion but it's still a clear delete. Orange sticker (talk)...

your reference, all possible deletion criteria for drafts are listed at WP:GCSD. Jay 💬 18:20, 2 April 2025 (UTC) Thank you! Moondust342 (talk) 19:29, 2...

the draft per the request. However, the G4 absolutely applies here. Per WP:GCSD, general speedy delete criteria applies to "every type of page with exclusions...