Search Results: Wikipedia:GCSD


Wikipedia:Speedy deletion
Rabu, 2026-05-27 05:37:51

event of a dispute, start a new deletion discussion. Shortcut WP:GCSDWP:GCSD These apply to every type of page with exclusions listed for specific criteria...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehsan Malik
Jumat, 2025-11-28 01:37:40

WP:TROLL. SocialRanger (talk) 03:32, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Speedy Delete per WP:GCSD criterion G3 -- it's a blatant hoax. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 18:30, 22 March 2013...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Elite mma championship
Jumat, 2025-11-28 04:34:20

sherdog. Papaursa (talk) 20:10, 30 May 2013 (UTC) Speedy Delete - Per WP:GCSD G1 (Patent Nonsense) and G3 (Blatant Hoax). Event doesn't exist and IMO the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jude Hassan
Jumat, 2025-11-28 02:25:03

Delete This article seems to be self promotional and could fall under WP:GCSD G11. Its most significant contributors are Judehassan and an IP editor that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to swing a baseball bat
Minggu, 2025-01-12 15:24:41

realise now this doesn't quite meet any of the criteria in WP:ACSD or WP:GCSD for speedy deletion but it's still a clear delete. Orange sticker (talk)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prison handball
Rabu, 2025-12-10 11:33:43

Rathfelder and Orville1974. Ultimately I don't think it meets WP:ACSD or WP:GCSD; specifically, I feel that A7 isn't satisfied because the article claims...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Criteria/Archive
Selasa, 2025-12-09 15:16:21

{{GenericCountryStub}}, {{GenericCountryStubDetail}} and the redirects {{GCS}}; {{GCSD}} Stub-type redirection *R: {{royal-stub}}; {{euro-royal-stub}}; {{peer-stub}}...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Streetseekers/Blackwater Primero
Jumat, 2022-03-11 20:54:26

can be formed that it meets WP:CSD#G11 or anther of the criteria within WP:GCSD or WP:CSD#User pages. If the user indeed has a coi, they may choose to submit...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Criteria/Archive10
Rabu, 2023-02-08 12:58:47

different name for their articles. (only a few has this problem) {{GCSD|Us|United States}}:{{GCSD|Us|United States}} {{GenericCountryStubDetail|Us|United...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2018 November 19
Sabtu, 2018-11-24 10:08:16

for CSD G5? CoolSkittle (talk) 12:51, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Yes, see WP:GCSD. --David Biddulph (talk) 14:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC) I am not a frequent...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 26
Senin, 2021-09-06 13:21:24

missed it because I was looking under WP:RCSD and so didn't look under WP:GCSD. As this discussion is already in progress, I believe it's too late to add...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive317
Minggu, 2024-05-19 16:39:46

wording not quite fitting? Johnuniq (talk) 22:38, 28 January 2020 (UTC) WP:GCSD specifies that the general speedy criteria apply to all types of pages, explicitly...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive245
Minggu, 2025-01-26 23:03:01

fun, rather than malicious misinformation? I know that at the top of WP:GCSD it says that the General criteria do apply to user pages (among other places);...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 149
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 06:44:14

deletion of non-notable drafts that otherwise didn't meet any of our extant WP:GCSD. But I would like to support something that will make impact. Many proposals...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 153
Kamis, 2024-11-14 05:14:04

as merely loading the file page. I'm tempted to delete it under Commons:GCSD#1, but before that I'd like input from someone with a different computer...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 827
Kamis, 2024-09-12 00:46:33

serious problems which mean they can never be accepted as an article (see WP:GCSD); otherwise, they are usually left alone so that their creators can continue...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 March 3
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:25:26

Delete This article seems to be self promotional and could fall under WP:GCSD G11. Its most significant contributors are Judehassan and an IP editor that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Bot requests/Archive 54
Kamis, 2023-03-16 05:42:00

applies to rejected AfCs that have not been edited in over a year. See WP:GCSD. It should also put some sort of message on the creator's page similar to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 May 30
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:23:16

sherdog. Papaursa (talk) 20:10, 30 May 2013 (UTC) Speedy Delete - Per WP:GCSD G1 (Patent Nonsense) and G3 (Blatant Hoax). Event doesn't exist and IMO the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 June 1
Jumat, 2023-03-03 18:55:03

Rathfelder and Orville1974. Ultimately I don't think it meets WP:ACSD or WP:GCSD; specifically, I feel that A7 isn't satisfied because the article claims...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 March 19
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:26:10

WP:TROLL. SocialRanger (talk) 03:32, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Speedy Delete per WP:GCSD criterion G3 -- it's a blatant hoax. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 18:30, 22 March 2013...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:YOLO Swag/Userpage proposal
Selasa, 2025-09-30 22:59:12

userspace ... --Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:52, 8 December 2012 (UTC) From WP:GCSD G4 A sufficiently identical and unimproved copy, having any title, of a page...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 December 17
Minggu, 2022-12-25 03:52:22

20:57, 17 December 2022 (UTC) Watch out there. It's going to have to meet WP:GCSD or WP:ACSD. I think you meant strong delete? Sungodtemple (talk • contribs)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/greenville.k12.sc.us
Rabu, 2020-05-13 00:52:55

links | watch | logs) (diff  !top) - Link: www.greenville.k12.sc.us/pr/2016/#GCSD/page1 (R/Xmeta/L) 2016-11-24 11:32:43 (UTC): User GoOKC t • c • dc • l •...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/December 15, 2022 Twitter suspensions
Rabu, 2025-12-24 11:53:31

20:57, 17 December 2022 (UTC) Watch out there. It's going to have to meet WP:GCSD or WP:ACSD. I think you meant strong delete? Sungodtemple (talk • contribs)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Blackpink/GA1
Rabu, 2024-05-08 11:12:48

are both internal (non-reader facing) process pages covered only by the GCSD, your point is irrelevant anyway because it is trivial to find even better...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/Deleted/May 2005
Selasa, 2026-01-06 22:44:51

This template is a stub. Feel free to expand it until it has become an acceptable size. Then you may remove this tag and start adding it to template stubs...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 October
Minggu, 2012-09-30 07:02:17

known about the 2009 discussion, I would have speedy'd the new article under GCSD no. 4. I have discussed the issue with Beeblebrox, and even he has said "I...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 August
Jumat, 2020-07-31 07:00:28

Andrew🐉(talk) 14:52, 6 August 2020 (UTC) @Andrew Davidson: G4 is governed by WP:GCSD which states (with my emphasis): These apply to every type of page with exclusions...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 December
Jumat, 2012-11-30 07:01:51

Andrevan@ 21:38, 31 December 2012 (UTC) Your action was legitimate (per WP:GCSD#G4) but your above rationale is very poor. First of all, this is not AFD#2...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 December 29
Jumat, 2023-12-01 23:30:09

Andrevan@ 21:38, 31 December 2012 (UTC) Your action was legitimate (per WP:GCSD#G4) but your above rationale is very poor. First of all, this is not AFD#2...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 October 22
Jumat, 2023-02-10 01:18:16

known about the 2009 discussion, I would have speedy'd the new article under GCSD no. 4. I have discussed the issue with Beeblebrox, and even he has said "I...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 August 4
Kamis, 2021-08-19 10:17:35

Andrew🐉(talk) 14:52, 6 August 2020 (UTC) @Andrew Davidson: G4 is governed by WP:GCSD which states (with my emphasis): These apply to every type of page with exclusions...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 11
Rabu, 2026-05-27 09:16:47

2026 (UTC) What's your basis for saying no redirect qualifies for G1? At WP:GCSD, the policy states: These apply to every type of page with exclusions listed...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2026 April 16
Sabtu, 2026-04-25 11:07:24

the draft per the request. However, the G4 absolutely applies here. Per WP:GCSD, general speedy delete criteria applies to "every type of page with exclusions...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 January 11
Minggu, 2025-01-19 06:21:57

realise now this doesn't quite meet any of the criteria in WP:ACSD or WP:GCSD for speedy deletion but it's still a clear delete. Orange sticker (talk)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 408
Selasa, 2025-05-06 01:54:39

your reference, all possible deletion criteria for drafts are listed at WP:GCSD. Jay 💬 18:20, 2 April 2025 (UTC) Thank you! Moondust342 (talk) 19:29, 2...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2026 April
Selasa, 2026-03-31 07:04:54

the draft per the request. However, the G4 absolutely applies here. Per WP:GCSD, general speedy delete criteria applies to "every type of page with exclusions...

Click to read more »