DOKUMEN123.COM

Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article or a Wikipedia policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community. Shortcut WP:DINCWP:DINC...

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Jacob Dinc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...

2014 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Cem Dinç (2nd nomination) Cem Dinç (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...

sourced but WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:49, 5 January 2024 (UTC) Keep Seems like an easy pass of WP:NPROF. As David Eppstein said, WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham...

Keep there is coverage to meet WP:GNG, but there is also some WP:PROMO. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:43, 8 July 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. WP:DINC (non-admin closure) sst✈ 05:08, 29 February 2016 (UTC) Council of International...

WP:NEXIST matters, not just what is shown on the article right now. WP:DINC -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:11, 9 August 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

anyone can add satisfactory refs to support the article. Please see: WP:DINC and do not disrupt AfD to make a point here or with Geostubs. Star Mississippi...

and overly based on primary sources, but WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 18:58, 6 August 2021 (UTC) DINC, yes, but it's not that I didn't try, I just...

articles for deletion is a normal part of Wikipedia editing. Maybe you meant WP:DINC? Which is also not really applicable as the nominator is essentially claiming...

2022 (UTC) Keep Seems to meet WP:NAUTHOR given sources found by Pburka. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:52, 26 June 2022 (UTC) Keep Notability is proved...

editor to add references and expand. WP:TNT (for truly horrible articles) WP:DINC, which disagrees with this essay Wikipedia:NPOV deletion, situations where...

Bonusballs (talk) 12:37, 13 August 2014 (UTC) I think this is a valid use of WP:DINC#The Case for Discussion driving Cleanup.--Launchballer 12:11, 13 August 2014...

but WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:23, 10 February 2025 (UTC) Comment: The original proposal was draftification (not deletion, so WP:DINC was never...

of WP:NPROF as others have said. Also need to take note of WP:ATD and WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:49, 3 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:44, 19 June 2020 (UTC) Keep See WP:DINC. The article could use some work but the individual is notable. --Micky (talk)...

support the rest of the case. The article is not in the best of shape, but WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 17:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC) Keep. Clear pass of...

consensus that this should be kept per the new sources found and per WP:DINC (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:31, 3 July 2020 (UTC)...

some updating (she seems to no longer be active since around 2005) but WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:17, 4 April 2022 (UTC) Yes, deletion is not cleanup...

Number?. Certes (talk) 13:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) Keep. Needs sourcing but WP:DINC. There are plenty of interesting and sourceable mathematical properties for...

MacDonald (talk) 14:19, 29 July 2020 (UTC) Delete Promotional as is, but WP:DINC. However, it is WP:TOOSOON as not sufficient independant coverage. Kj cheetham...

news search, books about it, scholarly articles, etc) and is verifiable. WP:DINC If an article is bad we fix it. if we don't have the time or ability to fix...

The result was keep. Consensus that the article needs some cleanup, but WP:DINC. (non-admin closure) Kj cheetham (talk) 20:24, 1 July 2022 (UTC) [Hide this...

(UTC) Keep Seems to have sufficient coverage. Does need some tidying, but WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:07, 8 March 2021 (UTC) Speedy keep: Because it not...

history and a reason for cleanup but not a valid reason for deletion; see WP:DINC. I don't see heavy citations for him in Google Scholar but the awards listed...

meet GNG as an individual, and I hear Davidstewartharvey's argument but WP:DINC. --Micky (talk) 01:50, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Withdraw nomination per excellent...

finishers are also notable enough for articles of their own. This is a clear DINC situation, these articles need expansion and cleanup. If there's no chance...

as it stands, but WP:DINC RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC) RandomCanadian, I don't see this as a DINC case since in my opinion...

Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC) Keep per WP:DINC. Is there any doubt that Konečni is notable? Joe Roe (talk) 14:46, 30 August...

some agreement that the article needs to be improved, and to that, I say WP:DINC. (non-admin closure)  Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 18:04, 30 September 2020 (UTC)...

The article needs editing, but that is not a reason to delete it. See WP:DINC. --Jersey92 (talk) 15:54, 28 October 2014 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. WP:SNOW keep, per WP:DINC. Article has been cleaned up. (non-admin closure) ZXCVBNM (TALK) 05:39, 12...

issues identified in the article are cause for cleanup, not deletion; see WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:22, 23 January 2022 (UTC) Keep per excellent job...

articles; and the promotional issues are a matter of, as pointed out, WP:DINC (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:38, 22 June 2020...

per consensus. If there is WP:OR it can be handled without deleting as WP:DINC. (non-admin closure) Kj cheetham (talk) 21:36, 5 July 2022 (UTC) [Hide this...

notability is WP:NOTTEMPORARY. The article definitely needs some work, but WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 13:52, 21 August 2022 (UTC) Keep. Distinguished professorship...

enough for WP:AUTHOR. The article is in severe need of clean-up, but WP:DINC. Incidentally, there are also multiple publications about someone else with...

00:32, 15 April 2021 (UTC) Keep as per WP:NPROF as others have said. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:34, 15 April 2021 (UTC) Keep - per WP:NPROF Sonofstar...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:25, 24 May 2026 (UTC) WP:SNOW keep per WP:DINC. Obviously notable as a major branch of academic research. Merely searching...

July 2021 (UTC) Keep as others have said, seems to meet WP:NPROF. Also, WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:15, 26 July 2021 (UTC) Keep as per David Eppstein...

Eppstein (talk) 21:00, 6 December 2020 (UTC) Keep as others have said. WP:DINC -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:38, 12 December 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is...

107 (talk) 03:09, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Keep Easy pass of WP:NPROF. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC) Keep passes WP:NPROF.Pharaoh...

the other socks were named have been a perennial problem, but WP:DINC. IEEE Fellow is an automatic pass of WP:PROF#C3 (it's even explicitly stated...

13 June 2020 (UTC) Keep - then add some references and remember that WP:DINC. Nfitz (talk) 20:31, 13 June 2020 (UTC) Speedy Keep - Do I really need to...

great shape, but doesn't strike me as overly promotional, and as usual WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 06:26, 13 July 2021 (UTC) Keep. Appears to pass WP:NACADEMIC...

considers to be missing. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:45, 20 July 2022 (UTC) Keep: WP:DINC, if there is concern that the article is only partially completed, then just...

so promotional that it would have to be fundamentally rewritten, and WP:DINC. Jclemens (talk) 03:11, 27 February 2022 (UTC) Keep According to references...

2022 (UTC) Keep Just about meets WP:GNG. Not a case of WP:BLP1E. Also WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 23:17, 10 August 2022 (UTC) P.S. Though almost every...

WP:NLIST. Some work is needed to clarify what it should include, but WP:DINC. (non-admin closure) Kj cheetham (talk) 21:14, 29 June 2022 (UTC) AfDs for...

navigational purposes. Lightburst (talk) 18:20, 2 January 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:DINC, the list is easy to expand, and just because it hasn't been expanded yet...

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:39, 27 October 2019 (UTC) Keep - Yes, it is a mess, but WP:DINC. This is a topic that merits an article, so fix it, don't delete it entirely...

per Less Unless and, hell, per the article's pre-existing notability. WP:DINC. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 07:51, 22 January 2021 (UTC) Keep per discussion...

Pack Lambert (talk) 16:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:SOFIXIT and WP:DINC. Why not trim the excess plot instead of deleting it outright? Important...

consensus to delete or enough doubt to justify a no consensus close, and WP:DINC, and the article does appear to have enough material sourced to independent...

the De Soto Initiative is also a little promotional in its wording but WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:52, 12 May 2022 (UTC) Keep - while virtually unsourced...

with reference. Elemimele (talk) 13:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC) Keep: Per WP:DINC and WP:HEY. Skeptical the nominator performed a WP:BEFORE check. Curbon7...

--hroest 04:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC) Keep. The article needs cleanup but WP:DINC. Besides WP:PROF#C1 as above, I found and added to the article enough published...

various levels of membership). The article needs some work, but as usual, WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 20:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC) Keep Meets WP:NACADEMICS...

Non-notable company. Kvng's argument to deprod the article was essentially WP:DINC. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:36, 15 April 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

describing her research interests needs secondary sourcing or removal but WP:DINC and otherwise the article looks unproblematic, merely a neutral and factual...

how lousy the article is, it's not a candidate for deletion. Also see WP:DINC. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 17:51, 17 April 2018 (UTC) It is not about cleanup...

scope_creep, the citations probably do mean a pass of WP:NPROF. Also, WP:DINC, though the article has been recently edited to be less promotional about...

other delete !vote appears to be based on the quality of the prose (cf., WP:DINC), which is not a reason for deletion. Likewise, the keep !votes- although...

deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 12:29, 10 November 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:DINC. "It is even unknown if "Urheimat" is even a real term" is a subjective statement...

Life Cycle Design Andrew🐉(talk) 21:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC) Keep per wp:DINC. I've also started to extend the page to make it less stubby. BrxBrx(talk)(please...

low-citation field, making a case for WP:PROF#C1. The article needs work but WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC) comment David Eppstein...

Keep as passes WP:NPROF. More work is needed as David Eppstein said, but WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:27, 8 January 2022 (UTC) Keep. Pass of WP:Prof. The...

WP:GNG, but the article could still use cleanup (probably more sources). WP:DINC (non-admin closure) Aasim 08:42, 7 June 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...

Keep Seems to meet WP:NPROF, and whilst the article is in a poor state, WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:06, 5 June 2021 (UTC) Keep, department head at Princeton...

WP:AUTHOR. As for Extua's "unless anyone can improve the article": see WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:07, 6 June 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is...

be enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. The article is in a poor state, but WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 13:20, 30 August 2022 (UTC) Comment This academic text...

contributions of his books. Bad nomination, no effort at WP:BEFORE demonstrated, WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:20, 28 September 2021 (UTC) Keep. Passes NPROF#1...

improving not deleting Spiderone 23:14, 6 November 2020 (UTC) Keep as WP:DINC. Noted that nom seems to be a fairly new account, but doesn't affect my ...

(UTC) Keep seems to meet WP:GNG. Some work needed on the article, but WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:18, 1 August 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

If the only complaint were that this reads like a cv, I would point to WP:DINC. But his citation record on Google Scholar is too weak for WP:PROF#C1 (following...

above. Svartner (talk) 02:43, 2 September 2025 (UTC) Keep or Draftify per WP:DINC. No WP:DEL-REASON is provided. – Ike Lek (talk) 02:51, 2 September 2025 (UTC)...

the economy of Indonesia and its CSR activities targeting youth groups. WP:DINC. Primary sources should be replaced with secondary ones and puffery can and...

13 July 2021 (UTC) Delete It doesn't fail GNG because of it's tone - WP:DINC. That being said, it does fail WP:GNG and WP:NPROF nonetheless. -Kj cheetham...

15:27, 18 July 2022 (UTC) Keep Meet WP:NPROF due to academic citations. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:01, 19 July 2022 (UTC) Keep a lot of citations and...

sufficiently notable, especially with the sources found by Beccaynr. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:09, 22 April 2022 (UTC) Keep agree with above Keep...

state legislator. The nominator would benefit from reading WP:NEXIST and WP:DINC. I was able to find plenty of coverage on newspapers.com. When conducting...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) At risk of going against WP:DINC, I think this article as well as List of mutual-fund families in the United...

(talk) 04:33, 20 October 2021 (UTC) Keep as seems to meet WP:GNG, and WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:10, 20 October 2021 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

how prestigious they are). The article could be cleaned up a bit, but WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:14, 21 October 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is...

contract dispute. Certainly the article could use some improving but WP:DINC. IceBergYYC (talk) 02:09, 2 July 2023 (UTC) What sources are there that show...

towards notability but it should also be mentioned in the article. Also, WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:48, 4 February 2021 (UTC) Keep. Per the comments...

but I don't see anything too bad to the point it warrants a WP:TNT (WP:DINC). Curbon7 (talk) 09:03, 1 September 2023 (UTC) Also, the article should be...

sources discussing the subject and his work in depth. AfD is not cleanup, Wp:DINC. Gleeanon 22:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC) Keep. Instinct Magazine called the...

WP:RS. The paid/commissioned concerns can be addressed separately as WP:DINC. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 08:50, 7 October 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:58, 1 February 2026 (UTC) Keep: Per WP:DINC. This is a well written article, though it could do with better sourcing...

and Missouri. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC) Keep WP:DINC. You can just stubify it and start over if nobody has been able to deal with...

one 1, 2, 3, 4 have a troubled history on Wikipedia. Lastly even if the WP:DINC argument comes up, I would argue that this article is still unfit to stand...

cannot be used by itself, and is therefore not ambiguous in its usage, but WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:22, 4 October 2022 (UTC) Keep. Ambiguous term...

WP:AUTHOR. Article needs updating (he is emeritus professor now) but WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:06, 28 August 2023 (UTC) Both of those are listed...

January 2022 (UTC) Weak keep as per JoelleJay's comments. Not 100% sure. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC) Leaning keep per strength...

WP:PROF. This is a brand-new article, not in great shape as nominated, but WP:DINC. Subject appears to pass WP:PROF#C6 both as head of a major scholarly association...

January 2021 (UTC) Keep due to invalid deletion rationale. "Promotional" is WP:DINC, "not in English" is outright counter to policy. Vaticidalprophet (talk)...

MFD is not cleanup. —Kusma (t·c) 08:40, 1 October 2019 (UTC) @Kusma: WP:DINC only applies to articles. ToThAc (talk) 19:18, 3 October 2019 (UTC) @ToThAc:...

consensus that this should be kept per the new sources found and per WP:DINC (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:31, 3 July 2020 (UTC)...

series is just about notable enough per WP:NBOOKS and per Thebiguglyalien, WP:DINC. Though the article does need significant help because it does seem to be...

subject is clearly notable, but WP:TNT might be needed, on the other hand, WP:DINC... I'm leaning towards keep though. Might need stubifying (is that a word...

deleted Celestinesucess (talk) 22:56, 19 June 2020 (UTC) Keep Remember WP:DINC. It has been cleaned up and likely never needed an AfD to do so. --Micky...

merge as a WP:ATD to some relevant article about football variants). WP:DINC, and in any case there appears to be sufficient coverage of this in proper...

non-reliable sources to the point where notability has become hard to discern. WP:DINC, but there is an argument to be made for WP:TNT here. —David Eppstein (talk)...

and meets WP:ORG. As for the current status of the article please see WP:DINC.--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 22:01, 27 May 2026 (UTC) Keep supported by reliable...

banners, I've seen much worse (in BLPs in no danger of being deleted) and WP:DINC. And calling for draftification of a years-old article with years-old cleanup...

–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 15:37, 7 May 2025 (UTC) Keep: per WP:DINC 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 07:12, 8 May 2025 (UTC) Speedy keep: Easily meets...

using AI. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:08, 29 December 2025 (UTC) Keep per WP:DINC. TheInevitables (talk) 03:25, 28 December 2025 (UTC) Keep but clean and additional...

on my unprod: FRSE is a pass of WP:PROF#C3, and she also passes #C1. WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:55, 20 April 2022 (UTC) Keep. I have to Me Too...

have a WP:GNG pass. Article definitely needs cleanup and updating, but WP:DINC. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:29, 4 November 2024 (UTC) I added those links to...

few sources to the article where helpful. This article needs work, but WP:DINC, willing to put in more work for research provided this article isn't going...

is WP:NOTCLEANUP BrigadierG (talk) 15:32, 22 October 2025 (UTC) Keep. WP:DINC - the current state of the article doesn't determine whether the subject...

2021 (UTC) Keep under WP:NPROF. Article needs better referencing, but WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:02, 27 March 2021 (UTC) Keep, impressive citations...

needs quite a bit of work for style and WP:PROMO issues, but as usual, WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 10:39, 29 January 2021 (UTC) Weak keep As David Eppstein...

clearly qualifies under WP:PROF#C3. The article does need some cleanup but WP:DINC. Nsk92 (talk) 10:51, 8 April 2021 (UTC) Speedy keep, per GS he has an h index...

orbit and rebuilding by a SME. Couruu (talk) 10:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC) WP:DINC. TNT is only for cases where there is nothing salvageable, far from the case...

May Bukas Pa (2009 TV series). Article may need additional sources, but WP:DINC. HiwilmsTalk 14:58, 28 June 2020 (UTC) Keep as per WP:HEY as multiple references...

Seems to have some coverage from multiple sources to pass WP:GNG, and WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC) Keep (on the weak side)...

Sliekid (talk) 16:33, 9 March 2021 (UTC) Keep Seems to meet WP:NAUTHOR, and WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:35, 9 March 2021 (UTC) Keep - for all mentioned above...

Dictionary of National Biography or similar publication," and the essay WP:DINC. Beccaynr (talk) 03:04, 9 March 2021 (UTC) Comment Added more refs. Tons...

Macktheknifeau (talk) 04:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC) You still need to read WP:DINC and WP:BEFORE. AfD is not about cleanup and notability is not about what's...

Sure the sources above need to be added into the article but remember WP:DINC. --Micky (talk) 00:51, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Blocked sockpuppet --Malcolmxl5...

lacks sources, yes, but that does not necessarily equate to deletion. WP:DINC. Subject passes WP:GNG. This also includes for those other articles nominated...

language in the article but not so much as to make it worthy of deletion; WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC) Keep absolutely no question...

There is no need for the entire list to be on the main article, but WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:56, 19 July 2022 (UTC) Merge with Marissa Lingen:...

discussions. --Calathan (talk) 22:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC) Keep per WP:DINC, this article would not fall under any WP:CSD criteria. - Knowledgekid87...

description of his research and make the rest look less like a resume, but WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:33, 14 August 2024 (UTC) Keep per WP:PROF. I know...

outside of Cardiff U's newsletter for his main honors, but as usual, WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 08:43, 29 April 2021 (UTC) I added (primary) sources...

Eppstein (talk) 06:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC) Keep Easy pass of WP:NPROF. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is...

(UTC) Keep under WP:PROF. Lots of cites, plus holder of a named chair. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC) Keep I went through and...

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC) Vanderwaalforce: see WP:DINC and WP:BEFORE. A good outcome is not a justification for a bad nomination...

(UTC) Keep appears to pass WP:GNG, I think this is a good example of WP:DINC. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 07:43, 24 August 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is...

Theroadislong (talk) 10:09, 27 January 2026 (UTC) Keep Per WP:NGEO and WP:DINC. We don't delete articles about geographic places as they are inherently...

nomination that complains about bare URLs appears to be missing that WP:DINC. Jclemens (talk) 07:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC) Keep as per all of the comment...

should be moved to Radonifying operator. It does need referencing but WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:42, 2 March 2026 (UTC) Thanks for discovering...

amount of unsourced content (not really a deletion reason by itself per WP:DINC), we have none of the in-depth and independent published reliable sources...

like it should just be redirected to a bigger page. But in the spirit of WP:DINC, my !vote is to keep and expand/improve. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:02, 20 May...

above. Nominator doesn't seem to have done a proper WP:BEFORE check, and WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

meets WP:NAUTHOR. The article certainly needs significant cleanup, but WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:36, 14 July 2022 (UTC) Keep - While the article needs...

nearly all of the points raised in the nom, but not with the conclusion. WP:DINC applies, as there is a clear body of scholarly work, much of it cited in...

participation in football and hockey leagues, I think it's appropriate to cite WP:DINC.--DesiMoore (talk) 15:50, 22 December 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is...

exactly thick on the ground since you won't find a drier subject), but WP:DINC. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 21:21, 27 November 2023 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

magazine. Article needs work of course to rely on independent sources, but WP:DINC. Courtesy ping to A. B. for evaluation of provided sources. Dclemens1971...

single coauthor. Espresso Addict (talk) 04:08, 4 January 2021 (UTC) Keep, WP:DINC. Appears to pass both WP:AUTHOR (reviews including [1] [2] [3] [4]) and WP:PROF#C1...

November 2025 (UTC) (Article should be improved from its current state but WP:DINC. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:53, 19 November 2025 (UTC)) Keep: I found several...

needed to clear out user-generated and other unreliable sources, but WP:DINC. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC) It is very sad that neurodiverse...

California" entry (since its historic district is already listed), but WP:DINC. edit to add: my !vote is regarding the usefulness of the page; I agree with...

one does [1], the AAAS membership is verified here [2] -- but as usual, WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 05:50, 10 January 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

reviews which can fill out an entire reception section. This needs work but WP:DINC. Gleeanon409 (talk) 05:26, 5 August 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:BEFORE step D...

personal facts, and the list of selected publications is a bit overlong, but WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 11:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC) Speedy keep seeming...

of journal articles, and more trimming is likely needed, but as usual, WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 22:12, 12 October 2023 (UTC) Keep. The GS citations...

- however even though it's current not NPOV, we should remember that wp:DINC. BrxBrx(talk)(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}}) 03:35, 25 February 2021...

the same topic. Both articles do not have great explanatory leads but WP:DINC. Katzrockso (talk) 08:21, 14 November 2025 (UTC) Keep. I don't see what's...

you, but I wish to elucidate with two advices: 1) per WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:DINC, the threat of deletion is not supposed to be used to force improvements...

show, in line with common sense, a WP:GNG pass for this topic. Moreover, WP:DINC. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:41, 3 March 2025 (UTC) Keep per Clarityfiend and...

(talk • contribs • global count) 00:57, 6 November 2023 (UTC) Keep - WP:DINC. The concept is widely referred to in secondary and tertiary literature,...

Keep As per the last AFD in September, subject is still notable, and WP:DINC. Subject can request changes on the article's talk page. -Kj cheetham (talk)...

July 2022 (UTC) Weak keep under WP:GNG. Article need further work but WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:25, 29 July 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

be made to this page.‎ The result was no consensus. Firstly, lets get WP:DINC out of the way, which applies to the original nomination statement. A mere...

request for citations and more content" it appears that they ought to read WP:DINC before making any more such misguided nominations. Oh, also, this article...

http://www.mxtv.co.jp/gunslinger/chara.html. Also, deletion is not cleanup WP:DINC. The detail can certainly be trimmed down but sourcing info to the manga...

reasoning. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 05:00, 7 May 2015 (UTC) Keep per WP:DINC so while the article is in bad shape currently deletion isn't clean up. per...

took only plugging his name into Google News. As for formatting, see WP:DINC, but User:XOR'easter seems to have already done much of the necessary cleanup...

this list? Just already being an inventor with a Wikipedia page? I agree WP:DINC though. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:15, 7 May 2022 (UTC) Keep. The argument that...

non-AfD discussion about how to clean up the article, including merging it. WP:DINC Jclemens (talk) 04:46, 20 April 2017 (UTC) @Jclemens: Merge is listed as...

than to promote him as someone who has appeared in New Scientist, but WP:DINC and these are not delete-worthy problems. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:59, 11...

WestCD (talk) 03:52, 3 December 2021 (UTC) Keep seem to meet WP:NAUTHOR. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC) Keep per above passes WP:NAUTHOR...

available via a simple Google search. It is in dire need of some TLC, but WP:DINC. Jmertel23 (talk) 21:54, 23 April 2019 (UTC) Jmertel23, I feel the subject...

WP:BEFORE search? The nominator would benefit from reading WP:NEXIST and WP:DINC. Curbon7 (talk) 20:42, 7 August 2024 (UTC) Note: I will note that Chapter...

about the sources already listed as references in the article. See also WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC) Keep per David Eppstein;...

[4]. The article desperately needs editing and expansion, not deletion (WP:DINC). Cheers, Last1in (talk) 20:47, 27 November 2023 (UTC) Strong Keep -- there...

point – i'd be amenable to changing my vote to a neutral for that reason (WP:DINC) notwithstanding. I would like to emphasize to the closer, and any future...

still extremely bad. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:05, 31 August 2018 (UTC) WP:DINC. If the subject is notable, then poor sourcing is no reason to delete or...

referenced or else have their own articles. Refs can be added for the rest (WP:DINC). The subject of the list is notable based on a quick Google Scholar search;...

reason for deletion? No. Do sources exist about Strike? Yes. Many of them. WP:DINC - Samsmachado (talk) 01:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC) Keep - well referenced .....

discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:06, 27 August 2016 (UTC) Keep. WP:DINC. Clearly the article needs some TLC, but comments above, as well as coverage...

but I'm leaning towards keep. It does read like a resume in places, WP:DINC after all. -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC) The person,...

article doesn't reflect WP:BEFORE. Yes, the article has problems, but WP:DINC.--Jahaza (talk) 20:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC) Well, would you mind actually...

not yet been incorporated into Wikipedia, and deletion is not clean-up (WP:DINC). NeuroJasper (talk) 03:33, 19 February 2026 (UTC) This was unreferenced...

and PROMO issues that need fixing, but that is not what AFD is for per WP:DINC. We have better ways to address those problems using the editorial process...

respond to AfD to ensure there's an article to update when I get back). WP:DINC and WP:IMPATIENT seem relevant here - it was less than a week from the removal...

August 2022 (UTC) Keep seems to meet WP:GNG given the sources mentioned. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:49, 9 August 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

need of cleanup but almost always based on underlying notability, and WP:DINC. In this case, IEEE Fellow is an automatic pass of WP:PROF#C3, the exact...

07:04, 24 January 2025 (UTC) WP:DINC. Koshuri Sultan (talk) 07:11, 24 January 2025 (UTC) @Koshuri Sultan: citing DINC isn't a particularly great idea...

is so inclined, but that is not a reason to delete in the meantime per WP:DINC. --Micky (talk) 02:18, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Blocked sockpuppet Malcolmxl5 (talk)...

the article includes no usable content at all; see WP:SURMOUNTABLE and WP:DINC. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 12:03, 1 January 2021 (UTC) Keep as he sure meets...

to Me! 11:59, 18 November 2023 (UTC) Keep -- This is the edge of WP:DINC. This purports to be an article, but is effectively a list of debate camps...

September 1 Mev Dinc (edit talk links history) — Rainbouw19 CLOP (edit talk links history) — Thisisarealusername (newly tagged - originally created 24...

notability WP:GNG, per Eastmain and Michig comments above. AfD is not cleanup WP:DINC. I understand the nominator's point about the problem with the quantity of...

article like the rest easily meets GNG and just needs to be improved, WP:DINC. Gleeanon409 (talk) 01:17, 15 July 2020 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

you know more and better than this about our policy. WP:NEXIST, WP:SAL, WP:DINC... Plot summaries that describe characters are independent RS for those characters;...

does not make its topic clear to non-specialists is problematic, but WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:48, 4 September 2021 (UTC) Keep. While the article...

agree the article is in terrible shape, but this feels very much like a WP:DINC discussion. Once AfD is complete, I'll also recommend on the TALK that we...

discussions. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 17:22, 13 October 2018 (UTC) Keep as WP:DINC. His leaving IGN has spawned a number of articles about him specifically...

this article is good as is, though; it's a mess per WP:NOTRESUME, but WP:DINC. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:12, 24 March 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

blanked summaries of the talks look that way. WP:ATD, WP:NOTCLEANUP, AND WP:DINC apply just as much to draftification as to outright deletion. —Syrenka V...

2019 (UTC) I never said the article could not be improved. Remember, WP:DINC. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:35, 28 March 2019 (UTC) Delete for the exact same...

promotional language and unsourced material needs to be cut out, but WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 23:50, 6 April 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is...

Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 02:27, 26 April 2016 (UTC) Speedy Keep - WP:DINC, This article needs more sources, but they do exist and just need to be added...

2019 (UTC) Keep – clearly passes WP:NFOOTY, this feels like a case of WP:DINC more than anything. 21.colinthompson (talk) 22:42, 7 April 2019 (UTC) Delete...

made any constructive improvement. See WP:POT and WP:SAUCE. See also WP:DINC. Andrew🐉(talk) 20:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC) Keep Being complete is never a...

a clear pass of WP:NFOOTY. Although this page needs some cleaning up, WP:DINC. 21.colinthompson (talk) 22:50, 7 April 2019 (UTC) Delete. nom consulted...

article because of that material: revert it to what used to be there. WP:DINC! Bondegezou (talk) 14:50, 10 March 2021 (UTC) This is an older version of...

sources in the article) are not reasons to delete; see in particular WP:DINC. The nominator has offered no evidence of a WP:BEFORE and I'm certainly not...

or something similar. Skeletor3000 (talk) 18:58, 16 January 2020 (UTC) WP:DINC. Nothing precludes fixing the article during the vote. Nfitz (talk) 20:59...

promotional material. It could probably use additional cleanup beyond that but WP:DINC. Also, to the anonymous editor above, your AI-written walls of text are counterproductive...

football team. KSAWikipedian (talk) 20:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC) Also WP:DINC KSAWikipedian (talk) 20:11, 19 August 2022 (UTC) Neither of those is a valid...

long-blocked sockpuppeteer Topcipher/SwisterTwister; they need cleanup, but WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:42, 22 March 2024 (UTC) Honestly I was unable...

has identified potential sources. So whilst the article needs work, by WP:DINC we shouldn't rush to delete it because of (potentially) addressable concerns...

LibStar (talk) 23:14, 7 August 2025 (UTC) Keep – This clearly falls under WP:DINC. The subject is clearly notable, and significant third party coverage obviously...

CT55555 (talk) 19:49, 23 July 2022 (UTC) CT55555 Indeed, as per WP:NEXIST. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:48, 23 July 2022 (UTC) Comment Only four media mentions...

primary sources - very few secondary sources are present. While I get wp:DINC might be cited, I can't imagine how a rescue could be made for an article...

article's references as nominated are almost as empty as the nomination but WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:11, 17 January 2025 (UTC) Sorry folks. @Jfire...

formatting, structure and citations, but the topic is notable. Remember that WP:DINC. Katzrockso (talk) 02:18, 14 October 2025 (UTC) Keep. A zillion citations...

that is exactly what those pages are. Also Not really relevant since WP:DINC, but nvm; urgh; some people just have no taste at all as far as aesthetics...

these indicators show that he has them. The article needs cleanup but WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Keep Passes WP:PROF#C1...

missing articles do not indicate deletion is the best course of action; WP:DINC and WP:BEFORE is needed. --Micky (talk) 03:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Blocked...

policy-based reason to delete. The article needs cleanup, but that falls under WP:DINC as Goldsztajn mentions. The article has enough sources that appear to be...

"elevated fellow" and look at the shorter articles among the results) but WP:DINC. In this case, we also have a recent thwarted attempt at turning this into...

topic, this ain't it, and would require such extensive revision that WP:DINC doesn't apply and WP:TNT does. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:25, 8 April 2025 (UTC)...

subculturally notable music label. In addition to WP:SURMOUNTABLE and WP:DINC, keep in mind that small subcultures (such as specific metal subgenres) may...

coverage to be made into something worthwhile are concerned, and per WP:DINC as to the current state of the article. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs)...

and Schools. Shellwood (talk) 21:36, 4 September 2023 (UTC) Keep per WP:DINC. The article is largely unsourced and poorly written, but per WP:BEFORE C1-3...

removed without prejudice to the existence of the article as a whole (WP:DINC). Svartner (talk) 01:33, 31 March 2025 (UTC) We need to see articles that...

interest even if the article needing a good cleanup, pretty much because WP:DINC. I lean towards a weak keep because I haven't been able to review all the...

Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:14, 8 September 2023 (UTC) Keep per WP:DINC. The article needs to be rewritten, but it is neither unencyclopaedic nor...

October 2025 (UTC) Weak keep. Promotional and needs more trimming but WP:DINC. I think there are enough reviews of his two published books for WP:AUTHOR...

September, additional promotional fluff has been added to it; however, WP:DINC and the subject is notable. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:51, 7 January 2026 (UTC)...

and some of the sourcing looks to me like it was "astroturfed". While WP:DINC, I am holding off on replacing !vote. Remark that the PhD thesis and very...

(UTC) In what way does it "feel very autobiographical"? In any case, WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:07, 15 February 2022 (UTC) Keep. Reading through...

—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:44, 5 December 2023 (UTC) Keep as WP:DINC. The sources are there with a depth of sourcing that more than meets policy...

not cleanup.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:47, 26 January 2018 (UTC) Keep - per WP:DINC. XavierItzm (talk) 18:53, 26 January 2018 (UTC) Keep - ongoing coverage/protests...

invalid. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC) Weak keep WP:DINC -Kj cheetham (talk) 22:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC) Keep and agree that a general...

notability criterion.) As for the promotional edits and content, see WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:46, 29 May 2025 (UTC) Objectively, his publications...

Usage of user account i can't find my post 鷹傑之友 Editing Editor bugs Mev Dinc Book copyright violations? User keeps reverting draft to incorrect version...

discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:44, 14 April 2017 (UTC) Keep WP:DINC; NPOV problems are not a valid reason for deletion. Many, many reliable sources...

is an article along those lines needing cleanup that is needling you (WP:DINC). I've been trying to go through articles in my interest with notability...

(☎) 14:56, 15 August 2020 (UTC) Keep, AfD is for non-notable subjects, WP:DINC. Gleeanon409 (talk) 17:56, 15 August 2020 (UTC) Keep This is a notable topic...

combination looks quite solid to me, and although the article is in poor shape, WP:DINC applies. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 08:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC) The above discussion...

Even Nom admits the subject is notable, it is important to remember WP:DINC. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 16:56, 31 October 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

seems to be a pass of WP:PROF, especially in light of the time period. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:25, 17 December 2020 (UTC) Keep I removed the prod...

that.) The page needs work, but is at least not overly promotional, and WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 14:31, 27 October 2021 (UTC) @David Eppstein: if I...

can you improve it? Bloxzge 025 (talk) 02:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC) So WP:DINC? Killarnee (talk) 20:10, 29 October 2024 (UTC) Merge to a related list. I...

Spartaz Humbug! 16:30, 5 May 2014 (UTC) Nom comment & withdrawn Rebecca1990 WP:DINC (essay) has to be balanced against WP:BLP (policy) in particular WP:V "The...

A look at the references cited, despite the issues of cite-bombing (WP:DINC which I pointed out at the time), seems to render the delete argument invalid...

which have articles. Any other issues involve cleanup, not deletion -- WP:DINC.--A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 01:15, 3 October 2025 (UTC) Speedy...

the prose and I have some minor WP:SYNTH concerns, but those fall under WP:DINC. The sourcing seems (IMHO) to clear GNG based on both existing cites and...

(talk) 18:34, 17 March 2026 (UTC) Keep because of the difference in topic. WP:DINC. Miniapolis 21:34, 19 March 2026 (UTC) Keep Undoubtedly notable. Lorstaking...

some support via WP:NPROF C7. The article is in poor shape, but as usual WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 07:58, 19 March 2023 (UTC) Striking "weak", after...

There isn't even a motives section Then feel free to add it yourself. WP:DINC. Even if a good page could exist on this subject, the current one is clearly...

Someone wrote quite a good draft about Draft:Mev Dinc, a famous video game programmer in the 1990s. Dinc is worth mentioning on Wikipedia as there are articles...

☎ ✎ 03:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC) Keep. I think this is a very clear WP:DINC situation. A merge may be worth discussing, but it's not necessary as ATD...

deletion discussions. Chidgk1 (talk) 13:31, 29 April 2023 (UTC) Keep WP:DINC small jars tc 16:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

about notability and the availability of sourcing, not about cleanup. See WP:DINC. Interestingly, however, the kind of coverage that's driving the inclusion...

sources, not about whether they have actually been added to the article. WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC) Because every time I see...

to do it now. Santacruz ⁂ Please tag me! 22:42, 23 November 2021 (UTC) WP:DINC. I think what might raise eyebrows about this AfD is stuff like the description...

include refs, under pain of deletion of any unreferenced entries, but WP:DINC. XavierItzm (talk) 13:51, 30 May 2022 (UTC) There is nothing to cleanup for...

of WP:BEFORE. Thryduulf (talk) 20:20, 17 December 2023 (UTC) Keep per WP:DINC. The article is a hot mess, but if WP:BEFORE was done at all, it was done...

detailed coverage – an easy pass of WP:BASIC. See WP:ATD, WP:NEXIST and WP:DINC. Andrew🐉(talk) 13:07, 22 July 2021 (UTC) There's quite a big difference...

see that this article needs a lot of work, but deletion is not cleanup WP:DINC and therefore for a notable topic (see WP:GNG, we should make the effort...

worth salvaging. —Locke Cole • t • c 02:57, 19 July 2025 (UTC) Keep. WP:DINC and the article is not nearly in poor enough state to deserve WP:TNT. There...

coverage have been identified that can be used to expand the article. WP:DINC, and the state of this article is a WP:SURMOUNTABLE issue. Beccaynr (talk)...

of the 14 reasons for deletion in WP:DELETE. Two essays, WP:RUSH and WP:DINC, seem to cover this pretty thoroughly. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 20:57, 27 November...

starting from there. Marcelus (talk) 18:41, 9 December 2025 (UTC) Keep per WP:DINC. This page should be improved instead of deleting it. In addition, the problem...

multiple reviews exist convinces me. The article does need work, but WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 22:57, 18 June 2022 (UTC) They are just jointly edited...

November 2022 (UTC) I'm not sure where you get that anything I said merits a WP:DINC response. That's about using deletion as a process to remake the page—I am...

notability, and not how complete the article is as per WP:INTROTODELETE. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:11, 12 June 2022 (UTC) P.S. In terms of criteria...

WP:TNT essay. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:16, 21 September 2025 (UTC) Keep per WP:DINC – Ike Lek (talk) 19:56, 21 September 2025 (UTC) Comment by article creator...

(non-RS) recollection of that event. The article is in sad shape, but WP:DINC. If this were a new article, I'd probably suggest draftify, but it is referenced...

is not. You don’t seem to recognize the difference and in violation of WP:DINC, seem to think others should drop everything their working on to prove you...

which as present. However none of these issues is a reason for deletion; WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC) David Eppstein, I was...

towards those critical debates; but this does not mean we should delete per WP:DINC. Jtrrs0 (talk) 17:45, 10 October 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

AI-generated, and while it is clearly promotional and needs to be cleaned up, WP:DINC. Dclemens1971 (talk) 12:12, 12 February 2025 (UTC) Keep per the analysis...

clarify it's a fake degree and remove promo that's more like clean-up and WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC) @Kj cheetham: Thanks for the...

to be done to improve this article; sure, but see WP:IGNORINGATD and WP:DINC. Furthermore, SOLDIER IMHO is equivalent to WP:WPBB/N. While CTA suggests...

(talk) 07:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC) Keep The article needs citations, but WP:DINC. This is a notable artist and having a list of their works is standard practice...

WP:DEL-REASON presented here, so many of the arguments appear to simply be WP:DINC/WP:PROBLEM. Katzrockso (talk) 20:08, 3 October 2025 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

getting coverage.WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE Although deletion is not cleanup WP:DINC, the preponderance of unreliable sources makes it difficult to assess this...

The article needs revision to reflect information from the sources, but WP:DINC. Beccaynr (talk) 16:24, 9 October 2021 (UTC) @Beccaynr, WP:SUSTAINED is part...

than deleting the page. The essay section WP:NOTCLEANUP and the essay WP:DINC expand eloquently on this point. Holtzman, Phyllis (March 30, 1998). "Penn...

my WP:THREE together within the next day or so, but this looks like a WP:DINC problem. I would accept TNT as an AtD, but I'd rather see someone adopt the...

I agree with concerns of Aseleste about WP:REFBOMBing, but as usual, WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 20:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Weak Delete Failing to...

think it is not in such bad shape that draftification is necessary, and WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...

main editor has since engaged in communication, so my feeling is more WP:DINC than WP:TNT at the moment. -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:35, 2 February 2024 (UTC)...

keeping an article cleanup? Esquivalience t 18:23, 9 July 2015 (UTC) WP:DINC is just an essay. Which policy says there are different standards for parent...

WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. If it wasn't for that I'd might have !voted the other way as WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:24, 25 June 2022 (UTC) I also agree with Beccaynr...

essay, just as WP:TNT is. Natureium (talk) 23:55, 24 May 2018 (UTC) Keep. WP:DINC. Furthermore, nomination is defective, as it consists largely of a personal...

being a WP:BLP1E. The article is in relatively poor shape, but as usual, WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 10:13, 14 July 2021 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

"neuroscience". 128.70.165.112 (talk) 07:17, 9 March 2021 (UTC) Keep WP:DINC. There was a stub but valid article before all the Eryomin stuff was added...

Seems like a case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT, given there is WP:SIGCOV. Also, WP:DINC, and nothing seems significantly different in terms of notability since the...

with the French internet. [1][2][3][4] SFB 23:51, 9 March 2018 (UTC) WP:DINC, Prince of Thieves. No one here has to add sources just to convince you of...

3 August 2023 (UTC) Keep This seems to be a textbook case of either WP:DINC or WP:DIC: Why not include examples from latin american countries? Iterresise...

just because of the wonky sourcing at the moment directly conflicts with WP:DINC. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 18:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC) Comment That academic...

per Cunard, as for the comments of the quality of the article I believe WP:DINC is particularly revelent here. Hitpoint0213 (talk) 07:13, 13 June 2020 (UTC)...

it seems that it is used in many papers not written by George Haller. WP:DINC should apply here. I am not confident in this vote so I am marking it as...

2A05:87C7:9008:2C00:A839:6080:4248:D58B (talk) 21:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC) WP:DINC is an essay, not a policy, it isn't undisputed. Janhrach (talk) 21:03, 29...

Keep It's a real term, citations exist. A better article can be written: WP:DINC. Bondegezou (talk) 08:56, 18 February 2026 (UTC) Keep per the sources Daranios...

2025 (UTC) Keep – The article should be improved, not scrapped (see: WP:DINC). Kelob2678 makes an excellent point that the marketing of McDonald's has...

December 2023 (UTC) Weak keep as per comments by Rublamb to meet WP:NARTIST. WP:DINC, even if most sources at the time the article was nominated were primary...

article being in a poor state is not in itself a reason for deletion - see WP:DINC. This is a WP:PAGEDECIDE issue rather than an issue of inherent notability...

article here discusses the Saudi response to the operation. Mindful of WP:DINC that the article's quality shouldn't have a bearing on whether it's deleted...

understand the distinction between notability and verifiability? Also, WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:35, 30 August 2022 (UTC) Does this mean that you...

in the lede, a lot of copy-edit work and perhaps a better title, but WP:DINC. The subject is encyclopaedic and RS exist. I see no policy-based reasons...

18:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC) Point taken, the result looks like crap, but WP:DINC. Self is notable and complex, so Outline of self must be also. 192.160.216...

needs some work in terms of tone and it sounds a bit like WP:PROMO, but WP:DINC. Overall though with the citation counts, I'd say it is a pass of WP:NPROF...

selection or exclusion of its content may be difficult. See WP:SURMOUNTABLE, WP:DINC, and WP:BATHWATER for related essays. VQuakr (talk) 23:27, 5 April 2014 (UTC)...

discussion. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 08:50, 3 July 2025 (UTC) Some editors cited WP:DINC last time this was up for discussion. In that time (almost three years),...

what is available as sourcing, not on what is already in the article. WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC) There is and always...

cultural or religious boundaries! If you have objections over specifics, WP:DINC. Cheers. Last1in (talk) 19:12, 14 December 2023 (UTC) Seems to me that this...

(minor) article. Definitely needs to be trimmed way the heck down, but WP:DINC. Ford MF (talk) 23:28, 8 November 2019 (UTC) Not even remotely policy based...

a standalone article.VR talk 14:54, 14 November 2021 (UTC) Keep: Per WP:DINC, a.k.a "Deletion is not cleanup". Dunutubble (talk) 18:32, 14 November 2021...

book sources out of the hundred or so found in Google Books as well. As WP:DINC, the COI can be tagged and someone can cleanup when they have an opportunity...

nominator has pointed to some gaps, which is a reason to improve, not delete WP:DINC. Importantly, the article includes useful, verified information. I can see...

[1]. Any issues with sourcing are not a valid reason for deletion, as WP:DINC. Katzrockso (talk) 21:07, 13 November 2025 (UTC) Per Wikipedia:Articles for...

Saliba Christina Saliba sv:Abraham Staifo Abraham Staifo sv:Jacob Dinc Jacob Dinc sv:Elias Durmaz Elias Durmaz sv:Emanuel Chabo Emanuel Chabo sv:Habib...

it sits now, the quote is susceptible to accusations of synth. But per WP:DINC AfD is not cleanup, so the place to raise these sort of issues is the TP...

November 2023 (UTC) Unless I'm misreading that, it feels like it falls under WP:DINC, or it's WP:BABY writ large. If instead you mean that the subject meets GNG...

sources Uncle G found, and cleanup through normal editorial processes per WP:DINC. A merge to werewolf fiction is not appropriate, because while they may overlap...

some but not others. Some articles have problems but can be cleaned up (WP:DINC) but others may not be worth it. --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count)...

notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 18:35, 24 February 2026 (UTC) Keep per WP:HEY and WP:DINC. Neutral per CoryGlee. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer]...

WP:NACADEMIC; and there's enough information to write something encyclopedic. WP:DINC, and while some parts could be trimmed or maybe checked for tone, it does...

list being a "POV fork" (it's not), this comes off as WP:IDONTLIKEIT and WP:DINC. The topic of "worst games ever made" is clearly notable, as evident by the...

topic with clear and persistent sourcing. The article needs cleanup, but WP:DINC. Easily meets WP:GNG on all points. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 20:18, 12 December...

problems. Peter Isotalo 06:52, 8 April 2015 (UTC) Deletion is not cleanup WP:DINC if you don't like the way that article looks I'm sorry, wikipedia is a work...

this article is kinda terrible and certainly needs to be cleaned up, but WP:DINC. I didn't find anything obvious for him in terms of coverage outside of academia...

Sure the sources above need to be added into the article but remember WP:DINC. --Micky (talk) 00:51, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Blocked sockpuppet --Malcolmxl5...

that article.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  04:42, 21 November 2021 (UTC) Keep WP:DINC applies (even more so, in that the redirect is perfectly OK, and this would...

call for the content to be improved, not for it to be tossed out (see WP:DINC). Inter&anthro (talk) 17:18, 16 April 2018 (UTC) Conditional Support I personally...

WP:IDONTLIKEIT; and shows a basic lack of knowledge of our common practices such as WP:DINC. If you don't like that the lab leak is one among many fringe theories and...

adequate information worth merging somewhere, which isn't the case here, and DINC is an opinion essay with no applicability here. Avilich (talk) 03:51, 17...

fix the conflation of verification and notability may be helpful, but WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:23, 28 June 2022 (UTC) @David Eppstein: What I...

raised is "selective quotes and a POV essay." This is egregious, since WP:DINC, deletion is not cleanup: if anyone has any genuine objections to the material...

than many other essays, but it is still just an essay in the same way WP:DINC is also a widely cited essay many editors take seriously. – Ike Lek (talk)...

basically it? (P.S. You're welcome to make those changes yourself. See WP:DINC.) Chetsford (talk) 00:22, 28 December 2021 (UTC) Mentioning it in the article...

actually is, not making decisions based on the state of the article. WP:DINC seems relevant here. The Toronto Star article above helps establish notability...

deletion discussions. Sandstein 11:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:DINC and WP:BEFORE failure. So, I haven't read Foundation, etc. in 30 years, but...

about deleting them. Deagol2 (talk) 18:21, 28 January 2020 (UTC) Keep: WP:DINC. If you want to make the plot summary more concise or do other edits, that's...

are those of the men who were convicted of raping "Jeanette". Second, WP:DINC. If anyone wants to raise a discussion on the list of convicts (whose photos...

multiple reviews exist convinces me. The article does need work, but WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 22:57, 18 June 2022 (UTC) They are just jointly edited...

to remove the original research, but that is not a reason to delete. WP:DINC CT55555(talk) 18:58, 2 February 2023 (UTC) Your first source doesn't even...

missing articles do not indicate deletion is the best course of action; WP:DINC and WP:BEFORE is needed. --Micky (talk) 03:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Blocked...

(born 1999) association football player 1999-06-29 Essen Q93494618 1 Ayşe Dinç Turkish handball player (born 1999) handball player beach handball player...

00:32, 15 April 2021 (UTC) Keep as per WP:NPROF as others have said. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:34, 15 April 2021 (UTC) Keep - per WP:NPROF Sonofstar...

articles for deletion is a normal part of Wikipedia editing. Maybe you meant WP:DINC? Which is also not really applicable as the nominator is essentially claiming...

as it stands, but WP:DINC RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC) RandomCanadian, I don't see this as a DINC case since in my opinion...

2014 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Cem Dinç (2nd nomination) Cem Dinç (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...

not some new SPA. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 00:50, 9 July 2025 (UTC) WP:TNT and WP:DINC are dueling essays, and both have some part of the truth. In this case, where...

If the only complaint were that this reads like a cv, I would point to WP:DINC. But his citation record on Google Scholar is too weak for WP:PROF#C1 (following...

convince me of a pass of WP:GNG. The article is not in great shape but WP:DINC and it's on a technical enough topic that even cleaned up I wouldn't expect...

understand the distinction between notability and verifiability? Also, WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:35, 30 August 2022 (UTC) Does this mean that you...

MaynardClark (talk) 20:57, 31 August 2025 (UTC) I would counter your Wikipedia:DINC with WP:TNT.208.87.236.180 (talk) 12:12, 4 September 2025 (UTC) Keep This...

Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 05:40, 28 January 2026 (UTC) Keep :Firstly, WP:DINC and WP:NOTCLEANUP both agree that fixable problems should not be the grounds...

article like the rest easily meets GNG and just needs to be improved, WP:DINC. Gleeanon409 (talk) 01:17, 15 July 2020 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

non-AfD discussion about how to clean up the article, including merging it. WP:DINC Jclemens (talk) 04:46, 20 April 2017 (UTC) @Jclemens: Merge is listed as...

I'm not convinced of that). All things told, though, this one is in the WP:DINC bucket. XOR'easter (talk) 21:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC) Comment Looks like...

clarify it's a fake degree and remove promo that's more like clean-up and WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC) @Kj cheetham: Thanks for the...

—MaximumGrossTakeOffWeight(talk). 16:22, 31 December 2015 (UTC) Keep because DINC. I think we have enough to establish notability. The article is actively...

the rename Johnbod (talk) 16:35, 28 December 2015 (UTC) Keep because WP:DINC. It's clearly WP:RS, and the MathWorld reference convinced me that this is...

asilvering (talk) 22:24, 2 July 2022 (UTC) very weak keep WP:NOTDUP and WP:DINC, but also WP:NOTDIRECTORY. -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:33, 3 July 2022 (UTC) I...

needs quite a bit of work for style and WP:PROMO issues, but as usual, WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 10:39, 29 January 2021 (UTC) Weak keep As David Eppstein...

May Bukas Pa (2009 TV series). Article may need additional sources, but WP:DINC. HiwilmsTalk 14:58, 28 June 2020 (UTC) Keep as per WP:HEY as multiple references...

Dictionary of National Biography or similar publication," and the essay WP:DINC. Beccaynr (talk) 03:04, 9 March 2021 (UTC) Comment Added more refs. Tons...

finishers are also notable enough for articles of their own. This is a clear DINC situation, these articles need expansion and cleanup. If there's no chance...

discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:44, 14 April 2017 (UTC) Keep WP:DINC; NPOV problems are not a valid reason for deletion. Many, many reliable sources...

and overly based on primary sources, but WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 18:58, 6 August 2021 (UTC) DINC, yes, but it's not that I didn't try, I just...

subculturally notable music label. In addition to WP:SURMOUNTABLE and WP:DINC, keep in mind that small subcultures (such as specific metal subgenres) may...

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Jacob Dinc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...

which as present. However none of these issues is a reason for deletion; WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC) David Eppstein, I was...

August 2022 (UTC) Keep seems to meet WP:GNG given the sources mentioned. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:49, 9 August 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 20:08, 12 November 2025 (UTC) Keep per WP:DINC - It seems this nomination pertains more to article quality rather than an...

Macktheknifeau (talk) 04:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC) You still need to read WP:DINC and WP:BEFORE. AfD is not about cleanup and notability is not about what's...

2022 (UTC) Keep Seems to meet WP:NAUTHOR given sources found by Pburka. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:52, 26 June 2022 (UTC) Keep Notability is proved...

Flyer (talk) 23:08, 11 April 2017 (UTC) Keep and rewrite per NOTNEWS and DINC (or merge, whichever action seems more appropriate). While it's definitely...

it sits now, the quote is susceptible to accusations of synth. But per WP:DINC AfD is not cleanup, so the place to raise these sort of issues is the TP...

anyone can add satisfactory refs to support the article. Please see: WP:DINC and do not disrupt AfD to make a point here or with Geostubs. Star Mississippi...

- however even though it's current not NPOV, we should remember that wp:DINC. BrxBrx(talk)(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}}) 03:35, 25 February 2021...

be made to this page.‎ The result was no consensus. Firstly, lets get WP:DINC out of the way, which applies to the original nomination statement. A mere...

and PROMO issues that need fixing, but that is not what AFD is for per WP:DINC. We have better ways to address those problems using the editorial process...

there were "synth" issues, you would raise them in the TP, not here. WP:DINC, deletion is not cleanup. The fact is you cite no policy, just "lack of depth"...

navigational purposes. Lightburst (talk) 18:20, 2 January 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:DINC, the list is easy to expand, and just because it hasn't been expanded yet...

2019 (UTC) Keep – clearly passes WP:NFOOTY, this feels like a case of WP:DINC more than anything. 21.colinthompson (talk) 22:42, 7 April 2019 (UTC) Delete...

sources Uncle G found, and cleanup through normal editorial processes per WP:DINC. A merge to werewolf fiction is not appropriate, because while they may overlap...

consensus to delete or enough doubt to justify a no consensus close, and WP:DINC, and the article does appear to have enough material sourced to independent...

reasoning. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 05:00, 7 May 2015 (UTC) Keep per WP:DINC so while the article is in bad shape currently deletion isn't clean up. per...

Number?. Certes (talk) 13:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) Keep. Needs sourcing but WP:DINC. There are plenty of interesting and sourceable mathematical properties for...

football team. KSAWikipedian (talk) 20:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC) Also WP:DINC KSAWikipedian (talk) 20:11, 19 August 2022 (UTC) Neither of those is a valid...

above. They would improve the article, and WP:ATH has been met, and as WP:DINC, any source would help improve the article. Nfitz (talk) 18:37, 30 November...

how prestigious they are). The article could be cleaned up a bit, but WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:14, 21 October 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is...

"neuroscience". 128.70.165.112 (talk) 07:17, 9 March 2021 (UTC) Keep WP:DINC. There was a stub but valid article before all the Eryomin stuff was added...

to do it now. Santacruz ⁂ Please tag me! 22:42, 23 November 2021 (UTC) WP:DINC. I think what might raise eyebrows about this AfD is stuff like the description...

primary sources - very few secondary sources are present. While I get wp:DINC might be cited, I can't imagine how a rescue could be made for an article...

15:27, 18 July 2022 (UTC) Keep Meet WP:NPROF due to academic citations. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:01, 19 July 2022 (UTC) Keep a lot of citations and...

with the French internet. [8][9][10][11] SFB 23:51, 9 March 2018 (UTC) WP:DINC, Prince of Thieves. No one here has to add sources just to convince you of...

CT55555 (talk) 19:49, 23 July 2022 (UTC) CT55555 Indeed, as per WP:NEXIST. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:48, 23 July 2022 (UTC) Comment Only four media mentions...

28 June 2022 (UTC) I agree that it could be improved. But please note WP:DINC. CT55555 (talk) 19:44, 28 June 2022 (UTC) I now agree with editors below...

reason for deletion? No. Do sources exist about Strike? Yes. Many of them. WP:DINC - Samsmachado (talk) 01:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC) Keep - well referenced .....

the article includes no usable content at all; see WP:SURMOUNTABLE and WP:DINC. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 12:03, 1 January 2021 (UTC) Keep as he sure meets...

Flyer (talk) 23:08, 11 April 2017 (UTC) Keep and rewrite per NOTNEWS and DINC (or merge, whichever action seems more appropriate). While it's definitely...

coverage have been identified that can be used to expand the article. WP:DINC, and the state of this article is a WP:SURMOUNTABLE issue. Beccaynr (talk)...

There is no need for the entire list to be on the main article, but WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:56, 19 July 2022 (UTC) Merge with Marissa Lingen:...

Spartaz Humbug! 16:30, 5 May 2014 (UTC) Nom comment & withdrawn Rebecca1990 WP:DINC (essay) has to be balanced against WP:BLP (policy) in particular WP:V "The...

Bonusballs (talk) 12:37, 13 August 2014 (UTC) I think this is a valid use of WP:DINC#The Case for Discussion driving Cleanup.--Launchballer 12:11, 13 August 2014...

notability, and not how complete the article is as per WP:INTROTODELETE. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:11, 12 June 2022 (UTC) P.S. In terms of criteria...

per consensus. If there is WP:OR it can be handled without deleting as WP:DINC. (non-admin closure) Kj cheetham (talk) 21:36, 5 July 2022 (UTC) Dust (His...

other delete !vote appears to be based on the quality of the prose (cf., WP:DINC), which is not a reason for deletion. Likewise, the keep !votes- although...

per Cunard, as for the comments of the quality of the article I believe WP:DINC is particularly revelent here. Hitpoint0213 (talk) 07:13, 13 June 2020 (UTC)...

asilvering (talk) 22:24, 2 July 2022 (UTC) very weak keep WP:NOTDUP and WP:DINC, but also WP:NOTDIRECTORY. -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:33, 3 July 2022 (UTC) I...

Pack Lambert (talk) 16:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:SOFIXIT and WP:DINC. Why not trim the excess plot instead of deleting it outright? Important...

2022 (UTC) Keep Just about meets WP:GNG. Not a case of WP:BLP1E. Also WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 23:17, 10 August 2022 (UTC) P.S. Though almost every...

WP:NLIST. Some work is needed to clarify what it should include, but WP:DINC. (non-admin closure) Kj cheetham (talk) 21:14, 29 June 2022 (UTC) AfDs for...

18:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC) Point taken, the result looks like crap, but WP:DINC. Self is notable and complex, so Outline of self must be also. 192.160.216...

nominator has pointed to some gaps, which is a reason to improve, not delete WP:DINC. Importantly, the article includes useful, verified information. I can see...

seems to be a pass of WP:PROF, especially in light of the time period. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:25, 17 December 2020 (UTC) Keep I removed the prod...

WP:NACADEMIC; and there's enough information to write something encyclopedic. WP:DINC, and while some parts could be trimmed or maybe checked for tone, it does...

Seems like a case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT, given there is WP:SIGCOV. Also, WP:DINC, and nothing seems significantly different in terms of notability since the...

the rename Johnbod (talk) 16:35, 28 December 2015 (UTC) Keep because WP:DINC. It's clearly WP:RS, and the MathWorld reference convinced me that this is...

enough for WP:AUTHOR. The article is in severe need of clean-up, but WP:DINC. Incidentally, there are also multiple publications about someone else with...

meets WP:NAUTHOR. The article certainly needs significant cleanup, but WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:36, 14 July 2022 (UTC) Keep - While the article needs...

notability WP:GNG, per Eastmain and Michig comments above. AfD is not cleanup WP:DINC. I understand the nominator's point about the problem with the quantity of...

merge as a WP:ATD to some relevant article about football variants). WP:DINC, and in any case there appears to be sufficient coverage of this in proper...

well cited enough, and someone is working to fix that. Remember people, WP:DINC. I see a lot of that today. --Micky (talk) 03:32, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Blocked...

that is exactly what those pages are. Also Not really relevant since WP:DINC, but nvm; urgh; some people just have no taste at all as far as aesthetics...

discussions. --Calathan (talk) 22:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC) Keep per WP:DINC, this article would not fall under any WP:CSD criteria. - Knowledgekid87...

July 2021 (UTC) Keep as others have said, seems to meet WP:NPROF. Also, WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:15, 26 July 2021 (UTC) Keep as per David Eppstein...

Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC) Keep per WP:DINC. Is there any doubt that Konečni is notable? Joe Roe (talk) 14:46, 30 August...

(minor) article. Definitely needs to be trimmed way the heck down, but WP:DINC. Ford MF (talk) 23:28, 8 November 2019 (UTC) Not even remotely policy based...

blanked summaries of the talks look that way. WP:ATD, WP:NOTCLEANUP, AND WP:DINC apply just as much to draftification as to outright deletion. —Syrenka V...

Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 02:27, 26 April 2016 (UTC) Speedy Keep - WP:DINC, This article needs more sources, but they do exist and just need to be added...

essay, just as WP:TNT is. Natureium (talk) 23:55, 24 May 2018 (UTC) Keep. WP:DINC. Furthermore, nomination is defective, as it consists largely of a personal...

include refs, under pain of deletion of any unreferenced entries, but WP:DINC. XavierItzm (talk) 13:51, 30 May 2022 (UTC) There is nothing to cleanup for...

articles; and the promotional issues are a matter of, as pointed out, WP:DINC (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:38, 22 June 2020...

clearly qualifies under WP:PROF#C3. The article does need some cleanup but WP:DINC. Nsk92 (talk) 10:51, 8 April 2021 (UTC) Speedy keep, per GS he has an h index...

Keep there is coverage to meet WP:GNG, but there is also some WP:PROMO. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:43, 8 July 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

some updating (she seems to no longer be active since around 2005) but WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:17, 4 April 2022 (UTC) Yes, deletion is not cleanup...

(UTC) Keep Seems to have sufficient coverage. Does need some tidying, but WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:07, 8 March 2021 (UTC) Speedy keep: Because it not...

made any constructive improvement. See WP:POT and WP:SAUCE. See also WP:DINC. Andrew🐉(talk) 20:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC) Keep Being complete is never a...

discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:06, 27 August 2016 (UTC) Keep. WP:DINC. Clearly the article needs some TLC, but comments above, as well as coverage...

The result was keep. Consensus that the article needs some cleanup, but WP:DINC. (non-admin closure) Kj cheetham (talk) 20:24, 1 July 2022 (UTC) Loch Naver...

some agreement that the article needs to be improved, and to that, I say WP:DINC. (non-admin closure)  Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 18:04, 30 September 2020 (UTC)...

considers to be missing. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:45, 20 July 2022 (UTC) Keep: WP:DINC, if there is concern that the article is only partially completed, then just...

2021 (UTC) Keep under WP:NPROF. Article needs better referencing, but WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:02, 27 March 2021 (UTC) Keep, impressive citations...

notability is WP:NOTTEMPORARY. The article definitely needs some work, but WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 13:52, 21 August 2022 (UTC) Keep. Distinguished professorship...

Seems to have some coverage from multiple sources to pass WP:GNG, and WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC) Keep (on the weak side)...

28 June 2022 (UTC) I agree that it could be improved. But please note WP:DINC. CT55555 (talk) 19:44, 28 June 2022 (UTC) I now agree with editors below...

Flyer (talk) 23:08, 11 April 2017 (UTC) Keep and rewrite per NOTNEWS and DINC (or merge, whichever action seems more appropriate). While it's definitely...

great shape, but doesn't strike me as overly promotional, and as usual WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 06:26, 13 July 2021 (UTC) Keep. Appears to pass WP:NACADEMIC...

(UTC) In what way does it "feel very autobiographical"? In any case, WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:07, 15 February 2022 (UTC) Keep. Reading through...

towards notability but it should also be mentioned in the article. Also, WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:48, 4 February 2021 (UTC) Keep. Per the comments...

you, but I wish to elucidate with two advices: 1) per WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:DINC, the threat of deletion is not supposed to be used to force improvements...

January 2022 (UTC) Weak keep as per JoelleJay's comments. Not 100% sure. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC) Leaning keep per strength...

single coauthor. Espresso Addict (talk) 04:08, 4 January 2021 (UTC) Keep, WP:DINC. Appears to pass both WP:AUTHOR (reviews including [33] [34] [35] [36]) and...

November 2022 (UTC) I'm not sure where you get that anything I said merits a WP:DINC response. That's about using deletion as a process to remake the page—I am...

promotional language and unsourced material needs to be cut out, but WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 23:50, 6 April 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is...

not cleanup.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:47, 26 January 2018 (UTC) Keep - per WP:DINC. XavierItzm (talk) 18:53, 26 January 2018 (UTC) Keep - ongoing coverage/protests...

deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 12:29, 10 November 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:DINC. "It is even unknown if "Urheimat" is even a real term" is a subjective statement...

discussions. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 17:22, 13 October 2018 (UTC) Keep as WP:DINC. His leaving IGN has spawned a number of articles about him specifically...

nomination that complains about bare URLs appears to be missing that WP:DINC. Jclemens (talk) 07:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC) Keep as per all of the comment...

Even Nom admits the subject is notable, it is important to remember WP:DINC. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 16:56, 31 October 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

does not make its topic clear to non-specialists is problematic, but WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:48, 4 September 2021 (UTC) Keep. While the article...

the other socks were named have been a perennial problem, but WP:DINC. IEEE Fellow is an automatic pass of WP:PROF#C3 (it's even explicitly stated...

13 July 2021 (UTC) Delete It doesn't fail GNG because of it's tone - WP:DINC. That being said, it does fail WP:GNG and WP:NPROF nonetheless. -Kj cheetham...

towards those critical debates; but this does not mean we should delete per WP:DINC. Jtrrs0 (talk) 17:45, 10 October 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

above. They would improve the article, and WP:ATH has been met, and as WP:DINC, any source would help improve the article. Nfitz (talk) 18:37, 30 November...

of WP:NPROF as others have said. Also need to take note of WP:ATD and WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:49, 3 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

(UTC) Keep appears to pass WP:GNG, I think this is a good example of WP:DINC. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 07:43, 24 August 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is...

sufficiently notable, especially with the sources found by Beccaynr. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:09, 22 April 2022 (UTC) Keep agree with above Keep...

than deleting the page. The essay section WP:NOTCLEANUP and the essay WP:DINC expand eloquently on this point. Holtzman, Phyllis (March 30, 1998). "Penn...

news search, books about it, scholarly articles, etc) and is verifiable. WP:DINC If an article is bad we fix it. if we don't have the time or ability to fix...

The article needs revision to reflect information from the sources, but WP:DINC. Beccaynr (talk) 16:24, 9 October 2021 (UTC) @Beccaynr, WP:SUSTAINED is part...

sources, not about whether they have actually been added to the article. WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC) Because every time I see...

keeping an article cleanup? Esquivalience t 18:23, 9 July 2015 (UTC) WP:DINC is just an essay. Which policy says there are different standards for parent...

WP:RS. The paid/commissioned concerns can be addressed separately as WP:DINC. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 08:50, 7 October 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

truly is a hoax, then of course it should be deleted. If not, keep per WP:DINC. –Fredddie™ 00:26, 10 August 2023 (UTC) gidonb's comment above includes supporting...

Eppstein (talk) 21:00, 6 December 2020 (UTC) Keep as others have said. WP:DINC -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:38, 12 December 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is...

Keep Seems to meet WP:NPROF, and whilst the article is in a poor state, WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:06, 5 June 2021 (UTC) Keep, department head at Princeton...

WP:PROF. This is a brand-new article, not in great shape as nominated, but WP:DINC. Subject appears to pass WP:PROF#C6 both as head of a major scholarly association...

WP:AUTHOR. As for Extua's "unless anyone can improve the article": see WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:07, 6 June 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is...

still extremely bad. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:05, 31 August 2018 (UTC) WP:DINC. If the subject is notable, then poor sourcing is no reason to delete or...

--hroest 04:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC) Keep. The article needs cleanup but WP:DINC. Besides WP:PROF#C1 as above, I found and added to the article enough published...

how lousy the article is, it's not a candidate for deletion. Also see WP:DINC. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 17:51, 17 April 2018 (UTC) It is not about cleanup...

there were "synth" issues, you would raise them in the TP, not here. WP:DINC, deletion is not cleanup. The fact is you cite no policy, just "lack of depth"...

with reference. Elemimele (talk) 13:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC) Keep: Per WP:DINC and WP:HEY. Skeptical the nominator performed a WP:BEFORE check. Curbon7...

being a WP:BLP1E. The article is in relatively poor shape, but as usual, WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 10:13, 14 July 2021 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

Wikipedia. The rationales listed in the nomination are fixable and as WP:DINC, "If editing can address all relevant reasons for deletion, this should be...

13 June 2020 (UTC) Keep - then add some references and remember that WP:DINC. Nfitz (talk) 20:31, 13 June 2020 (UTC) Speedy Keep - Do I really need to...

is an article along those lines needing cleanup that is needling you (WP:DINC). I've been trying to go through articles in my interest with notability...

poorly, and a bettern name would be desired, but still, WP:SPINOFF and WP:DINC. Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 13:44, 4 May 2022 (UTC) Sure, the massacres...

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:39, 27 October 2019 (UTC) Keep - Yes, it is a mess, but WP:DINC. This is a topic that merits an article, so fix it, don't delete it entirely...

to be done to improve this article; sure, but see WP:IGNORINGATD and WP:DINC. Furthermore, SOLDIER IMHO is equivalent to WP:WPBB/N. While CTA suggests...

one 1, 2, 3, 4 have a troubled history on Wikipedia. Lastly even if the WP:DINC argument comes up, I would argue that this article is still unfit to stand...

sources discussing the subject and his work in depth. AfD is not cleanup, Wp:DINC. Gleeanon 22:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC) Keep. Instinct Magazine called the...

Life Cycle Design Andrew🐉(talk) 21:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC) Keep per wp:DINC. I've also started to extend the page to make it less stubby. BrxBrx(talk)(please...

WestCD (talk) 03:52, 3 December 2021 (UTC) Keep seem to meet WP:NAUTHOR. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC) Keep per above passes WP:NAUTHOR...

article doesn't reflect WP:BEFORE. Yes, the article has problems, but WP:DINC.--Jahaza (talk) 20:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC) Well, would you mind actually...

this article is kinda terrible and certainly needs to be cleaned up, but WP:DINC. I didn't find anything obvious for him in terms of coverage outside of academia...

(UTC) Keep under WP:PROF. Lots of cites, plus holder of a named chair. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC) Keep I went through and...

or something similar. Skeletor3000 (talk) 18:58, 16 January 2020 (UTC) WP:DINC. Nothing precludes fixing the article during the vote. Nfitz (talk) 20:59...

(UTC) Keep seems to meet WP:GNG. Some work needed on the article, but WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:18, 1 August 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

per Less Unless and, hell, per the article's pre-existing notability. WP:DINC. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 07:51, 22 January 2021 (UTC) Keep per discussion...

this list? Just already being an inventor with a Wikipedia page? I agree WP:DINC though. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:15, 7 May 2022 (UTC) Keep. The argument that...