Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2013 December 8
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
- Ebastine (history · last edit · rewrite) from http://home.intekom.com/pharm/lennon/kestine.html. ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 08:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- World Agroforestry Centre (history · last edit · rewrite) from http://www.worldagroforestry.org/about_us/our_history and elsewhere on website. References section below says content is acceptably licensed, but website says "all rights reserved".. Dana boomer (talk) 17:35, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Contract farming (history · last edit · rewrite) from From given sources. Copyvio and extensive close paraphrasing.. Dana boomer (talk) 18:42, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Revised version posted to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Contract_farming/Temp#Issues_of_concern_related_to_contract_farming Urgent attention to approving this and restoring the page would be appreciated.Roundtheworld (talk) 09:29, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. The rewrite seems thorough. I've spot-checked and used duplicate detector on a few sources. Please flag if I've overlooked anything. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Ecoagriculture (history · last edit · rewrite) from http://www.ecoagriculture.org/page.php?id=228&name=FAQs%20about%20ecoagriculture. Dana boomer (talk) 18:51, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- OTRS Ticket received, article now licensed and compatible with CC-BY-SA. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:35, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Irrigation of alluvial fans (history · last edit · rewrite) from From given sources, all subsections of waterlog.info.. Dana boomer (talk) 19:06, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- I tried to find the article but the only thing it says that there is a copyright problem. Going to the previous version I found sources from www.waterlog.info, which I checked. On the "Articles" page and on the "Reports an case studies" page of this web site I read: "They are free for all kind of uses". What is the poblem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.215.155.71 (talk) 18:17, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Are we sure that waterlog.info has the right to release these documents? They are copies of ILRI articles from various places/annual reports...does ILRI copyright their publications? This article would seem to suggest they do (see page 4). Dana boomer (talk) 16:24, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- That publication (27) is not used in the article under discussion. Reference is only made to parts of ILRI´s annual reports and project reports, which apparently are not under copy right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.215.155.71 (talk) 18:25, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- We have two issues here. First, the release on the website is not specific enough for us to use as a license. We need to know that they are licensed for use, including commercial, and modification. We recommend the language at Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries. Secondly, we need the website host to verify that he is R.J. Osterbaan and is the copyright owner of this content, especially with material like this having evidently produced by commission of the United Nations, which does retain copyright to its publications. Are you in any way connected to Osterbaan so that we have a chance of progress with this? --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:38, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- It may be that formal publications of UN organizations like FAO are copyright protected. However, commissioned project reports are for public use and scrutiny. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.215.154.223 (talk) 22:30, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- We have two issues here. First, the release on the website is not specific enough for us to use as a license. We need to know that they are licensed for use, including commercial, and modification. We recommend the language at Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries. Secondly, we need the website host to verify that he is R.J. Osterbaan and is the copyright owner of this content, especially with material like this having evidently produced by commission of the United Nations, which does retain copyright to its publications. Are you in any way connected to Osterbaan so that we have a chance of progress with this? --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:38, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- That publication (27) is not used in the article under discussion. Reference is only made to parts of ILRI´s annual reports and project reports, which apparently are not under copy right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.215.155.71 (talk) 18:25, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Are we sure that waterlog.info has the right to release these documents? They are copies of ILRI articles from various places/annual reports...does ILRI copyright their publications? This article would seem to suggest they do (see page 4). Dana boomer (talk) 16:24, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- I tried to find the article but the only thing it says that there is a copyright problem. Going to the previous version I found sources from www.waterlog.info, which I checked. On the "Articles" page and on the "Reports an case studies" page of this web site I read: "They are free for all kind of uses". What is the poblem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.215.155.71 (talk) 18:17, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.