DOKUMEN123.COM

from English Wikipedia. Shortcuts WP:ELNEVERWP:ELNEVER WP:COPYVIOELWP:COPYVIOEL For policy or technical reasons, editors are restricted from linking to...

lyrics and chord (again WP:COPYVIOEL) in non-RS, no coverage on the subject. [9] is a clone of [3] in another WP:COPYVIOEL non-RS (song and chord). [10]...

copyrights, so linking to them from Wikipedia would also violate the WP:COPYVIOEL guideline and the WP:COPYVIO policy. Removing the URLs from the citations...

also not be linked to. I see nothing to suggest this site conforms to WP:COPYVIOEL, and they only host pirated images. While the fair use rationale could...

the unblocking of the website here, but my request was denied per WP:COPYVIOEL. ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 13:33, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Keep treaty has been proven...

violations and have been removed per WP's copyright policy (WP:COPYVIO, WP:COPYVIOEL, WP:LINKVIO), and citations retained. Redundant WP:REFBOMB was removed...

adds notice to a page that the contents may be a copyright violation {{copyvioel}}: places a banner that the page may contain external links to copyright...

archive.org or flickr.com clips of the newspaper, which falls afoul of WP:COPYVIOEL, and should absolutely be cleaned up even if the article is kept. What...

discussing it's use for content is highly questionable considering WP:COPYVIOEL despite a certain editor's view to the contrary. So it would be best if...

can't find any sources beyond what I removed because they were all WP:COPYVIOELs of images of the magazine, so nothing of value was lost even by removing...

(Redacted) per WP:COPYVIOEL - Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 12:32, 13 September 2016 (UTC) Holocaust denial [9] Israel Shamir (Redacted) per WP:COPYVIOEL - Ryk72 'c.s.n...

considered fair use, at least as far as I understand it. This is noted in WP:COPYVIOEL: "it uses the work in a way compliant with fair use". Toa Nidhiki05 22:58...

downloading the book, I potentially should not post the link because of WP:COPYVIOEL. —Alalch E. 10:11, 18 July 2025 (UTC) To be honest I'm not entirely sure...

after, Serendipodous apparently restored it, again in violation of WP:COPYVIOEL, which I had removed from the template for that reason specifically. –Deacon...

status of the linked content isn't 100% clear, may be disallowed by WP:COPYVIOEL and WP:COPYLINK. I think the policy is heavy-handed and deserves to be...

rights as at least potentially valid, this puts the bot in violation of WP:COPYVIOEL, which tells us "If there is reason to believe that a website has a copy...

18 November 2016 (UTC) See WP:LINKVIO for the official policy, and WP:COPYVIOEL. My understanding is that it's not technically within the scope of WP:COPYVIO...

Copyright infringing material should also not be linked to, or possibly to WP:COPYVIOEL which is equally explicit, generally the appropriate forum would be WP:ELN...

copyrights, so linking to them from Wikipedia would also violate the WP:COPYVIOEL guideline and the WP:COPYVIO policy. If a particular document hosted on...

considered fair use, at least as far as I understand it. This is noted in WP:COPYVIOEL: "it uses the work in a way compliant with fair use". Toa Nidhiki05 22:58...

21:51, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Winkelvi, I blocked partly because of the WP:COPYVIOEL violations, but also because Director was being pointy and intentionally...

Whatever else, I agree that linking to the full book is a violation of WP:COPYVIOEL. While WP:REX and other methods can be used to exchange resources to help...

or they were in the public domain, they'd be perfectly fine. (see WP:COPYVIOEL) As for whether it was a misguided citation, possibly but in the past...

specifically concerns whether this is a proper application of WP:ELNEVER/WP:COPYVIOEL. I see this as a slippery slope situation, where we are made to censor...

copyright material that they are not entitled to. By policy mentioned at WP:COPYVIOEL, Wikipedia does not allow citations to include links to such sites. Also...

lyrics and chord (again WP:COPYVIOEL) in non-RS, no coverage on the subject. [9] is a clone of [3] in another WP:COPYVIOEL non-RS (song and chord). [10]...

edits. Also recommend deleting edit log addition given that it cite WP:COPYVIOEL from the same fringe site Falconfly loved citing. Squatch347 (talk) 14:16...

Martinevans123 (talk) 15:07, 2 July 2018 (UTC) Should not be linked (WP:COPYVIOEL), but no explicit word on blocking policy. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs)...

or via WP:Book sources in conjunction with {{ISBN}}. The guideline WP:COPYVIOEL states editors are restricted from linking to the following, without exception...

the unblocking of the website here, but my request was denied per WP:COPYVIOEL. ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 13:33, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Keep treaty has been proven...

provide its link in an external-links section or in a citation, per WP:COPYVIOEL. Anyway, is such blatant copyright violator (Sarup & Sons) considered...

alone counting toward notability, they seem to be in violation of the WP:COPYVIOEL: Ref 5 This is a word-for-word copy of the Luxe Life source. Ref 6 This...

Wikipedia? Chuntuk (talk) 12:53, 9 May 2017 (UTC) What's to stop us? WP:COPYVIOEL. Jason Quinn (talk) 17:16, 9 May 2017 (UTC) Of course Russia can copy...

archive.org or flickr.com clips of the newspaper, which falls afoul of WP:COPYVIOEL, and should absolutely be cleaned up even if the article is kept. What...

that all those full-text book links to the worldradiohistory.com are WP:COPYVIOEL issues. The website clearly isn't the copyright holder, and I'm doubting...

use of links. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 04:08, 22 April 2020 (UTC) Well, see WP:COPYVIOEL. There are links we don't include for copyright reasons. Gråbergs Gråa...

alone counting toward notability, they seem to be in violation of the WP:COPYVIOEL: Ref 5 This is a word-for-word copy of the Luxe Life source. Ref 6 This...

link to a magazine scan hosted on davidgerard.co.uk probably violates WP:COPYVIOEL and should be replaced. Bridget (talk) 17:47, 25 May 2022 (UTC) Partly...

being released by the copyright holder, then it's a clear violation of WP:COPYVIOEL. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:19, 1 May 2022 (UTC) The Internet Archive would...

(UTC) This practice raises issues about whether the Daily Mail meets WP:COPYVIOEL. While the site may be complying with the law, stealing the work of other...

can't find any sources beyond what I removed because they were all WP:COPYVIOELs of images of the magazine, so nothing of value was lost even by removing...

certainly convenient to our readers, I wondered how this squares with WP:COPYVIOEL since pretty much all of these journal articles are behind a paywall on...

image) would likely be removed from Wikipedia, or flagged up with a {{copyvioel}} template to draw editors' attention to possible infringement by linking...

talk 19:35, 15 July 2021 (UTC) In my opinion, this "archive" violates WP:COPYVIOEL as there is no evidence that this person agreed that their content could...

some kind of permission? Or should these references be removed per WP:COPYVIOEL? Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 06:32, 10 July 2019 (UTC) Blacklist...

Joyce Kenney Interviews Illustrator Edward Gorey (1991) may fall under WP:COPYVIOEL. Are you able to demonstrate the uploader owns copyright for the work...

the article manually at the copyright problems board for follow-up. {{Copyvioel}} and {{Copyvio link}} Places a notice that one or more sources used in...

from linking to any site that is hosting material that is a copyvios (WP:COPYVIOEL. - Donald Albury 19:32, 12 November 2021 (UTC) - edited 19:38, 12 November...

copy of the cited source. So I guess we can't even it cite here, per WP:COPYVIOEL. And it seems that the site accepts content from common people with no...

intellectual property rights issues making some of the stuff from them a WP:COPYVIOEL. Shouldn't Infoshop.org be deprecated? Graywalls (talk) 20:00, 5 October...

any issues about using such a site as a source, this (Redacted) per WP:COPYVIOEL seems to be a copyvio download of a book still in copyright. Doug Weller...

external webpages with copyright violations from mainspace articles (per WP:COPYVIOEL); there are also a number of links to the same webpages in Talk, User...

2 October 2023 (UTC) This link should probably be removed then per WP:COPYVIOEL. Nick-D (talk) 03:52, 2 October 2023 (UTC) Done. JumbledPasta (talk) 03:58...

14 September 2021 (UTC) The link seems to be a clear violation of WP:COPYVIOEL to me. It's okay to have convenience links for sources, but not when they're...

that. Any objections? PS Your comment is confusing. A lot of typos? WP:COPYVIOEL isn't a problem since this the torrent is official; I see nothing at WP:EL...

these edits[9][10][11][12] compliant with WP:EL,WP:ELBLP, WP:BLPEL, WP:COPYVIOEL and other relevant policies & guidelines? Should the link be removed pending...

logs) Indefinite semi-protection: Repeated addition of links that violate COPYVIOEL by IPs or new users. The page has been temporarily semiprotected but the...

recording the copyright compliance of the video might be in question. See WP:COPYVIOEL. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC) Thanks, good to know...

them as sources. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:20, 9 April 2020 (UTC) Wikipedia:COPYVIOEL expressly mentions WikiLeaks as a website we are not supposed to link...

(UTC) No you may not link to it if it is a copyright violation. See WP:COPYVIOEL. If the channels have the right to show it, then it would be okay. --...

at WP:NFCCP.  ★  Bigr Tex 03:15, 24 July 2020 (UTC) WP:COPYVIO and WP:COPYVIOEL seem pretty clear that we should not be directing our readers to any material...

Graywalls (talk) 02:20, 6 November 2019 (UTC) Delete and link to Wikipedia:COPYVIOEL which is here, and I stated that above, but should have linked to it for...

July 2021 (UTC) I removed a link from a citation in Liar paradox per WP:COPYVIOEL. @Fabrickator: argues that Archive.org has the right to do so [host copyrighted...

immediately without warning or preparation. Per my understanding of WP:COPYVIOEL material that violates the copyrights of others per contributors' rights...

sapphaline (talk) 10:49, 20 April 2026 (UTC) @Sapphaline Generally not, see WP:COPYVIOEL. Toadspike [Talk] 10:51, 20 April 2026 (UTC) If you want to replace those...

the videos are fan created from footage that they don't own, then WP:COPYVIOEL may also apply. I agree that the videos are basically spam.- MrX 17:10...

(UTC) I don't believe 2). and 4). are valid copyright exemptions. Per WP:COPYVIOEL ..links to websites that display copyrighted works are acceptable as long...

(talk/contributions) 16:14, 6 September 2024 (UTC) So should we rewrite WP:COPYVIOEL to say it's a-okay to be linking to sites that violate the copyrights...

copyright situation is not above board then linking is forbidden per WP:COPYVIOEL Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 18:50, 2 August 2023 (UTC) Some of their pages...

2 October 2023 (UTC) This link should probably be removed then per WP:COPYVIOEL. Nick-D (talk) 03:52, 2 October 2023 (UTC) Done. JumbledPasta (talk) 03:58...

downloading the book, I potentially should not post the link because of WP:COPYVIOEL. —Alalch E. 10:11, 18 July 2025 (UTC) To be honest I'm not entirely sure...

illegal. I don't think it's smart to just ignore that. Apart from that, WP:COPYVIOEL prohibits the addition of links that are knowingly in violation of copyright...

not permitted for use on Wikipedia" this seems to be the reverse of WP:COPYVIOEL. This site should be blacklisted in my view...pure junk.Moxy- 16:44, 14...

that all those full-text book links to the worldradiohistory.com are WP:COPYVIOEL issues. The website clearly isn't the copyright holder, and I'm doubting...

permission to do so we should probably not link to them at all, per WP:COPYVIOEL. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 14:39, 29 September 2025 (UTC)...

links to web pages that are still live, which flies in the face of WP:COPYVIOEL. Years back, they bought used bookseller Better World Books and their...

net a reliable source? I'm not convinced that it is compatible with WP:COPYVIOEL. See "Does this not infringe copyright?". Looks like it's used as a source...

Joyce Kenney Interviews Illustrator Edward Gorey (1991) may fall under WP:COPYVIOEL. Are you able to demonstrate the uploader owns copyright for the work...

copyrights, so linking to them from Wikipedia would also violate the WP:COPYVIOEL guideline and the WP:COPYVIO policy. If a particular document hosted on...

believe that the content on the IMDB page may violate a copyright, then WP:COPYVIOEL applies; i.e., we cannot have a link in the article to that page. - Donald...

immediately without warning or preparation. Per my understanding of WP:COPYVIOEL material that violates the copyrights of others per contributors' rights...

violate copyright, hosting material whose copyright they do not own (see WP:COPYVIOEL), so with something like a Private Eye article you'd need to be sure akmedea...

Baike's user agreement, therefore linking to this website is potentially WP:COPYVIOEL. – robertsky (talk) 17:59, 18 January 2023 (UTC) The pages look and feel...

violations and have been removed per WP's copyright policy (WP:COPYVIO, WP:COPYVIOEL, WP:LINKVIO), and citations retained. Redundant WP:REFBOMB was removed...

https://www.avetruthbooks.com (e.g., [7][8][9]) may be in violation of WP:COPYVIOEL. I asked them to self-revert but they seem to believe it's not a violation...

copyrights, so linking to them from Wikipedia would also violate the WP:COPYVIOEL guideline and the WP:COPYVIO policy. If a particular document hosted on...