DOKUMEN123.COM

lists and List selection criteria. Shortcuts WP:ARTNWP:ARTN WP:CONTNWP:CONTN Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. If...

policy justify your move. Standalone article as it follows WP:NOTEWORTHY, WP:CONTN, WP:NRVE, WP:NOTTEMPORARY, WP:SUSTAINED. Dey subrata (talk) 08:51, 3 January...

"Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article." - WP:CONTN. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:13, 27 August 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

2008 is irrelevent ie. "Article content does not determine notability" (WP:CONTN). Coolabahapple (talk) 17:57, 2 July 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

WP:COISELF. Besides being a war veteran, nothing else is significant. (WP:CONTN, WP:NTEMP, WP:SUSTAINED) Your welcome | Democratics Talk 08:57, 4 February...

article is stub. Per WP:GNG, article content doesn't determine notability WP:CONTN. I will advise you to withdraw this misnomination –Ammarpad (talk) 23:23...

Eppstein (talk) 19:08, 22 September 2019 (UTC) Keep. Clearly a case of WP:CONTN. Passes WP:BIO. Worth noting his archive is maintained at the IISG here...

coherent story, but that's normal article improvement, not AfD, see also WP:CONTN and WP:NEXIST. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 02:27, 8 July 2019 (UTC) The added...

Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:46, 8 July 2019 (UTC) That's true. But per WP:CONTN and WP:NEXIST the quality of an article doesn't influence the notability...

notable to me. Aoziwe (talk) 12:10, 18 February 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:CONTN. --BonkHindrance (talk) 15:29, 18 February 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...

Current page status is not necessarily an indication of notability per WP:CONTN and time would be better spent improving the page. Tailored searches produce...

principles that differ from the GNG. I'll go another step further with WP:CONTN: Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. Your...

(talk) 04:52, 21 October 2017 (UTC) Comment, nominator needs to remember WP:CONTN - "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article...

size doesn't matter? needs improvement but editors need to remember WP:CONTN, sources discussed above/listed in the article indicate notability so a...

research. Also, a plea to nominators of afds, pleeeeeezzzz remember WP:CONTN ie. Article content does not determine notability, and WP:BEFORE - D. Search...

bread, article now reflects this (although editors need to remember WP:CONTN) with sources added by Mccapra (thankyou:)). Coolabahapple (talk) 07:59...

discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:27, 22 November 2017 (UTC) Comment, from WP:CONTN - "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article...

covered elsewhere - I know that content does not determine notability WP:CONTN, but this article is almost incomprehensible - it reads like a badly written...

but this should not have been nominated in the first place (noting WP:CONTN - "Article content does not determine notability") as the subject meets...

since sources exist demonstrating the notability of the subject, per WP:CONTN. Gab4gab has added three sources already, with plenty more to used to improve...

does not depend on the state of the "article in its present form", per WP:CONTN and WP:NEXIST. That said, I'd say an article with zero prose is right next...

2019 (UTC) Keep Notability is not about the content of the article (WP:CONTN), but about the subject. The German Wikipedia article lists 34 films, 23...

2017 (UTC) Keep In response to references not being PRIMARY sources: WP:CONTN - "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article...

April 2021 (UTC) Weak keep: I de-prodded the article on the basis of WP:CONTN, and to give it a fair chance of being saved, because there is a reasonable...

FYI, the current state of the article is not considered during AfD. WP:CONTN, WP:NRV —МандичкаYO 😜 14:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC) There is no point in using...

7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC) Shortcuts WP:ARTNWP:ARTN WP:CONTNWP:CONTN If you have RS add them in, just saying they exist is unlikely to save this...

but notability is never defined by the content or state of an article WP:CONTN. Ammarpad (talk) 05:58, 21 December 2017 (UTC) @Ammarpad: The somewhat incestuous...

the other articles you mentioned were not mistakenly deleted despite WP:CONTN and NEXIST or SNG, simply because no one took the time to fix it. Atsme...

WP:Before before proposing the AFD Shortcuts WP:ARTNWP:ARTN WP:CONTNWP:CONTN Actually I didn't add the references on the talk page. I rewrote the whole...

02:46, 19 January 2018 (UTC) Comment, "article provides no references", WP:CONTN - "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article...

21 April 2019 (UTC) Comment Notability is not about the article, per WP:CONTN. Quite a bit has been written about her (enough to meet WP:GNG), but whether...

rewrite and the inclusion of additional references. However, as per WP:CONTN and WP:NPOSSIBLE, the current state of the article has no bearing on its...

Comment, an article does not need to show that a subject is notable, see WP:CONTN - "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article...

exist, even though they have not yet been added to the article, per WP:CONTN: Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. If...

published. Jonathan170 (talk) 00:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC) Comment Wouldn’t WP:CONTN apply? Deletion is based on notability, not on article content. Park3r (talk)...

sources', 'can't find any sources', and 'no good sources in the article'. WP:CONTN specifically makes the last point not worth anything. Now the 'keep' arguments:...

article may need improvement, but content does not affect notability WP:CONTN. Books, such a The Pilgrim Church by E.H. Broadbent, trace the development...

06:39, 25 August 2022 (UTC) The relevant PAGs that apply here include: WP:CONTN, WP:NEXIST, WP:V, WP:NGEO, and WP:SNG. There is no disputing the fact that...

WP:NSOFTWARE. Although the article may not be ideal, at least remembering about WP:CONTN a quick search beyond shows the subject looks not too famous but notable...

The current state of the article does not affect its notabilty, per WP:CONTN. In terms of availability of sources, A Google search indicates a fair amount...

principles that differ from the GNG. I'll go another step further with WP:CONTN: Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. Your...

the article", when such sources exist, in direct contradiction of the WP:CONTN guideline? Daranios (talk) 21:26, 17 July 2020 (UTC) Why do I feel as though...

written. I know notability doesn't apply to article content WP:NNC and WP:CONTN, but I hope that those editors who believe this article should be kept can...

22 October 2017 (UTC) Comment, hi Maineartists, please have a look at WP:CONTN - "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article...

in a news program is not enough to establish notability. The point of WP:CONTN is it applies both ways, no amount of trivial, WP:PROMO additions to an...

the current state of the article will be irrelevant per WP:NEXIST and WP:CONTN. Link20XX (talk) 14:06, 3 June 2021 (UTC) Indecisive -- I would like to...

page. I do not understand why you care if he is a child prodigy or not (WP:CONTN), please direct me to the right part of a Wikipedia deletion policy. Some...

SPEEDY KEEP. A WP:BEFOREsearch I just conducted found many WP:RS. Under WP:CONTN, if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing within...

the subject? The article content does not determine notability, see WP:CONTN. Broc (talk) 21:22, 22 June 2024 (UTC) Keep. Passes WP:GNG with an in-depth...

are not required from the content of the article, only to its subject (WP:CONTN). So, not the sources, but the notability of the subject should be discussed...

is notable by one norm, we do not need to check WP:SIGCOV. Further, WP:CONTN suggests that notability is not based on the content of the article; the...

notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:04, 8 August 2016 (UTC) Comment, WP:CONTN] - "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article...

principles that differ from the GNG. I'll go another step further with WP:CONTN: Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. Your...

22:01, 28 May 2025 (UTC) Notability isn't based on the article quality (WP:CONTN). I removed the X (Twitter) source. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 22:13, 28 May...

English article leaves a lot to be desired (but not relevant in AfD per WP:CONTN and WP:NEXIST), but could be brought into something much more acceptable...

KeepItGoingForward (talk) 20:24, 10 December 2022 (UTC) Bearing in mind WP:CONTN, this is a sad case of WP:BIAS, given the plethora of Chinese-language sources...

Talk:Rosemount High School Talk:Rosemount High School (Montreal). According to WP:CONTN, Article content does not determine notability ...if the source material...

content does not establish notability of the subject as discussed at WP:CONTN. Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion...

from what I've seen. The current state of the article is irrelevant per WP:CONTN. Mdrnpndr (talk) 06:36, 11 August 2015 (UTC) Keep for now at least. It is...

pp 12, 21, plus it would be nice if the nominator in future remembers WP:CONTN - "Article content does not determine notability", also that the article...

promotional puffery - David Gerard (talk) 16:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC) WP:CONTN says the "present state of the article," or "Article content" does not determine...

Along with secondary sources being used throughout the article. The WP:CONTN states that if the source material exists, then even very poor writing and...

Delete Mr. Vujcic might be a talented sports journalist but I'm afraid WP:CONTN applies here. --N Jordan (talk) 23:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC) Delete per...

but there is nothing to show that the series itself is notable per WP:CONTN, "Article content does not determine notability" - Epinoia (talk) 00:49...

principles that differ from the GNG. I'll go another step further with WP:CONTN: Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. Your...

irrelevant to notability as per WP:NEXIST and length is irrelevant as per WP:CONTN. Moreover, WP:NLIST acknowledges potential exceptions to WP:GNG for certain...

May 2015 (UTC) Comment/question Is WP:NOTPLOT grounds for deletion? WP:CONTN - "Article content does not determine notability: Notability is a property...

discussions. Hegvald (talk) 20:09, 12 April 2015 (UTC) Comment taken from WP:CONTN - "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article...

who do. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:17, 14 December 2022 (UTC) Per WP:CONTN, "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article."...

point is that it's useless and misleading in its current form", see WP:CONTN, emphasises that notability is of the subject and not of the wikiarticle...

April 2020 (UTC) Keep. I agree with the previous commmenter. As per WP:CONTN, "if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing...

notability, one doesn't even need to look at the content of the article per WP:CONTN. Subject notability is independent of the article. I will also throw in...

before the big bad editors destroy you!), just a small reminder from WP:CONTN - "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article...

qualify for WP:GNG, rather than directly improving the article per se, see WP:CONTN. I will say I am quite impressed with what you have accomplished given the...

or routine coverage is not enough, as WP:SIGCOV is not met and fails WP:CONTN. This newly establish company requries WP:NRVE and if the company was notable...

eliminating all citations doesn't change the notability of the topic. See WP:CONTN. — Nomopbs (talk) 04:43, 14 August 2019 (UTC) Focus on content and stop...

current content is not a reflection of a subject's notability, as per WP:CONTN. Comments above about The Daily Star are incorrect - it is a newspaper of...

appropriateness of content are separate (though related) questions: see WP:NNC and WP:CONTN. When a newspaper decides to cover a company, that is evidence of the company's...

keep votes assert that article content does not determine notability WP:CONTN, which is fair enough to point out. I take issue with the assertion that...

deletion decision should not be based on the current status of an article (WP:CONTN, WP:AtD, etc.), assuming that it can be improved. I am convinced it can...

is explicitly ruled out in our notability guideline at WP:NEXIST and WP:CONTN. That's something for our normal ongoing article improvement processes,...

content does not determine notability: Shortcuts WP:ARTNWP:ARTN WP:CONTNWP:CONTN Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. If...

establish or deny notability at AfD. This is explicitly ruled out in WP:CONTN and WP:NEXIST, both part of the relevant notability guideline. In either...

21:37, 28 October 2024 (UTC) Keep, badly written is not a WP:DELREASON (WP:CONTN). It clearly has the history and can also be converted to a contemporary...

connection to them, are unlikely to be strong evidence of notability. Also WP:CONTN: Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. If...

going coverage and recognition from numerous reputable sources. WP:ARTN WP:CONTN Article content does not determine notability. Irregardless of whether we...

coherent story, but that's normal article improvement, not AfD, see also WP:CONTN and WP:NEXIST. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 02:27, 8 July 2019 (UTC) The added...

to the notability issue I raised in the original AfD nomination per WP:CONTN.) There just isn't enough supporting material on the performer or the act...

survivors were junior officers, etc), or editing/deleting - but per WP:CONTN, that is not a reason for deletion. RebeccaGreen (talk) 20:53, 22 June 2019...

because notability does not have anything to do with article content: WP:CONTN. The bottom line is that Boetzel has created and played a major role in...

exist, even though they have not yet been added to the article, per WP:CONTN: Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. If...

article. Sources exist demonstrating the notability of the subject, per WP:CONTN. It has three sources already, with plenty more listed on the article's...

06:39, 25 August 2022 (UTC) The relevant PAGs that apply here include: WP:CONTN, WP:NEXIST, WP:V, WP:NGEO, and WP:SNG. There is no disputing the fact that...

independent coverage. PeterTheFourth (talk) 05:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC) Keep per WP:CONTN a quick news search for "National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association"...

a subject is notable its notable, articles don't need to show this - WP:CONTN, anyway, sources were added in October 2013 - [2], but were then deleted...

standard, but articles are kept or deleted based on their notability (per WP:CONTN which is part of a guideline, rather than an essay). As such, the HEY standard...

content does not determine notability Shortcuts WP:ARTNWP:ARTN WP:CONTNWP:CONTN Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. If...

current plot on the article's talk page. Please re-read WP:UNCENSORED and WP:CONTN, and try to stop making this film discussion to be about the drug Naltrexone...

policy justify your move. Standalone article as it follows WP:NOTEWORTHY, WP:CONTN, WP:NRVE, WP:NOTTEMPORARY, WP:SUSTAINED. Dey subrata (talk) 08:51, 3 January...

above. Your reasoning for it being non-notable is invalid according to WP:CONTN and WP:NEXIST. May I remind you all this AfD was created just 2 hours after...

(talk) 16:41, 31 July 2020 (UTC) If you will read WP:N, specifically WP:CONTN, you will see that the content of the article is not relevant to notability...

Some of our guidelines actually work in that regard at AfD, including WP:CONTN, WP:NEXIST and SNG, but they need more clarity and clout, not the opposite...

article is stub. Per WP:GNG, article content doesn't determine notability WP:CONTN. I will advise you to withdraw this misnomination –Ammarpad (talk) 23:23...

is notable by one norm, we do not need to check WP:SIGCOV. Further, WP:CONTN suggests that notability is not based on the content of the article; the...

notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:04, 8 August 2016 (UTC) Comment, WP:CONTN] - "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article...

article is pretty obvious and it should receive the relevant tags, but WP:CONTN applies. Additionally, given the depth of personal detail that multiple...

since sources exist demonstrating the notability of the subject, per WP:CONTN. Gab4gab has added three sources already, with plenty more to used to improve...

Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:46, 8 July 2019 (UTC) That's true. But per WP:CONTN and WP:NEXIST the quality of an article doesn't influence the notability...

7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC) Shortcuts WP:ARTNWP:ARTN WP:CONTNWP:CONTN If you have RS add them in, just saying they exist is unlikely to save this...

the other articles you mentioned were not mistakenly deleted despite WP:CONTN and NEXIST or SNG, simply because no one took the time to fix it. Atsme...

WP:Before before proposing the AFD Shortcuts WP:ARTNWP:ARTN WP:CONTNWP:CONTN Actually I didn't add the references on the talk page. I rewrote the whole...

SPEEDY KEEP. A WP:BEFOREsearch I just conducted found many WP:RS. Under WP:CONTN, if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing within...

content does not establish notability of the subject as discussed at WP:CONTN. Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion...

the article", when such sources exist, in direct contradiction of the WP:CONTN guideline? Daranios (talk) 21:26, 17 July 2020 (UTC) Why do I feel as though...

(talk) 16:41, 31 July 2020 (UTC) If you will read WP:N, specifically WP:CONTN, you will see that the content of the article is not relevant to notability...

discussions. Hegvald (talk) 20:09, 12 April 2015 (UTC) Comment taken from WP:CONTN - "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article...

determine notability. WP:ARTN & WP:CONTN--MickeyDangerez (talk) 13:03, 6 September 2017 (UTC) SInce you are referring to WP:CONTN, the guideline; where is your...

but notability is never defined by the content or state of an article WP:CONTN. Ammarpad (talk) 05:58, 21 December 2017 (UTC) @Ammarpad: The somewhat incestuous...

establish or deny notability at AfD. This is explicitly ruled out in WP:CONTN and WP:NEXIST, both part of the relevant notability guideline. In either...

written. I know notability doesn't apply to article content WP:NNC and WP:CONTN, but I hope that those editors who believe this article should be kept can...

above. Your reasoning for it being non-notable is invalid according to WP:CONTN and WP:NEXIST. May I remind you all this AfD was created just 2 hours after...

Current page status is not necessarily an indication of notability per WP:CONTN and time would be better spent improving the page. Tailored searches produce...

April 2021 (UTC) Weak keep: I de-prodded the article on the basis of WP:CONTN, and to give it a fair chance of being saved, because there is a reasonable...

FYI, the current state of the article is not considered during AfD. WP:CONTN, WP:NRV —МандичкаYO 😜 14:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC) There is no point in using...

Comment, an article does not need to show that a subject is notable, see WP:CONTN - "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article...

article. Sources exist demonstrating the notability of the subject, per WP:CONTN. It has three sources already, with plenty more listed on the article's...

May 2015 (UTC) Comment/question Is WP:NOTPLOT grounds for deletion? WP:CONTN - "Article content does not determine notability: Notability is a property...

current content is not a reflection of a subject's notability, as per WP:CONTN. Comments above about The Daily Star are incorrect - it is a newspaper of...

discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:27, 22 November 2017 (UTC) Comment, from WP:CONTN - "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article...

(talk) 04:52, 21 October 2017 (UTC) Comment, nominator needs to remember WP:CONTN - "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article...

to the notability issue I raised in the original AfD nomination per WP:CONTN.) There just isn't enough supporting material on the performer or the act...

02:46, 19 January 2018 (UTC) Comment, "article provides no references", WP:CONTN - "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article...

content does not determine notability Shortcuts WP:ARTNWP:ARTN WP:CONTNWP:CONTN Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. If...

but there is nothing to show that the series itself is notable per WP:CONTN, "Article content does not determine notability" - Epinoia (talk) 00:49...

does not depend on the state of the "article in its present form", per WP:CONTN and WP:NEXIST. That said, I'd say an article with zero prose is right next...

the content of the article is irrelevant to the notability question (WP:CONTN). To say that the article shouldn't be included in Wikipedia because the...

pp 12, 21, plus it would be nice if the nominator in future remembers WP:CONTN - "Article content does not determine notability", also that the article...

notable to me. Aoziwe (talk) 12:10, 18 February 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:CONTN. --BonkHindrance (talk) 15:29, 18 February 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...

22 October 2017 (UTC) Comment, hi Maineartists, please have a look at WP:CONTN - "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article...

from what I've seen. The current state of the article is irrelevant per WP:CONTN. Mdrnpndr (talk) 06:36, 11 August 2015 (UTC) Keep for now at least. It is...

principles that differ from the GNG. I'll go another step further with WP:CONTN: Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. Your...

promotional puffery - David Gerard (talk) 16:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC) WP:CONTN says the "present state of the article," or "Article content" does not determine...

2019 (UTC) Keep Notability is not about the content of the article (WP:CONTN), but about the subject. The German Wikipedia article lists 34 films, 23...

KeepItGoingForward (talk) 20:24, 10 December 2022 (UTC) Bearing in mind WP:CONTN, this is a sad case of WP:BIAS, given the plethora of Chinese-language sources...

current plot on the article's talk page. Please re-read WP:UNCENSORED and WP:CONTN, and try to stop making this film discussion to be about the drug Naltrexone...

the current state of the article will be irrelevant per WP:NEXIST and WP:CONTN. Link20XX (talk) 14:06, 3 June 2021 (UTC) Indecisive -- I would like to...

Delete Mr. Vujcic might be a talented sports journalist but I'm afraid WP:CONTN applies here. --N Jordan (talk) 23:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC) Delete per...

The current state of the article does not affect its notabilty, per WP:CONTN. In terms of availability of sources, A Google search indicates a fair amount...

the content of the article is irrelevant to the notability question (WP:CONTN). To say that the article shouldn't be included in Wikipedia because the...

size doesn't matter? needs improvement but editors need to remember WP:CONTN, sources discussed above/listed in the article indicate notability so a...

article may need improvement, but content does not affect notability WP:CONTN. Books, such a The Pilgrim Church by E.H. Broadbent, trace the development...

who do. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:17, 14 December 2022 (UTC) Per WP:CONTN, "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article."...

research. Also, a plea to nominators of afds, pleeeeeezzzz remember WP:CONTN ie. Article content does not determine notability, and WP:BEFORE - D. Search...

or routine coverage is not enough, as WP:SIGCOV is not met and fails WP:CONTN. This newly establish company requries WP:NRVE and if the company was notable...

going coverage and recognition from numerous reputable sources. WP:ARTN WP:CONTN Article content does not determine notability. Irregardless of whether we...

bread, article now reflects this (although editors need to remember WP:CONTN) with sources added by Mccapra (thankyou:)). Coolabahapple (talk) 07:59...

page. I do not understand why you care if he is a child prodigy or not (WP:CONTN), please direct me to the right part of a Wikipedia deletion policy. Some...

are not required from the content of the article, only to its subject (WP:CONTN). So, not the sources, but the notability of the subject should be discussed...

but this should not have been nominated in the first place (noting WP:CONTN - "Article content does not determine notability") as the subject meets...

April 2020 (UTC) Keep. I agree with the previous commmenter. As per WP:CONTN, "if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing...

2008 is irrelevent ie. "Article content does not determine notability" (WP:CONTN). Coolabahapple (talk) 17:57, 2 July 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

WP:COISELF. Besides being a war veteran, nothing else is significant. (WP:CONTN, WP:NTEMP, WP:SUSTAINED) Your welcome | Democratics Talk 08:57, 4 February...

before but I'll say it again: content does not determine notability (WP:CONTN). Notability is determined solely by coverage in reliable sources. Why do...

sources', 'can't find any sources', and 'no good sources in the article'. WP:CONTN specifically makes the last point not worth anything. Now the 'keep' arguments:...

independent coverage. PeterTheFourth (talk) 05:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC) Keep per WP:CONTN a quick news search for "National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association"...

WP:NSOFTWARE. Although the article may not be ideal, at least remembering about WP:CONTN a quick search beyond shows the subject looks not too famous but notable...

published. Jonathan170 (talk) 00:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC) Comment Wouldn’t WP:CONTN apply? Deletion is based on notability, not on article content. Park3r (talk)...

point is that it's useless and misleading in its current form", see WP:CONTN, emphasises that notability is of the subject and not of the wikiarticle...

have many stub and otherwise imperfect articles about notable topics. WP:CONTN and WP:PAGEDECIDE both address those concerns of yours. Neither supports...

a subject is notable its notable, articles don't need to show this - WP:CONTN, anyway, sources were added in October 2013 - [29], but were then deleted...

21 April 2019 (UTC) Comment Notability is not about the article, per WP:CONTN. Quite a bit has been written about her (enough to meet WP:GNG), but whether...

connection to them, are unlikely to be strong evidence of notability. Also WP:CONTN: Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article. If...

eliminating all citations doesn't change the notability of the topic. See WP:CONTN. — Nomopbs (talk) 04:43, 14 August 2019 (UTC) Focus on content and stop...

before the big bad editors destroy you!), just a small reminder from WP:CONTN - "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article...

English article leaves a lot to be desired (but not relevant in AfD per WP:CONTN and WP:NEXIST), but could be brought into something much more acceptable...

work. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:19, 12 December 2022 (UTC) See also WP:CONTN KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 22:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC) Keep looking beyond the...

survivors were junior officers, etc), or editing/deleting - but per WP:CONTN, that is not a reason for deletion. RebeccaGreen (talk) 20:53, 22 June 2019...

deletion decision should not be based on the current status of an article (WP:CONTN, WP:AtD, etc.), assuming that it can be improved. I am convinced it can...

Eppstein (talk) 19:08, 22 September 2019 (UTC) Keep. Clearly a case of WP:CONTN. Passes WP:BIO. Worth noting his archive is maintained at the IISG here...

appropriateness of content are separate (though related) questions: see WP:NNC and WP:CONTN. When a newspaper decides to cover a company, that is evidence of the company's...

covered elsewhere - I know that content does not determine notability WP:CONTN, but this article is almost incomprehensible - it reads like a badly written...

is explicitly ruled out in our notability guideline at WP:NEXIST and WP:CONTN. That's something for our normal ongoing article improvement processes,...

Along with secondary sources being used throughout the article. The WP:CONTN states that if the source material exists, then even very poor writing and...

work. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:19, 12 December 2022 (UTC) See also WP:CONTN KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 22:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC) Keep looking beyond the...

in a news program is not enough to establish notability. The point of WP:CONTN is it applies both ways, no amount of trivial, WP:PROMO additions to an...

2017 (UTC) Keep In response to references not being PRIMARY sources: WP:CONTN - "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article...

have many stub and otherwise imperfect articles about notable topics. WP:CONTN and WP:PAGEDECIDE both address those concerns of yours. Neither supports...

before but I'll say it again: content does not determine notability (WP:CONTN). Notability is determined solely by coverage in reliable sources. Why do...

June 2015 (UTC) The AfD is not decided on the article's contents. Per WP:CONTN: “Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article....

WP:REFUND, WP:DRVPURPOSE, WP:MERGE, WP:TNT Content/notability concerns:WP:CONTN,WP:NRV, WP:NEXIST/ WP:N, WP:FAILN, WP:GNG,WP:SUSTAINED, WP:NOTMADEUP; size...

(UTC) Endorse – the close was accurately based on WP:PAG, specifically CONTN, NEXIST and GEOLAND. Atsme 💬 📧 09:39, 3 September 2022 (UTC) Endorse per...

editing/formatting in the world is not going to make someone Wikipedia notable per WP:CONTN. I suggest you take a look at WP:NACTOR, WP:MUSICBIO and WP:PEOPLE to see...

determine notability. WP:ARTN & WP:CONTN--MickeyDangerez (talk) 13:03, 6 September 2017 (UTC) SInce you are referring to WP:CONTN, the guideline; where is your...

WP:REFUND, WP:DRVPURPOSE, WP:MERGE, WP:TNT Content/notability concerns:WP:CONTN,WP:NRV, WP:NEXIST/ WP:N, WP:FAILN, WP:GNG,WP:SUSTAINED, WP:NOTMADEUP; size...

(UTC) Endorse – the close was accurately based on WP:PAG, specifically CONTN, NEXIST and GEOLAND. Atsme 💬 📧 09:39, 3 September 2022 (UTC) Endorse per...

you again C.Fred. I do appreciate the help. Is that principle called WP:CONTN? Please try to grasp the confusion that the conflict between above guidance...

(talk) 03:04, 28 January 2021 (UTC) Shortcuts WP:ARTNWP:ARTN WP:CONTNWP:CONTN Actually I didn't add the references on the talk page. I rewrote the whole...

work on trigonometric functions, and were tabulated extensively. See WP:CONTN: the current situation is not particularly problematic from a mathematical...

the subject? The article content does not determine notability, see WP:CONTN. Broc (talk) 21:22, 22 June 2024 (UTC) Keep. Passes WP:GNG with an in-depth...

rewrite and the inclusion of additional references. However, as per WP:CONTN and WP:NPOSSIBLE, the current state of the article has no bearing on its...

21:37, 28 October 2024 (UTC) Keep, badly written is not a WP:DELREASON (WP:CONTN). It clearly has the history and can also be converted to a contemporary...

through text. Normanhunter2 (talk) 19:14, 4 July 2024 (UTC) I forgot about WP:CONTN, disregard the message where it includes the articles content. Normanhunter2...

qualify for WP:GNG, rather than directly improving the article per se, see WP:CONTN. I will say I am quite impressed with what you have accomplished given the...

keep votes assert that article content does not determine notability WP:CONTN, which is fair enough to point out. I take issue with the assertion that...

through text. Normanhunter2 (talk) 19:14, 4 July 2024 (UTC) I forgot about WP:CONTN, disregard the message where it includes the articles content. Normanhunter2...

notability, one doesn't even need to look at the content of the article per WP:CONTN. Subject notability is independent of the article. I will also throw in...

22:01, 28 May 2025 (UTC) Notability isn't based on the article quality (WP:CONTN). I removed the X (Twitter) source. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 22:13, 28 May...

Talk:Rosemount High School Talk:Rosemount High School (Montreal). According to WP:CONTN, Article content does not determine notability ...if the source material...

article is pretty obvious and it should receive the relevant tags, but WP:CONTN applies. Additionally, given the depth of personal detail that multiple...

because notability does not have anything to do with article content: WP:CONTN. The bottom line is that Boetzel has created and played a major role in...

irrelevant to notability as per WP:NEXIST and length is irrelevant as per WP:CONTN. Moreover, WP:NLIST acknowledges potential exceptions to WP:GNG for certain...

standard, but articles are kept or deleted based on their notability (per WP:CONTN which is part of a guideline, rather than an essay). As such, the HEY standard...