DOKUMEN123.COM

{{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}} Shortcut WP:CONREDWP:CONRED If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider...

under Constituent colleges, item #212, so I'm not sure why this is a WP:CONRED, and leaving the search term seems preferable. --Muhandes (talk) 14:23,...

No useful sources were surfaced by the minimum searches mentioned in WP:CONRED. A previous PROD was contested. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:08, 26 May 2023 (UTC)...

GNG-level sources were surfaced by the minimum searches mentioned in WP:CONRED. PROD was contested. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC) Note: This...

No useful sources were surfaced by the minimum searches mentioned in WP:CONRED. A previous PROD was contested. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:06, 26 May 2023 (UTC)...

editorial process.4meter4 (talk) 20:40, 21 June 2022 (UTC) Actually, per WP:CONRED, AfD is an acceptable place to discuss contested redirects as well, no need...

GNG-level sources were surfaced by the minimum searches mentioned in WP:CONRED. PROD was contested. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:40, 2 June 2023 (UTC) Note: This...

be dealt with via normal editing or cleanup tags rather than deletion WP:CONRED. I'd also suggest C2 should have been considered prior to the AfD process...

GNG-level sources were surfaced by the minimum searches mentioned in WP:CONRED. A previous PROD was self-reverted. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:37, 1 June 2023...

No useful sources were surfaced by the minimum searches mentioned in WP:CONRED. A previous PROD was contested. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:19, 25 May 2023 (UTC)...

No useful sources were surfaced by the minimum searches mentioned in WP:CONRED. A previous PROD was contested. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:24, 25 May 2023 (UTC)...

article can certainly be expanded and improved: please see WP:BEFORE and WP:CONRED. Dormskirk (talk) 09:38, 3 November 2022 (UTC) A wide range of sources?...

exist, though of course listing them in the article is preferable (see WP:CONRED). Was a BEFORE done on this, Just Another Cringy Username? There are reviews...

No useful sources were surfaced by the minimum searches mentioned in WP:CONRED. A previous PROD was contested.-MPGuy2824 (talk) 01:58, 17 May 2023 (UTC)...

with Me 19:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC) For future reference, it's covered at WP:CONRED - "If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they...

(UTC) Edit: I see there's actually a redirect for this purpose already: WP:CONRED. Looks like AfD is the appropriate venue. Suriname0 (talk) 19:20, 29 April...

present in the article (although the latter is preferable long term). Per WP:CONRED, "If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they...

(UTC) Keep as per SuperJew above. The nominator in question fails to WP:CONRED to keep their logs up, and edges ever closer to be considered for a topic...

substantial body work for which they have received numerous awards. As Wikipedia:CONRED says If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not...

AFD is an appropriate place to discuss controversial redirects; see WP:CONRED. Suriname0 (talk) 19:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC) Comment Which sources support...

check if other sources existed in books and academic sources as per WP:CONRED? I dont see here any arguments that challenge its WP:NOTABILITY. I have...

(talk|contribs) 01:01, 3 March 2026 (UTC) Note: This request has been made per WP:CONRED. Jacksonvil (talk|contribs) 01:04, 3 March 2026 (UTC) Retarget to List of...

settle controversial or contested cases of blanking and redirecting. and WP:CONRED, which is part of WP:BEFORE, says that If a redirection is controversial...

accessible with your Wikipedia library login, but WP:BEFORE in Section D.2 (WP:CONRED) says to make use of the Wikipedia Library. Which is an absolute must if...

assertion is the article could not be "fixed by normal editing" under WP:CONRED. Fram has rejected the idea of a merge discussion, which is how I assumed...

guilty before being proven innocent or personalities when per: Wikipedia:CONRED: If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate...

imagine such an argument for their deletion. Sources must be added, but WP:CONRED clearly suggests that this should not be a reasoning if improvement can...

discuss potential merges and redirects is encouraged in some cases per WP:CONRED: If a redirection is controversial, however, AfD may be an appropriate venue...

(talk) 08:17, 21 August 2023 (UTC) OK, let's look at the guideline. Under WP:CONRED you are supposed under D3 to have considered the referencing, and concluded...

people from this era); see the instructions at WP:AFD - particularly WP:CONRED in WP:BEFORE about "Search for additional sources, if the main concern is...

text includes many wikilinks so please let me suggest that you read WP:CONRED and kindly familiarise yourself with other important portions of the AfD...

week). It is not the CVU sensationalizing it. And if that is what you are conred with tehn a revamp of the CVU page would take are of most of that. As I...

first. Feel free to change this tag if the parameters were changed in error. Guide to WikiProjects Directory of WikiProjects Shortcut WP:CONRESWP:CONRES...

access is available to virtually everyone through Wikipedia Library. WP:CONRED suggests using Wikipedia Library WP:BEFORE nominating. Perhaps not necessary...

I'm proposing a redirect to Great Barrington Declaration#Sponsor as a WP:CONRED. All the secondary sourcing I could find basically discuss the organisation...

the bold merge was rejected the appropriate action, per WP:ATD-R and WP:CONRED #4, is to open an AfD. You also misrepresent my nomination, which was on...

should open that discussion instead of engaging in edit warring. Per WP:CONRED, If a redirection is controversial, however, AfD may be an appropriate venue...

getting back at me, even though I specifically requested he abide by WP:CONRED which he hasn't. Be that as it may... I think the article as it currently...

participants are expected to use them; especially the nominator. Per WP:CONRED, "The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books...

actually being referenced in the article is not a basis for deletion (WP:CONRED). Nfitz (talk) 14:25, 11 November 2021 (UTC) Strong keep refactoring my...

that. The additional part I was commenting on in BEFORE in C (such as WP:CONRED) was that you are expected to fix these problems through normal editing...

editorial process.4meter4 (talk) 20:40, 21 June 2022 (UTC) Actually, per WP:CONRED, AfD is an acceptable place to discuss contested redirects as well, no need...

text includes many wikilinks so please let me suggest that you read WP:CONRED and kindly familiarise yourself with other important portions of the AfD...

imagine such an argument for their deletion. Sources must be added, but WP:CONRED clearly suggests that this should not be a reasoning if improvement can...

article can certainly be expanded and improved: please see WP:BEFORE and WP:CONRED. Dormskirk (talk) 09:38, 3 November 2022 (UTC) A wide range of sources?...

actually being referenced in the article is not a basis for deletion (WP:CONRED). Nfitz (talk) 14:25, 11 November 2021 (UTC) Strong keep refactoring my...

Orange and Mary: offered secretaryship of state, 1677; too* part in the conre at Nimeguen, bat disapprove of the treaty, w:n offered secretaryship again...

exist, though of course listing them in the article is preferable (see WP:CONRED). Was a BEFORE done on this, Just Another Cringy Username? There are reviews...

be dealt with via normal editing or cleanup tags rather than deletion WP:CONRED. I'd also suggest C2 should have been considered prior to the AfD process...

under Constituent colleges, item #212, so I'm not sure why this is a WP:CONRED, and leaving the search term seems preferable. --Muhandes (talk) 14:23,...

with Me 19:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC) For future reference, it's covered at WP:CONRED - "If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they...

present in the article (although the latter is preferable long term). Per WP:CONRED, "If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they...

access is available to virtually everyone through Wikipedia Library. WP:CONRED suggests using Wikipedia Library WP:BEFORE nominating. Perhaps not necessary...

assertion is the article could not be "fixed by normal editing" under WP:CONRED. Fram has rejected the idea of a merge discussion, which is how I assumed...

guilty before being proven innocent or personalities when per: Wikipedia:CONRED: If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate...

getting back at me, even though I specifically requested he abide by WP:CONRED which he hasn't. Be that as it may... I think the article as it currently...

check if other sources existed in books and academic sources as per WP:CONRED? I dont see here any arguments that challenge its WP:NOTABILITY. I have...

that. The additional part I was commenting on in BEFORE in C (such as WP:CONRED) was that you are expected to fix these problems through normal editing...

January 2021 (UTC) Please see Talk:History_of_Texas_(1865–99)#a_word_--_"ex-Conre"_--_unknown_to_search_engines  Mike Schwartz (talk) 20:17, 12 January 2021...

No useful sources were surfaced by the minimum searches mentioned in WP:CONRED. A previous PROD was contested. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:08, 26 May 2023 (UTC)...

done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term. Shortcut WP:CONRED. If a redirection is controversial, however, AfD may be an appropriate venue...

No useful sources were surfaced by the minimum searches mentioned in WP:CONRED. A previous PROD was contested. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:19, 25 May 2023 (UTC)...

case could have been a WP:MERGEPROP, but could plausibly be framed as a WP:CONRED instead. Suriname0 (talk) 20:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC) Endorse - No Consensus...

attempted directly. —Cryptic 07:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) User:Cryptic, read CONRED more carefully. Controversial redirects. Really, that’s a subset of...

settle controversial or contested cases of blanking and redirecting. and WP:CONRED, which is part of WP:BEFORE, says that If a redirection is controversial...

(UTC) Edit: I see there's actually a redirect for this purpose already: WP:CONRED. Looks like AfD is the appropriate venue. Suriname0 (talk) 19:20, 29 April...

done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term. Shortcut WP:CONRED. If a redirection is controversial, however, AfD may be an appropriate venue...

accessible with your Wikipedia library login, but WP:BEFORE in Section D.2 (WP:CONRED) says to make use of the Wikipedia Library. Which is an absolute must if...

substantial body work for which they have received numerous awards. As Wikipedia:CONRED says If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not...

No useful sources were surfaced by the minimum searches mentioned in WP:CONRED. A previous PROD was contested. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:06, 26 May 2023 (UTC)...

No useful sources were surfaced by the minimum searches mentioned in WP:CONRED. A previous PROD was contested. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:24, 25 May 2023 (UTC)...

(UTC) Keep as per SuperJew above. The nominator in question fails to WP:CONRED to keep their logs up, and edges ever closer to be considered for a topic...

No useful sources were surfaced by the minimum searches mentioned in WP:CONRED. A previous PROD was contested.-MPGuy2824 (talk) 01:58, 17 May 2023 (UTC)...

GNG-level sources were surfaced by the minimum searches mentioned in WP:CONRED. PROD was contested. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:40, 2 June 2023 (UTC) Note: This...

(talk|contribs) 01:01, 3 March 2026 (UTC) Note: This request has been made per WP:CONRED. Jacksonvil (talk|contribs) 01:04, 3 March 2026 (UTC) Retarget to List of...

discuss potential merges and redirects is encouraged in some cases per WP:CONRED: If a redirection is controversial, however, AfD may be an appropriate venue...

people from this era); see the instructions at WP:AFD - particularly WP:CONRED in WP:BEFORE about "Search for additional sources, if the main concern is...

I'm proposing a redirect to Great Barrington Declaration#Sponsor as a WP:CONRED. All the secondary sourcing I could find basically discuss the organisation...

Wikipedia:Proposed article mergers as historical and adding merging to WP:CONRED. Not sure what exactly to do with TM:AfD and TM:Merge though; the laziest...

(talk) 08:17, 21 August 2023 (UTC) OK, let's look at the guideline. Under WP:CONRED you are supposed under D3 to have considered the referencing, and concluded...

org crnm.org aledmissionarea.org titanclydebank.com rivierematapedia.org conred.org edfenergyrugby.com greensblog.org holchanbelize.org editeur-corse.com...

01:00, 2 September 2025 (UTC) Specifically I mean WP:BEFORE#C4, aka WP:CONRED. It is very good advice if the nominator would like their AfD to be productive...

deletion without properly doing a Google search or taking WP:BEFORE and WP:CONRED into account. He nominated the Munachi Abii, Victor Thompson and Adeoye...

case could have been a WP:MERGEPROP, but could plausibly be framed as a WP:CONRED instead. Suriname0 (talk) 20:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC) Endorse - No Consensus...

attempted directly. —Cryptic 07:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) User:Cryptic, read CONRED more carefully. Controversial redirects. Really, that’s a subset of...

01:00, 2 September 2025 (UTC) Specifically I mean WP:BEFORE#C4, aka WP:CONRED. It is very good advice if the nominator would like their AfD to be productive...