Search Results: Wikipedia:COISOURCE
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Wikipedia:Independent sources
Rabu, 2026-04-15 20:31:10and avoids synchronization issues and link rot. Shortcut WP:COISOURCEWP:COISOURCE Any publication put out by an organization is clearly not independent...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vine awards
Selasa, 2025-12-16 13:17:30sources used in the article are self published, pr generated, and WP:COISOURCE all of which we do not consider reliable. A before search doesn’t show...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahriza Hussein
Minggu, 2025-12-14 09:02:38arrangements) and Hussein was a regular writer for The Star, i have WP:COISOURCE concerns with these, similarly with the Victoria Institution piece (he...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spencer Kuvin (4th nomination)
Senin, 2026-02-23 04:30:48other people he was litigating against (obvious conflicts of interest, WP:COISOURCE). WP:ACADEMIC says that researchers can be notable merely due to their...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Athletico Physical Therapy
Selasa, 2024-11-05 21:48:46of the PT company's clients, so not an independent source, that's a WP:COISOURCE. The YouTube video is published by the company's account, so clearly not...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LumoPro
Minggu, 2025-12-14 04:32:13(NOTSTATS/NOTCATALOG), advertisements, or sponsored/supplied review content (COISOURCE); these are not reliable secondary sources imv. Plus, all seven of the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alyssa Giannetti
Rabu, 2025-12-10 02:15:19team, etc.) which for me doesn't satisfy WP:SIGCOV and many run in to WP:COISOURCE issues (e.g. publicity by her teams/leagues). Upon a cursory search, I...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribute (website)
Senin, 2025-12-15 05:11:02organization thus can’t be counted as a reliable piece. See WP:ORGIND & WP:COISOURCE. To further expatiate on this point, I find them adverting(spamming?)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Coast Club Champion (AFL Women's)
Minggu, 2025-12-14 11:51:10club, and not by them, doesn't make them an independent source. See WP:COISOURCE: "Any publication put out by an organization is clearly not independent...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persecution Relief
Minggu, 2025-12-14 07:05:52that multiple reliable sources independent of the NGO should abide WP:COISOURCE to establish notability. Hence, we eliminate the publications which are...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trans Memorial
Sabtu, 2026-01-24 22:42:24don’t think that Xtra Magazine is an independent source either per WP:COISOURCE. I2Overcome talk 23:24, 18 January 2026 (UTC) I also agree that the author...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of college football coaches with 100 losses
Jumat, 2024-09-27 11:37:47contracts with per this comment from an older AfD, so it's likely a WP:COISOURCE, but the other four references presented above seem sufficient for satisfying...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Agra religious conversions
Sabtu, 2026-04-11 21:07:52FirstPost /TimeNow, where these biases were noted. Relevant guidelines are WP:COISOURCE. India Today is also listed at Godi media#Coinage. I have not found any...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of career achievements by Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
Sabtu, 2024-08-24 20:39:03in promoting him since he was inducted into the Hall of Fame, see WP:COISOURCE ✗ Fail Slam Online is an indiscriminate source since it offers a similar...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Johnson (labor leader)
Senin, 2025-12-22 06:13:05cannot be truly independent if written by staff of an entity. See WP:COISOURCE, "less direct interests can be harder to see and more subjective to establish...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Monster
Rabu, 2025-12-10 12:05:52delete per WP:G10 as a wholly negative BLP. The PPC Ian interview fails WP:COISOURCE as the author has a COI with Epik. The HuffPost article should be taken...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1086
Kamis, 2025-11-13 18:37:55changes (removing the master's thesis etc, removal and discussion of WP:COISOURCE which is also the correct policy to apply wrt publications). So if anything...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1075
Rabu, 2026-02-18 13:31:54should not be repeated but is not sanctionable by itself). Arguing WP:COISOURCE is not pushing a fringe theory or conspiracy theory, and I actually think...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rasheed Ayobami Aranmolate
Sabtu, 2025-09-27 04:05:44than WP:NEWSORGNIGERIA does (arguably less). Even putting aside the WP:COISOURCE/WP:SPIP concerns, which I feel like you're not actually engaging with...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Wood
Jumat, 2024-11-01 09:34:45(link) was authored by the article subject's daughter, so clearly a WP:COISOURCE, not independent. Left guide (talk) 01:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 November 3
Sabtu, 2023-11-11 10:02:40are published by the article subject's employer and thus fall under WP:COISOURCE. As for the others, citations 5 and 7 do not provide significant ccoverage...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 294
Jumat, 2026-02-13 03:04:15citing genre based material published by Bandcamp, personally I think WP:COISOURCE applies, it's not a WP:IS because of its commercial nature; what Bandcamp...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 January 3
Jumat, 2022-01-14 07:58:25(NOTSTATS/NOTCATALOG), advertisements, or sponsored/supplied review content (COISOURCE); these are not reliable secondary sources imv. Plus, all seven of the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 May 24
Jumat, 2021-06-04 13:03:55club, and not by them, doesn't make them an independent source. See WP:COISOURCE: "Any publication put out by an organization is clearly not independent...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharifa Yazmeen
Selasa, 2026-02-10 11:07:44to demonstrate notability. You may want to review WP:PRSOURCE and WP:COISOURCE. —BrechtBro (talk) 03:50, 31 January 2026 (UTC) Wikipedia:Independent...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 December 29
Senin, 2022-01-10 01:51:05arrangements) and Hussein was a regular writer for The Star, i have WP:COISOURCE concerns with these, similarly with the Victoria Institution piece (he...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 March 1
Rabu, 2022-03-09 14:46:36organization thus can’t be counted as a reliable piece. See WP:ORGIND & WP:COISOURCE. To further expatiate on this point, I find them adverting(spamming?)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 October 7
Senin, 2021-10-18 15:34:40that multiple reliable sources independent of the NGO should abide WP:COISOURCE to establish notability. Hence, we eliminate the publications which are...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 June 1
Jumat, 2023-03-03 18:55:03team, etc.) which for me doesn't satisfy WP:SIGCOV and many run in to WP:COISOURCE issues (e.g. publicity by her teams/leagues). Upon a cursory search, I...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 March 28
Rabu, 2022-04-06 01:49:12sources used in the article are self published, pr generated, and WP:COISOURCE all of which we do not consider reliable. A before search doesn’t show...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 May 18
Jumat, 2023-03-03 18:51:33delete per WP:G10 as a wholly negative BLP. The PPC Ian interview fails WP:COISOURCE as the author has a COI with Epik. The HuffPost article should be taken...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 359
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 23:11:45to Skeptical Inquirer, and so these references are a violation of WP:COISOURCE. I find the continued use of such sources on BLPs of people related to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zupan's Markets
Senin, 2025-12-22 11:23:35among thousands in the U.S. Unless there's evidence that this is a WP:COISOURCE (which doesn't appear to be applicable here), I don't see how this source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 426
Jumat, 2024-10-04 07:35:53independent; they are secondary but they fall under the purview of WP:COISOURCE, so they likely don't count towards notability. Limited uses with in-text...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 462
Sabtu, 2025-11-08 16:20:28those covering academic topics) are. This is explained further in the WP:COISOURCE essay linked in SPS policy. JoelleJay (talk) 20:11, 19 December 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 142
Rabu, 2019-05-15 10:21:39impossible. However a change in policy is not necessary. Guidelines such as WP:COISOURCE provide advice for editing contributions, which may originate from from...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive296
Sabtu, 2024-10-19 19:40:29stating it as fact. Bleepenvoy (talk) 08:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC) WP:COISOURCE having a lot of trouble considering the widespread conflicts of interest...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Zebelyan
Jumat, 2025-12-19 09:00:27mainly question and answer style interviews. These all fail WP:IS, WP:COISOURCE. Guideline states, "Non-independent sources may not be used to establish...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Heckman
Senin, 2025-12-22 03:48:59Dickinson College Written for and by Heckmen's alma matter, consituting a WP:COISOURCE. ~ May have been provided entirely by Heckmen without any editorial oversight...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 454
Senin, 2024-11-04 23:24:20seems to imply some sort of conflict of interest which would make it a WP:COISOURCE. Left guide (talk) 00:25, 18 October 2024 (UTC) Also this book published...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 October 29
Rabu, 2024-11-06 21:12:21of the PT company's clients, so not an independent source, that's a WP:COISOURCE. The YouTube video is published by the company's account, so clearly not...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 489
Minggu, 2025-10-05 00:23:37discussion, while there are probably cases where the distinction between a WP:COISOURCE and a WP:PRIMARY source (and independent vs secondary) is important, and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive347
Minggu, 2023-04-30 23:30:43grind." Springee (talk) 12:52, 14 March 2023 (UTC) There is also WP: COISOURCE in INDY that starts out with "Any publication put out by an organization...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 June 26
Jumat, 2025-07-04 21:29:45than WP:NEWSORGNIGERIA does (arguably less). Even putting aside the WP:COISOURCE/WP:SPIP concerns, which I feel like you're not actually engaging with...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 19
Rabu, 2024-03-27 14:25:41among thousands in the U.S. Unless there's evidence that this is a WP:COISOURCE (which doesn't appear to be applicable here), I don't see how this source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 22
Senin, 2024-09-30 18:52:17contracts with per this comment from an older AfD, so it's likely a WP:COISOURCE, but the other four references presented above seem sufficient for satisfying...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 116
Minggu, 2025-11-16 13:24:25as well as the recommendations and guidance from WP:REPUTABLE and WP:COISOURCE. Including the content that I added that cited the MJRC would provide...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 485
Kamis, 2025-09-25 22:01:27industry specific, the content is rather similar to trade press and the same COISOURCE analysis should be carried out for claims that are self-serving or exceptional...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 29
Jumat, 2024-06-07 21:56:07Dickinson College Written for and by Heckmen's alma matter, consituting a WP:COISOURCE. ~ May have been provided entirely by Heckmen without any editorial oversight...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 28
Senin, 2024-10-07 16:54:20(link) was authored by the article subject's daughter, so clearly a WP:COISOURCE, not independent. Left guide (talk) 01:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive365
Jumat, 2025-01-24 23:39:23harassment campaigns that include being swatted, stalked, which would be a WP:COISOURCE due to the friendship, and more than likely not considered a reliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 February 15
Senin, 2026-02-23 21:25:26other people he was litigating against (obvious conflicts of interest, WP:COISOURCE). WP:ACADEMIC says that researchers can be notable merely due to their...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 August 16
Sabtu, 2024-08-24 11:49:31in promoting him since he was inducted into the Hall of Fame, see WP:COISOURCE ✗ Fail Slam Online is an indiscriminate source since it offers a similar...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive372
Selasa, 2025-11-18 23:54:42this material: his profile at MLB.com (WP:PRIMARY, WP:TERTIARY, and WP:COISOURCE) and the stats website "Baseball Reference" (WP:TERTIARY and arguably...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 April 13
Sabtu, 2023-04-22 02:06:42mainly question and answer style interviews. These all fail WP:IS, WP:COISOURCE. Guideline states, "Non-independent sources may not be used to establish...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 February 2
Selasa, 2026-02-10 21:17:51to demonstrate notability. You may want to review WP:PRSOURCE and WP:COISOURCE. —BrechtBro (talk) 03:50, 31 January 2026 (UTC) Wikipedia:Independent...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 January 16
Minggu, 2026-01-25 09:06:59don’t think that Xtra Magazine is an independent source either per WP:COISOURCE. I2Overcome talk 23:24, 18 January 2026 (UTC) I also agree that the author...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 20
Kamis, 2024-05-30 19:16:11cannot be truly independent if written by staff of an entity. See WP:COISOURCE, "less direct interests can be harder to see and more subjective to establish...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 April 4
Minggu, 2026-04-12 11:24:22FirstPost /TimeNow, where these biases were noted. Relevant guidelines are WP:COISOURCE. India Today is also listed at Godi media#Coinage. I have not found any...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1138
Senin, 2026-01-12 19:01:20BBC employee, might, although generally being an RS, have a COI per WP:COISOURCE, and that The Guardian, which was also used to source what The Sun said...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive372
Rabu, 2025-12-24 01:11:06not source Conflict of Interest. A better analysis can be found in WP: COISOURCE which explains that "Any publication put out by an organization is clearly...
Click to read more »