DOKUMEN123.COM

edits should be made to this discussion. Shortcut WP:CLOSECHALLENGEWP:CLOSECHALLENGE All discussion closures are subject to review. Usually, reviews are...

to discussing the dispute with involved editors, as suggested at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. The community is encouraged to hold an RfC to supplement the existing...

The result was speedy keep. WP:SKCRIT#2. Marsellus W, please read WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Or I'm reporting you the next time. (non-admin closure) wumbolo ^^^...

to discussing the dispute with involved editors, as suggested at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. The community is encouraged to hold an RfC to supplement the existing...

The result was speedy keep. WP:SKCRIT#2. Marsellus W, please read WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Or I'm reporting you the next time. (non-admin closure) wumbolo ^^^...

(talk) 04:35, 2 January 2015 (UTC) Dude this is too soon. Refer to WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:57, 2 January 2015 (UTC) Given a no-consensus...

everyone gave good reasons for "A", but the summary said "B"), then a WP:CLOSECHALLENGE could be possible. If you think that the discussion came to the wrong...

at least consulting the administrator who deleted the article per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE since it was deleted via AFD. If you think the close was made in error...

to discussing the dispute with involved editors, as suggested at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. The community is encouraged to hold an RfC to supplement the existing...

over a period of approximately two days, and the suggestions at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE were not followed. The tenor of discussion was largely uncollegial and...

criteria, not on opinions of what should be presumed notable. See WP:CLOSECHALLENGE if you disagree with the close of that RfC. Also per that RfC, offline...

see that you are trying to contact the closing editor according to WP:CLOSECHALLENGE: it looks to me as if your other option is to take it to WP:AN). ColinFine...

restored because the close was in error? If that's the case you can try WP:CLOSECHALLENGE or WP:DRV, but it seems to be have been a fairly strong consensus and...

reverting without discussion is not the correct way to handle it; see WP:CLOSECHALLENGE for future reference. Regards SoWhy 08:52, 24 August 2017 (UTC) Persona...

reverted despite being advised to discuss with closing admin per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, which is quite similar to what SevcoFraudsters was doing (as discussed...

in the discussion, I am all ears. I would point you towards the WP:CLOSECHALLENGE page @Only in death: has already linked to, particularly this point:...

closer was a non-admin. If you believe the close was incorrect, WP:CLOSECHALLENGE applies, but this whole "only admins should close discussions, even...

discussion has been closed, there are options that anyone can pursue per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE if they feel an error was made. At some point though, anyone who disagrees...

24 December 2021 (UTC) I have boldly added a couple sentences to WP:CLOSECHALLENGE about this. Levivich 17:00, 21 December 2021 (UTC) The title of the...

might have caused confusion, but despite what Eightball posts here, WP:CLOSECHALLENGE is not some "made up hoop" that I've created. All he needs to do is...

in effect, be re-litigating the RFC, if only admins comment here, WP:CLOSECHALLENGE wisely makes no such restriction. It's more than appropriate to have...

think that the RfC overstepped its boundaries, rise the issue at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 10:19, 2 February 2018 (UTC) We are...

the talk page. I followed literally what Close says. It states, in WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, "Depending on the type of discussion, a review will take place at one...

contribs) @ 20:47, 1 November 2021 (UTC) The global consensus at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE is rather clear. If someone wants to challenge this close, they should...

am not ultra-familiar with the procedure here, having only read WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Is it frowned upon to explain the closing statement? If so, I suppose...

7 April 2021 (UTC) S Marshall, I'm puzzled. First, you send the WP:CLOSECHALLENGE directly to AN without comment rather than try to address it on your...

back to the admin and then be subject to the tedious rigmarole of WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Persistently editing against consensus has given Marchjuly something...

much about it nor do I think it would be very productive, anyways WP:CLOSECHALLENGE would be the way to go. Tayi Arajakate Talk 18:52, 5 December 2021 (UTC)...

were binding, but I reversed my overturn literally 2 minutes after WP:CLOSECHALLENGE was pointed out to me. As for the reverts at the other articles, even...

misinterpreted the consensus, then what should be done is described at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE; reopening a closed RFC by replacing the template with a new date is...

he should discuss it with Explicit or follow the instructions in WP:CLOSECHALLENGE and ask that it be reviewed. I believe the my removing the file and...

and the re-adding of the rationales and files was incorrect since WP:CLOSECHALLENGE was not followed. However, it also appears that the file's page was...

to discussing the dispute with involved editors, as suggested at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. The community is encouraged to hold an RfC to supplement the existing...

did not carry sufficient weight). That is how WP:CONSENSUS works. WP:CLOSECHALLENGE has guidance on following that up: Simply believing a closure is wrong...

discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE I'd like a closure review on Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015...

above was made, and noted that above. That is entirely compliant with CLOSECHALLENGE (which both Depiep and Wpegden seem unaware of). The RfC was subsequently...

company. – Brianhe (talk) 09:30, 21 November 2015 (UTC) I am following WP:CLOSECHALLENGE#Challenging_other_closures. I claim there is a problem with the close...

predjudice against the WP:NFCR being further discussed in accordance with WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Also, some form of WP:PP may be an option if blocking is deemed to...

re-closes over a period of a approximately two days, the suggestions at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE were not followed. The tenor of discussion was largely uncollegial and...

72.198.26.61 (talk) 03:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC) I am following WP:CLOSECHALLENGE#Challenging_other_closures. I claim there is a problem with the close...

is closed, Literaturegeek. That is not a recipe for a successful WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. El_C 01:52, 21 April 2020 (UTC) I just want to be assured that a WP:SUPERVOTE...

Peter Gulutzan (talk) 15:23, 25 November 2015 (UTC) I am following WP:CLOSECHALLENGE#Challenging_other_closures. I claim there is a problem with the close...

asked User:Edokter to post to WP:AN if he wanted to contest this per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, rather than repeatedly reverting me; he refused (see User talk:Edokter#Your...

further on your talk page substantively before bringing the next WP:CLOSECHALLENGE to the admin boards. As already mentioned, once a week may be too much...

«Restored revision 1059330603 by JBchrch talk): The way to go would be WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. This proposal just wasting time.» 08:57, Dec 9, 2021 - «Undid revision...

edits should be made to this discussion. Moved from WP:AN/I  – per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Swarm ♠ 23:08, 27 January 2018 (UTC) This is a request to review the...

back. — JFG talk 03:16, 25 August 2018 (UTC) Reviews at WP:AN per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE are undertaken by the community, not by a single admin; if a consensus...

message also verging on the personal attacks) has left Wikipedia. Per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE (diff), I re-open it to the community. Not only does it assume a whole...

GiantSnowman 18:29, 30 June 2015 (UTC) I would suggest that you should read WP:CLOSECHALLENGE as you proceed GiantSnowman. IMO it is unlikely that an admin will respond...

 — Amakuru (talk) 14:48, 7 October 2019 (UTC) There is a procedure: WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. But it is vague. According to this essay WP:AN is one appropriate board...

previous AFD did so in error, you can follow the guidance given in WP:CLOSECHALLENGE and discuss things with them and explain your concerns. If you do decide...

to discussing the dispute with involved editors, as suggested at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. The community is encouraged to hold an RfC to supplement the existing...

that would have altered the discussion outcome were it held now." (WP:CLOSECHALLENGE). If anyone is concerned about the "thousands of BLPs wiki-wide" (actually...

of those who participated in the RFC? If so, a closure review per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE is encouraged. I do not suspect there is an appetite for an immediate...

decision is not going to be the end all, be all of discussions. Also, WP:CLOSECHALLENGE instructs you to bring concerns to closers if you have any issues, and...

closer's talk page, I am bringing it here for community review per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. I am concerned with the close for two main reasons: FormalDude, who...

duty end (talk) 11:56, 6 October 2017 (UTC) (ec) Wrong forum, see WP:CLOSECHALLENGE: WP:AN is the proper forum. --Francis Schonken (talk) 11:58, 6 October...

01:10, 9 October 2022 (UTC) Overturn to no consensus. To put this in WP:CLOSECHALLENGE language: "the closure was not a reasonable summation of the discussion"...

_RfC_closure_challenge:_job_title_capitalization_in_infoboxes, a WP:CLOSECHALLENGE that I opened. GoodDay has made clear they strongly object to the challenge...

discussions explicitly states that "archived discussions are immutable" WP:CLOSECHALLENGE clearly explains the proper recourse for disputing closed discussions...

header. Refershing. BTW, I think you skipped a couple of steps of WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, Bob not snob. Anyway, with respect to Piotrus, this was an WP:ACDS...

experience on numerous AfDs. I reverted to reinstate the close, per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, (following a recent example set by an admin in a similar situation)...

the closure, Gwillhickers should follow the process described at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE (i.e. take it up with the closer first, and if that doesn't resolve...

resolution request closure. The way to challenge that is through a WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Greater care is expected on their part from now on. El_C 19:57, 17...

for content. [396]. This doesn't seem like an appropriate way to WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Sorry in advance if this isn't the right forum for this sorta thing—blindlynx...

belong there. If anyone wants to challenge the RFC then please see WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, but please discuss with the closing Admin first. Therefore, SV's statement...

further edits should be made to this discussion. Moved to WP:AN  – per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Swarm ♠ 10:26, 19 February 2018 (UTC) The discussion above is closed...

reinstate my close in 24 hours. After that, of course, the procedures at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE will apply. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 00:50, 4 October 2016 (UTC) I'm...

seems to me that if the close is disputed with have a process at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE that was not followed, and if it is not disputed the fact that it was...

(UTC) Reverts: Revert 3 Revert 2 Revert 1 - I advise you to review WP:CLOSECHALLENGE as I have not asserted any power. I simply attempted to close the discussion...

Moved to WP:AN § Request review of closure at Disk storage  – per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Swarm ♠ 23:09, 27 January 2018 (UTC) The discussion above is closed...

comments made in the RfC, I am not inclined to withdraw my close. Per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, a close review can occur, and it should include "a concrete description...

characterization of media sources. I request an RFC closure review, per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. - Cwobeel (talk) 00:10, 19 June 2015 (UTC) My reading is that Nyttend...

comment added 12:22, 24 February 2018 (UTC) Moved from WP:ANI  – per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE Swarm ♠ 10:28, 19 February 2018 (UTC) John from Idegon closed a discussion...

inexperienced users. That's par for the course. They're welcome to WP:CLOSECHALLENGE it here, but I doubt much will come of it. El_C 19:11, 7 March 2021...

October 2017 (UTC) As I said in the discussion below: wrong forum, see WP:CLOSECHALLENGE: WP:AN is the proper forum. --Francis Schonken (talk) 12:01, 6 October...

remove the close. Go to WP:AN and contest the close there. Notice how WP:CLOSECHALLENGE does not advise people to edit war with the closer. NinjaRobotPirate...

we pointed out to this user there, that the proper procedure was WP:CLOSECHALLENGE or WP:Deletion review they instead opened an RfC at the article talk...

sentence), in which case this AN is unneeded. But the Information page WP:CLOSECHALLENGE says "Most closure reviews need to be based on context or information...

The closer amended his close. Cunard (talk) 01:46, 11 March 2019 (UTC) The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments...

contentious topic area, and why it outweighs any concerns of due process (WP:CLOSECHALLENGE/WP:MRV) not being followed. There are a lot of good reasons we have...

movement to collapse or blur the lead image. I was told I could use WP:CLOSECHALLENGE to reopen the RfC, which I don't think is an appropriate use of Close...

brought up the idea of a new RfC.)[203] I was trying to adhere to WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Like I said at Talk:Donald Trump, I thought I read somewhere that that...

Please do not re-open or add to closed reports, that is not how WP:CLOSECHALLENGE works. El_C 16:49, 3 May 2020 (UTC) The discussion above is closed....

further, you may make a case to dispute this close itself. Please see WP:CLOSECHALLENGE for details. Any questions, comments, or concerns may be addressed to...

18:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC) @Levivich: the next step should have been WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, not AE. El_C 18:34, 17 March 2020 (UTC) @ජපස: but by forcing the IP...

have been created without TfM. The result was keep nonetheless. WP:CLOSECHALLENGE explains what to do in case of not agreeing with a close. Forumshopping...

anyone feels the AfD was closed incorrectly, they are free to use WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. — Gestrid (talk) 04:31, 30 April 2017 (UTC) I have left a message on...

(UTC) If you wish to challenge the result of the closure, please see WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. 207.161.86.162 (talk) 07:35, 12 November 2020 (UTC) There is an RfC...

renominated rather than following the proper procedure outlined at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE that might have been grounds for a speedy keep, but the nominator was...

so soon after the first AfD, it might've been better to explore WP:CLOSECHALLENGE or WP:DRV first — Marchjuly (talk) 03:54, 12 December 2022 (UTC) Hi...

with it. DMySon (talk) 11:12, 19 December 2021 (UTC) @DMySon: per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, close challenges of XfD's go to WP:DRV. Make sure to read the page...

closing it too early. We don't want the closer having to deal with WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. — Gestrid (talk) 18:44, 27 April 2017 (UTC) I'm willing to close this...

17 March 2020 (UTC) Hi Whisperjanes. In general, you can follow WP:CLOSECHALLENGE for any discussion that's formally closed, but in some cases that might...

the RfC close was inappropriate, you have a venue to oppose it at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. — JFG talk 13:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC) Millions of protesters have...

(transparency, and the opportunity to challenge the closure – per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE – in a timely manner). If there are a few cases where you can't anticipate...

close, then please discuss it with the closing administrator per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. If you disagree with how the NFCC is being applied in such cases, then...

over a period of approximately two days, and the suggestions at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE were not followed. The tenor of discussion was largely uncollegial and...

talk:Premeditated Chaos if you have a question about the close as explained in WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Premeditated Chaos should be able to advise you on what your options...

think that the RfC overstepped its boundaries, rise the issue at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 10:19, 2 February 2018 (UTC) We are...

RFC; if might be possible to challenge the close as explained in WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, but you can't really just re-open the discussion just because you want...

criteria, not on opinions of what should be presumed notable. See WP:CLOSECHALLENGE if you disagree with the close of that RfC. Also per that RfC, offline...

issue and they know it. As you have said, their next step is to WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. What do you believe I have done that amounts to censorship? ― Tartan357 Talk...

article, you can but you're going to have do so in accordance with WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:37, 16 November 2019 (UTC) I had a wikipedia...

There was no renomination so the standards about that don't apply. WP:CLOSECHALLENGE states that editors can use formal processes such as WP:DRV but you...

renominated rather than following the proper procedure outlined at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE that might have been grounds for a speedy keep, but the nominator was...

the RfC close was inappropriate, you have a venue to oppose it at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. — JFG talk 13:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC) Millions of protesters have...

There was no renomination so the standards about that don't apply. WP:CLOSECHALLENGE states that editors can use formal processes such as WP:DRV but you...

restored because the close was in error? If that's the case you can try WP:CLOSECHALLENGE or WP:DRV, but it seems to be have been a fairly strong consensus and...

close should be taken up with the closer or otherwise challenged per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. --DannyS712 (talk) 14:52, 15 July 2019 (UTC) Done - (Initiated 3648...

(talk) 04:35, 2 January 2015 (UTC) Dude this is too soon. Refer to WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:57, 2 January 2015 (UTC) Given a no-consensus...

by a non-administrator. Any CLOSE can be challenged/reviewed per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, but there needs to be a good reason that generally has to do with the...

reverting without discussion is not the correct way to handle it; see WP:CLOSECHALLENGE for future reference. Regards SoWhy 08:52, 24 August 2017 (UTC) Persona...

currently do have a way to "make sure RfC's do their job accurately": WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. aprock (talk) 21:41, 21 October 2014 (UTC) Yes but that is only reviewable...

the discussion that lead to the article's deletion and then follow WP:CLOSECHALLENGE if you still disagree with the close of the discussion. Generally, the...

is actually a mechanism to do so. That mechanism is outlined in WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, and involves a challenge on the administrator's noticeboard. An informal...

February 2023 (UTC) Maybe take it to the closer's talk page first per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:47, 1 February 2023 (UTC)...

by Explicit or feel it should be reconsidered, you should follow WP:CLOSECHALLENGE and discuss things with Explicit first. You just created Zephyr (rover)...

overturn what the closers concluded in WP:DAILYMAIL your recourse is WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 14:12, 9 May 2020 (UTC) I think WP:RSPDM in general...

to discussing the dispute with involved editors, as suggested at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. The community is encouraged to hold an RfC to supplement the existing...

open a discussion at WP:AN and ask for a review of the closure per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Tayi Arajakate Talk 19:56, 26 October 2021 (UTC) @Tayi Arajakate: I...

gotten the right advice already, but no one has yet linked you to WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Step one is discussion at the closer's user talk page. Firefangledfeathers...

Morbidthoughts, it has been closed by a non-admin it seems. Per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, that alone shouldn't be a reason to overturn or disregard the close...

after this discussion on my talk page. Although not consistent with WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, I have explained my reasoning as a good-faith effort. Eggishorn (talk)...

There was no renomination so the standards about that don't apply. WP:CLOSECHALLENGE states that editors can use formal processes such as WP:DRV but you...

rationale amended Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive281#WP:CLOSECHALLENGE: Should this closure be overturned? 19 June 2016 Wikipedia:Village pump...

reasonable to request that the discussion be relisted per item 3 of WP:CLOSECHALLENGE or even start another AFD per WP:RENOM (after a reasonable amount of...

with Darkwind who is the administrator who deleted the article per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. It would probably be helpful if you could add a list of the sources...

issue. If there was an involved close, that can be challenged per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. ~ Rob13Talk 23:17, 10 December 2017 (UTC) @BU Rob13: Please see above;...

have opposed it if I had, but the close was a reasonable one. Per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, "Simply believing a closure is wrong, even if reasonable people would...

discovered a lot more about the template and how it worked. Per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, a deletion review may be used if significant new information has come...

discovered a lot more about the template and how it worked. Per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, a deletion review may be used if significant new information has come...

of my edit and his response). I follow the protocol outlined in WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, which says: All discussion closures are subject to review. [...] If...

@TonyBallioni: if you find fault with the close, follow the steps at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE#Challenging other closures. Until then, the close stands. – Finnusertop...

to challenge the closing, they can follow the process defined at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE.- MrX 🖋 13:00, 12 December 2018 (UTC) The following discussion is closed...

challenge a crat chat closure, or any other RfA closure at WP:AN, per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. But you can only challenge the closer's reading of consensus, not appeal...

generally be applicable. I will direct interested parties to the WP:CLOSECHALLENGE and WP:FORUMSHOP policies and guidelines in advance. (non-admin closure)...

who closed the AfDs and explain what you want to do and why per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Perhaps they will draftify the article for you. — Marchjuly (talk)...

19 November 2021) A closure of the RfC was withdrawn following a WP:CLOSECHALLENGE at WP:AN. An experienced closer is requested. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 04:46...

from this discussion (or not) may be challenged afterwards, see WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, where it is said that a challenged close of what is discussed here...

reasonable to request that the discussion be relisted per item 3 of WP:CLOSECHALLENGE or even start another AFD per WP:RENOM (after a reasonable amount of...

still may be options available at WP:REFUND, WP:DRV or even per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE if someone feels the deletion was in error. At some point though, the...

multiple editors asking you to self-revert, then there will be a WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, and you will have massively increased the amount of bureaucracy on...

clearly a merge discussion and it was never listed at WP:RM. Per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, going to WP:AN would probably be the best choice procedurally, and...

The OP of this reveiw has not raised concerns IAW the advice at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE for a move or a close more generally. What should be happening is a...

case agreed that the question was bad, but that's not enough for WP:CLOSECHALLENGE so I don't see a way to overturn now except via a new RfC. Peter Gulutzan...

changed since then, please read and follow the guidance given in WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Please also note that this article title has also been WP:SALTed due...

sales was closed after being listed at WP:CR & rather than following WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, four editors have reverted the closure and the implementation of the...

close review? BilledMammal (talk) 09:55, 10 February 2022 (UTC) WP:CLOSECHALLENGE says nothing about review closures being an admin prerogative and according...

WP:CONDUCTDISPUTE, that formal closure review can be requested at WP:AN with WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, and that specific concerns regarding the close are welcome at the closer's...

ignored the other important reason why I requested this review. Per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE: "Most closure reviews need to be based on context or information left...

@TonyBallioni: if you find fault with the close, follow the steps at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE#Challenging other closures. Until then, the close stands. – Finnusertop...

edit the articles. Hot-button topics sometimes provoke unwarranted WP:CLOSECHALLENGEs by anyone who feels their side "lost", and if you wait for the reaction...

why the RFC closure was incorrect. You have the instructions at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE (which were provided to you many weeks ago on The ed17's talk page)...

draft a new close. That's not how close challenges work. Please see WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:57, 21 July 2025 (UTC) I'm also not...

see WP:CLOSECHALLENGE to learn how the closure review process works. FaviFake (talk) 23:21, 31 October 2025 (UTC) Please see WP:CLOSECHALLENGE to learn...

reject the validity of the WP:NSPORTS2022 RfC on procedural grounds, WP:CLOSECHALLENGE will be helpful. That being said, I don't think that there is any reason...

close of that RFC? # Why are those issues not best dealt with via a WP:CLOSECHALLENGE? Because, as an observer with no real skin in the game, I don't see...

latter case, the deletion of the file could still be challenged per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE and the administrator could be asked to restore the file so that it...

content about reopening discussions is about deleted articles. E.g. WP:CLOSECHALLENGE should generally apply to category discussions, but its contents don't...

wishes to challenge the close, they can follow the procedure at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE; but that means giving policy-based reasons why the close was not a...

sales was closed after being listed at WP:CR & rather than following WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, four editors have reverted the closure and the implementation of the...

procedures. WP:Closure requests and WP:CLOSECHALLENGE should proceed normally. But maybe another process after WP:CLOSECHALLENGE can be considered. Bogazicili...

--BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:23, 15 June 2023 (UTC) @BrownHairedGirl WP:CLOSECHALLENGE does not allow a deletion review to be used 5. to repeat arguments already...

the page is created. This may potentially impact WP:NOCON. Modify WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, Wikipedia:Processes#Formal_review and other relevant policies, guidelines...

bureaucratic/procedural grounds, yet at the same time oddly threatening to WP:CLOSECHALLENGE at WP:AN (?!?) rather than do the normal thing for AfDs and go to WP:DRV...

process outlined in CLOSECHALLENGE. They knew the next step after the discussion on my talk page, was to bring a CLOSECHALLENGE here to AN. Instead,...

(UTC) Endorse: DR isn't really a place to try to re-argue an FFD per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, and it's not clear how the closer's close might've been incorrect given...

challenge to the closure, then I'd suggest following the guidance at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Unless and until there is a successful challenge that overturns the...

discussion, and the relevant policies; I would not have closed otherwise. WP:CLOSECHALLENGE applies of course, if you'd like other editors to review. Please read...

attempt to re-argue the FFD, than argue the close was improper per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. As for examples of court cases, I'm sure you can provide examples of...

a very recent RFC. Anyone wanting to change it should go through WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. The idea that the participants didn't take NPOV into account is a none...

ce#Removal_of_Quillette_quote now closed. We'll see if there's a WP:CLOSECHALLENGE or something. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)...

RfC. They reverted the close, which is improper, and skipped the WP:CLOSECHALLENGE steps, which is also improper, and took a closer to ANI over their closes...

reject the validity of the WP:NSPORTS2022 RfC on procedural grounds, WP:CLOSECHALLENGE will be helpful. That being said, I don't think that there is any reason...

wiki. Editors are going to inevitably miss discussions. That's why WP:CLOSECHALLENGE specifies that people missing a discussion is only relevant if they...

that's one reason against using technicalities to overturn. Now WP:CLOSECHALLENGE asks people to point out what's wrong with the closure. It seems the...

Do not endorse the use of rollback, which was out-of-process per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. However, as Seraphimblade has already stated here that the use of rollback...

in my words, "sort of 'intimidating' the closer" @BrownHairedGirl WP:CLOSECHALLENGE does not allow a deletion review to be used 5. to repeat arguments already...

101#archive.today deprecation. On the off chance that it's relevant, WP:CLOSECHALLENGE specifies that contested summaries of RFCs are discussed right here...

anyone could undo my close. My closing philosophy is consistent with WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, which says we generally shouldn't reopen discussions when nobody is...

the editor was making an argument (and I'll borrow a phrase from WP:CLOSECHALLENGE) of the "significant additional information" type, while your response...

and the threads it references from before that, then self-revert. WP:CLOSECHALLENGE should not be necessary when the very act was wrong. Peter Gulutzan...

discussions isn't an admin power. If you want to challenge a close WP:CLOSECHALLENGE outlines what you should do. Since you've already asked BushRanger about...

even if it is unlikely they will be implemented. For example, the CLOSECHALLENGE of the 2021 admin election RfC resulted in consensus to discount arguments...

reasonable editor might have reached a different conclusion. Rather, per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, a close should only be overturned if it was inherently unreasonable...

thing to do, however, would be to probably follow the guidance in WP:CLOSECHALLENGE and discuss your concerns with the closer of the AFD first. Since articles...

the current title, but even then, that isn't the right way to do a WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. They don't seem to be outlining any substantial new information, which...

the June 2023 SMALLCAT CfD for Expatriates A-G: @BrownHairedGirl WP:CLOSECHALLENGE does not allow a deletion review to be used 5. to repeat arguments already...

clarification or express any concerns you have by following the guidance in WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. An AfD close can be reviewed in some cases, but there needs to be a...

BusterD (talk) 03:28, 21 October 2024 (UTC) Welcome! Go to Wikipedia:CLOSECHALLENGE. Electrou (formerly Susbush) (talk) 12:38, 21 October 2024 (UTC)  Courtesy...

FFD discussion, the best thing to do is to follow the guidance in WP:CLOSECHALLENGE because there's not really anything anyone can do here at the Teahouse...

(UTC) Oops, sorry if I spread misinformation. My understanding is that CLOSECHALLENGEs for RfCs go to the Administrators' noticeboard, hence the reference...

Similarly, if you feel the FFD close was incorrect, you can follow WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:25, 14 January 2025 (UTC) > I'm guessing Iruka13...

WP:THREEOUTCOMES). The RfC was closed in line with P&Gs. The info page WP:CLOSECHALLENGE states: Closures will rarely be changed by either the closing editor...

There isn't a clear-cut policy on when a close should be overturned. WP:CLOSECHALLENGE is an information page. There isn't a clear-cut policy on when to use...

have made matters much tougher for the accusers. ... So I (to quote WP:CLOSECHALLENGE requirement #1) "believe the closure was not a reasonable summation...

RfC. VidanaliK (talk to me) 21:48, 2 January 2026 (UTC) see Wikipedia:CLOSECHALLENGE. WP:AN, i.e. right here, is for any closure that isn't an AfD/RM....

merits and therefore cannot generate a binding waiting period (see WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, ¶1; WP:RMCI, “Closures without discussion”). The August close prevented...

May 2024 (UTC) Actually this is technically the right venue per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE (see section "Challenging other closures"), but OP should have probably...

the RfC outcome, they should formally challenge the closure per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE and yet this has not been done once. Mellk (talk) 14:34, 7 January 2026...

about the closure to try to resolve the issue through discussion per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. I see a clear consensus of editors agreeing that the RfC should be...

giving an explanation why this was done this way (skipping the normal WP:CLOSECHALLENGE procedure), nor addressing the points made in the original closure statement...

closure of another, for that you want to follow the guidance at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Outside of an explicit closure challenge at the appropriate noticeboard...

probably need to be confirmed through an SPI first. You could try WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, but the closer being a "new user" doesn't automatically make it a bad...

RFC closure is at WP:AN, rather than mass reverting changes. See WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 20:13, 6 December 2025 (UTC) P.S.: Of...

reflecting the consensus attained at the discussion, please see WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:10, 1 February 2023 (UTC) Official stats...

it would literally be physically unsafe for me to bring this to a WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. This is a remarkably evil situation. This situation is of your own...

(talk • contribs • global count) 19:53, 20 December 2023 (UTC) WP:CLOSECHALLENGE covers it. Basically it's just a post at WP:AN. I strongly that you...

(UTC) Endorse: DR isn't really a place to try to re-argue an FFD per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, and it's not clear how the closer's close might've been incorrect given...