DOKUMEN123.COM

create significant errors for others to clean up. Shortcut WP:CIRNOTWP:CIRNOT It does not mean "come down hard like a ton of bricks on someone as soon...

(please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 18:33, 4 July 2021 (UTC) In WP:CIRNOT there's something important to note: It does not mean we should label people...

add the Franklin template. As to questioning editors' competence, see WP:CIRNOT. The nomination's criticisms seem entirely fixable, and arguments that no...

(UTC) Well, WP:CIRNOT would consider that a personal attack, and I agree with that. -- Beland (talk) 22:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC) Sure, CIRNOT should be factored...

"intention to mislead the user"[91] Personal attacks and misuse of policies (WP:CIRNOT) (emphasis mine): "This is an example of your reckless, impulsive editing...

(talk) 11:58, 6 December 2022 (UTC) I think what Govvy means, and indeed WP:CIRNOT says directly, that we should strive to be as patient as possible and avoid...

User:Awilley himself. Your comment was a clear personal attack as per WP:CIRNOT which appears on the page you linked to. To make matters worse, you had...

listened to HighInBC and I am competent enough to edit here. Please read WP:CIRNOT "It does not mean we should label people as incompetent. Calling someone...

for that option also. ——Serial 12:49, 15 April 2021 (UTC) Dear all, WP:CIRNOT, Blessings, Yaakov W.Yaakov Wa. (talk) 15:28, 15 April 2021 (UTC) @Yaakov...

mainspace submissions. Also, I'm not sure why you're going on and on about CIRNOT — I submit to you that it is a distraction from the matter at hand and isn't...

indicated do not qualify as PAs in your eyes. I believe they do, based on WP:CIRNOT: "Calling someone incompetent is a personal attack and is not helpful. Always...

Alsee (talk) 23:39, 26 April 2018 (UTC) Comment I made a new link (WP:CIRNOT) that lists what this essay is NOT. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:31, 27 April...

add the Franklin template. As to questioning editors' competence, see WP:CIRNOT. The nomination's criticisms seem entirely fixable, and arguments that no...

February 2022 (UTC) I have read that many times. I suggest YOU read WP:CIRNOT. casualdejekyll 12:39, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Be nice to each other please...

don't understand what you're trying to tell me. I'd like you to read WP:CIRNOT, because the third point seems to qualify even incorrect punctuation as...

negated by the potential continued usage of it. As noted above that WP:CIRNOT says not to call people incompetent, which is what this redirect is doing...

reading more than the first few sentences of that essay. Specifically, WP:CIRNOT: It does not mean "come down hard like a ton of bricks on someone as soon...

hand To some inclusionist users lower standard may suffice, as such WP:CIRNOT says "It does not mean perfection is required. Articles can be improved...

hand To some inclusionist users lower standard may suffice, as such WP:CIRNOT says "It does not mean perfection is required. Articles can be improved...

IUndid revision 1248964967 by Skitash (talk)" 13:42, 2 October 2024: "WP:CIRNOT Undid revision 1248966675 by Skitash (talk)" Diff of edit warring / 3RR...

that doesn't have a page isn't a "mess". You seem to completely ignore WP:CIRNOT. Read this "It does not mean "come down hard like a ton of bricks on someone...

skills should not be a barrier alone to editing enwiki, hence why per WP:CIRNOT I suggested to the editor that they start suggesting edits at the talk page...

guideline. And as for competency please read the first bullet point of WP:CIRNOT, Mr Helpful Raccoon (not a personal attack, just a suggestion). And yes...