DOKUMEN123.COM

The BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (BRD) is one of many optional strategies that editors may use to seek consensus. This process is not mandated by Wikipedia...

editors exhibiting behaviors that misuse the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (WP:BRD): an edit (or revert) ninja a filibusterer. If the advice suggested doesn't...

shortened version of the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (BRD) page with focus on the crux of BRD and how it can be used to encourage discussion and collaboration...

regarding BRD [ [ W P : B R D ] ] = {\displaystyle \mathrm {[[WP:BRD]]=} } Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. B R D {\displaystyle \mathrm {BRD} } isn't...

sources added to the article. Davewild (talk) 20:08, 21 November 2007 (UTC) BRD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...

When editors tell you to "follow BRD" or that "BRD is practically policy", they almost always mean you need to follow the talking and editing policy....

as an aside to BRD or whatever else people have in mind. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC) Wikipedia:A note regarding BRD (edit | talk |...

consensus.  Salvio Let's talk about it! 23:18, 28 October 2011 (UTC) Wikipedia:BRD misuse (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Delete: Non-constructive...

keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:15, 21 July 2017 (UTC) 2017 BRD Bucharest Open – Singles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links |...

brd-org.se: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on...

brd-org.se: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on...

brd.rw: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en...

brd.rw: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en...

blocks. Here is the page restriction on this article: "24-hour BRD, 1RR=no". 24-hour BRD was and is intended to provide an improved restriction, in that...

Guide to deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! BRD PG COLLEGE DEORIA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...

3 days: 01:15, 21 June 2011 17:31, 23 June 2011 Both times he's cited WP:BRD, but to this point he has not actually discussed either revert on the talk...

BRD has now made some substantial changes to the BRD page. I'd like to know how much agreement there actually is on these changes. Please see WT:BRD#Recent...

Agreement ("SLDRA"), any edit that does not at least meet the standards of WP:BRD counts as edit warring. The most typical case is the following: Instead of...

editors believing that they "MUST" BRD. In fact, BRD is an advanced high speed method for fixing/building content, and the BRD rules, as they, are mark the...

WP:RS. Or they will revert you after you have removed the crap, then cite WP:BRD and bore you to tears on the talk page in the hope you will just give up...

What is BRD? The BOLD, revert, discuss cycle The BOLD is where making bold edits is encouraged, as it will result in either improving an article, or stimulating...

follow BRD policy. Where was your BRD policy on Malassay page? Where was your BRD policy on Ahmad ibn Ibrahim al-Ghazi page? Where was your BRD policy...

discussion moving forward, or concedes with silence (WP:BRD). If the discussion is intense, the BRD cycle may increase contention, such that the dispute...

WP:FREQUENTly  WP:REF  WP:CUTS  WP:LIKE  "WP:BEANS",  "WP:BALLS",  WP:AND  "WP:BRD". While these MOS:ABBRs  WP:ARE  WP:GREAT  WP:FOR  WP:RDRing  WP:TO  WP:A ...

Singles, 2011 BRD Năstase Țiriac Trophy – Singles, 2012 BRD Năstase Țiriac Trophy – Singles, 2013 BRD Năstase Țiriac Trophy – Singles, 2014 BRD Năstase Țiriac...

BRD Năstase Țiriac Trophy 2011 BRD Năstase Țiriac Trophy – Doubles 2011 BRD Năstase Țiriac Trophy – Singles 2012 BRD Năstase Țiriac Trophy 2012 BRD Năstase...

brd=20&g_thrd=1508. * Links added in this diff: www.kallery.net/q_get_pddng.php?g_clss=forum&g_prcss=thrd&g_tmplt=&g_brd=20&g_thrd=1508...

2022 (UTC) At Template:Uw-brd, it says that {{subst:uw-brd|Article}} references a specific article. I tried typing {{subst:uw-brd|Template:Eisbrecher}} at...

B-R-R-D-ANEW is not "following BRD" either. There are other alternatives to BRD, and sometimes they are more effective than BRD. See WP:BRD#Alternatives if you don't...

answering your question. You asked if BRD is a get-out-of-edit-warring-free-card. I replied, per BRD itself, that BRD is never a revert reason. This is intimately...

bravehost.com/ (8, 13, 3, 1) www.geschichte-wissen.de/zeitgeschichte/60-die-brd/114-rechtsradikalismus-in-deutschland.html (8, 84, 4, 1) 2009-08-14 23:03:15...

make it respectable. Having already had "I'm only following the steps of WP:BRD" thrown at me to justify a major deletion against consensus (and by the person...

amended it with a new version. I did not agree with the new version and per WP:BRD reversed this to the consensus version added by User:Thehistorian1984 until...

merging can happen outside of this AfD by editors being bold (and following WP:BRD if necessary). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:31, 30 August 2018 (UTC) [Hide...

without discussion or following BRD [2]. After 129.170 was notified on their talk page about edit-warring, 3RR and BRD [3], the exact same edit was made...

Confusion during BRD at ExxonMobil climate change controversy. It is my understanding that changes are not kept during discussion during BRD, until consensus...

merging or redirecting, but that can be done by anyone as an edit subject to BRD. Salvio 14:15, 21 August 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...

Talk:Benjamin_Constant#Inclusion_in_WikiProject_Libertarianism for a WikiProject scope BRD discussion] Defunct Cliff Hyra Draft:Larry Sharpe (politician) Please note...

yourself with WP:PSCI, WP:FRINGE, WP:ARBPS, WP:CITE, WP:PARITY, WP:LEAD, WP:BRD (and WP:CONSENSUS) Read/update the To do list Review the new pages log, adding...

Where a BRD sets off an edit/revert war, I can see the original BRD being exempt from the edit revert chain, but only as long as: the original BRD itself...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits on participation by all editors in a specific discussion...

discussion on the TENDENTIOUSness of reverting without DISCUSSion, on the BRD essay talk page, of all places. We agreed that obverting and restoring may...

Wikipedia:Reviewing (disambiguation) (WP:RVW) Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (WP:BRD) Wikipedia:Three revert rule (WP:3RR) Wikipedia:Replies to common objections...

thought I would mention it. I personally don't agree with one part of the BRD essay, the one where you discuss personally with one or at least two editors...

objections about combining certain sources, an editor should follow the WP:BRD cycle and seek a policy-based consensus on the talk page about whether or...

understanding of WP:BRD while continuing to revert war. Millahnna (talk) 05:05, 7 April 2011 (UTC) Betty Logan disrupted a legitimate BRD request as editors...

editorial decision, not part of this close, which may be challenged per WP:BRD as usual. JohnCD (talk) 22:11, 22 May 2016 (UTC) User:BeenChanged/Reds-Cardinals...

B-R-R-D-ANEW is not "following BRD" either. There are other alternatives to BRD, and sometimes they are more effective than BRD. See WP:BRD#Alternatives if you don't...

(UTC) So redirect it. If it's duplicative, just redirect it WP:BLAR and WP:BRD. Reywas92Talk 14:33, 23 November 2022 (UTC) Sure. I’ll let this run its course;...

Indeed it should redirect to Thirty pieces of silver. In accordance with WP:BRD, I've just made this happen.—S Marshall Talk/Cont 22:09, 15 March 2010 (UTC)...

found the edit legit, reverted him back (my only edit on that page). Per WP:BRD, this is the normal sequence of events, why jump the gun instead of discussing...

edits is part of an editing practice known as Bold-Revert-Discuss (or BRD). In the BRD cycle of editing, an editor boldly changes an article, the changes...

details should (at a minimum) be merged LOSSLESSLY into Eva O. Also, WP:BRD. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2013 (UTC) Reply. I have lost count of...

Page restrictions page protection, revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction...

Reverters don't read BRD. WP:Nobody reads the directions in general, but reverters, taken as a group, really don't seem to understand BRD. BRD is advice written...

longevity is more powerful than consensus and a damned sight better than BRD. With all its spam, frustrations, and broken dreams, Wikipedia is still an...

the existence of the article subject by years. The general guideline WP:BRD was also ignored when the above edit was reverted, with Astynax simply reverting...

but for whatever reason have not been promoted. Some essays - such as WP:BRD, WP:CREEP, Wikipedia:What is consensus?, Wikipedia:Quotations, WP:ATA - are...

The Muppet Show except for the WP:PROMO. I have removed the PROMO under WP:BRD but seems to me fairly obvious if the article was created in the same week...

going to have to list this out. BRD is not a policy, it is an essay suggesting one way to make improvements to an article. BRD does not give you the right...

you discuss edits like this. You are not abiding by BRD. What BRD? I did not make any edits per BRD. This is not a good faith discussion by SainAviator...

deviated from the BRD process with your second edit, and then continued with two more of the same. The other editor should have linked to WP:BRD in the edit...

is the same, but for a typical content mash up, I almost always utilise BRD, since it is a solid model of how consensus works, and that it almost always...

break-BRD=block rule [107] and blocked Lvhis for breaking BRD. Later, Tenmei broke BRD and Magog refused to block arguing that Tenmei did not break BRD [108]...

That's why I will continue to cite WP:BRD WP:BRD WP:BRD WP:BRD WP:BRD WP:BRD WP:BRD WP:BRD WP:BRD WP:BRD WP:BRD until you actually read that page and...

to this page. The result of the discussion was: speedy keep . WP:IAR/WP:BRD This is a silly dispute that MFD clearly doesn't need to deal with. It's...

one took the option of using BRD in a case where one ought to know it is not uncontroversial. There is a reason for BRD--it will at least provoke discussion...

noticed the user making the change, I reverted the change, noting that, as per BRD, the user should use the talk page to seek consensus for the drastic alteration...

casuistical response about WP:BRD (and see the related process discussion at WP:CON) is unconvincing. WP:PPP is also an essay; like WP:BRD, it is widely respected...

feel you were right, you can take it to the talk page to discuss. See WP:BRD. If you're really unsure, you can ask on the talk page of the article here...

because he says the WPC is not a reliable source. I followed the Wikipedia:BRD policy to discuss and attempt to come to a truce, however; swatjester does...

discussion, you're no longer on the BRD pathway, and you broke BRD. If the person reverts you again, they've also broke BRD. And both of you are clearly edit...

In a content or title dispute editors are generally expected to BRD if a change made is reverted however its not clear how long the new content/title...

tools seem to have improved interactions with new editors (for instance, BRD engagement, and newuser-welcoming functionality). Adding tool functionality...

2ad21f7a.html (54, 356, 3, 1) www.thebulletin.us/site/news.cfm?newsid=18220281&brd=2737&pag=461&dept_id=576361&rfi=6 (54, 68, 3, 1) www.thesunchronicle...

WP:BRD, which applies as much to the placement of tags as to anything else. [11] I revert, with a specific request for JHunterJ to follow WP:BRD [12]...

one or more if these as "Historical" at editorial discretion (keeping WP:BRD, etc. in mind, of course). - jc37 01:46, 26 April 2021 (UTC) Wikipedia:WikiProject...

Wikipedia:Ignore all rules = WP:IAR Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle = WP:BRD Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines = WP:TALK Wikipedia:IPs are human too = WP:HUMAN...

those groups, and hammer out an actual consensus. You can either use WP:BRD (small-medium scale), or occasional opinion polls (medium-large scale) to...

failure to engage and justify your edits, despite polite request in line with BRD, was this demonstration, therefore I find your protestation of good faith...

after someone objects, but generally the thing to do then is to follow WP:BRD and seek consensus. --Aquillion (talk) 03:55, 27 January 2025 (UTC) Well...

I get for not immediately dropping a 3RR report on you when you ignored BRD thrice in a row? Well, the chronology is nicely timestamped in the history...

Redirect, Merge or Take to article talk per BRD: No need for a big drahmah here, it's perfectly reasonable per BRD to redirect a start-class article to the...

opening a new section to do so, i.e: WP:BRD. In each of my reversals I urged you (and Bkobres) to follow WP:BRD and discuss the matter in the TP before...

that to be the result here so that should be left to the normal editing/BRD process. Ron Ritzman (talk) 17:58, 8 January 2011 (UTC) Mackerel Snapper...

proposing this merger or deletion, either of which I'd favour. In fact, per WP:BRD, I merged this page into Meridian Credit Union as it seemed to be becoming...

(UTC) Semiprotected, indefinitely. El_C 17:08, 2 July 2019 (UTC) Applied BRD sanction to 3 pages: 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries (removed...

April 2016 (UTC) BRD is an essay and strictly in conflict with CIVIL. –Be..anyone 💩 07:16, 16 April 2016 (UTC) It is true that BRD has never been raised...

WP:BRD, get WP:CONSENSUS for these changes rather than re-reverting." 10:33, 6 April 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 891199790 by Krimuk2.0 (talk) per WP:BRD...

nominator that this should be a redirect, so I'll redirect it myself per WP:BRD; there's no need to go through a full AfD for a redirect that hasn't even...

to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the...

the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 10:56, 8 July 2012 (UTC) WP-BRD → Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (links to redirect • history •...

where someone doesn't get what they want out of a nomination process, RfC, BRD discussion, or other thread, and feels that someone in particular blockaded...

Also, BRD doesn't necessarily give you "one chance" on every article. IF somebody has asked you to stop, in some cases you shouldn't then claim BRD again...

rename, so I've not implemented it as part of my close. Anyone is free to BRD as they wish (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 10:40, 2 September 2019...

added in 2013 (there was the B in BRD), then user Prokaryotes legitimately reverted that bold change (the R in BRD). At that point, the next step would...

02:47, 4 May 2016 (UTC) Procedural close - The move has been reverted per WP:BRD as Happysquirrel expresses reasonable concerns that it isn't suitable for...

it is the consensus. @AlexTheWhovian: - regard this as the "R" part of WP:BRD, and start a discussion on the talk page if you think your expansion should...

"new" editor reverts HighKing here and demonstrates knowledge of policy BRD. HighKing (talk) 17:51, 7 August 2011 (UTC) Accused parties may also comment/discuss...

you disagree with the closing editor's analysis of the consensus. Also, WP:BRD is not a guideline or policy and is meant more for content additions/removals...

yourself with WP:PSCI, WP:FRINGE, WP:ARBPS, WP:CITE, WP:PARITY, WP:LEAD, WP:BRD (and WP:CONSENSUS) Read/update the To do list Review the new pages log, adding...

times with this breaking WP:BRD and only then he started a discussion in the talk page. He was informed about the rules of WP:BRD and status quo ante principle...

should be discussed very thoroughly first. I immediately reverted them with a BRD warning. They didn't heed the warning and continued to delete. (That's edit...

the BRD) and failing to address the issue of article (independent) notability. WP:N The editor Rocknrollmancer has the opportunity to use the BRD discussion...

here. (No BRD initiated) Same style-expansion to different section (B) made here and reverted by different editor with explanation here (No BRD initiated)...

Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 22:34, 9 February 2018 (UTC) Speedy redirect and protect per BRD. WP:Pokémon test is a quite well-established precedent, and the page was...

The OP relates to this edit at WP:BRD. After being reverted by two different editors, the discussion should occur at BRD talk, and it is not necessary or...

article while complaining about no afd to put things back is usurping. WP:BRD requires that the original mover should discuss, not repeat the same mistake...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits for all participants in a specific discussion The...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits for all participants in a specific discussion The...

insists that BRD requires that consensus be reached before the other person's edit can be allowed. This wrong in so many ways: First, BRD is not a policy...

you being blocked under the three-revert rule if continued. The essay WP:BRD describes one strategy for finding conensus on the content of an article...

not created an article on a non-notable album in some time, even though WP:BRD allows me to do so. There exists a school of thought discussed here stating...

not created an article on a non-notable album in some time, even though WP:BRD allows me to do so. There exists a school of thought discussed here stating...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits for all participants in a specific discussion The...

discussion and strongly disputed by several editors. BRD is not written BR BR BR D. It's only BRD. You made a Bold edit, I Reverted it. Instead of returning...

be judged with the same degree of harshness. BRD is the tool that helps to determine this. The point of BRD is to force editors to reach a consensus on...

Shatter Resistance genuinely misunderstands WP policies, in particular 3RR and BRD, as evidenced by the edit summary here. Unless he previously edited under...

the language straight from the BRD WP:essay. Nearly verbatim (not my emphasis): The BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (BRD) is an optional method of reaching...

indiscriminate collection of trivial lists. Anyone who disagrees is free to apply WP:BRD. As for the main list, I have reformatted the list, and have added various...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits for all participants in a specific discussion The...

the talk p. for the article or the redirect target, which is required by BRD, and is the way to get a consensus on challenged edits. That was not a good...

--Vintagekits (talk) 13:21, 9 May 2009 (UTC) BRD isn't a secret I don't think - were you aware of WP:BRD? If so, the appropriate location also was not...

whether that be subsequent to a consensus on the talk page or under WP:BRD. Stifle (talk) 08:09, 3 June 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...

appropriateness was for BRD to decide. I'm defending Medeis in this thread, but I don't defend that particular case because it violated BRD. For now, BRD/consensus...

104.129, 1.128.105.231, & 1.128.108.41. No attempt by anybody to follow WP:BRD and discuss it on the article's talk page. Blocks all round? Cabayi (talk)...

to redirect this to Pattam Pole, but was reverted I'm nominating per WP:BRD. I dream of horses (T) @ 10:05, 20 September 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...

needed," and then not engage in any substantive discussion. In other words, BRD without the D. For a strategy to deal with this behavior, see How to respond...

bold BOTREQ (WP:BOTREQ) – Bot requests BP (WP:BP) – Blocking policy BRD (WP:BRD) – BOLD, revert, discuss cycle BRFA (WP:BRFA) – Bots/Requests for approval...

am closing per SK1. From here, the article can be redirected through the BRD process or expanded; I'll leave that decision up to individual editors. (non-admin...

invoke the AfD process to do this. No administrator tools are needed and WP:BRD is sufficient. Procedurally, because there are no opinions suggesting the...

further edits should be made to this page. The result was merge with WP:BRD (non-admin closure) Trainsandotherthings (talk) 00:14, 2 April 2022 (UTC)...

(talk) 00:20, 14 December 2022 (UTC) BRD* Elkhiar (talk) 00:21, 14 December 2022 (UTC) I see that you know about WP:BRD too (something you clearly weren't...

elsewhere. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:41, 8 May 2014 (UTC) Comment - I'm inclined to WP:BRD move/copy the page to mainspace, and then directly AFD list it. My reason...

to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the...

before the BRD promotion discussion began at Village Pump, and some of us ended up there with that dispute in mind. Most of us didn't go and edit BRD, though...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits for all participants in a specific discussion The...

moves that the nominator can make outside of this deletion discussion (WP:BRD). Malinaccier (talk) 15:00, 7 August 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

(talk) 18:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC) I have read the BRD cycle many times. Neither you nor I violated BRD. So the accusation of "disruptive editing" is false...

that article in the future (such removals would fall under the usual WP:BRD process). Yunshui 雲水 11:19, 6 November 2018 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...

replacing with redirects without prior discussion is an overbold use of BRD. The appropriate course is to discuss first, and then merge/redirect after...

"Enforced BRD" to describe a process that is not WP:BRD. Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle begins like this: The BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (BRD) is one...

not created an article on a non-notable album in some time, even though WP:BRD allows me to do so. In fact, the notability of some of the albums that BHG...

then, JFD and Jayjg have been edit warring to keep it off the page. Per WP:BRD, they should take it to talk rather than re-reverting, not in addition to...

edit. If you revert because you believe someone else will object, then the BRD process will break down. Shortcuts WP:STATUSQUOWP:STATUSQUO WP:QUOWP:QUO...

per WP:GNG. ― Padenton |☎  17:50, 22 March 2015 (UTC) Keep - Beginning WP:BRD now... -- IamM1rv (talk) 16:22, 6 April 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

multiple times (against their own advise on 06:24, 6 August 2008 to follow WP:BRD) the inclusion in the lead of the very short sentence: "Monogenic forms[5]...

make more than 3 reverts in 24h to violate 3RR. (b) BRD states: "The BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (BRD) is an optional method of reaching consensus" (emphasis...

it ever been how BRD works. That interpretation would mean you could use BRD to lock out other editors--the first person to start a BRD cycle would essentially...

other side blocked for "disruption". But most importantly, BRRR is not BRD! BRD is making concessions to the Terrorists, while BRRR is a POWERFUL WEAPON...

and unsourced content you should've gone to the talkpage as required by BRD (Copyvio not so much had you provided the source of the copyvio). –Davey2010Talk...

decided to incorporate optional clauses to be looked at in Berlin via WP:BRD to reflect different possibilities. Draft Ziko (and others) Ziko's draft...

articles. Largely a single topic editor he clearly doesn't understand how WP:BRD works. Another editor, AndyTheGrump, has provided numerous diffs regarding...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits for all participants in a specific discussion The...

disputes. Nowadays I take it straight to talk. Primarily I work on enforcing BRD. Despite unfair blocks (my last one), I do feel ive been going to talk more...

remember to be bold. However, on the other side of the coin, the opposite to BRD is simply silence. No-one says anything about the edit, for maybe a day,...

editor may revert it. This may be the beginning of a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. An edit war only arises if the situation develops into a series of...

5 August 2005 (UTC) Delete, WP:NOR, WP:NPOV, and reading it gave me WP:BRD. =P Xaa 00:42, 6 August 2005 (UTC) Delete OR. Even written in first person...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits for all participants in a specific discussion The...

have numerous factual inaccuracies. If this user would simply follow the WP:BRD policies, these errors could be sorted out. It is actually User:Kbrose that...

merely their willingness to cooperate. BRD – a guideline on article content (is this?) shouldn't need to go into the BRD process; it should contain guidelines...

support into article into the one with more support as a non-binding (i.e. WP:BRD-eligible) outcome. My hope is there will be enough consensus for a binding...

the situation? Option 1, doesn't fee like "Enforced BRD", it feels like "BRD-lite" or "Temp-BRD"; surely Option 1 is an incentive to stop having the...

Amaury's BRD request */ Reply" 19:30, 24 October 2018 (UTC) "/* Amaury's BRD request */ Reply" 23:56, 24 October 2018 (UTC) "/* Amaury's BRD request */...

I simultaneously fixed the policy page and added explanation to talk per BRD: 23:13 Dec 20, 2011 Phrase restored [12] 23:13 Dec 20, 2011 Explanation on...

state that they were trying to revert it to the version before ante per WP:BRD Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: See their recent block log - they were...

per nom. Izno (talk) 20:38, 27 October 2023 (UTC) Keep Like WP:NONAZIS, WP:BRD is an essay, not official policy, but there is general consensus in its favor...

to WP:BRD on the Don Bacon page and you yourself were edit-warring? I reverted the addition of new content to the page (which is my right per BRD) and...

time an editor adds unverifiable material (or indeed any material—see WP:BRD): reversion with a clear edit summary is a first step. With inexperienced...

WP:BRD, and with your wish instead to edit war. Jayjg (talk) 00:10, 9 May 2012 (UTC) ah jayjg, my other most ardent supporter. No where does WP:BRD specify...

deprodded it and added evidence of notability on the article's talk page. WP:BRD has not so far worked to resolve this so I am bringing this here because...

if BRD was followed as should be done. Just for the record though, before going over the 3RR I notified the original user at his talk page as per BRD, but...

if you are, just do it. If someone doesn't like it, you can chat. See WP:BRD 86.20.193.222 (talk) 20:36, 26 December 2017 (UTC) I've done it and so far...

change of the infobox image on Hayley Atwell, which I reverted based on WP:BRD. The former account made the same unexplained edit today, the day after Sudipto...

there is a link to WP:BRD in it. Being bold is great but if you are reverted, actually discuss it before making it again. BRD. Where there are DS --...

non-editwar contingencies co-occur); other wikis might not have this rule. If the brd-ing editor unreverts, they risk the other editor re-reverting back anyway...

for a "slight" (& sleep-coveting) 1RR violation, they are aware of 1RR + BRD on this page. Now my today "watchlist" shew this page turned to battleground...

about WP:BRD....after you again did not stopped [54], [55], [56] and I legally reverted you and warned to enter to the talk page, follow WP:BRD reach WP:CONSENSUS...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits for all participants in a specific discussion April...

just redirect them mate. If someone objects then it can be discussed per WP:BRD. Government agencies can be notable and many large ones are. But smaller...

than it was on BoogerD, per WP:BRD. The material was added (B in BRD). I reverted and requested a source per WP:V (R in BRD). BoogerD should have started...

was reverted, with the editor citing WP:BRD, but at the same time, the editor wasn't actually following WP:BRD. I think the above, plus reading the discussion...

has been doing BRD--a while back, anyway. I can see that. But not now, though. Even so, he's been edit-warring too. If someone is doing BRD but still keeps...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits for all participants in a specific discussion The...

watch | logs | views) Discussion at Talk:Iraq War#WMDs found in Iraq. WP:BRD. Relevant diffs: [1][2][3][4][5][6] RFC was bypassed because of the number...

14:43, 14 March 2010 (UTC) Well, I can just set up the soft redirect per WP:BRD without any further ado; if you're happy to withdraw the nomination, Emeraude...

minutes and meanwhile use the Edit Summary to link to the Talk topic. Apply BRD by discussing disputes, whether you open the discussion or someone else does...

repeatedly contested then there should be a talk page discussion, per WP:BRD. Why is there not? Phil Bridger (talk) 20:55, 6 June 2022 (UTC) Relisted...

not violated 3RR but you have violated WP:BRD by trying to add content without consensus in a dispute. BRD is not BRRRRRRRRRRRRD. No action should be...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits for all participants in a specific discussion The...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits for all participants in a specific discussion The...

- AffeL (talk) 10:19, 3 May 2017 (UTC) It's about time you did. Per WP:BRD, you added the edit, it was reverted, meaning that it was up to you to discuss...

revert restrictions, the “consensus required” restriction, the “enforced BRD” restriction [ONLY IF APPLICABLE] Specially-designated set [FOR EXAMPLE]...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits for all participants in a specific discussion The...

infodump, and the following discussion indicated to ChrisGualtieri that BRD and consensus was important to article-building [2]. He collapsed it without...

Lemongirl942 (talk)BRD - you can sek third party opinion immed" 07:22, 1 August 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 732477123 by Lemongirl942 (talk) BRD for sourced content"...

School articles before deviating from the current style. That being said, WP:BRD is important, and discussion on any changes is welcome; Pre-nominals (academic...

probability". If it is on "BOP" then this article should be deleted. If it is "BRD" then DGG has a point and I think there is some doubt as to whether this...

edit summary which states what the action was Now you can continue using WP:BRD if you are a mediator Keep your initial position to yourself. You are neutral...

Serena Williams article and then flagrantly ignoring WP:Consensus and WP:BRD by repeating the attempt over and over again. This is the same tactic that...

elements, and asked him to respect WP:BRD. He reverted again, as did I, and again requested that he respect BRD. SMcCandlish has since added his preferred...

at Spiral Dynamics where the above editor has violated both WP:3rr and WP:BRD. My real name is very easy to find as I link to my web site from my user...

and 2) It is only opinion that pages such as WP:BRD are in fact "best practices". I would say BRD is one of many accepted editing practices. (1 == 2)Until...

article is pretty short, and a merge may be attempted, following the usual WP:BRD process. Mangojuicetalk 17:29, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Alexander Arbuthnot (politician)...

assessment's quality scale, as it is clearly more than a stub. Read the BRD section on the Talk page. Tamiko Thiel There is no discussion of her ethnicity...

- initial invitation to follow BRD convention Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [146] - additional reminder of BRD, and warning of intent to file ANE...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits for all participants in a specific discussion The...

discuss (BRD)] "which presumes even a major edit may be tried out, unless another editor objects to the point of reversion, at which point BRD is complete...

diffs, and again cited BRD as justification, then called for "page protection" to shut discussion down, yet again citing BRD and making accusations of...

warring, and have a tendency to ignore WP:BRD. Regarding the content, that's not an issue for this page. Read WP:BRD. You need to at least try to work it out...

take it to talk page. BRD. Edit summary: YOU restored the prices first. YOU were being reverted. You should be one to dicuss. BRD doesn't work like this...

wrong with that? Isn't that how the process is supposed to work, through BRD? DN (talk) 00:14, 17 May 2026 (UTC) We don't want editors to revert with...

conerns: WP:POVPUSHing by: Failing to follow WP:BRD by not actually discussing (ironic since he brings BRD up) Failing to WP:LISTEN as part of discussions...

can be an alternate place for new ideas to germinate and, through the WP:BRD cycle, take a form suitable for successful presentation to community as a...

Bluebird207 (talk) 18:51, 27 January 2018 (UTC) Declined Normal editing per WP:BRD NeilN talk to me 19:10, 27 January 2018 (UTC) Page Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits for all participants in a specific discussion The...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits for all participants in a specific discussion The...

under discussion here. Best practice would go to the article and apply WP:BRD. John from Idegon (talk) 17:06, 17 March 2020 (UTC) Probably should that...

revertion could've left ColonialGrid safe from the BRD policy. However, his second revertion broke the BRD policy against him. I did a temporary 3rd revertion...

2009 and earlier. WP:BRD indicates that proposing new material is an acceptable practice. "The BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (BRD) is a proactive method...

-DePiep (talk) 20:53, 10 March 2019 a(UTC) As for the timeline: original BRD started 2019-02-23 [97] (talk opened by R8R, good). It was concluded by R8R...

AfD. Rlendog (talk) 20:32, 17 July 2009 (UTC) Comment - I believe that WP:BRD stands for bold-revert-discuss, not bold-revert-delete. Rlendog (talk) 20:46...

elimination really doesn't add anything to the article, I've removed it as per WP:BRD. Hopefully this puts an end to a rather WP:LAME edit war. TDL (talk) 06:48...

engaging in a discussion with the reverting editor to reach consensus: see WP:BRD. However, your edits make it appear that you have a conflict of interest...

about the edit content on his or her talk page, ignored the pointers to WP:BRD and WP:EW on the user's talk page, and didn't respond to my opening of the...

change? Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 23:34, 6 January 2009 (UTC) Delete - WP:BRD misuse is an essay, not a policy or guideline, and should not really be linked...

without discussion is disruptive. Those changes have been reverted, per WP:BRD. Even if it is removed from the Community Portal, which it shouldn't be,...

consensus" which is, as the saying goes, a page directly out of the BRD book. BRD is intended as a tool for finding consensus in difficult situations...

reverted those edits and invited the user to discuss on the talk page per WP:BRD. However, the user simply restored the edits without reaching a WP:CONSENSUS...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits for all participants in a specific discussion The...

[3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] When challenged, he states that BRD entitles him to remove infoboxes, no matter how long they have been on the...

the proposed redirect, but you don’t need an AfD for a redirect, see WP:BRD. Mccapra (talk) 04:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC) I would recommend withdrawing...

current BRD, as it would not require people to plead, and then wait to receive the reverter's consent before putting back the material. The design of BRD is...

not want to edit war or repeat myself to no avail. Also, BRD states explicitly: In general, BRD fails if: (1) there is consensus in the community against...

Unscintillating (talk) Again, reverting controversial bold edit - already attempt WP:BRD proc. on talkpage, prev editor has yet to participate - RFC) 2014-05-17T23:45:04...

contrary. Unfounded accusations made to the wrong person. Refuses to follow WP:BRD, starts editwar when her bold changes are reverted. Canvassing. The result...

really appreciate feedback. Rselby1 Rselby1 (talk) 04:54, 5 March 2015 (UTC) BRD-98 (talk) 19:29, 5 April 2015 (UTC) - Interested in urban geography, specifically...

worked by BRD all along in both cases". This claim is bogus. BRD says (quoted verbatim): If your edit gets reverted, do not revert again and BRD is not an...

- BRD is on the talkpage. using TW") 19:49, 24 November 2011 (edit summary: "Reverted 1 edit by Plot Spoiler (talk): Please stop tag teaming - BRD - well...

request debate is recommended. In all cases, name changes must follow the WP:BRD cycle. The following rule of thumb for determining what is current or historical...

respond to your objections while making a case in discussion, as per WP:BRD. The reversion must itself be a form of "discussion", else it is mere wp:status...

The consensus based on policy has already been made. again, please see WP:BRD. You're pushing change on established text and, even on "votes", you're behind...

promised to follow WP:CONSENSUS and to follow WP:DR when needed (see WP:BRD). Remember: academics HATE trying to edit Wikipedia because its purpose is...

en:Mickey Sherman (diff). Links: 203mediagroup.com/sherman.txt" www.journalinquirer.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=18294207&BRD=985&PAG=461&dept_id=161556&rfi=6....

usafa.org (-1, 32, X, X R/X/L) www.zwire.com/site/index.cfm?newsid=18784866&brd=1707&pag=461&dept_id=72297&rfi=8 (-1, 1034, X, X R/X/L) pawlingnewschronicle...

stupid saying made up on the Vestibule: http://boards.ign.com/Board.aspx?brd=5296 - Tal Delete - looks like personal joke. Jgritz 06:33, 15 December 2005...

recent issue, no edit-war though, since I'm following WP:BRD). User:Jaakobou does not follow WP:BRD, forces his preferred version during ongoing discussions...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits for all participants in a specific discussion The...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits for all participants in a specific discussion The...

Your central argument seems to be around WP:BRD, and your attempts to require others to follow it. However, BRD is not a policy, nor even a guideline - it's...

Kingdom#Images, again. - refusing to abide by BRD Talk:Prince William of Wales#Image - refusing to abide by BRD Talk:Prince Henry of Wales#Images here, now...

violating WP:MULTI, I started the discussion at the navbox talk page per WP:BRD, but I have redirected the matter to this location. I have restructured the...

follow the WP:BRD cycle, but was seemingly unwilling to take the matter to the talk page, so I eventually took it to the talk page myself. Per BRD, however...

suggest that Druaga make gradual improvements to the page in line with the WP:BRD process rather than seeking deletion. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 08:12, 19...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, and other restrictions that have been specifically designated...

[244] Comments: I applied WP:BRD but no discussion was forthcoming. The user has also applied similar tactics to my BRD revert at Climate of Ireland on...

| links | watch | logs) I have requested BRD which has been ignored). that is a lie first I requested the brd https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php...

right to tell you to take it to the talk page, per WP:BRD (which is not BRRD, or BRRRRD). Per WP:BRD, after the material was removed, you should have gone...

revert restrictions, the “consensus required” restriction, the “enforced BRD” restriction, and any other restrictions designated by the Arbitration Committee...

dispute you had with Iaof2017. And you left them a message with the summary "BRD breach" because they reverted your edits on Sarandë. Your message to them...

around to reply replies, and we only discuss when that becomes necessary (BRD, you could call it). Physchim62 (talk) 18:42, 8 June 2009 (UTC) The Signpost...

problem could be made clear to Montana, and they would learn to respect the WP:BRD cycle, as opposed to edit warring and simply ignoring talk page messages...

warned by me multiple times about WP:BRD which they undoubtedly noticed. I think they were already aware of BRD due to their knowledge of Wiki policies...

so far; this is the B in BRD. 09:42, 19 April 2019 [122] Pico reverts Oldstone James. This is also fine; it it the R in BRD. 10:28, 19 April 2019 (UTC)...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits for all participants in a specific discussion The...

list of appearances in media. Fails GNG/NFICTION.. I redirected them per WP:BRD and WP:ATD-R, but they have been reverted three times each. I'm getting very...

very first action with this account was to prolong an edit war, against BRD and other policies. Hmmm. Newimpartial (talk) 00:27, 1 July 2018 (UTC) Happy...

because we don't like it. Blanking is not requested, but done according to WP:BRD. I oppose the blanking of this page. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:45, 14 September...

desire to engage in discussion outside of edit summaries, then what is WP:BRD even for? Observe the avoidance of article talk page discussion. I've done...

(UTC) "Undid revision 810685403 by Boomer Vial (talk) Further missue of BRD will have you up for an ANI award." 20:14, 16 November 2017 (UTC) "Undid...

editing? ~Awilley (talk) 17:21, 18 November 2018 (UTC) I prefer "Enforced WP:BRD", although 3 is probably "safest" in that it accompanies that with a clear-cut...

impose their content without discussion: this goes against the spirit of BRD. Same thing when editor A removes something, editor B restores it and editor...

player specifically branded with Blu-Ray Disc capability. I don't think BRD players have been on the market for three years, but nevertheless, you'd...

travesties of Wikipedia. Low volume articles get WP:OWNed by people who say BRD, BRD, then have no intention of ever agreeing to a compromise. Lipsquid (talk)...

up to five in total. It's clear he has no respect whatsoever for 3RR or BRD. Number 57 18:54, 24 May 2016 (UTC) I agree that it's likely the user editing...

are numerous things to consider Stanzek Lem. BMK is on the correct side of BRD. You boldly made an edit. They reverted.. You reverted. They initiated a...

10 May 2016 (Undid revision 719610810 by Kateypup (talk) Please see WP:BRD If you want to "collaborate" follow what it says, do not revert again) Diffs...

WP:Wikilawyering (note the 'Aha!')[26][27]. I think this is a hijacking of WP:BRD to WP:GAME and block me from contributing valid encyclopedic content that...

genre it was on there ages before I ever even edited the page and under (BRD) it is on him to seek a consensus and explain why an edition that as been...

library – Next tip Read more: Wikipedia:Tag bombing   Responsible tagging   What is BRD? The BOLD, revert, discuss cycle The BOLD is where making bold edits is encouraged...

PLNR The first two edits, have been made on separate days. They are part of BRD effort which have been discussed here, after Podiaebba initial edit.(who...

off the very people you want to convince. See WP:CIVIL. Second: Follow WP:BRD. You're free to make WP:BOLD edits, but once you've been reverted, take it...

violate BRD by reverting my revert, but I chose not to). I then posted on the ANI, as linked above, and asked someone to comment on his violations of BRD and...

article Talk page (having taken somewhat too long to make it there per WP:BRD). The full issue to be mediated, though, is not altogether clear, but in...

the diff you did abuse. You first revert and then comment, that is not WP:BRD, you should first discuss. Jyoti (talk) 02:10, 14 June 2014 (UTC) Page: Talimeran...

be accepted, even if the reviewer decides to revert them as part of the BRD process. I've even pitched in with the reviewing myself to keep delays in...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits for all participants in a specific discussion The...

would've helped the editor. –Davey2010Talk 15:22, 28 June 2018 (UTC) WP:BRD says: "BRD is not an excuse to revert any change more than once". Ultimately your...

(edit summary: "Undid revision 466598920 by Walter Görlitz (talk) per WP:BRD, yes it is") 16:14, 19 December 2011 (compare) (edit summary: "Undid revision...

reverted, you find yourself on the talk page, having arrived at the "D" of "BRD". This is where the magic happens! It begins in a straightforward manner:...

reverted to Diffs of the user's reverts 04:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC) "WP:BRD and stop disruptive Wikilaywering. See BBC Radio One and all other major...

that there is a large core of regulars on the board that buy into the WP:BRD and WP:CONSENSUS process and that the system works as designed. Its just...

are cheap and prevent recreation. If someone reverts the redirect, we have BRD and BLOCKs to deal with it. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 03:01, 13 October 2019 (UTC)...

on talk page, citing BRD. I also tried to engage on their talk page with a 'welcome' template and personal message explaining BRD and consensus. I was...

See WP:BRD, once reverted, the onus is on you to discuss, and not to restore without consensus. Sir Joseph (talk) 20:09, 14 December 2017 (UTC) BRD isn't...

work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post...

grammatical mistake, and I thought this would be fine per WP:STATUSQUO and WP:BRD. However, Bilby then blanks the whole section because this is a BLP (sorry...

Muboshgu (talk)um yeah... per WP:BRD, it does." 21:24, 20 January 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 700824998 by JDC808 (talk)per WP:BRD, take it to the talk page"...

once again proceeded to edit citing WP:BRD. [189] Without replying in the talk-page the user reverted my BRD-edit claiming that I have yet to gather...

by WP:BRD but Ohconfucius has flagrantly edit-warred and continued to remove icons while the discussions are ongoing in direct breach of WP:BRD. Doesn't...

we can "D" in the BRD process, which is all I was trying to get you to do (how's that for a run-on sentence?). Remember, it's a BRD process, not a BRRD...

anon IP in the 86.173 range making the same non-standard edits, flouting WP:BRD, and refusing to discuss his edits. Previous version reverted to: [105] 18:09...

perhaps merge 3RR and BRD somehow. That's already the practice anyway, as far as I've seen. Equazcion •✗/C • 04:29, 16 Mar 2008 (UTC) WP:BRD is not merely a...

It is also an example of an editor using a revert rather than following BRD in ARBPIA. After my revert with the edit summary 'rv blatant edit warring...

refusal to understand what WP:CONSENSUS is and total lack of disregard for WP:BRD. This is disruptive and sucks up a lot of time. I'm honestly sick and tired...

of some attendees, who view that as a misinterpretation of WP:BOLD and WP:BRD. Lih said that although the speech was somewhat unrefined, it is difficult...

Comments: At the 3rd revert Agricolae called for respect of BRD, however per WP:BRD-NOT, BRD is not a valid excuse for reverting good-faith efforts to improve...

so-called "edit war" has really just been me pursuing the normal path of WP:BRD. Jordgette is putting forward the false notion that I was simply deleting...

further explained my rationale, and reminded Contaldo of WP:BRD. (NB: We have had the BRD discussion many, many times, including recently on his talk...

it to the talk page. You should not revert back when you are reverted (WP:BRD). Wretchskull (talk) 12:18, 31 January 2022 (UTC) Sorry, which Link are you...

topic ban on article space of a month (not including talk pages) to promote BRD.--Cerejota (talk) 16:57, 20 September 2011 (UTC) where was there a violation...

without affirmative consensus on the talk page. On pages where "enforced BRD" is in effect, an edit that is challenged by reversion may not be reinstated...

was added and removed, it should not have been restored (not to mention WP:BRD, which carries the greatest weight in the context of "bold addition" of contentious...

non-constructive edits to Green Arrow. When pointed to the talk page under WP:BRD, the IP flipped it back to LiquidLuke91's preferred version. Next was GreenWest's...

of BRD; I was the one who gave up afterwards. @FobTown: Do you see a difference? Never did I sandwich an admin comment into a discussion, or skip BRD to...

Index, and Worldcat). I recognize everyone does not have easy access to BRD and BRI, but everyone does have easy free access to WorldCat, and , if WP:BEFORE...

article - it has not been developed enough. Keep, and sort it all out by WP:BRD, not drive by tagging. - Neonorange (talk) 02:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC) Note:...

change it get a consensus first per WP:BRD. BRD says in the first line "is an optional method", in §What BRD is, and is not "is not an excuse to revert...

bold edit, so you can't start the BRD cycle). There are also an unfortunate number of people who have invoked BRD as a tool for POV pushing (e.g., "You...

only want to shoehorn their preferred links into the article, heedless of BRD or any other process. JesseRafe (talk) 16:23, 4 June 2019 (UTC) Blocked –...

- J man708 (talk) 21:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC) I note that WP:BRD does state that BRD will fail if - amongst other criteria - A single editor is reverting...

explicitly called for WP:BRD in the edit summary to stem another near edit war, with an immediate revert, then responded to the associated BRD Talk section which...

legitimate. Thats real rich claiming OWNERSHIP when you dont want to follow BRD to get consensus BEFORE reverting 'without explanation! and then ignore sources...

Comments: Was directed to an existing discussion on the talk page per WP:BRD, refuses to engage in discussion and calls reliable sources "editorials"...

object to the merge and revert it (as is proper procedure according to WP:BRD) but then the content that was supposed to be merged is either effectively...

multiple guidelines with complete disregard to them such as WP:EW, WP:DE, WP:BRD, WP:CONSENSUS, and I think it wouldn't be entirely unreasonable to suggest...

for 24 hours. This looks like a case of WP:BRD run amok. We ought to be well into the 'discuss' phase of BRD by now. There is a page at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject...

language. I reverted, saying please don't edit war and again pointed to DR BRD would suggest, instead, that you discuss, and justify, your using cites which...

here for one reason (accounts who generally don't know or care about WP:BRD) should get some support from the admin corps, and that support is woefully...

should be me reporting you for misuse of WP:BRD and finding a way to get around it using the excuse of 1RR. BRD also requires discussion on talk page, you...

reverted your addition of the catagory. Per WP:BRD, you should then start a discussion. You broke WP:BRD and reverted back, which is the reason I "repeatedly"...

redirect to continue the BRD cycle. Dolovis (talk) 17:49, 5 April 2011 (UTC) Not sure how you see that he isn't following the BRD cycle. He was bold, its...

CL was also fully entitled to remove the edit as part of the typical WP:BRD cycle, and CL did initiate the discussion so it's on RecentEdit or anyone...

told Josh to engage in dialogue (see both talk pages) and informed him of BRD and he still doesn't communicate or attempt to cooperate. His edits to the...

article here. Missvain (talk) 05:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC) Reverted per WP:BRD. The source is very balanced and in no way calls it transphobic in their...

do the same, to the contrary. The WP:BDR say "BRD is never a reason for reverting" and "Don't invoke BRD as your reason for reverting someone else's work"...

- J posts a {{uw-brd}} message at G's user talk page 17:55 - J reverts again, with edit summary quoting WP:NAV and linking to WP:BRD 17:56 - blocks Jax...

sources and their context. Withdraw this, and go to the talk page. I take WP:BRD very seriously, (I left you the link on your talk page). Editors who refuse...

additionally didn't follow BRD. Initially when my entries were reverted I was not going to restore them because I do normally respect BRD, but I became inflamed...

Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2019 September 12 Rosario Tijeras Mark McManus - actor WP:BRD not working, much opposition to my edits no clear or valid answer for exclusion...

of) WP:BRD. They now know about the policy, and undertake to follow it. Can this be closed now? Anthony (talk) 11:48, 25 July 2010 (UTC) BRD is an essay...

noticeboard/IncidentArchive722#Slow edit-warring and refusal to follow WP:BRD, reported by Benlisquare, October 2011, with evidence of disturbing off-wiki...

@LeaveMeB: You were Bold, you were Reverted, now it's time to Discuss (see WP:BRD.) You tried to make some changes, and someone reverted you. At this point...

not an administrative action but a bold edit, so it was reverted per WP:BRD. There is certainly not any clear consensus to keep the article, and "well...

entitled to revert an alteration to the article as per WP:BRD. I suggest in accordance with BRD you propose your edit on the talk page and see if there...

"enforced BRD", including a reminder of who has the WP:ONUS to obtain consensus for any change. Suggested wording for clarity: Enforced BRD – If an edit...

to test behaviour to others. He also accused me of not understanding WP:BRD and using a racial slur, which are legitimate accusations but occurred at...

Following the page history I found this. The User:Wtshymanski followed WP:BRD, the recommended method essay. I suggest you read it and attempt to follow...

flimsy it could be seen as a personal attack. You should be following WP:BRD - you've been reverted, now discuss on the article's talk page. Closing....

not to re-revert, which is a WP:BRD failure (my revert was the revert step, which makes your re-revert BRR instead of BRD). So I had a behavioural remark...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, word limits on participation by all editors in a specific discussion...

restored earlier today (with an edit summary of "removal of local consensus see BRD: No consensus on redirect, or target of redirect due to synthesis WP:SYN...

reverting to language that is grammatically incorrect. History page has BRD and request to use talk page. Article is COVID-related and may be subject...

pressured the other users to discuss it on the talk page. The fact that WP:BRD is never adhered to should not be my fault.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 05:07, 27 October...

till...well you know. Hard to move forward when someone doen not follow BRD and edit-wars in there version over and over.. So I moved forward with what...

need admin tools to convert something to a redirect, all you need is WP:BRD (and if you're reverted, take it to the talk page). So the AfD process is...

June 2020, and here again at 07:13, 20 June. Horse Eye Jack, restored per BRD here at 07:20, 20 June 2020‎. Whereas you have participated discussion here...

of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:46, 6 February 2020 (UTC) BRD algebra → Clifford algebra  (talk · links · history ·...

(until aprox. 00:00, 20 May 2020) for violations of the 1RR and enforced BRD page sanctions. — Wug·a·po·des​ 00:00, 13 May 2020 (UTC) Kolya Butternut...

aside, redirecting could have and should have been attempted first per WP:BRD rather than through WP:AFD (per WP:ATD. QED). postdlf (talk) 03:47, 17 May...

just being a friendly policy wonk, I have read BRD. It says "BRD is not a policy". It also says "BRD is not a valid excuse for reverting good-faith efforts...

[119] [120] [121] [122] Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: warned to abide BRD and to talk to talk, warned 3RR and to take to talk, Warned about edit warring...

just announced today. Computer40 «»(talk) 22:49, 30 August 2018 (UTC) WP:BRD is a thing. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:07, 31 August 2018 (UTC) I would possibly...

months, and your deletion has been reverted by multiple editors. Per WP:BRD, you should be Discussing the reasoning for your proposed edit, yet not once...

no issues discussing if this is considered a controversial addition. (WP:BRD)) (undo | thank) SportingFlyer talk 04:26, 19 July 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

pointing to WP:V Inserted again - Reverted by another editor who points to BRD and requests not to edit war Inserted again claiming "common knowledge" and...

edit warring and could land you in difficulty with the community. See WP:BRD and discuss with other editors involved to reach consensus. Note though,...

value. DGG ( talk ) 03:11, 23 January 2013 (UTC) Comment. In the spirit of BRD, and given that no one is advocating that we keep this subject as a stand-alone...

is Mueller(1976) in Collage : Zeitschrift für Literatur und Grafik in der BRD. [1] Update: strongly object to merge, because the article has no usable...

one point I had a big list of diffs of FobTown's tenacious reverting. WP:BRD is non-existent to FobTown, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is their go-to argument,...

--Crossmr (talk) 12:26, 6 October 2011 (UTC) Oh, and you need to give BRD another read. BRD refers to a previous existing consensus. You are not a consensus...

(UTC) Well, you may as well wait for this discussion to conclude, but WP:BRD could result in Way Back into Love being improved. Schmidt, Michael Q. 20:49...

"I think IAR and BRD are not workable policies for substantive changes to policy and guidelines". - I could not agree Less. BOLD, BRD (less so) and IAR...

2022 (UTC) Correct me if I am wrong but WP:BRD is an essay. It doesn't literally mean you have to follow the BRD cycle. The point is that editors should...

(talk) 14:22, 22 June 2012 (UTC) OK, I am going to do that now, and if WP:BRD doesn't kick in, then we can close this as being resolved. --Guy Macon (talk)...

to WP:BRD. Squinge (talk) 18:37, 28 January 2015 (UTC) I have reverted to the version before the disputed change was first made, as per WP:BRD, and I...

incorrectly cites WP:ONUS to suggest that CaradhrasAiguo does not need to follow BRD when challenged on removal that changes status quo, and then performs the...

an appropriate dispute tag and add a note to explain the tag in talk. The BRD cycle may be repeated after a day or two if there is still no response, but...

warning and explanation of BRD etc. and reverting again. Perhaps I should not have reverted their initial violation of BRD, I'm not sure how to handle...

have been poor versions of text included, but the war prevented a standard BRD improvement cycle since the content has been repeatedly deleted.) (update...

government website blacklisted? Writing A new Article Letter case Template:Uw-brd Finding DAB links on a page Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2022 April 17 Question...

2016 (UTC) @Drmies: Yes it takes two to tango, and I tried to follow WP:BRD which requires at least 1 reversal. After that, I made an attempt to either...

addition of cats on Talk page. Per BRD, these recent additions mneed discussion. Stop edit warring and follow BRD." 18:47, 16 June 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision...

Snooganssnoogans' revert without any attempt to compromise or follow the D part of WP:BRD. In Snooganssnoogans' 1RR-violating edit summary, he asked to take the discussion...

however, don't be surprised when the user doesn't reach the "D" part of BRD. Notifying them of the three-revert rule should be the next step, in order...

minor pages as if they were major policies. Also, failure to understand BRD while hypocritically insisting that other parties are the edit warriors....

too eager to talk.[97]. I also used an edit summary to inform him about WP:BRD [98]. Cinadon36 23:18, 29 December 2019 (UTC) Guilty! I have tried for years...

hours of my work without any discussion about why. He keeps invoking WP:BRD, which would seem to apply only to article space. GabeMc (talk|contribs)...

edit warring to your preferred version is not acceptable. Please see WP:BRD. You boldly added your section. It was reverted. You readded it six more...

an edit war. McDoobAU93:Reverted 1 edit by Cla68 (talk): Restoring per WP:BRD and will open on talk page. McDoobAU93 re-reverts (making McDoob's second...

contribs) Always Knicks. Heatproud (talk · contribs)- Miami Heat updates. BRD-98 (talk · contribs)- Left Wikipedia for awhile, so I'm adding myself back...

actually. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:27, 23 June 2021 (UTC) @RZuo: Per WP:BRD, the person being reverted is expected to start the discussion. Discuss the...

disputes and that someone else violated WP:BRD. In those two cases it was clearly you who violated WP:BRD by not starting a talk page discussion. They...

article that is at AfD. So, you can edit target articles (and follow WP:BRD on these pages) but do not blank entire sections of this one. (The most frequent...

clearly a new-ish editor here, so I would advise you read up on WP:3RR and WP:BRD in particular; when adding new content, the onus is on the person adding...

issue on talk, as I mentioned in the summary. I didn't explicitly wrote WP:BRD, WP:ONUS, WP:POV in there because I thought you were already well aware of...

and four in almost a 24 hour period. Some reverting is allowed under WP:BRD. My last revert was to undo the previous revert by Sayerslle[49] after I...

on solo navboxes. BMK (talk) 14:44, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Please read WP:BRD, along with the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#Collapsing...

the talk page are mimimal. Dingo blocked for longer for ignoring the WP:BRD cycle and the advice of admin immediately above; MFIreland blocked because...

redirected the article, but applyingWP:AGF this is just an extremely long WP:BRD cycle.Vulcan's Forge (talk) 01:21, 13 September 2013 (UTC) Delete or merge:...

User:William M. Connolley's reference to WP:BRD, I would like to emphasize that the "discussion" part of "BRD" has not been followed through by User:William...

brought up by those claiming BRD), and despite BRD saying many times over that "BRD is never a reason for reverting": - "BRD is not a policy, though it...

indiscriminate collection of trivial lists. Anyone who disagrees is free to apply WP:BRD. As for the main list, I have reformatted the list, and have added various...

article and the insertion was opposed editors splitting evenly on it; WP:BRD was however ignored. The matter went to the RS notice board and the clear...

WP:NOT3RR and WP:BRD. You gotta do better than that." 15:29, 26 April 2019 (UTC) "(Reverting as per example 7 of WP:NOT3RR and WP:BRD) No, we have not...

(UTC) The IP is back today inserting the same material with edit summary "WP:BRD is a guideline while WP:OWN is policy. Then on talk page argues that it doesn't...

believe they know about edit waring. I have also told them repeatedly about BRD cycle and requested them not to edit war. Multiple editors have reverted...

quite clear that Roccodrift breached the WP:3RR while completely ignoring WP:BRD. If Rocco had an issue with the source AN/I is most definitely not the place...

cut), and a WP:INVOLVED admin is imposing a two-month sanction on me for WP:BRD edits which incorporated others' suggestions. The bias and lack of accountability...

revert restrictions, the "consensus required" restriction, the "enforced BRD" restriction, and any other restrictions designated by the Arbitration Committee...

notability. [My redirect of this article was reverted, which was reasonable per BRD, but it was then nominated for deletion by the same editor who reverted me...

reverted, they often accuse others of POV. Classic pattern. Please read WP:BRD. The acronym means Bold, Revert, Discuss. You Boldly add something, someone...

categories. I'm only thinking of it now, but that might have been better (BRD) than CfD in the first place, especially since the editor hasn't justified...

Widescreen has continued edit waring against the consensus without abiding by WP:BRD. All the issues were agreed to in dispute resolution and by the editors on...

into a similar "voluntary" unofficial BRD agreement, I don't recall ever seeing editors subjected to individual BRD or Consensus Required sanctions. But...

25 May 2018 (UTC) William, I tried to have a discussion with you per WP:BRD. You kept on reverting, so naturally I came here to get you to stop. --BrownHairedGirl...

that his behavior is disruptive per WP:POINT, and asked him to follow WP:BRD to discuss changes in the article. He did not listen. Therefore, I request...

understand what means "breaching WP:3RR ans as well the BRD process". Jesus Christ...read please WP:BRD, WP:3RR as well what it means. As a consequence your...

a huge series of concurrent moves, which I subsequently reverted per WP:BRD. The decapitalisation was subsequently discussed at a mass RM, where it was...

deletion. Instead of going to the article's talk page to discuss it (see WP:BRD), that editor went to WikiProject_Mathematics, proposed deleting info boxes...

these names, he accused me of wikihounding and reverted again. Ignorinig WP:BRD. [184], [185]. He's repeatedly claimed consensus yet each time he's asked...

of your disruptive editing and violation of 3RR and refusal to follow WP:BRD, with the addition of personal attacks, that is more than enough grounds...

November 2012 (UTC) Also, is this a trap you spring on people? A team ignores BRD then goads another revert by making a blatantly false statement: "No consensus...

reverting those redirects. These of course are the first two steps of WP:BRD. Instead of initiating the 3rd step (discuss) the nom seems to have instead...

"fandom". While he and his supporters are citing WP:BRD to justify his actions, one must remember that WP:BRD is meant to initiate the consensus building process...

should (at a minimum) be merged LOSSLESSLY into Shadow Project. Also, WP:BRD. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:29, 28 March 2013 (UTC) Duplicate !vote struck. --BrownHairedGirl...

sudden rv - that would be the reason behind my remark, having in mind WP:BRD - in any case, the only thing from them in entire first two-three hours of...

describing subsequent deletions as "vandalism" isn't remotely in accord with WP:BRD. And unless I'm mistaken, a proper merge would involve the edit history of...

person says about themself. DGG ( talk ) 22:48, 3 June 2021 (UTC) Per WP:BRD and WP:BASIC, which permits the use of primary sources, I have reverted the...

hundreds of articles. He was reverted by numerous editors. Per Wikipedia:BRD he should not continue edit-warring, but rather discuss and reach consensus...

the version I was reverting the article to? I was merely being bold per WP:BRD. Admittedly I reverted TLAM's revert of my edit, but that is a sign to bring...

to "win" a content dispute. It is different than a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle." scrapiron won't discuss the issue, and clearly is in the minority...

be using multiple IPs to advance his agenda, his failure to adhere to WP:BRD and his violation of the three-revert rule is unfortunate.TheTimesAreAChanging...

discussion..." [22], which is consistent with his lack of regard for WP:BRD editing. [23] WP:BRD is not required by guide or policy, but it is widely regarded as...

and then go to the talk page only when someone reverts your edit (see WP:BRD). Don't take offence if you get reverted using this method as it is a normal...

__meco (talk) 10:26, 1 August 2012 (UTC) WP:ATA is 'just an essay', so's WP:BRD. Quoting relevant essays that define reasonable standards that have been...

should have been them taking it to the talk page for discussion, per WP:BRD. As far as their reasoning – "to avoid unnecessary bracketing within a direct...

forum agrees with me. I feel like I could easily revert that change per WP:BRD and not get into any sort of edit conflict. Furthermore, an SNG is meaningless...

criticism" on talk. Not sure if this should be AIV or EWN. But IP did not follow BRD and continues to revert 4x. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 03:55, 7 September 2022...

others object, you are generally obligated to respect the objections per WP:BRD, unless you are acting in an administrator capacity. It's also likely to...

reverted them and reverts my reverts (and if that person doesn't follow WP:BRD) Air Force Bases in the US Unable to upload image from eng wiki to czech...

15 December 2013 (UTC) Aerecinski, you do realize that according to WP:BRD, if you add a paragraph and it gets removed, you may never re-add it until...

reversion, and it came under BRD. You even said it was a bold addition, and you therefore fail to grasp the theory behind BRD, and Wikipedia policy. The...

respecting BRD. I will do my best to work on curbing my behavior further. I just don't want to end up punished, as usual, for trying to respect BRD and coming...

Repeatedly re-reverting and not following good faith approaches such as WP:BRD and WP:STATUSQUO is not the answer. All of the diffs above have clear justification...

someone objects, then it is easily reverted in favour of a discussion; see WP:BRD. If routine maintenance, like this seems to be, is repeatedly brought to...

Comments: Editor has drastically changed the article, I objected and so as per BRD I asked them to go to the talkpage to discuss their edits but so far they've...

is not sufficient reason to threaten escalation. Get a grip, both of you, BRD, and go beyond. —swpbT go beyond 15:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC) Delete I dont...

their relevance to a reader's complete understanding. If you'd like to WP:BRD (preferably skipping the "R" for now to err on the side of BLP), I'm happy...

with BRD. Jahaza (talk) 04:48, 17 December 2022 (UTC) Oppose: The "discussion" part of BRD does not mean "I wrote an edit summary." To quote from BRD, "Discuss...

many articles about them. Sorry that I do not know how to add to this list! BRD-98 (talk · contribs) - Monorails and intercity transport. Virusurbanus (talk ·...

after edit summaries asking for explanations, a warning, and a link to WP:BRD. Singularity42 (talk) 19:30, 25 September 2013 (UTC) Declined Feel free to...

Auto-generated every hour. Editor interaction utility Compare diffs citing "BRD, not BRRD": LargelyRecyclable: [1] HansZwiller: [2] The former is a new account...

discuss on talk page per WP:BRD if that isn't clear.)"[186] "(Remove WP:OR (please read source and again discuss per WP:BRD instead of edit warring), Also...

self reverted. Note that JimKaatFan is also at 3rr and also has ignored BRD. The material they are edit warring into the lead had been rejected thus...

Arguably each of my reverts was a case of WP:BRD. The edits were all reverted by User:HighKing, who also stated WP:BRD in the edit summaries. HighKing then proceeded...

avoid edit-warring. They have chosen to follow none of them, especially BRD. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 21:03, 22 August 2019 (UTC) Update The user posted...

discuss it on the talk page. I.e., if one is going to use something like WP:BRD as an edit summary, a discussion should be started immediately by the person...

the events at Title but can present some diffs for what I think illustrate BRD failures and substantial changes made with little or no consensus at MOSCAPS:...

t-bans, article bans, blocks, iBans, etc. Restrictions come in the form of BRD, 1RR consensus required, semi- or full-page protection, and on and on...all...

seems entirely correct, as the page was moved - by you - with only a "WP:BRD" as rationale and protected six minutes later in response to your request...

photos Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2018 February 13 not keep change during BRD Draft not published truth editing film article for educational project -...

(diff  top?) - Link: review.aks.ac.kr/lab/contentBoardView.do?brd_no=35051&menu_no=296&brd_mgrno=162 (R/Xmeta/L- still there) User is in trusted groups...

January 2012 (UTC) Sounds fair enough to me. The guideline on this is WP:BRD which says be bold and do it. If someone disagrees they undo what you did...

outright false statements about me. You edit where reverted then discussion WP:BRD, but instead of waiting for the discussion to be completed you reverted me...

policy (WP:BURDEN) and delete unsourced material, which would not fall under BRD. This is a 2007 article, so WP:BURDENWAIT may not be a good argument. Just...

in edit summaries and has made no attempt at discussion according to WP:BRD ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC) Blocked – for...

[7] to discuss this edit on the article's talk page but did not follow WP:BRD Meters (talk) 06:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC) Similar behaviour by this IP on...

18 January 2017 (UTC) It's not (the closest thing would probably be WP:BRD), but it's common courtesy to leave it until the AfD is over unless it's...

discretion. Discuss on the talk page if required. Read WP:Consensus and WP:BRD. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 15:17, 28 April 2011 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

content from the article now 3 times. I've directed him to WP:EW and WP:BRD, and invited him to an active discussion taking place on the talk page, but...

blacklist hits · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Google · StopForumSpam) Brd (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · Edit filter search ·...

Enforced BRD, not me, but I have no interest in pressing the matter. R2 (bleep) 01:04, 8 July 2019 (UTC) Swarm, R2 is correct here. (The BRD rule on the...

(talk) 16:21, 13 October 2012 (UTC) RfCs are started when BRD hasn't worked. To accept BRD on the result of RfCs would make a nonsense of the whole process...

even if we consider his edit nº3 an edit, it was reverted by my and by BRD it should have been discussed, so his insistence on it in the edit 5 without...

occur. I will leave a note on their talkpage and advise them to read WP:BRD. Can I also suggest that you (Jimfbleak) avoid using rollback to revert non-vandalism...

was per Wikipedia:Be bold. As I disagreed with the move I reverted per WP:BRD, a perfectly normal move, precipitating discussion on the article Talk page...

article. I can understand why the new editor/IP didn't know about our WP:BRD process and edit warred but I'm not sure why Arianewiki1 has supported them...

near ready for mainspace. To be honest, this should really be a case of BRD. The pages where redirects, an article boldly split the content and converted...

Maduro. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:54, 14 January 2026 (UTC) BRD required provision in effect on Dewi Evans - The Bushranger One ping only...

still refused to change. Yelling "BRD" every time you revert another editor does not give you immunity to 3RR. BRD is an WP:ESSAY. 3RR/Edit Warring is...

WP:BURDEN+WP:ONUS and yeah the essay WP:BRD. Yet no one will suggest this means we actually have 0RR or 1RR or imposed BRD or whatever. So all ATD-R is really...

I'm not required to notify anyone when I revert unhelpful edits. See WP:BRD. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 05:36, 12 November 2020 (UTC) Page: Naturopathy (edit...

incidences on this article of the reported editor acting well outside of BRD, even though active discussion was taking place on the article talk page...

case you can Discuss the matter with them on the article's Talk page – this BRD cycle is the usual way in which a consensus on content is reached. One possible...

new section" 21:47, 7 March 2014 (UTC) "/* WP:BRD */ new section" 21:51, 7 March 2014 (UTC) "/* WP:BRD */" 21:52, 7 March 2014 (UTC) "Warning: Violating...

communicate with unregistered users who don't respond to my comments or follow WP:BRD? how do I know whether the first three users are really a single user with...

(talk) 11:22, 27 September 2011 (UTC) BRD is not an excuse for reverting any change more than once[66][67]. BRD is not a policy. This means it is not...

heart the warnings of WP:BRD in your editing style. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:20, 21 April 2011 (UTC) I fully support WP:BRD. I have only reverted changes...

19 May 2017 (UTC) Yes, this proposal does turn BRD on its head a bit but it is in the spirit of BRD, which is that if you're in a disagreement with an...

changes: If you arrive at the "discussion" part of the "bold, revert, discuss" (BRD) cycle, and the subject involves a number of separate changes you would like...

WP:BRD to justify a revert. Does BRD really apply in these cases? Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 10:45, 1 October 2013 (UTC) I invoked WP:BRD not...

please discuss on talk page per WP:BRD." 10:07, 6 May 2015 (UTC) "Reverted 1 edit by MaranoFan (talk): Please follow BRD at the article talk page, do jot...

Wikipedia’s policy as laid out in WP:BRD). Not only has he reverted me back (so this would appear to be a violation of WP:BRD) but he has also been doing this...

made. Applying BRD indiscriminately to multiple edits as has been done here also seems rather odd. BRD also suggests the following: "BRD is not a valid...

Jgeddis (talk) 10:40, 3 August 2013 (UTC) (Non-administrator comment) WP:BRD is clear on how this situation works - you're bold, if someone else reverts...

April 2021 (UTC) I know what wp:BRD is, but I don't understand what you steps you'd mean to take in "I'm trying to BRD this". Opening an RFD is nothing...

international community. However I think its obvious Razborka doesn't understand WP:BRD or WP:CONSENSUS, when their edits are a position contrary to WP:RECORDCHARTS...

Despite multiple requests [51] [52], Efbrazil frequenty does not use WP:BRD, even though they edit mainly in contentious areas. I asked twice that they...

covered by WP:BRD. If the material is genuinely and unambiguously relevant then consensus will be evident. It is also the polar opposite of WP:BRD - essentially...