DOKUMEN123.COM

Editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page, including but not limited to articles, talk pages...

often just asking IMDb or Google. An unsourced DOB is obviously against WP:BLPDOB, and a "based on age" template suggests that any added date (even if correct)...

I guess it is. A lot of mentions of dates of birth don't comply with WP:BLPDOB relying on one or two crappy sources which even if they are reliable sources...

BLPDOB. I've therefore removed the DOB while keeping the year after further consideration. If an editor can find a source which complies with BLPDOB,...

started at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Possible BLPDOB problem- this should smooth out the BLP-related issues. Though I still question...

don't think being "widely published" is a necessary criteria, despite WP:BLPDOB making it clear it is. Diffs of previous relevant sanctions, if any n/a...

mass-creation where a commentator seems to be completely ignoring WP:BLPDOB. I'm not sure if the IP's allegations are accurate, but if they are, it...

not consider that someone else publishing the DOBs in bulk would meet WP:BLPDOB. Remember that especially for DOBs, although as for all areas of Wikipedia...

Target corrected. El_C 16:27, 13 February 2022 (UTC) Reason: Persistent WP:BLPDOB violations by new accounts/IPs. FDW777 (talk) 09:22, 13 February 2022 (UTC)...

AllMusic in the absence of something exceptional cannot comply with WP:BLPDOB. A date which may not even be accurate cannot be said to be widespread,...

verified account, okay fine maybe we can take this as complying with WP:BLPDOB and WP:BLPSPS. I'm unconvinced we should take someone else tweeting Happy...

birth. I'd prefer not to find out which admins don't consider removing a WP:BLPDOB violation to be exempt from edit-warring, so if someone could do the necessary...

January 2022, 29 on 6 January 2022. So it's a complete mess, and per WP:BLPDOB we are supposed to follow If multiple independent reliable sources state...

since a date of December 26 1951 is definitely circa 1951/1952. Per WP:BLPDOB we don't report precise dates of birth unless it's either well established...

(she/her) (talk) 08:14, 14 January 2024 (UTC) Just a reminder that per WP:BLPDOB, the issue is not simply is the source reliable but has it been "widely...

Moved from Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/RFC: Southern Poverty Law Center This is a two part RFC about the reliability of Southern Poverty Law...

of whether it is technically synthesis is missing the bigger issue. WP:BLPDOB says "Wikipedia includes full names and dates of birth that have been widely...

records via ancestry.com for DOB of living people, see WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLPDOB. Schazjmd (talk) 16:19, 12 March 2023 (UTC) OK, thanks I imagine it would...

generally reliable, but I dont think the stat side comes close to satisfying WP:BLPDOB. And I'm not seeing any evidence of Aspinall's DOB being widely published...

can't verify it so I don't get to add it to the SIA. The spirit behind WP:BLPDOB, to a certain extent, applies here to, imo. Dab pages I'm a little unsure...

personal pages or marketing as necessarily reliable other than to satisfy WP:BLPDOB indication they don't mind concerns) Under these conditions and since no...

practice isn't followed, unfortunately a lot of people don't understand WP:BLPDOB. But when it does come up, poorly sourced dates of birth are excluded. Nil...

large number of editors who either aren't aware of or don't understand BLPDOB; and are convinced DOBs are super important often compounded with the equally...