DOKUMEN123.COM

of the image should be used instead, per WP:AIGI. Shortcuts WP:BLPCATWP:BLPCAT WP:BLPLISTWP:BLPLIST Category names do not carry disclaimers or modifiers...

talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Violates WP:BLPCAT as the aim is to categorize living people accused of crimes, not those actually...

(UTC) Strong delete. Fails WP:LISTCRIT and additionally goes against WP:BLPCAT (Categories regarding religious beliefs (or lack of such) or sexual orientation...

review 3 related categorization guidelines (WP:DEFINING,WP:COP#N and WP:BLPCAT) and to clarify them better and to add links to them. Gibraltar-related...

categorisation are less relevant to the outcome (it being questionable whether WP:BLPCAT even applies). Also of little relevance is the discussion regarding the...

@Doomsdayer520: I linked the wrong section. What I meant to link to was WP:BLPCAT which says this Caution should be used with content categories that suggest...

Nominator's rationale: Per WP:OCASSOC, WP:PERFCAT and, in many cases, WP:BLPCAT What's convenient here, is that this category literally start with "People...

LGBTQ categories, to group related topics together. See WP:CAT for more. WP:BLPCAT and WP:EGRS provide important guidance on categorizing articles about people...

Another argument was that WP:BLPCAT precludes the list because it is based on religious beliefs. The principles of BLPCAT are explicitly applicable to...

December 2010 (UTC) Comment The sourcing is dreadful in places. Per WP:BLPCAT, we need (recent) self-identification, and relevance to the person's notability...

have never admitted their religion, thus the article probably violates WP:BLPCAT too. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 18:04, 25 April 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...

in the military. Article is also completely unreferenced and violates WP:BLPCAT. SnottyWong confer 19:28, 30 November 2010 (UTC) The above discussion is...

quadrilateral. SmilingFace (talk) 10:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC) Not at all. WP:BLPCAT says "Categories regarding religious beliefs or sexual orientation should...

outsiders. BLPCAT seems to be based on this assumption, and enforces (not 'recommends') it. AndyTheGrump (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2010 (UTC) BLPCAT has to...

establish that the people listed are tarkhans and hence is a violation of WP:BLPCAT --Anbu121 (talk me) 05:19, 15 October 2012 (UTC) are you saying they are...

Being a rape victim carries a stigma in most modern societies, and WP:BLPCAT reminds us that "caution should be used with [content categories and lists]...

utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools Dualipa95 was blocked for WP:BLPCAT concerns - I wrote on Amyaustin97's talk page with similar concerns regarding...

such thing as an ethnic Chinese. The arguments for keeping include: WP:BLPCAT et al. do not apply as this is a list, not a category. There are enough...

is lower. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:18, 1 August 2022 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:BLPCAT as well as not being a defining category. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 08:38...

09:07, 5 March 2012 (UTC) delete all as violations in spirit of Wikipedia:BLPCAT with a list being equivilent to a category, and the policy reading "religious...

November 2021 (UTC) Delete as it additionally goes against the spirit of WP:BLPCAT and WP:LISTPEOPLE ("Special care must be taken when adding living persons...

how religion or sexual orientation are regarded in WP:LISTPEOPLE and WP:BLPCAT. As demonstrated in this AfD discussion, even agreeing on what is a reliable...

not" because WP:BLPCAT does not include "ethnicity" as requiring "self-identification". Please parse the language found at WP:BLPCAT carefully. But this...

barney (talk) 09:23, 5 May 2013 (UTC) Keep Article meets WP:LISTPEOPLE, WP:BLPCAT and WP:EGRS. Miniapolis 13:34, 8 May 2013 (UTC) Sorry, IMO you are mistaken...

recentism and personal opinions). Relevant policies and guidelines include WP:BLPCAT, WP:OPINIONCAT, WP:POVCAT, WP:COPDEF, and MOS:LABEL. --Animalparty! (talk)...

in BLpcat and applying it to the word "Jewish", which is unquestionably an ethnic group and a "people", something not convered in BLPcat. If BLPcat did...

otherwise we wouldn't have WP:BLPCAT specifically discussing orientation. (I am not arguing that BLPCAT applies here, merely that BLPCAT shows that sexual orientation...

Remove. Per WP:BLPCAT. There is no source in the article in which he self-identifies as gay. I won't even touch the notablity obstacle of BLPCAT as it's an...

EvergreenFir raised on User Talk:Doug Weller#BLPs, Mental Illness, and WP:BLPCAT (which is indirectly what of prompted me to make this AFD). EvergreenFir...

agrees that sources meet blpcat and notability in terms of relevance.[125] Nomoskedasticity agrees that sources meet blpcat.[126] Nomoskedasticity indirectly...

known as "Fdinshaw". Inserting "Parsi" to Sam Dastor in violation of WP:BLPCAT.[15][16] Same ethnic labeling on Jivanji Jamshedji Modi.[17][18] No one...

rules are the only reasonable interpretation of how WP:BLPCAT should apply to this list, because BLPCAT seems to apply to statements about the religious beliefs...

with the Lewinsky scandal Nominator's rationale: Per WP:OCASSOC and WP:BLPCAT What's convenient here, is that these categories literally start with "People...

subject has publicly self-identified with the belief in question (see WP:BLPCAT), either through direct speech or through actions like serving in an official...

October 2015 (UTC) Question @Masem: Could you point me to that policy? WP:BLPCAT, the one I'm obviously most familiar with, only requires living people to...

"The Israel Lobby" adding a summary that explictly stated he was aware of blpcat" [110] and linking to this anti-semitic website discussing Zionists, Jews...

taken when adding living persons to lists based on religion" (see also WP:BLPCAT and WP:CAT/R) - Epinoia (talk) 00:14, 15 September 2019 (UTC) @Epinoia:...

cross-categorization that fails WP:NOTDIR criterion #6. It also fails WP:BLPCAT: Caution should be used with content categories that suggest a person has...

although membership in secret societies is not specifically mentioned in WP:BLPCAT, I believe that would likely qualify as requiring that the reference would...

articles). As for your categorization suggestion, please read WP:OCAT and WP:BLPCAT. If we are to maintain this information here in such detail, we would do...

subject has publicly self-identified with the belief in question (see WP:BLPCAT), either through direct speech or through actions such as serving in an...

comprehensive nor along basic WP policy rules. WP:COP, WP:LISTPEOPLE and WP:BLPCAT are not being followed. The underlying article does exclude a large part...

be taken when adding living persons to lists based on religion" (also WP:BLPCAT & WP:CAT/R, category guidelines apply to lists) - Epinoia (talk) 21:37,...

logs) Nominator's rationale: Quite useless category that likely violates WP:BLPCAT. Unlike Category:Conspiracy theories regarding Barack Obama, this is not...

sources? It's cruft. --JN466 12:59, 26 November 2010 (UTC) Delete violates BLPCAT, EGRS, and per Jayjg.--Therexbanner (talk) 19:24, 26 November 2010 (UTC)...

is "invention" itself. And that's not even getting into the definition/BLPCAT issues with "Jewish". Rd232 talk 11:13, 1 December 2010 (UTC) Delete - non-notable...

22:47, 28 September 2014 (UTC) see WP:BLPCAT -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:19, 28 September 2014 (UTC) BLPCAT does not answer my question. Can someone...

the suggestion that 3RR does not apply to a BLPCAT violation, I note that this was in no way a WP:BLPCAT as was asserted by the editor, as it does not...

vote changed - see below) I don't see anything at either WP:Lists or WP:BLPCAT that states that all lists need to have references that support the list...

with respect to our BLP policies, starting with, but not limited to, WP:BLPCAT. --j⚛e deckertalk 16:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC) Request for procedural information...

talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:BLPCAT with questionable additions, fork of Category:American people convicted...

of Category:Conspiracy theorists or any other category covered under WP:BLPCAT or WP:EGRS; what this category needs is a solid definition (by consensus)...

01:42, 16 November 2015 (UTC) Strong Keep more than satisfies WP:GNG and WP:BLPCAT. The history of Jews in New York City is a well-known part of American culture...

of global warming which allows sources and clear quotations. Also see WP:BLPCAT. Stephan Schulz (talk) 13:20, 7 November 2009 (UTC) I made the same mistake...

Americnas and organization Y = cartoonists. Article is also in conflict with WP:BLPCAT. SnottyWong talk 19:20, 30 November 2010 (UTC) Not so, your example might...

same sex subjects and not the subject tis dating a woman - clearly as per BLPCat there is a disputable position here - content is king and insisting on labeling...

WP:BLP doesn't explicitly comment redirects, but first paragraph of WP:BLPCAT is probably applicable to this case. WP:RNEUTRAL isn't too helpful guideline...

always the case when Bus Stop gets involved in such discussions, that WP:BLPCAT (and indeed Wikipedia policy on sourcing in general) doesn't apply when...

-Crossroads- (talk) 21:09, 3 August 2019 (UTC) LABEL is not a policy, while BLPCAT is. Also, objections to the term TERF (which are usually objections to the...

lists of this kind. WP:BLPCAT does in fact explicitly pertain to lits as well as categories. The addition of "ethnic" to BLPCAT is currently being discussed...

have to "demonstrate" that a actor is notable for being Jewish (part of WP:BLPCAT which does apply to lists as well but only to the living persons listed)...

fascination is getting quite old and is not supported by BLPCAT. WikifanBe nice 10:27, 4 June 2012 (UTC) BLPCAT requires self-identification. Having a reliable...

that's another issue. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:39, 26 February 2011 (UTC) WP:BLPCAT probably covers it. Although possibly only at a stretch in this case :)...

anti-communist dissidents. In the case of living people the category may violate WP:BLPCAT: "Caution should be used with content categories that suggest a person has...

to reflect BLPCAT and is just poor wording. BLPCAT as a policy trumps EGRS as a guideline and the latter should be interpreted the way BLPCAT intends it...

to reflect BLPCAT and is just poor wording. BLPCAT as a policy trumps EGRS as a guideline and the latter should be interpreted the way BLPCAT intends it...

positions that fall foul of WP:BLPCAT, in the discussions I have seen so far Andy is just trying to point out what BLPCAT says, as can be seen here at the...

) And it's not a "minefield waiting to go bang", either, because per WP:BLPCAT we do not use the category to perform the outing of closeted gay actors...

inaction, like, for example, when people tried to add "ethnicity" to WP:BLPCAT, specifically because they lack focus. Case-by-case XfDs are and always...

reverted to Diffs of the user's reverts 14:38, 27 May 2014 (UTC) "Violates WP:BLPCAT, which is enshrined in a policy and thus overrides a discussion on the talk...

influenced by Michael Jackson which has seen frequent violations of WP:BLPCAT and here, MJ fans falsely claim just any popular celebrity to have been...

(UTC) Delete paints persons so labeled in a very negative light, risking WP:BLPCAT violation for those who are still living, and is almost never a defining...

nuanced approach as we normally use with religion and the like with WP:BLPCAT. There may well be times when mentioning an individual's caste is appropriate...

brining articles in line with WP:BLPCAT? Why restrict it to just one category? If I understand correctly, WP:BLPCAT applies to dozens or hundreds of categories...

page of Jeremy Piven, even though BLPcat does not cover ethnicity, and in fact, the proposal to add ethnicity to BLPcat was not passed through. All Hallow's...

category itself and for the inclusion of a specific article in it, and also WP:BLPCAT in the case of living people. From these conditions, while it seems pretty...

February 2015 (UTC) Note: [5] is not even remotely acceptable under WP:BLPCAT and I find the continued insistence to label a person a JEW in Wikipedia's...

according to BLPCAT the person has to self identify. The problem is that he complained to the BLP Noticeboard and was basically told that BLPCAT doesn't apply...

Wikidemon (talk) 07:34, 27 December 2009 (UTC) Wrong again, I'm afraid. See WP:BLPCAT: "Category names do not carry disclaimers or modifiers, so the case for...

the aspect that makes the religious affiliation blpcat notable.[10] @MrX: agrees that sources meet blpcat and notability in terms of relevance.[11] @Nomoskedasticity:...

clarify ethnicity, culture, or religion. Further I started a discussion at WT:BLPCAT yesterday (and notified all editors of Category:Jewish atheists through...

page is entirely what WP:BLPCAT is all about. I think this confusion illustrates well why it isn't productive for the BLPCAT standard to leak into other...

F&H repeatedly referred to a BLP issue in their reversions, including WP:BLPCAT (the cat is only very marginally supported in the body, not enough, in my...

January 2014 (UTC) WP:BLPCAT is policy. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:46, 28 January 2014 (UTC) AndyTheGrump—there is nothing wrong with WP:BLPCAT policy. The problem...

minor is WP:BLP violation under WP:BLPCAT." Two questions: 1. Does WP:BLPCAT say anything about minors? 2. Does WP:BLPCAT say anything about material for...

lists: If the person is alive (WP:BLP) then the entry should comply with WP:BLPCAT but other editors argue that if no sources dispute the information of a...

Americnas and organization Y = cartoonists. Article is also in conflict with WP:BLPCAT. SnottyWong talk 19:20, 30 November 2010 (UTC) Not so, your example might...

the subject's public notability? (As presently required by WP:CAT/R, WP:BLPCAT, and WP:NONDEF.) Xenophrenic (talk) 20:56, 23 March 2016 (UTC) Oppose. Summoned...

there's nothing in the article about it, violating WP:BLPCAT on Lauren Laverne here, violating WP:BLPCAT on Richard Ramirez here by claiming he's a former...

applied to navbox templates, at least informally. So is that of the WP:BLPCAT policy, which explicitly covers them, and lists. Per WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY,...

WP:BLPCAT applies to categories and infoboxes, not article text. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 22:40, 19 December 2010 (UTC) @Nomoskedasticity, BLPCAT applies...

question at issue was sexuality-related categorisation in accordance with BLPCAT. In one case it took multiple admins and an OTRS ticket, in addition to...

groups Nominator's rationale: Per WP:CATEGRS (WP:ETHNICRACECAT) and WP:BLPCAT Blue-eyed soul is an often derogatory term (source) for white performers...

which mention "Hindu"/"Hinduism", thus violating WP:BLPCAT again. 13 December: Restores his another BLPCAT violation when neither sources confirm the subject's...

individual. WP:BLPCAT and it's subset WP:EGRS is clear on the policy in this case.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:31, 24 September 2019 (UTC) WP:BLPCAT doesn’t...

member the Jewish religion (Judaism) in his own words as required by WP:BLPCAT and WP:CAT/R. As before, he refuses to provide a citation and is implying...

@User:EvergreenFir, I notice you citing WP:BLPCAT, but nobody has yet mentioned WP:EGRS which actually expands on BLPCAT, which is just a summary. The WP:WikiProject...

March 2013 (UTC) Editor in question has agreed to be more careful re:WP:BLPCAT in future, so I believe we're done here. - The Bushranger One ping only...

subject has publicly self-identified with the belief in question (see WP:BLPCAT), either through direct speech or through actions like serving in an official...

Category:Khas people, too. It is being used for very vague purposes and is a BLPCAT minefield. - Sitush (talk) 21:39, 6 May 2017 (UTC) Support per WP:NONDEF...

category must contain reliable sources. See Wikipedia:Categorization and WP:BLPCAT for advice on how to apply categorization to articles relating to people...

that "it is inappropriate during a CfD". What I actually said was "Per WP:BLPCAT, I will always support the removal of BLP articles from categories which...

in edit summary, "request by article subject on talk page" and a link to blpcat. I don't know whether the assertion about the Talk page request is verified...

self-censorship. - DustFormsWords (talk) 23:00, 5 January 2011 (UTC) Per WP:BLPCAT, whether or not stigma attaches to HIV is indeed relevant to Wikipedia lists...

2009, I believe that the citations amply warrant the sentence as is. WP:BLPCAT, which my colleague refers to, is limited to statements as to the subject's...

be reinserting the disputed category unless there is consensus that WP:BLPCAT does not apply in this case. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 16:20, 25 September...

living people. --Animalparty! (talk) 19:58, 3 August 2021 (UTC) Delete WP:BLPCAT violation, highly contentious label. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:07, 4 August...

Template:Criticism_of_religion_sidebar by abusing roll back and finally violating WP:BLPCAT on every edit,[127][128][129] he never even participated on talk page.[130]...

violates BLPCAT, EGRS. Jeez, how many of these are there (incl. all ethnicities)?--Therexbanner (talk) 10:57, 27 November 2010 (UTC) Delete violates BLPCAT. Dougweller...

sock whose diffs are: [236] [237] to avoid 3RR until he found out that "WP:BLPCAT exempts from WP:3RR" and keep writing that when reverting my edits. Drivarum...

whether or not she is still a lesbian despite her current circumstances, WP:BLPCAT is quite clear that as far as sexual orientation is concerned, only self...

with those interpretations). Indeed he is all but quoting the policy of WP:BLPCAT in the first comment you cite. Your comments are taken on board r.e. the...

majority of biographies in this category are unsourced and unprovable. Per WP:BLPCAT, "Category names do not carry disclaimers or modifiers, so the case for...

likely current) blocks out there for this same individual for these same WP:BLPCAT violations.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:41, 14 September 2017 (UTC) Page...

on what she says, per WP:BLPCAT. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 23:43, 23 January 2013 (UTC) When it comes to WP:BLP and WP:BLPCAT, even if WP:RS have drawn...

which mention "Hindu"/"Hinduism", thus violating WP:BLPCAT again. 13 December: Restores his another BLPCAT violation when neither sources confirm the subject's...

impartially written. For reference, the relevant part of the policy is WP:BLPCAT which applies to templates. The COI template/s do not violate that in any...

violates basic policies regarding categorization, and especially violates BLPCAT.--The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 23:54, 15 December 2013 (UTC) I disagree...

clear to me what administrator actions you want here. But anyway, Wikipedia:BLPCAT has been part of BLP policy for a long while and is linked from the page...

contributions are meant in good faith, however they are definitely in violation of BLPCAT. The spread and number of edits also makes it hard to deal with this by...

does not mean that he identifies himself as Catholic as an adult. See WP:BLPCAT. This is your FINAL WARNING. Cresix (talk) 14:24, 27 August 2012 (UTC) Alec...

but when that isn't made clear by omitting "topics": WP:OCASSOC issues WP:BLPCAT issues --Francis Schonken (talk) 11:37, 3 October 2014 (UTC) - updated 05:35...

18:34, 22 March 2015 (UTC) In theory, that's right, in practice there is WP:BLPCAT, and the above described restriction of the scope of certain categories...

BLPCAT), for both criteria independently, or for both criteria jointly - I can see good arguments for all three choices. However, by virtue of BLPCAT...

that, because it's not a defining characteristic of a person. Also see WP:BLPCAT, particularly Caution should be used with content categories that suggest...

the article. The community has not accepted any proposal to relax our WP:BLPCAT requirements for Nigerian people, or anyone else, based on the ability of...

categorized the same actor as a Scientologist and had been reminded of WP:BLPCAT. Looking through Neptunekh2's contributions, I came across this edit where...

| links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: delete, violation of WP:BLPCAT: the case for each content category must be made clear by the article text...

I also agree with Mangoe that vagueness is unhelpful when you take WP:BLPCAT into account. Rodhullandemu 23:14, 3 March 2011 (UTC) Just to clarify, this...

disruption? Only a WP:NOTHERE editor would want to edit war to violate WP:BLPCAT and ignore consensus. Capitals00 (talk) 04:12, 19 May 2017 (UTC) Support...

Deleting Category:Demoniacs Nominator's rationale: WP:COP, including WP:BLPCAT with 3 living people in the category, and WP:V Q: What do Mother Teresa...

Cyril Smith. Jim Michael (talk) 15:31, 11 February 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:BLPCAT, and too similar to Category:People charged with sex crimes. Also recommend...

publicly self-identified with the belief or orientation in question (see WP:BLPCAT). For a dead person, there must be a verified consensus of reliable published...

"totally lying his ass off",[218] yet failing to justify his violation of WP:BLPCAT. I think that it is the time when multiple editors indeed have problem with...

inaccuracies; removing religion from the Portman infobox was correct per WP:BLPCAT, he just did not cite that policy in the edit summary (which should be encouraged)...

any particular religion the way Sanders does and I will remove it per WP:BLPCAT. --Guy Macon (talk) 09:00, 2 March 2016 (UTC) All else aside, those comments...

(UTC) Well, some of those are bad example; Gerald Kaufman obviously passes BLPCAT with a trivial (30s) check, for example. As to the rest; thanks, I will...

avenue to point editors to the use of the template. I will state this, WP:BLPCAT notes "Category names do not carry disclaimers or modifiers, so the case...

March this year [141]. It doesn't explicitly mention categories, but as WP:BLPCAT says, categories are if anything more sensitive since they have no disclaimer...

23 February 2016 (UTC) Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SUBJECTIVE and WP:BLPCAT A political boss is someone "who wields disproportionate power and influence...

- it's not clear the category serves any purpose other than trivia. WP:BLPCAT applies, I think, in that just because someone has this condition doesn't...

Category: American Scientologists. This is an apparent violation of WP:BLPCAT. This article had so many gratuitous references to Scientology and Scientologists...

is specifically demonstratably significant to their notability; see WP:BLPCAT. I've not looked in depth, but on the surface those removals look fine;...

"self-identification" for Categorization purposes as concerns religion according to WP:BLPCAT. But to add to the already established identity of "Jew" that the individual...

Jimbo's talk page and I share similar concerns. We could probably use WP:BLPCAT and cut the primary sourced material pending adequate sourcing (although...

people, despite the fact that none of them meet the strict critera at WP:BLPCAT over the addition of religous categories. Numerous warnings have been ignored...

of these articles seems to pass the bar set at WP:OCEGRS, WP:EGRS and WP:BLPCAT that the association between their background and their athletic career...

and populated it with a large number of people, in clear violation of WP:BLPCAT. WMC and I removed the unsourced categorizations, and I nominated the category...

all happened after he was already cautioned by multiple editors about WP:BLPCAT, WP:V and other relevant policies per his talk page after he had added names...

User:Cincinatis benefits from taking his time a little bit and reading WP:BLPCAT and Wikipedia:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality,...

aim was solely the removal of the Mondoweiss quote, claiming I violated BLPCAT with it. I continue to build the article. [72] Xenophrenic continues to...

(UTC) The BLO policy treats lists and categories identically (Wikipedia:BLPCAT#Categories.2C lists and navigation templates). The policy allows the sources...

highly pejorative label on a BLP, we have to be particularly cautious (WP:BLPCAT). Given that I think the close is fine on strength of argument. Hut 8.5...

prefer another label like "agnostic" or "uninterested in religion". Per BLPCAT, we have to go by self-identification, and until and unless Miliband says...

WP:GAME and misrepresent consensus on these articles[24][25] violating WP:BLPCAT, WP:LINKVIO, etc. He went onto WP:WIKIHOUND my edits by making edits where...

often added in complete disregard for the conditions set at WP:EGRS and WP:BLPCAT, as well as categories already present on the page. As an example, Olympic...

an atheist. Please remove the category. And, Neptunekh2, please read WP:BLPCAT, which deals with adding sexuality and religion categories to articles about...

Pectore, because you dislike my removals of other stuff elsewhere per WP:BLPCAT. And you are still miffed now. I am trying to improve the standard of the...

adjoining areas to suppress the revolt"[4] 23 April 2017 clear violation of WP:BLPCAT, the person has never identified himself to be Pakistani. Before making...

Erzan (talk) 02:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC) Erzan, if you're referring to WP:BLPCAT note the limited application: "Categories regarding religious beliefs (or...

version and per consensus on talk page,[161][162] with accordance to WP:BLPCAT. OP regards it as "deletion". This was not talk page blanking. But manual...

self-declaration argument; for living persons it is well established (see WP:BLPCAT for example) that self-declaration is the marker to use in controversial...

kumar.goel perceived the problem to be: "Your continued violation of WP:BLPCAT, WP:OR and WP:RS on List of converts to Christianity from Hinduism and List...

links in the discussion at Talk:Bill_Maher, and an apparent disregard of WP:BLPCAT concerning, so I'm moving this here – it may need more time and explanation...

page, not here.— Diannaa (talk) 22:04, 8 April 2022 (UTC) @Radiohist: WP:BLPCAT is quite clear that "Categories regarding religious beliefs (or lack of...

adding Category:Human rights abuses. I reverted this on the grounds of WP:BLPCAT and WP:NPOV. Subsequently the i.p. continually readded it, being reverted...

WP:BLPCAT implications to encourage more participation. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:50, 8 November 2015 (UTC) We didn't specifically discuss WP:BLPCAT on...

considered unnecessary. However our standards for living people are clear, WP:BLPCAT and Euriditescholar needs to follow them. If they wish to make exceptions...

Being a well respected organisation says nothing about fact checking. WP:BLPCAT unequivocally states Categories regarding religious beliefs (or lack of...

not included to support the additions. This goes against WP:CATVER and WP:BLPCAT. This is a persistent problem with this editor. Editor has received warnings...

investigation is highly disruptive, particularly for something not covered by WP:BLPCAT. Gaijin42 (talk) 02:41, 6 February 2014 (UTC) Because I've become so accustomed...

(UTC) Comment use of the field should be strongly discouraged under WP:BLPCAT. That is a BLP policy that is only minimally enforced, partly due to the...

wing populism category to Gina Carano which seems to be a violation of BLPCAT. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:22, 22 April 2021 (UTC) The discussion...

17:15, 23 December 2017 (UTC) Also, such a category seems to violate WP:BLPCAT. — kashmīrī TALK 17:30, 23 December 2017 (UTC) The speed between edits looks...

the article do not seem sufficient to support the criminal cats per WP:BLPCAT. Removing the "terrorism" cat would be a little more shaky even though it...

undesirable and not condoned by policy, please re-read the first paragraph of WP:BLPCAT. I have recently made these edits, [81], [82], and I do not expect to be...

Most/Keep Witchcraft My reading of WP:BLP (specifically WP:SUSPECT, WP:BLPCAT & WP:BLPCRIMINAL) is that these categories are not permissible for living...

articles? Need we list every entity linked from 2015 FIFA corruption case? WP:BLPCAT also applies: if we don't normally categorize, say actors, by "Actors who...

WP:BLPCAT implications to encourage more participation. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:50, 8 November 2015 (UTC) We didn't specifically discuss WP:BLPCAT on...

quadrilateral. SmilingFace (talk) 10:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC) Not at all. WP:BLPCAT says "Categories regarding religious beliefs or sexual orientation should...

titles. The current holder of the title will be listed in the article, so WP:BLPCAT is relevant ... but since the worst that can happen here is for the technical...

history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: According to WP:BLPCAT: "Category:Criminals and its subcategories should only be added for an incident...

care, it's worth reading WP:BLP too.  Chzz  ►  02:05, 30 May 2011 (UTC) WP:BLPCAT says “Categories regarding religious beliefs … should not be used unless...

unique cultural topic in its own right. That does not apply. Further, WP:BLPCAT has the principle that a living person should only be classified as a "convert...

Thanks. Collect (talk) 20:53, 10 April 2013 (UTC) I agree with you. Per WP:BLPCAT, we need to be extremely circumspect with categories implying negative associations...

individuals in the category who are still living, this poses a likely WP:BLPCAT violation. The persona non grata status also is not a defining characteristic...

March 2012 (UTC) Comment. That is exactly what we must not do - see WP:BLPCAT: "Category names do not carry disclaimers or modifiers, so the case for...

how it's worded. I can't see any basis for adding the cat, although WP:BLPCAT doesn't address these particular circumstances, i.e., a finding by a body...

subjective, too easy for BLP violations, possibly an inherent violation of WP:BLPCAT. Doesn't even include the most notable use of the actual term "white hispanic"...

intent, would it be in keeping with the WP:BLPCAT? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 12:33, 21 May 2011 (UTC) The BLPCAT policy is intended to keep us from labeling...

- it's not clear the category serves any purpose other than trivia. WP:BLPCAT applies, I think, in that just because someone has this condition doesn't...

supported by article text and references. See the first paragraph of WP:BLPCAT. AllyD (talk) 10:51, 15 May 2011 (UTC) BTW The Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions...

December a WP:BLPCAT violating category was added to the Nicole Kidman article by an editor with 25 edits. I recommending reading WP:BLPCAT now, other editors...

self-identification in both the cases. The changes should also be reflected in WP:BLPCAT. --AshLey Msg 12:49, 28 May 2012 (UTC) Support This would help put a stop...

Subjective category with respect to definition of "celebrity", and per WP:BLPCAT, a nightmare. Many of the people already listed in it were convicted years...

let someone else deal with it. Govvy (talk) 10:59, 9 July 2020 (UTC) WP:BLPCAT may be applicable, which does also cover lists. WP:AFD is the place to take...

actor would be categorized in any of the categories mentioned thus far: WP:BLPCAT, WP:COP, WP:MOSBIO, etc. --Francis Schonken (talk) 16:31, 28 February 2016...

Congressman, then he is not to be categorized as such. Applicable policy: WP:BLPCAT: Categories and Infobox fields on religious beliefs (or lack of such) should...

BLPN that we should not have a category of climate change deniers per WP:BLPCAT. Holocaust denial is just as contentious and therefore this should not be...

how religion or sexual orientation are regarded in WP:LISTPEOPLE and WP:BLPCAT. As demonstrated in this AfD discussion, even agreeing on what is a reliable...

reliable sources, a minimum per WP:EGRS and, in the case of living people, WP:BLPCAT. Every article does not have to be in a descent (or emigrant/expatriate)...

pointed above.Alexikoua (talk) 15:38, 10 September 2013 (UTC) Oppose. WP:BLPCAT refers to some aspects of Wikipedia not carrying "disclaimers or modifiers"...

page is entirely what WP:BLPCAT is all about. I think this confusion illustrates well why it isn't productive for the BLPCAT standard to leak into other...

Propose Deleting Category:Perpetual travellers Nominator's rationale: Per WP:BLPCAT A Perpetual traveler (PT) is a term for someone who intentionally lives...

categorization to articles relating to people. See also the policy at WP:BLPCAT regarding categorization by religion or sexual orientation. Eastmain (talk...

the convicted, with Category:British Muslims. This is a violation of WP:BLPCAT, which requires that subjects explicitly self-identify before categories...

and/or family. Quis separabit? 12:08, 24 April 2014 (UTC) Delete per WP:BLPCAT; all entries are not sourced and should be removed, which would leave the...

In those cases, it should be removed from the articles instead. See WP:BLPCAT). I still believe that this category should be emptied or hidden pending...

Wikipedia:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality, WP:BLPCAT, etc. If the community wants to adjust those guidelines, it is best done...

categories based on religion or sexual orientation, in which case the WP:BLPCAT guideline requires that the membership group be related to their notability...

placing religious metadata in the infobox is higher than usual; see WP:BLPCAT. Regards, Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 21:34, 13 March 2013 (UTC) Apparently...

cases like these, we follow WP:BLPCAT; we go by self-identity. In a similar case, with regard to Jodie Foster, per WP:BLPCAT, we also don't call Foster a...

becomes a part of their notability. And by policy, YRC is right, for WP:BLPCAT policy states, "Categories regarding religious beliefs or sexual orientation...

(UTC) Strong delete. Fails WP:LISTCRIT and additionally goes against WP:BLPCAT (Categories regarding religious beliefs (or lack of such) or sexual orientation...

impossible to have sources for this article that meet the conditions of WP:BLPCAT (please note those conditions carefully). As things stand, without sources...

to be a defining characteristic of that person's life and career. See WP:BLPCAT. Binksternet (talk) 05:09, 21 February 2015 (UTC) If it is not defining...

contributed a number of refinements to Wikipedia's BLP policy over the years (WP:BLPCAT, No eventualism, discouraging contributions from individuals in a significant...

--Teratornis (talk) 09:32, 8 August 2010 (UTC) You should also look at this, WP:BLPCAT. The policy specifically says: "Categories regarding religious beliefs and...

that's another issue. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:39, 26 February 2011 (UTC) WP:BLPCAT probably covers it. Although possibly only at a stretch in this case :)...

non-specific and POVish. "Within the Infobox, "Religion" is defined using WP:BLPCAT and Mormon isn't a choice there at all. There is no "Mormons" category....

Schulz (talk) 21:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC) Delete this is a serious WP:BLPCAT problem. Finding the text in the article that places the individual in the...

heavy negative POV push and may violate guideline WP:COAT. Per guidleine WP:BLPCAT this may place the persons listed in this category in a false light. RightCowLeftCoast...

(talk) 06:21, 10 August 2014 (UTC) Declined. Declining per WP:BLPCAT. Quoting: "Caution should be used with content categories that suggest a...

'point'-y). As long as the identity is self-confessed and notable per WP:BLPCAT, the inclusion in such categories is positive as well as informational/encyclopedic...

(talk) 18:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC) I remove the cats from 2. Per WP:BLPCAT, the case for each content category must be made clear by the article text...

Lancaster (talk) 20:40, 18 December 2010 (UTC) I think MVOO should read WP:BLPCAT: "Categories regarding religious beliefs... should not be used unless the...

EvergreenFir raised on User Talk:Doug Weller#BLPs, Mental Illness, and WP:BLPCAT (which is indirectly what of prompted me to make this AFD). EvergreenFir...

cross-categorization that fails WP:NOTDIR criterion #6. It also fails WP:BLPCAT: Caution should be used with content categories that suggest a person has...

BLPs, which they themselves have not stated. That is a BLP vio, similar to BLPCAT in fact. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:25, 30 December 2013 (UTC) No I'm really...

Newimpartial (talk) 04:26, 3 August 2019 (UTC) I'll point out the second para of BLPCAT: Caution should be used with content categories that suggest a person has...

to describe Americans, so calling people it almost certainly violates WP:BLPCAT. JeffUK 22:21, 16 January 2023 (UTC) Comment the 37 subcategories in Category:Dissidents...

BLPs, which they themselves have not stated. That is a BLP vio, similar to BLPCAT in fact. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:25, 30 December 2013 (UTC) No I'm really...

is "invention" itself. And that's not even getting into the definition/BLPCAT issues with "Jewish". Rd232 talk 11:13, 1 December 2010 (UTC) Delete - non-notable...

whatsoever since it falls under WP:BLPCAT. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:41, 14 August 2013 (UTC) How on earth does it fall under WP:BLPCAT? We're talking about including...

establish that the people listed are tarkhans and hence is a violation of WP:BLPCAT --Anbu121 (talk me) 05:19, 15 October 2012 (UTC) are you saying they are...

"descent" information and categories to various BLPs in contravention of the WP:BLPCAT and WP:CATEGRS guidelines – the problem is encapsulated in this revert (and...

(Talk:Jodie_Foster#Redo_consensus), but there again was clear she should excluded per WP:BLPCAT. Ten months later, @Hearfourmewesique: is deciding the consensus to exclude...

subject has publicly self-identified with the belief in question (see WP:BLPCAT), either through direct speech or through actions like serving in an official...

subject has publicly self-identified with the belief in question (see WP:BLPCAT), either through direct speech or through actions like serving in an official...

subject has publicly self-identified with the belief in question (see WP:BLPCAT), either through direct speech or through actions like serving in an official...

individuals? Thanks S C Cheese (talk) 17:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC) See WP:BLPCAT and WP:RS. Shantavira|feed me 18:37, 17 October 2022 (UTC) I'm fairly confident...

logs) Nominator's rationale: Delete. Pretty much direct violation of WP:BLPCAT regarding sexual orientation: Categories regarding religious beliefs and...

have never admitted their religion, thus the article probably violates WP:BLPCAT too. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 18:04, 25 April 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...

WP:BLPCAT, which is perhaps why you believe that my saying that there must be self-identification for Jewish categories is wrong. However, forget BLPCAT...

all. Benkenobi18 (talk) 09:24, 13 December 2012 (UTC) Question - Does WP:BLPCAT mean that Fred Phelps needs to say "I'm a hyper-Calvinist" in order to be...

turtle-bay-grill-and-lounge.aspx | accessdate=March 29, 2012}}</ref> WP:BLPCAT requires specifically Categories regarding religious beliefs or sexual orientation...

totally ambiguous... but right now this category is completely ignoring WP:BLPCAT - including just about everyone and anyone who is both gay and an actor...

01:42, 16 November 2015 (UTC) Strong Keep more than satisfies WP:GNG and WP:BLPCAT. The history of Jews in New York City is a well-known part of American culture...

01:20, 20 June 2012 (UTC) BLPCAT does not apply, as we clearly are not talking about Jewish in the religious sense and BLPCAT does not apply to ethnicity...

barney (talk) 09:23, 5 May 2013 (UTC) Keep Article meets WP:LISTPEOPLE, WP:BLPCAT and WP:EGRS. Miniapolis 13:34, 8 May 2013 (UTC) Sorry, IMO you are mistaken...

articles). As for your categorization suggestion, please read WP:OCAT and WP:BLPCAT. If we are to maintain this information here in such detail, we would do...

vote changed - see below) I don't see anything at either WP:Lists or WP:BLPCAT that states that all lists need to have references that support the list...

Being a rape victim carries a stigma in most modern societies, and WP:BLPCAT reminds us that "caution should be used with [content categories and lists]...

child sexual abuse to the article. An editor reverted. The cat passes WP:BLPCAT. I'd like confirmation that the cat is within policy. Lionel (talk) 09:51...

be taken when adding living persons to lists based on religion" (also WP:BLPCAT & WP:CAT/R, category guidelines apply to lists) - Epinoia (talk) 21:37,...

crime, and I don't think one should be created for living people (see WP:BLPCAT). By the way, if you think a category might exist but don't know its name...

March 2012 (UTC) Comment. That is exactly what we must not do - see WP:BLPCAT: "Category names do not carry disclaimers or modifiers, so the case for...

taken when adding living persons to lists based on religion" (see also WP:BLPCAT and WP:CAT/R) - Epinoia (talk) 00:14, 15 September 2019 (UTC) @Epinoia:...

January 2010 (UTC) Comment on the removal of articles from categories. Per WP:BLPCAT, I will always support the removal of BLP articles from categories which...

November 2021 (UTC) Delete as it additionally goes against the spirit of WP:BLPCAT and WP:LISTPEOPLE ("Special care must be taken when adding living persons...

lists: If the person is alive (WP:BLP) then the entry should comply with WP:BLPCAT but other editors argue that if no sources dispute the information of a...

of self-identification on Wikipedia when applying categorization (see WP:BLPCAT). Now let us ask the following question. If all these rabbis were here to...

impossible to have sources for this article that meet the conditions of WP:BLPCAT (please note those conditions carefully). As things stand, without sources...

subject has publicly self-identified with the belief in question (see WP:BLPCAT), either through direct speech or through actions like serving in an official...

than Category:American Jews. We have WP:BLPCAT for a reason. --John (talk) 21:28, 7 May 2012 (UTC) YES - WP:BLPCAT is clear - its undue to add him the the...

with respect to our BLP policies, starting with, but not limited to, WP:BLPCAT. --j⚛e deckertalk 16:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC) Request for procedural information...

activities or public life" to quote WP:BLPCAT. The problem is that this seems to be a case where the requirements of BLPCAT conflict somewhat with commonsense...

category must contain reliable sources. See Wikipedia:Categorization and WP:BLPCAT for advice on how to apply categorization to articles relating to people...

I'd do a no-consensu o what to call the category, delete the cat under WP:BLPCAT and open a neutral RFC incorporating all of the main suggestions for category...

(contribs) 16:13, 6 January 2010 (UTC) Comment - Have we considered WP:BLPCAT in all of this?  Frank  |  talk  02:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC) From what I've...

me think up which policy is being broken. The best I could find was WP:BLPCAT which arguably prevents "lists ... (referring to living persons within any...

additions. I referred to BLPCAT to show that templates and lists are treated on an equal basis to categories. Yes, in BLPCAT it is in reference to individuals...

a part of Category:Esotericism and is viewed negatively by some then WP:BLPCAT seems to apply to its inclusion on a BLP - citable self declaration and...

October 2014 (UTC) Furthermore, I echo what User:Sparkie82 has quoted from WP:BLPCAT: "Categories regarding religious beliefs or sexual orientation should not...

a statement. This categorisation is a violation of WP:TERRORIST and WP:BLPCAT, because the people who did the sinkings are named in the article. After...

(talk) 06:36, 2 August 2011 (UTC) Keep ethnicity out of it. I think WP:BLPCAT and Wikipedia_talk:Categorization/Ethnicity,_gender,_religion_and_sexuality...

keep being returned. Polyamory is a sexual preference and covered by WP:BLPCAT which includes lists - living people should of course not be included unless...

about same-sex relationships. Siawase (talk) 18:28, 29 May 2014 (UTC) RE BLPCAT - I have generally operated under "Have they self declared?" and "Is it...

included him in a couple LGBT cats for a while, which I removed per WP:BLPCAT.) Gawker first "outed" him earlier this year, but they are clearly not a...

— Keithbob • Talk • 19:57, 12 February 2011 (UTC) Why don't you try WP:BLPCAT and if you aren't supposed to categorize and list people without them self...

cases of Murder–suicide? Martinevans123 (talk) 10:35, 6 July 2015 (UTC) WP:BLPCAT (a subsection of WP:BLP) covers this: Caution should be used with content...

you who just violated WP:BLPCAT by adding few entries on List of converts to Christianity from Hinduism that fail WP:BLPCAT,[58][59] and using or misrepresenting...

category. Johnbod (talk) 03:48, 26 December 2009 (UTC) Reply. Johnbod, WP:BLPCAT is very clear that for living people to be included in a category, a reference...

original religion and what did they convert to) that a category for that fails BLPCAT issues (which itself cautions about cats related to religious beliefs)....

Dantzig is long dead. However, I'm not sure where else to take this and WP:BLPCAT provides guidance that I believe should apply to all biographies, living...

me think up which policy is being broken. The best I could find was WP:BLPCAT which arguably prevents "lists ... (referring to living persons within any...

(Talk:Jodie_Foster#Redo_consensus), but there again was clear she should excluded per WP:BLPCAT. Ten months later, @Hearfourmewesique: is deciding the consensus to exclude...

Scientologists. That was an error on my part based on a misreading of WP:BLPCAT and I will not repeat it. To claim that those edits are "manipulation" of...

(talk) 22:14, 2 June 2011 (UTC) Except that that is not actually policy. WP:BLPCAT applies only to categories, and only to religion. Attempts to expand that...

covered by WP:BLP? Cheers. Collect (talk) 13:08, 19 December 2014 (UTC) WP:BLPCAT more specifically - and yes you are to fine to remove unreferenced content...

have a Jewish name. We do not call a person "Jewish" in any BLP per WP:BLPCAT without strong sourcing. The book presented does not even give its sources...

determine how Wikipedia should handle the matter. (The principles of WP:BLPCAT would likely apply, since Lists, like Categories, 'do not carry disclaimers...

gut reaction to this question was; "to clarify BLP policy". Ideas like WP:BLPCAT are important but are open to misrepresentation/mis-interpretation. There...

August 2012 (UTC) Only categorization requires self-identification (WP:BLPCAT.) For the prose in BLP articles on individuals who aren't publicly self-identified...

biography pages from that cat. And to preemptive catch the next question WP:BLPCAT would strongly discourage a category like "People accused of sexual misconduct"...

persons|biographies of living persons]] policy: IP hopping to restore [[WP:BLPCAT]]/[[WP:EGRS]] violations 5621 2A01:111F:E1A:A400:0:0:0:0/64 64 ST47 20190429211744...

argument for deletion. Argumrnts attempting to impose BLPCAT on a list are also clearly non-arguments. BLPCAT applies only to living people, and only to categories...

The guideline for whether someone can be categorized in a religion is WP:BLPCAT: Categories regarding religious beliefs (or lack of such) or sexual orientation...

she has publicly declared that it is significant in her life. Compare WP:BLPCAT (which is about categorization by religion, but I think the same applies...

subject has publicly self-identified with the belief in question (see WP:BLPCAT), either through direct speech or through actions like serving in an official...

Thanks. Collect (talk) 20:06, 8 July 2013 (UTC) Absolute violation of WP:BLPCAT to categorize or list someone, unless it is based on an unequivocal statement...

a part of Category:Esotericism and is viewed negatively by some then WP:BLPCAT seems to apply to its inclusion on a BLP - citable self declaration and...

mentioned in passing) (and perhaps a matter of self-identification as per WP:BLPCAT). I can imagine sources getting into the general issue -- it wouldn't surprise...

list must be stripped back to the small subset of entries that pass WP:BLPCAT and WP:CAT/R. The only reason I haven't done it already is that I don't...

find no such comment in the blog. Nor is the blog even written by Adams. BLPCAT is policy. Cheers. Collect (talk) 22:20, 29 March 2012 (UTC) The blog http://thenickadams...

history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) We have a WP:BLPCAT issue here. Two different editors Rodneyorpheus (talk · contribs) and...

been adding categories to biographies of living people in violation of WP:BLPCAT and using a source that is considered to be unreliable (www.truthaboutscientology...

close of that discussion, and also WP:COP#General_considerations and WP:BLPCAT. From that April 2009 CFD, there developed a set of categories which attribute...

to be concerned that the outcome of that 2015 RfC is in conflict with WP:BLPCAT at least when it comes to people who are still alive? Unless someone checks...

the Nazis and the US Constitution. This is clearly unacceptable per WP:BLPCAT and WP:NPOV. I've tried to engage with the editor on my talk page, but due...

October 2015 (UTC) I'm hoping that some editors who are familiar with WP:BLPCAT and WP:EGRS can help me clean up the edits made by Alexander Iskandar (talk ·...

Categories (of Scientology or Catholic nature) are in clear violation of WP:BLPCAT but I believe even the claim of "officially returned to the Catholic Church"...

cats as they would require self identification with that group as per WP:BLPCAT - or whichever that guideline is. Off2riorob (talk) 15:16, 2 July 2011 (UTC)...

attempt to add a cat or religion to the infobox that does not comply with WP:BLPCAT. Thus far, nothing has.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:23, 21 September 2013 (UTC) Asma...

plausible counter-argument that was raised in discussions was that per WP:BLPCAT, "Categories regarding religious beliefs and sexual orientation should not...

Marcocapelle (talk) 22:21, 21 November 2024 (UTC) Containerize for Now per WP:BLPCAT and WP:BLPCRIMINAL. Certainly this charge could be discussed in the article...

religion (regardless of how many sources state it) should stand (see WP:BLPCAT/WP:CAT/R). Kosner, in the Commentary piece, clearly and quite logically...

"criminals" is defined as a "sensitive category" per WP:COP#Sensitive and WP:BLPCAT. In the case at hand, the use of the category is,IMO, used more to discredit...

reason to suspect that this list does not pass WP:BLP, in particular WP:BLPCAT. I wonder if it is not time to propose it for WP:AFD, but want to have some...

links there may be as contentious as a category, which is covered by WP:BLPCAT. I'd say those have to go, possibly replaced with links that are more general:...

My chief problem is making people "poster children" for irreligion. WP:BLPCAT says "Categories regarding religious beliefs or sexual orientation should...

this section. The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Note that WP:BLPCAT applies to uses of this category, and the WP:BURDEN of providing a citation...

without a source are not worth a category, per WP:COP-HERITAGE and WP:BLPCAT . Upmerge Category:Honduran people of French-Canadian descent to 3 parents:...

reliably and discussing the issue in the article, as I see you told them, WP:BLPCAT. The Jewcy article is self written, I think we can accept that, as pretty...

own statements (he has said things which are hyper-Calvinist). Does WP:BLPCAT require Phelps to say "I'm a hyper-Calvinist," or is it sufficient for him...

to disapprove of such opinions being repeated about living persons. WP:BLPCAT makes clear that certain statements about living persons are problematic...

identity implied that the person had a "poor reputation", a term we find at WP:BLPCAT. Concerning Categorization we find: "Caution should be used with categories...

on a few points, and give a different perspective on the matter. Per WP:BLPCAT, though similar guidance applies to ALL articles, not just articles about...

only this source. - Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 23:14, 13 May 2015 (UTC) As per WP:BLPCAT, we need clear and unambiguous self-identification. NorthBySouthBaranof...

are some tricky areas with BLPCAT. Like should Richard B. Spencer be in Category:American neo-Nazis? That seems like a BLPCAT violation, right? But it's...

reply to Thivierr's 00:16 post.) @Thivierr: actually on the contrary, WP:BLPCAT requires that the case for each content category must be made clear by the...

IP to pay attention to sources. Are the other additions breaches of WP:BLPCAT too? (Also, if anyone else would like to deal with this, I'd be grateful...

require self-identification if the person is living, rather as with WP:BLPCAT. If that was the sole issue, then I would take this matter to WP:BLPN or...

politicians who are "conspiracy theorist" is inherently a violation of BLPCAT. "Do not categorize biographies of living people under such contentious...

talking, and the folks adding this are unregistered. This seems to violate WP:BLPCAT, but then that is for categories. Advice, please? It's my first dispute...

conspiracy theorist and we certainly don't call her that in Wiki voice. WP:BLPCAT states, "Category names do not carry disclaimers or modifiers, so the case...

children, see Phillip Adams's name? This is actually a fair question. WP:BLPCAT is the advise we have for when to apply terms of criminality in categories...

entire debate is silly. I suggest we follow the principles laid out by WP:BLPCAT and accept that if a group self-identifies as "Christian", it is "Christian"...

Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:26, 31 May 2023 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:BLPCAT, except that the sole member is dead. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:50, 31 May...

nothing in the infobox, there is a category so there's potentially also a WP:BLPCAT issue involved. Nil Einne (talk) 13:28, 10 August 2017 (UTC) Hello all....

argument for deletion. Argumrnts attempting to impose BLPCAT on a list are also clearly non-arguments. BLPCAT applies only to living people, and only to categories...

categories, so BLPCAT does not apply. However, note that BLPCAT, in spite of its name, does apply to lists as well as categories. BLPCAT indirectly relates...

there are POV issues, but they are minor, and your edits don't violate WP: BLPCAT as they are properly sourced (kudos to you!). However, it seems as if a...

something. --woodensuperman 16:32, 14 May 2026 (UTC) Purge zoophiliacs per WP:BLPCAT. If they were convicted of bestiality, that may be an acceptable category...

Abdul Kalam. Thanks--Neelkamala (talk) 10:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC) See WP:BLPCAT; the references that were being used were not sufficient, and I've removed...

"contentious"? Furthermore, couldn't we argue that we could extend the logic of WP:BLPCAT to articles like this that are lists: "Categories regarding religious beliefs...

(talk) 01:00, 15 September 2011 (UTC) BLP expertise, particularly in WP:BLPCAT subtleties, would be helpful at an RfC here. The issue is which criteria...

2014 (UTC) Near the start of the thread you were in I had pointed to WP:BLPCAT as the specific part that was applicable in the circumstances. The bit about...

from the list. They shouldn't be there if they're not sourced - it's WP:BLPCAT in reverse. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC) I wonder if...

decide what, if anything, to do. As an aside there are also violations of WP:BLPCAT with cats saying he is Jewish as opposed to of Jewish descent. As far as...

it's not mentioned in the prose, but because the mentions don't satisfy WP:BLPCAT.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:52, 27 April 2012 (UTC) Right on. I think it's a better...

actually have a policy regarding self identification except for cats (WP:BLPCAT) - for prose content, there is no such policy. MOS:IDENTITY specifically...

religion has no bearing on his particular notability, and in violation of WP:BLPCAT: "[Infobox c]ategories regarding religious beliefs or sexual orientation...

most likely IP editors; [84][85][86][87]) and removed especially per WP:BLPCAT. George Ho (talk) 21:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC); expanded, 22:39, 16 August...

(talk) 21:25, 17 April 2011 (UTC) Where did you get that nonsense from? WP:BLPCAT refers to categories and says that: "should not be used unless the subject...

one specific user can do that, while lacking the ability to understand WP:BLPCAT. Both have problems with WP:CIR. Capitals00 (talk) 09:39, 17 May 2017 (UTC)...

Sanders himself self-identifying as being a member of a religion. See WP:BLPCAT. The rules for filling out the "Religion = " entry in the infobox are: [A]...

changes protection and needs to be again. IPs and users unfamiliar with WP:BLPCAT keep adding Foster to LGBT categories. . Delicious carbuncle (talk) 03:59...

if we're consistent. For violating multiple criteria noted in WP:BLPCAT. Category names do not carry disclaimers or modifiers, so the case for each...

is allowed based on the text of the articles that are included (see WP:BLPCAT). However, the article lists sources for a few of the included people. In...

) - RevelationDirect (talk) 15:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC) Delete Per WP:BLPCAT and WP:BLPCRIMINAL. I may occasionally push the boundaries with editing...

citations where Eduardo Saverin identifies himself as an ethnic Jew? Per WP:BLPCAT I agree with Bb23 and would remove the ethno religios tagging.Youreallycan...

review 3 related categorization guidelines (WP:DEFINING,WP:COP#N and WP:BLPCAT) and to clarify them better and to add links to them. Gibraltar-related...

beginning of the day, I am seeing rollback abuse[57][58] and violation of WP:BLPCAT on this template. Surely needs protection. D4iNa4 (talk) 07:58, 27 December...

sources that would really support ethnic or religion categories per WP:BLPCAT, especially on Imad Chhadeh and Denho Acar. Place Clichy (talk) 20:54, 4...

Chambers has not self-identified as LGBT and this is a violation of WP:BLPCAT. The editor has violated WP:BRD and seems determined to edit war. On the...

Category:Fascists. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:03, 13 July 2024 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:BLPCAT and WP:SUBJECTIVECAT, see also Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/...

to the lesbian category, which would need to be removed each time per WP:BLPCAT. We go by what BLP subjects identify as. If there are more recent sources...

I would definitely lean more toward delete if someone had brought up WP:BLPCAT/WP:LISTPEOPLE, which I would have found to be applicable here if the BLP...

the people in this category, per WP:COPDEF, WP:DEFINING, WP:CATDEF, WP:BLPCAT, but rather an incidental aspect. The barrier to being a Substack writer...

19:37, 12 November 2012 (UTC) Is the category appropriate? No - see WP:BLPCAT. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:39, 12 November 2012 (UTC) He has now self-identified...

talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:BLPCAT by implying relation between people for having the same surname and skin...

@Doomsdayer520: I linked the wrong section. What I meant to link to was WP:BLPCAT which says this Caution should be used with content categories that suggest...

unless that source is the person being classified (for example, see WP:BLPCAT). If LGBTQ Nation is the only source describing a person as asexual, then...

who identified themselves..." (my emphasis added) yesterday, to match WP:BLPCAT. Both Category:Roman Catholics and especially Category:American Roman Catholics...

.. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:06, 11 September 2016 (UTC) Additionally, WP:BLPCAT requires self-identification to place a LP in a contentious category, which...

finding" about religious views and ethnic roots on the wrong side of OR and BLPCAT in BLPs. For multireligious I couldn't tell if that's a proper adjective...

close of that discussion, and also WP:COP#General_considerations and WP:BLPCAT. From that April 2009 CFD, there developed a set of categories which attribute...

WP:EXEMPT1E which says "These principles apply equally to lists", it is WP:BLPCAT, and it doesn't refer to WP:OCEGRS or any other mention of ethnicity. It...

discussion. The current members are all deceased but this could create WP:BLPCAT so I would favor WP:SALT since this is the 3rd go around. - RevelationDirect...

user space issues). To me, it seems like the most pertinent policy is WP:BLPCAT#Categories.2C lists and navigation templates: The Wikipedia article on cold...

Agree also with Gd123lbp. Eric talk 14:02, 20 November 2020 (UTC) per WP:BLPCAT Category names do not carry disclaimers or modifiers, so the case for each...

| watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: This category will never meet WP:BLPCAT or WP:CATDEFINE/WP:COPDEF. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:03, 15 June 2024...

to RfC. 2) Looking at RS and the preference of the group (something WP:BLPCAT lets us look at for BLP's at least) Ahmadiyya might reasonably be called...

WP:PEOPLECAT as a rather trivial, obscure WP:NONDEFINING aspect (see also WP:BLPCAT). The club has no Wikipedia article, and mention in the articles of the...

policy. In reality, what we need to do here is follow the spirit of WP:BLPCAT, where ethnic identification follows the subject's self-identification....

it's a gratuitous reference. I've removed it from the categories per WP:BLPCAT.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC) Thank you. I felt the statement...

the categories are there, which is clearly undesirable if we follow WP:BLPCAT and WP:CATVER. It's not my basic assumption that whoever added these had...

subject has publicly self-identified with the belief in question (see WP:BLPCAT), either through direct speech or through actions like serving in an official...

template. If you look at where BLP does and does not apply, and especially WP:BLPCAT, you'll see that templates don't require direct citations. They do absolutely...

(non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 13:29, 2 November 2025 (UTC) CAT:BLPCAT:BLP → Category:Unreferenced BLPs  (talk · links · history ·...

cherry-picked opinion of a single person? I think you need to read WP:CATDEF and WP:BLPCAT.- MrX 19:53, 20 August 2016 (UTC) You asked for "an example". I will give...

list must be stripped back to the small subset of entries that pass WP:BLPCAT and WP:CAT/R. The only reason I haven't done it already is that I don't...

discussion at Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons on whether WP:BLPCAT's requirement of sourcing for sexual orientation should also apply to non-binary...

delete this. Evan's sexuality is of no relevance to the article: see WP:BLPCAT. AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:58, 3 August 2011 (UTC) Disagree. Evans' himself...

to the "Pseudoscientists" category (which I dispute on the basis of WP:BLPCAT" A report has been filed at 3RRNB here and as I strongly suspect meat/sock...

reliable source where she says she is Bulgarian, then it would appear that WP:BLPCAT is satisfied. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 15:34, 21 April 2013 (UTC) Yes, there...

that neither category has a real-world counterpart, which would violate WP:BLPCAT. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC) Support renaming per...

to mention her moving with her wife, but I removed the LGBT cat. Per WP:BLPCAT, we require self identification for such cats. Her marrying a woman is not...

region of India or similar criteria. Per WP:EGRS and, in many cases, WP:BLPCAT, such ethnicity or language-based categories shouldn't be added to articles...

converts from one religion to the other include forced conversions. WP:BLPCAT, which applies to lists, prevents this for BLPs. That seems like a good...

Billings (talk) 03:57, 29 October 2020 (UTC) I was indeed referencing WP:BLPCAT and WP:EGRS, which both require self-identification, and which I also noted...

addition it is blatantly violating multiple of the criteria noted in WP:BLPCAT. Category names do not carry disclaimers or modifiers, so the case for each...

in Category:Martiniquais people of Guinean descent, seen guidelines WP:BLPCAT and WP:EGRS. Additional input would be welcome! Place Clichy (talk) 09:33...

Howard Stern, [17] nothing in the article mentions circumcision Per WP:BLPCAT "each content category must be made clear by the article text and its cited...

which closed as delete. No real-world counterpart, which would violate WP:BLPCAT. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:15, 5 February 2024 (UTC) Support per nom Mason...

anything about descent based on a football selection. Per WP:EGRS (and WP:BLPCAT for living people) we should have reliable sources constantly and consistently...

Marcocapelle (talk) 21:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC) Delete. Per WP:EGRS and WP:BLPCAT, the case for ethnicity categories must be made clear in the article and...

have the likes of the various religious categories, when WP:CAT/R and WP:BLPCAT aren't widely enforced? Category:American (or English, or French, or...)...

majority of biographies in this category are unsourced and unprovable. Per WP:BLPCAT, "Category names do not carry disclaimers or modifiers, so the case for...

this already covered by WP:BLPCAT? Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 00:57, 22 May 2024 (UTC) I think this is a request to make BLPCAT even stricter and to also apply...

bring up that topic. Zagalejo (talk) 03:32, 3 January 2024 (UTC) Per WP:BLPCAT, "Category names do not carry disclaimers or modifiers, so the case for...

something. --woodensuperman 16:32, 14 May 2026 (UTC) Purge zoophiliacs per WP:BLPCAT. If they were convicted of bestiality, that may be an acceptable category...

have been placed in it without evidence, making it a major problem for WP:BLPCAT. User:Namiba 16:45, 17 January 2024 (UTC) Delete per nom. Probably the same...

the editors who restored it though it was part of a larger revert. Per BLPCAT categories like that have a high bar for inclusion. I don't think Owen's...

definitely those cats don't belong on the current version of the article. WP:BLPCAT is quite clear that "Category names do not carry disclaimers or modifiers...

self-identification (regardless of secondary sources) as part of the BLP policies (see WP:BLPCAT). If we are going to be questioning someone's religious beliefs in an article...

probably going to get lost otherwise. I think User:NadVolum is thinking of WP:BLPCAT above, the part of BLP which deals with categories. It states that "Category...

content as a BLP violation, plus the related categories which run afoul of WP:BLPCAT. If they're restored, a block is in order.-- Ponyobons mots 16:41, 4 February...

inclusion of living people in the article. If any specific names violate WP:BLPCAT, I am happy to remove them, but I argue that this should not lead to the...

historical figures and events and organisations and so on to LGBTQ raises WP:BLPCAT issues and is a matter that should be settled via an RFC, not a single page...

some category maintenance (I remove religion cats from Irish BLPs where WP:BLPCAT isn't met), but it's only today I noticed an earlier major addition by a...

{{pseudoscience}} (which formerly, improperly, included Starbuck) per WP:BLPCAT. Using the loudest critics or most extreme opinions to describe, label,...

removed fugitive from the lead and few categories per WP:CATDEFINE and WP:BLPCAT. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:57, 9 May 2025 (UTC) Yeah, I would say...

edits state that as fact thus, for the same reason we wouldn't include a "BLPCAT:academics who committed fraud", we shouldn't include see also links that...

criteria of this category if they are unclear. See also the guidelines at WP:BLPCAT and Wikipedia:Categorizing articles about people. So I am wondering where...

LGBT-tags to BLPs unless...? Sounds like we're confusing categories (WP:BLPCAT) with WikiProject tags, which are ostensibly maintenance templates. An article...

article text through reference to a reliable source, in violation of WP:BLPCAT. 133.106.243.150 (talk) 04:06, 17 August 2023 (UTC) Semi-protected for a...

that are not backed up by the article in question (see WP:CATDEF and WP:BLPCAT) or are already subcategories (WP:CATSPECIFIC) Added various unsourced and/or...

person's name could be validly added to categories within the scope of WP:BLPCAT). Furthermore, even if {{BLP}} didn't apply to redirects, that would (in...

BLP policy violations – persistent addition of unverified categories – WP:BLPCAT. ~Sangdeboeuf (talk) 00:16, 19 May 2026 (UTC) Semi-protected for a period...

Of the three diffs provided, the second actually looks reasonable per WP:BLPCAT, but I agree that the complete picture of Justito's edits is one of someone...

good, and time for the next step of BRD: Talk:Emily_St._John_Mandel#WP:BLPCAT_BRD. In this discussion, Valjean tells me that removing these categories...

people's names in caste articles. If specific names are a violation of [WP:BLPCAT](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BLP_categories), I agree they should...