DOKUMEN123.COM

be a good reason for departing from their guidance. Shortcuts WP:ATTPWP:ATTP WP:IDONTLIKETHENOMINATORWP:IDONTLIKETHENOMINATOR Examples: Keep Creator has...

nominator. Doing so may be perceived as an ad hominem argument at AFD per WP:ATTP. 2. Don't use WP:BEFORE in a way that could be reasonably perceived to be...

because it was snowing. Nfitz (talk) 01:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC) My apologies; WP:ATTP lists ADHOM as a shortcut in its shortcuts box, but in fact that shortcut...

AFDs. MarnetteD|Talk 15:48, 30 April 2015 (UTC) Please stop with your WP:ATTP and give sources. None present currently. All About That Bass (A word?? /...

far as I know. Can you direct us to the guideline that says it is? Per WP:ATTP, please address the article, not the editor--what policy based concerns about...

(talk) 09:51, 20 August 2019 (UTC) Comment - Neither WP:NOIMPROVEMENT nor WP:ATTP are good reasons for deletion. What matters is WP:NEXIST and WP:NPROF, but...

about X") is still an argument to avoid for deletion discussions. So are WP:ATTP (Arguments to the person), WP:INTEREST, and WP:INTHENEWS. Note that interviews...

2018 (UTC) This comment should be given minimal weight per WP:NONENG and WP:ATTP — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 21:08, 23 September 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 02:19, 26 November 2017 (UTC) WP:ATTP. Deletion discussions are about the article not about the person who nominated...

I failed to do my due diligence in the first place. Please note what WP:ATTP explicitly says about why BEFORE should not be used as grounds to attack...

editors. Jusdafax's opinion is not taken into account per WP:AGF and WP:ATTP.  Sandstein  04:51, 5 September 2009 (UTC) VoteToImpeach (edit | talk | history |...

WP:OTHERSTUFF. Comments towards nominate are also an argument to avoid per WP:ATTP. One sentence at the beginning of an article doesn't really by itself indicate...

clever than you and i know everything about you", watch your attacking - WP:ATTP/WP:POV. But yep, that user page is pretty retarded, but nobody gives a shit...

far as I know. Can you direct us to the guideline that says it is? Per WP:ATTP, please address the article, not the editor--what policy based concerns about...

company is in fact notable the articles are not promotional in tone. Per WP:ATTP, although I've wasted far too much time this week (as have 86* and many others...

is kind of a checklist of things that aren't valid AFD arguments, like WP:ATTP or WP:NOTINHERITED.Rorshacma (talk) 16:39, 26 November 2019 (UTC) Delete...

(UTC) Fuzheado, I guess I missed any bias by the nominator, but then again, ATTP. Is Sun really so notable that minor topics related to it automatically become...

— Timneu22 · talk 19:15, 22 June 2010 (UTC) I draw your attention to WP:ATTP--82.46.90.154 (talk) 19:25, 22 June 2010 (UTC) WP:SPA. This really is a waste...

WP:DISRUPT.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:00, 24 July 2019 (UTC) I'm going to quote WP:ATTP here: As well, be very careful about flinging around accusations of a nominator's...

September 2018 (UTC) Honestly... Let's stick to the point, shall we? WP:ATTP This is not the place to discuss nonsense like this. Sandrobost (talk) 16:01...

of European descent. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 21:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC) WP:ATTP -- Millionsandbillions (talk) 18:11, 2 November 2017 (UTC) Keep per sources...

(talk) 13:36, 27 May 2021 (UTC) Speaking of vague waves, in this entire attp you have failed to explain how he is notable. You have made a vague claim...

person's edit history does not validate or invalidate their argument. See WP:ATTP. LeiAdeline (talk) 23:52, 27 December 2018 (UTC) It's odd that the discussion...

notability (or lack thereof) rather than the users that have edited them. (WP:ATTP) Qrsdogg (talk) 15:30, 11 April 2011 (UTC) Comment Not sure I agree that...

to determine whether better sourcing is available or not — please read WP:ATTP, "be very careful about flinging around accusations of a nominator's or commenter's...

has met that standard. --Big_iron (talk) 16:50, 22 September 2019 (UTC) WP:ATTP: "As well, be very careful about flinging around accusations of a nominator's...

about wether Beverte should have an article, it's not about me, read WP:ATTP. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC) The references which are...

WP:ROUTINE coverage. What you're doing here is just WP:ONLYGUIDELINE and WP:ATTP. Vestrian24Bio 07:40, 21 March 2025 (UTC) No, WP:NSEASONS does not say that...

WP:RUSUKR. Mellk (talk) 22:11, 9 December 2023 (UTC) Looks more like WP:ATTP: Delete: Creator has made only 27 edits so far. –NewbieHater (talk), 11:10...

best way to create the new page. Finally because you're argument is a WP:ATTP, it's clear that you didn't bother to read any of the history showing how...

more-than-trivial sources without demanding that they all be lengthy. And toward your WP:ATTP and your feeling it neccessary to bring up a failed RFA,[6] I have since...

Ravenswing 06:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC) This argument seems more fixed on WP:ATTP and WP:IDONTLIKEIT with assumption that the pro-keep argument is "turgid"...

masterpiece." Novaseminary (talk) 22:30, 5 November 2011 (UTC) My point per WP:ATTP, is that your irrelevently pointing out how a newcomer's angst resulted in...

address the articles and users’ arguments not the users themselves per WP:ATTP. Thanks Kabz15 (talk) Delete per nominator and after a deep research on the...

about X") is still an argument to avoid for deletion discussions. So are WP:ATTP (Arguments to the person), WP:INTEREST, and WP:INTHENEWS. Note that interviews...

deleted. Wikieditindia (talk) 18:00, 25 February 2012 (UTC) PS: Please see WP:ATTP PPS: I can see a seemingly COI pattern in edits by people who are arguing...

nominate this article for deletion. -- samj inout 13:20, 25 March 2015 (UTC) WP:ATTP to the side, let's not detract attention from the fact that this article...

WP:ATADD to fix. I'll note that I didn't actually violate WP:ATTP until you rewrote ATTP last night - which I don't think was the intent! :) I know little...

itself that I have an issue with. You might begin to have an argument with WP:ATTP, but I have not attacked the main editor, merely pointed out that his behavior...

12:15, 5 December 2019 (UTC) @DBigXray: Perhaps you're not aware, but WP:ATTP have never carried much weight around here. If there was a problem with WP:BEFORE...

75 per cent of the work I do on here at all, in fact — and kindly read WP:ATTP, which specifically states that "As well, be very careful about flinging...

wall to see what sticks. DarkKnight2149 08:18, 17 December 2019 (UTC) WP:ATTP is not a valid argument at AFD, and TTN isn't even the nominator of this...

editors. Jusdafax's opinion is not taken into account per WP:AGF and WP:ATTP.  Sandstein  04:51, 5 September 2009 (UTC) VoteToImpeach (edit | talk | history |...

far as I know. Can you direct us to the guideline that says it is? Per WP:ATTP, please address the article, not the editor--what policy based concerns about...

in deletion discussions - particularly WAX, WP:MERCY, WP:EFFORT, and WP:ATTP. –Chase (talk / contribs) 17:17, 7 November 2014 (UTC) Rejecting your advise...

writing quality is not a reason to have the article deleted. Also oddly, WP:ATTP also appears to be an invalid argument for deletion in as much as you appear...

fullfilling WP:N. Draketo (talk) 14:28, 1 March 2010 (UTC) Please see WP:ATTP and WP:OTHERSTUFF. — Rankiri (talk) 14:35, 1 March 2010 (UTC) I know that...

AFDs. MarnetteD|Talk 15:48, 30 April 2015 (UTC) Please stop with your WP:ATTP and give sources. None present currently. All About That Bass (A word?? /...

clever than you and i know everything about you", watch your attacking - WP:ATTP/WP:POV. But yep, that user page is pretty retarded, but nobody gives a shit...

is kind of a checklist of things that aren't valid AFD arguments, like WP:ATTP or WP:NOTINHERITED.Rorshacma (talk) 16:39, 26 November 2019 (UTC) Delete...

RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 02:19, 26 November 2017 (UTC) WP:ATTP. Deletion discussions are about the article not about the person who nominated...

2018 (UTC) This comment should be given minimal weight per WP:NONENG and WP:ATTP — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 21:08, 23 September 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

wall to see what sticks. DarkKnight2149 08:18, 17 December 2019 (UTC) WP:ATTP is not a valid argument at AFD, and TTN isn't even the nominator of this...

person's edit history does not validate or invalidate their argument. See WP:ATTP. LeiAdeline (talk) 23:52, 27 December 2018 (UTC) It's odd that the discussion...

best way to create the new page. Finally because you're argument is a WP:ATTP, it's clear that you didn't bother to read any of the history showing how...

address the articles and users’ arguments not the users themselves per WP:ATTP. Thanks Kabz15 (talk) Delete per nominator and after a deep research on the...

Ravenswing 06:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC) This argument seems more fixed on WP:ATTP and WP:IDONTLIKEIT with assumption that the pro-keep argument is "turgid"...

of European descent. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 21:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC) WP:ATTP -- Millionsandbillions (talk) 18:11, 2 November 2017 (UTC) Keep per sources...

in deletion discussions - particularly WAX, WP:MERCY, WP:EFFORT, and WP:ATTP. –Chase (talk / contribs) 17:17, 7 November 2014 (UTC) Rejecting your advise...

— Timneu22 · talk 19:15, 22 June 2010 (UTC) I draw your attention to WP:ATTP--82.46.90.154 (talk) 19:25, 22 June 2010 (UTC) WP:SPA. This really is a waste...

far as I know. Can you direct us to the guideline that says it is? Per WP:ATTP, please address the article, not the editor--what policy based concerns about...

famous". Both are covered by the same essay you tried to point us to: WP:ATTP and WP:IDONTKNOWIT/WP:OTHERSTUFF. The nominator found no independent coverage...

deleted. Wikieditindia (talk) 18:00, 25 February 2012 (UTC) PS: Please see WP:ATTP PPS: I can see a seemingly COI pattern in edits by people who are arguing...

to determine whether better sourcing is available or not — please read WP:ATTP, "be very careful about flinging around accusations of a nominator's or commenter's...

about wether Beverte should have an article, it's not about me, read WP:ATTP. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC) The references which are...

WP:OTHERSTUFF. Comments towards nominate are also an argument to avoid per WP:ATTP. One sentence at the beginning of an article doesn't really by itself indicate...

WP:ATTP discussion @M4DU7: Do you have any evidence to suggest that any keep !voters are single-purpose accounts or canvassed into this discussion in violation...

masterpiece." Novaseminary (talk) 22:30, 5 November 2011 (UTC) My point per WP:ATTP, is that your irrelevently pointing out how a newcomer's angst resulted in...

fullfilling WP:N. Draketo (talk) 14:28, 1 March 2010 (UTC) Please see WP:ATTP and WP:OTHERSTUFF. — Rankiri (talk) 14:35, 1 March 2010 (UTC) I know that...

itself that I have an issue with. You might begin to have an argument with WP:ATTP, but I have not attacked the main editor, merely pointed out that his behavior...

(talk/contribs) 15:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC) Comment I'd like to remind that per WP:ATTP, bad faith nomination should not be an argument for keep at this point, as...

nominate this article for deletion. -- samj inout 13:20, 25 March 2015 (UTC) WP:ATTP to the side, let's not detract attention from the fact that this article...

WP:DISRUPT.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:00, 24 July 2019 (UTC) I'm going to quote WP:ATTP here: As well, be very careful about flinging around accusations of a nominator's...

more-than-trivial sources without demanding that they all be lengthy. And toward your WP:ATTP and your feeling it neccessary to bring up a failed RFA,[69] I have since...

notability (or lack thereof) rather than the users that have edited them. (WP:ATTP) Qrsdogg (talk) 15:30, 11 April 2011 (UTC) Comment Not sure I agree that...

(talk) 09:51, 20 August 2019 (UTC) Comment - Neither WP:NOIMPROVEMENT nor WP:ATTP are good reasons for deletion. What matters is WP:NEXIST and WP:NPROF, but...

September 2018 (UTC) Honestly... Let's stick to the point, shall we? WP:ATTP This is not the place to discuss nonsense like this. Sandrobost (talk) 16:01...

(UTC) Fuzheado, I guess I missed any bias by the nominator, but then again, ATTP. Is Sun really so notable that minor topics related to it automatically become...

com/go/joinpublicchat?skypename=hugo.arg&topic=Wikimedia%20Lietuva&blob=IfY1OhXhDuwATTpKFSFccnb0k-nTmUIxsCXq9tBia02jCOhRGGJvzvsZeAFdR1kPVrDKM3x8e4PMzv_PLRxK11GM-ikb1RFlNSA...

has met that standard. --Big_iron (talk) 16:50, 22 September 2019 (UTC) WP:ATTP: "As well, be very careful about flinging around accusations of a nominator's...

writing quality is not a reason to have the article deleted. Also oddly, WP:ATTP also appears to be an invalid argument for deletion in as much as you appear...

company is in fact notable the articles are not promotional in tone. Per WP:ATTP, although I've wasted far too much time this week (as have 86* and many others...

I failed to do my due diligence in the first place. Please note what WP:ATTP explicitly says about why BEFORE should not be used as grounds to attack...

not found in nature but in thoery on other planets and two i submitted a attp fictious weapon which is based on THEL which is in your article so why delete...

(talk/contribs) 15:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC) Comment I'd like to remind that per WP:ATTP, bad faith nomination should not be an argument for keep at this point, as...

75 per cent of the work I do on here at all, in fact — and kindly read WP:ATTP, which specifically states that "As well, be very careful about flinging...

arguments for keeping it deleted fall under WP:GOOGLEHITS, WP:IDONTKNOWIT, WP:ATTP, WP:NOTAGAIN, WP:JNN, WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT, WP:NOEFFORT. Coincidentally, these...

12:15, 5 December 2019 (UTC) @DBigXray: Perhaps you're not aware, but WP:ATTP have never carried much weight around here. If there was a problem with WP:BEFORE...

arguments for keeping it deleted fall under WP:GOOGLEHITS, WP:IDONTKNOWIT, WP:ATTP, WP:NOTAGAIN, WP:JNN, WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT, WP:NOEFFORT. Coincidentally, these...

WP:ATTP discussion @M4DU7: Do you have any evidence to suggest that any keep !voters are single-purpose accounts or canvassed into this discussion in violation...

renominating this. Jay 💬 11:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:RDAB. WP:ATTPs like nom's block say nothing about the merits of the redirect. Nickps (talk)...

supposed to give much consideration to that in deletion discussions. (See WP:ATTP, WP:ITSNOTNEUTRAL, and WP:SUSC.) Cadddr (talk) 18:39, 13 May 2026 (UTC) I...

multi-edit history of an account. Sirguh (talk) 20:37, 12 October 2023 (UTC) WP:ATTP. You will find most of my edit history is within the realms of AfDs. TheRealOj32...

WP:ROUTINE coverage. What you're doing here is just WP:ONLYGUIDELINE and WP:ATTP. Vestrian24Bio 07:40, 21 March 2025 (UTC) No, WP:NSEASONS does not say that...

WP:RUSUKR. Mellk (talk) 22:11, 9 December 2023 (UTC) Looks more like WP:ATTP: Delete: Creator has made only 27 edits so far. –NewbieHater (talk), 11:10...

multi-edit history of an account. Sirguh (talk) 20:37, 12 October 2023 (UTC) WP:ATTP. You will find most of my edit history is within the realms of AfDs. TheRealOj32...

supposed to give much consideration to that in deletion discussions. (See WP:ATTP, WP:ITSNOTNEUTRAL, and WP:SUSC.) Cadddr (talk) 18:39, 13 May 2026 (UTC) I...

famous". Both are covered by the same essay you tried to point us to: WP:ATTP and WP:IDONTKNOWIT/WP:OTHERSTUFF. The nominator found no independent coverage...

GojiraFan1954 (talk) 04:18, 30 December 2024 (UTC) I found the page - Wikipedia:ATTP - so it wouldn't be worthwhile creating an essay IMO. If someone creates...

proves a negative). And in the event of nefarious motivations as per WP:ATTP, I should follow the issue perhaps elsewhere, not in the deletion discussions...

people making arguments, regardless of where they came from) goes against WP:ATTP. Please speak to the arguments and questions regarding the policies and guidelines...

people making arguments, regardless of where they came from) goes against WP:ATTP. Please speak to the arguments and questions regarding the policies and guidelines...