Search Results: Wikipedia:100W


Wikipedia:One hundred words
Sabtu, 2026-04-04 12:59:58

At the present time, the general notability guideline requires multiple (i.e. two) independent reliable secondary sources with significant coverage, but...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2015 June 4
Jumat, 2020-01-17 00:06:49

answers. Is it safe to use 100W incandescent lightbulbs (GE Reveal 100W) in a metal desk lamp rated for 60W bulbs? I've had these 100W bulbs in my desk lamp...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lychnostatis Open Air Museum
Senin, 2025-12-15 04:02:51

words to say about it, which is less then half of WP:100W. And some people don't even think 100W is a high enough standard. casualdejekyll 23:06, 7 February...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/Local/bestrobotsguide.com
Minggu, 2024-12-01 21:07:13

history | links | watch | logs) (diff  !top) - Link: bestrobotsguide.com/100w-led-light-bulbs-e27-e26 (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2016-12-26 12:37:51 (UTC): User...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/bestrobotsguide.com
Minggu, 2024-12-01 21:07:10

history | links | watch | logs) (diff  !top) - Link: bestrobotsguide.com/100w-led-light-bulbs-e27-e26 (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2016-12-26 12:37:51 (UTC): User...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2013 January 3
Selasa, 2022-02-22 14:52:35

out by 2016. Right now it's hard to find a CF with a light output > an old 100W bulb, so halogens are selling into this market. Presumably they're thinking...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/June 2015
Senin, 2015-07-06 08:40:04

June 4 Hurricanes, Tornadoes and Bushfires in Christmas (cont.) Safe to use 100W Bulb in 60W Desk Lamp? convention on biodiversity Wikipedia:Reference_de...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bang Cartoon (2nd nomination)
Sabtu, 2025-12-13 20:42:36

piece is archived, but that piece also spans two webpages (well over WP:100W), and it technically is live, (though for some reason the image is only retained...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Walling (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-12-19 08:58:33

(UTC) Hi BuySomeApples - I would like to improve the article. Based on WP:100W his footprint is in the several hundred words from multiple sources and WP:GNG...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tara Razavi
Jumat, 2026-04-03 02:49:55

notable artists and the collective WP:SIGCOV (I'm in support of the essay WP:100W as a helpful rule of thumb) from Vibe.com, Adweek, Konbini and more. CherryPie94...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2020 September 12
Minggu, 2020-09-20 08:11:41

believe my 20" box fan uses around 100W (haven't measured) and it definitely makes noise, but think of how loud a 100W stereo would be....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Engine (2024 film)
Rabu, 2026-02-04 15:04:41

28 January 2026 (UTC) This piece by The Free Press Journal also gives WP:100W coverage. So we have met WP:THREE. SatnaamIN (talk) 23:46, 28 January 2026...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoj Pant (civil servant)
Jumat, 2026-02-06 23:17:47

(talk) 08:59, 1 February 2026 (UTC) Whatever, but all refs are are giving WP:100W coverages about the subject person. I have covered WP:THREE with WP:RS. You...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2007 April 28
Sabtu, 2023-03-25 10:41:03

THD of the 200W amplifier running at 100W should be significantly better than the 100W amplifier running at 100W. It's not louder, it's cleaner. --Tbeatty...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mika'ela Fisher
Kamis, 2025-04-10 09:29:43

coverage; others are of little significant coverage that fail to meet even WP:100W, therefore failing WP:SIGCOV. It is also relevant to mention the other recent...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WBLQ-LP
Jumat, 2026-01-09 23:59:27

power that is the minimum for a class A F.M.-many of which DO broadcast @ 100W! Additionally, Wikipedia lists L.P.T.V. stations, so why NOT L.P.F.M. stations...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor Who: DWO Whocast (2nd nomination)
Sabtu, 2025-12-13 23:09:25

pieces were significant coverage. Several quotes themselves are over WP:100W—definitely more than just a rating. Now, it is possible that the entirety...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2015 January 15
Sabtu, 2022-02-26 10:43:34

high contrast) To model today's lighting with the known 100W LB brightness the increased 100W bulb streetlight density would have to be realistic. So...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 April 20
Selasa, 2026-01-06 22:21:59

today has four 100W channels in a case made from an old disk drive. Tiny thing. So why would any guitarist want to hump around a mere 100W amp the size...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locked Up: A Mother's Rage
Selasa, 2026-01-06 23:33:28

9 February 2022 (UTC) Delete. No significant coverage - doesn't reach WP:100W in any presented source. casualdejekyll 15:35, 8 February 2022 (UTC) On second...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Night Call (podcast)
Jumat, 2025-12-12 13:36:04

argument, and may have skewed some follow-on discussion points... Perhaps WP:100W was considered too high a bar? Short reviews are the norm in the book world...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaisua Liva (2nd nomination)
Selasa, 2025-12-16 13:10:17

my personal inclination is anything that has two sources of at least WP:100W (essay, I know, but it's something to measure "significant" with) will meet...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2012 February 14
Sabtu, 2023-03-25 14:26:32

that controls which ones light. If you 3 bulbs, equivalent to 40W, 75W, and 100W (each of which you can get for under $1 in the US), this would give you the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2014 July 6
Rabu, 2022-02-23 13:42:57

surface area [3] [4] [5]. But again, although it can be brighter than a 100W incandescent, isn't really intended or well suited for incandescent replacements...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Hornet-vespa.jpg
Jumat, 2023-02-10 08:39:25

foam board as both the floor and the background. The light itself was a 100W equivalent 6500K compact flourescent. Nominate and support. - PiccoloNamek...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2013 October 6
Kamis, 2022-02-24 13:24:38

few or no OEMs are dumb enough to not add a connector if the card draws 100W (or something). While OEMs do have some customisation ability including clocking...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alopua Petoa (2nd nomination)
Selasa, 2025-12-16 01:31:17

The source may not be longest, but even removing quotes, I'm seing over WP:100W, which, though an essay, is a measurement of "significant" that can one can...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2024 January 15
Selasa, 2024-01-30 09:09:03

what the human body emits in 5G frequencies, compared to a phone? Also, a 100W incandescent lightbulb? Zarnivop (talk) 10:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC) This...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ade (On a Sunday)
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 14:25:58

March 2026 (UTC) Keep. Found this one byelined as the 2nd review per WP:100W. --SatnaamIN (talk) 03:17, 2 April 2026 (UTC) Just now looking at this "review...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2008 June 14
Jumat, 2025-08-29 15:49:17

can't think of why 100w would be chosen as the load limit, especially when many small, but delicate devices would draw less than 100w. Freedomlinux (talk)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noodle (character)
Selasa, 2025-12-16 09:33:24

the book Pop Music and Easy Listening, where Johnson spends well over WP:100W (an essay, I know, but a measurement I find sufficient) discussing the "techno...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Izabel Rosa Pereira
Sabtu, 2025-10-04 18:59:24

the topic is not trivial and it is discussed in detail/at length (see WP:100W). I'm open to changing my mind, I guess just don't understand how some people...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2022 May 25
Kamis, 2022-06-02 08:32:28

or status display, shall not exceed 1,00 Watt." (note that means 1W, not 100W). My 2017-ish LG TV actually consumes less than 0.2W on standby. So what...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/eie.polyu.edu.hk
Sabtu, 2009-10-31 18:49:13

com/nationaledge/mar02/lm4910.html (53, 242, 1, 1) www.elecfree.com/circuit/power-amplifier/100w-ocl-amplifier-circuit-by-a1215-c2921/ (53, 2, 1, 1) www.kingsolder...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manish Kejriwal (4th nomination)
Sabtu, 2026-03-28 09:04:46

trivial mention. Even if we consider word count, this source clearly meets WP:100W. The subject isn’t a passing mention. He is the main focus of the article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2012 August 14
Minggu, 2023-03-19 05:43:16

16:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC) In that case, a simple 1:2 transformer (rated 100w or whatever your lava lamp is rated) or a switched-mode converter with appropriate...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2012 May 3
Selasa, 2022-02-22 23:09:41

make a lightbulb that runs 100 years, get a 1000W rated lightbulb and run 100W through it, you'll probably get as much light as a 20W lighbulb (if that)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murdoc Niccals
Jumat, 2025-12-19 07:18:59

the book Pop Music and Easy Listening, where Johnson spends well over WP:100W (an essay, I know, but a measurement I find sufficient) discussing the "techno...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2006 August 14
Jumat, 2023-03-10 20:33:41

bulbs may say "100W" while they have much lower wattage but equivalent luminosity, an unfortunate development. Let's assume it is a "true" 100W bulb, which...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2019 June 7
Minggu, 2019-06-30 17:47:06

(talk) 17:09, 14 June 2019 (UTC) How much louder is a 300w amp than a 100w amp?. And why do amp manufacturers emphasise the wattage above anything else...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2010 September 29
Rabu, 2026-03-11 04:57:14

example if your power supply is 70% efficient at 100W it's drawing 142.86W vs one that is 82% efficient at 100W that's drawing 121.95W or 20.91W difference...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2020 February 5
Kamis, 2020-02-13 10:12:13

application it would spend most of its time under 30W with peaks of maybe 100W when a bunch of users are hammering on the web server. Review:[4][5] --Guy...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2006 November 28
Sabtu, 2023-03-25 11:04:45

turbine. I imagine it costs more in energy to build a 3MW tower turbine than a 100W wind jig I can put on my shed - and they will have different efficiencies...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Llamas with Hats
Senin, 2025-12-15 04:01:14

show (214 if you count the last paragraph it's included in), satisfying WP:100W. I use that essay mostly because Wikipedia doesn't have an official word...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2015 September 9
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 03:28:45

this theory, considering a typical lightbulb says something like "30/70/100W, 120V", or in amps "250/583/833mA, 120V" (I think). So, is that right? Eman235/talk...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glitch Productions
Selasa, 2025-12-16 05:12:24

and SMG4 works or are primary sources from their own YouTube videos. If WP:100W were an official guideline, I still don't think the sources here would satisfy...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2006 October 10
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 02:13:09

October 2006 (UTC) One average human being produces as much heat as a 100W bulb (ie 100W) when sedentary.--Light current 02:20, 10 October 2006 (UTC) Since...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/15.ai
Selasa, 2026-01-06 21:06:46

I must disagree with your assessment. According to WP:WHATSIGCOV and WP:100W, "sources with at least 100 words of coverage of a topic generally count"...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2009 October 7
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 02:44:31

tube is rated at ? where as with an ordinary 100w standard incandescent bulb the consumption does show as 100w Regards George Atkinson —Preceding unsigned...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2009 November 1
Kamis, 2022-02-24 15:25:00

surroundings. There is no way for 900W to be lost to nowhere. I believe about 100W is the heat loss of a sitting adult. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 19:57, 3 November...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2009 October 4
Sabtu, 2023-03-25 12:41:01

looking at new PSUs, try entering all your hardware into this, then add ~100W, just to be on the safe side. That's the PSU you'll need. CaptainVindaloo...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive968
Minggu, 2026-01-18 19:58:34

and 6 of them spent with pulsed lasers with average powers between 20 and 100W, 3 years as a laser safety officer StuRat's responses made me shudder and...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2016 July 25
Sabtu, 2016-07-30 07:04:54

current to manage, or else a very low power. At 12V it's only 25W, at 24V only 100W. These are easy voltages to work with (cheap control modules are available)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2006 December 28
Sabtu, 2023-03-25 16:40:24

15:36, 28 December 2006 (UTC) According to Wikipedia's article on Candela, a 100W incandencent bulb produed about 120 000 mcd of light. On this basis, must...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barnstable Police Department
Kamis, 2025-11-13 07:19:30

sources in GBooks). You might be suprised by other opinions such as that in WP:100W. And there are other sources beside the two you mention. Look in Google Books...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2009 June 16
Minggu, 2023-01-29 00:22:40

say - the ones I can find seem to either be ~2W, or a big jump to above 100W, with nothing inbetween.83.100.250.79 (talk) 14:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC) I'm...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2008 August 30
Rabu, 2024-10-16 15:53:57

SpinningSpark 22:01, 30 August 2008 (UTC) Are you sure about the 100MHz? Finding a 100W Pdiss, 115v Vcb, 10A Ic transistor with that fT is going to be difficult...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2013 August 25
Jumat, 2022-05-20 01:57:10

proof" measure? If someone put in a 100W equivalent CFL bulb, the next person to swap it might assume that 100W is safe for the fixture, since they got...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/October-2005
Selasa, 2017-02-21 05:06:56

foam board as both the floor and the background. The light itself was a 100W equivalent 6500K compact flourescent. Nominate and support. - PiccoloNamek...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2016 January 25
Jumat, 2026-01-23 16:26:36

Nimur (talk) 16:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC) Yeah - improperly handled, a 100W IR laser is a terrifying weapon! It's not for no reason that our two machines...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2008 February 9
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 02:29:31

technology; audio spectrum analyser is the instrument you need. By the way, 100W speakers can generate high sound pressure levels. You would be advised to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2011 January 2
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 02:59:20

12:41, 2 January 2011 (UTC) My CFL's take 23W and my incandescents take 100W. These figures may help. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 12:47, 2 January 2011...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 May 30
Selasa, 2023-04-11 15:25:32

The source may not be longest, but even removing quotes, I'm seing over WP:100W, which, though an essay, is a measurement of "significant" that can one can...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2006 September 10
Jumat, 2023-03-10 20:25:21

--Proficient 06:15, 11 September 2006 (UTC) Suppose I have a 100W amp. Does it draw 100W all the time? Or does that depend on how far I turn the volume...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1098
Jumat, 2022-05-20 12:44:51

needing at least one or two decent articles, and I recently came across WP:100W. The particular articles I'm looking for answers on are Draft:The Mystery...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santa Monica Police Department
Sabtu, 2025-11-15 22:15:58

coverage. That passage alone , by itself, satisfies GNG as interpreted by WP:100W (which is intended as a maximum) before we even look at the hundreds of other...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2007 January 24
Senin, 2023-03-20 11:26:00

( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 04:23, 24 January 2007 (UTC) My amp outputs 100W for each speaker. from reading the article on speakers, i understand that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 January 31
Selasa, 2022-04-05 12:04:12

power that is the minimum for a class A F.M.-many of which DO broadcast @ 100W! Additionally, Wikipedia lists L.P.T.V. stations, so why NOT L.P.F.M. stations...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2010 January 9
Jumat, 2022-02-25 19:48:14

computers. Particularly if you use IGP, you could easily have a comp using under 100W under most normal usage for the average user i.e. a low load. Using energy...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 February 7
Selasa, 2022-02-15 09:59:41

words to say about it, which is less then half of WP:100W. And some people don't even think 100W is a high enough standard. casualdejekyll 23:06, 7 February...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 May 28
Sabtu, 2022-06-11 12:57:23

and SMG4 works or are primary sources from their own YouTube videos. If WP:100W were an official guideline, I still don't think the sources here would satisfy...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Hogan
Minggu, 2025-12-14 09:48:09

"A good meaty paragraph" is my standard, another guy's is "100 words" (WP:100W), another's might be "enough to, taken together, make a decent article, more...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 February 22
Jumat, 2021-03-05 03:07:57

piece is archived, but that piece also spans two webpages (well over WP:100W), and it technically is live, (though for some reason the image is only retained...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2007 February 14
Sabtu, 2023-03-25 11:58:56

and keep them very close to the lamp. Note that 40W cfls are advertised as 100W or 125W watts because they are supposed equivelant to that wattage of an...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 June 10
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:38:27

coverage. That passage alone , by itself, satisfies GNG as interpreted by WP:100W (which is intended as a maximum) before we even look at the hundreds of other...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 May 7
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:32:35

sources in GBooks). You might be suprised by other opinions such as that in WP:100W. And there are other sources beside the two you mention. Look in Google Books...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 16
Jumat, 2021-11-26 12:36:56

"A good meaty paragraph" is my standard, another guy's is "100 words" (WP:100W), another's might be "enough to, taken together, make a decent article, more...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2008 April 24
Minggu, 2023-02-19 06:28:56

power: You need too much input power to get just a little bit of thrust. 100W per Newton is 1 horsepower to produce 7.5 lb of force; you're better off...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 September 28
Minggu, 2020-10-11 03:02:25

argument, and may have skewed some follow-on discussion points... Perhaps WP:100W was considered too high a bar? Short reviews are the norm in the book world...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 December 5
Selasa, 2022-12-13 12:05:56

the book Pop Music and Easy Listening, where Johnson spends well over WP:100W (an essay, I know, but a measurement I find sufficient) discussing the "techno...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 February 27
Minggu, 2021-03-07 05:02:09

pieces were significant coverage. Several quotes themselves are over WP:100W—definitely more than just a rating. Now, it is possible that the entirety...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2009 November 8
Rabu, 2022-02-23 13:19:21

the spectrum rational? The number of elements must be finite: if I have a 100W bulb releasing 380 nm (ish) photons, there can only be 1.9 * 10^20 photons...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2011 April 29
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 02:56:55

Of course, it is also necessary to detect the signal, mandating that the 100W emitted by the human body, spread over 4 pi (400 km)(400 km) = 2 x 10^12...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 February 4
Sabtu, 2022-02-12 15:28:42

show (214 if you count the last paragraph it's included in), satisfying WP:100W. I use that essay mostly because Wikipedia doesn't have an official word...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2009 April 2
Jumat, 2023-02-10 20:17:27

rebooted all the time. I read the manual for the card and it said it required 100W all its own. So, since 300W was OK before, I assumed a 500W power supply...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 February 6
Senin, 2022-02-14 22:49:14

9 February 2022 (UTC) Delete. No significant coverage - doesn't reach WP:100W in any presented source. casualdejekyll 15:35, 8 February 2022 (UTC) On second...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2007 January 31
Senin, 2023-02-27 17:53:57

of 50W powering speakers will be loud in any house - so thats less that 100W (a bright lightbulb). However if you want to make it loud for a concert hall...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2009 June 5
Sabtu, 2023-03-25 16:30:46

technology and an efficient PSU, I would say you would still often use at least 100W when idle and even presuming 80% ends up as heat (which I expect is a bit...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2008 December 17
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 02:27:59

adapt perfectly well to seeing by candle-light - we don't need multiple 100W bulbs). Use light absorbing (ie flat-black) paint in areas where the light...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2010 March 31
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 02:52:50

highest energy man-made particle collisions. Seeing that Electronvolt says one 100W lightbulb takes 8000 TeV to work for one second, why is it amazing that these...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2009 May 18
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 02:42:36

probably about 1 m2, so that is 1400W from the sun. There is also about 100W from metabolism. By my calculations, completely exposed to vacuum one would...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/15.ai (2nd nomination)
Selasa, 2024-12-17 23:58:25

consists of independent analysis. 2. It's short, but it barely meets the WP:100W threshold. Obviously it's not Wikipedia policy, but one could argue it's...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 July
Kamis, 2022-06-30 07:01:14

bit promotional, and worse, there is not enough depth of coverage. See WP:100W, which although just an essay it reflects how people will judge this source...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2007 September 25
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 01:02:35

it. Secondly, it's not just the initial cost of the appliance. Making a 100w lightbulb cost more than a 7w CFL is useful - but getting people to turn...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 September
Rabu, 2022-08-31 07:00:35

source can never be independent evidence of notability. #2 has almost WP:100W words of secondary source description before it gets to the interview that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Louisiana/New Orleans task force/Article alerts/Archive 1
Selasa, 2026-05-26 12:15:53

QuicoleJR on 04 Feb 2025 23 Mar 2025 – Draft:Cheeky Blakk submitted for AfC by 100W bulb was accepted to Cheeky Blakk by NiftyyyNofteeeee on 24 Mar 2025 02 May...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/May 2006
Senin, 2023-04-03 17:56:36

probably only generate 80-120W of continuous power on your bike", so let's say 100W. If you ride for 10 hours, that's 1 kWh, which costs me 11 cents, according...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2018 November 2
Senin, 2019-04-29 09:30:50

wattage 3, 5, 7 = Equal 35w, 50w, and 70w HPS 10, 15, 20, 25, 31, 40, X1 = 100w, 150w, 200w, 250w, 310w, 400w, 1,000w (HPS) 17, 25, 40 = 175w, 250w, 400w...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2017 July 11
Jumat, 2022-05-20 01:52:08

idle state, the loss being more or less equal to basal production, around 100W) is around 20-22°C in the air, but 26-28°C in water also, you can easily...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 September 28
Sabtu, 2023-11-04 04:21:38

source can never be independent evidence of notability. #2 has almost WP:100W words of secondary source description before it gets to the interview that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2010 November 4
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:58:39

power a microwatt is, that’s 100,000,000 times less power than a standard 100W incandescent light bulb uses, and about 30,000 times less power than is used...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/April 2006
Selasa, 2026-04-21 13:00:07

transformers have a maximum wattage rating - a small one might be 50W or 100W, check the label. While this is fine for most small appliances, be warned...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2011 July 15
Senin, 2025-01-20 18:55:39

wont change the ball park. [3] gives the power output of trnsmitters to be ~100W for mobile towers. at 10m thats ~1W/m2. Push it an order of magnitude either...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2011 September 14
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:58:14

fluorescents cost far more. I've noticed that you can get CF bulbs equivalent to 60-100W incandescent bulbs for $1 each, but be prepared to pay 10x as much outside...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 4
Selasa, 2025-09-23 21:58:24

discussion on topic and productive. Hasteur (talk) 17:53, 15 August 2011 (UTC) 100w/side, not per person? In that case, Sitush and Q feel free to edit my words...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post Alley Pizza
Jumat, 2025-12-19 08:25:42

is a relative concept. For example, many of the cited sources meet the WP:100W bar; this one, for example, tallies at 170 words; this one and this on each...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 July 27
Jumat, 2022-08-05 17:09:23

bit promotional, and worse, there is not enough depth of coverage. See WP:100W, which although just an essay it reflects how people will judge this source...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/February 15–21 2006
Rabu, 2022-03-30 18:17:22

unit). The answer for your question:- If you use both bulbs for an hour the 100W bulb consumes 100/1000 * 1 KiloWatthour i.e. 0.1 KiloWatthour. In case of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristan Tate (2nd nomination)
Senin, 2025-12-22 10:39:09

word paragraph exclusively analyzing Tristan and his character. Also WP:100W. ✔ Yes https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/romanian-prosecutors-add-cha...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linette Lopez
Jumat, 2025-12-19 05:50:43

in the context of the Musk Tweets and Twitter suspension, passes the WP:100W rule-of-thumb. ✔ Yes The Independent via Yahoo! News This is an independent...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 December 9
Selasa, 2024-12-17 13:14:35

consists of independent analysis. 2. It's short, but it barely meets the WP:100W threshold. Obviously it's not Wikipedia policy, but one could argue it's...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incels.is
Jumat, 2025-12-19 04:16:42

(talk) 14:44, 7 June 2023 (UTC) Also, you might want to read WP:100W. There is much more than 100 words of coverage, even in this article alone...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 8
Jumat, 2023-06-23 13:59:44

in the context of the Musk Tweets and Twitter suspension, passes the WP:100W rule-of-thumb. ✔ Yes The Independent via Yahoo! News This is an independent...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Louisiana/Article alerts/Archive 2
Selasa, 2026-06-02 12:16:27

Gheus on 06 Mar 2025 23 Mar 2025 – Draft:Cheeky Blakk submitted for AfC by 100W bulb was accepted to Cheeky Blakk by NiftyyyNofteeeee on 24 Mar 2025 12 Apr...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 February 22
Sabtu, 2024-03-02 11:36:19

word paragraph exclusively analyzing Tristan and his character. Also WP:100W. ✔ Yes https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/romanian-prosecutors-add-cha...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 January 23
Selasa, 2023-01-31 06:48:16

I must disagree with your assessment. According to WP:WHATSIGCOV and WP:100W, "sources with at least 100 words of coverage of a topic generally count"...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2025/Coordination/MM/07
Selasa, 2025-11-18 07:06:24

User talk:Thoriq1024 User talk:Atlantlc27Lol User talk:JONOOBGAN User talk:100W bulb User talk:The Black Revolutionary 2006 User talk:Flipstatic Energy User...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 January 11
Jumat, 2024-01-19 06:41:24

(UTC) Hi BuySomeApples - I would like to improve the article. Based on WP:100W his footprint is in the several hundred words from multiple sources and WP:GNG...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Musicians/Article alerts/Archive 20
Selasa, 2025-05-13 06:05:12

NiftyyyNofteeeee on 24 Mar 2025 23 Mar 2025 – Draft:Cheeky Blakk submitted for AfC by 100W bulb was accepted to Cheeky Blakk by NiftyyyNofteeeee on 24 Mar 2025 30 Dec...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/Article alerts/Archive 51
Kamis, 2025-06-12 20:10:38

Hoary on 24 Mar 2025 23 Mar 2025 – Draft:Cheeky Blakk submitted for AfC by 100W bulb was accepted to Cheeky Blakk by NiftyyyNofteeeee on 24 Mar 2025 24 Mar...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 3
Jumat, 2025-04-11 19:59:18

coverage; others are of little significant coverage that fail to meet even WP:100W, therefore failing WP:SIGCOV. It is also relevant to mention the other recent...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 June 19
Minggu, 2023-07-09 23:14:28

don’t even mention the topic. The 28th reference appears good, but fails WP:100W (a very low bar, 100 words of coverage). I recommend WP:RENOM, and a better...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 June 3
Minggu, 2023-06-11 21:59:39

(talk) 14:44, 7 June 2023 (UTC) Also, you might want to read WP:100W. There is much more than 100 words of coverage, even in this article alone...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 April 10
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 20:34:21

March 2026 (UTC) Keep. Found this one byelined as the 2nd review per WP:100W. --SatnaamIN (talk) 03:17, 2 April 2026 (UTC) Just now looking at this "review...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 September 27
Senin, 2025-10-06 07:11:09

the topic is not trivial and it is discussed in detail/at length (see WP:100W). I'm open to changing my mind, I guess just don't understand how some people...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/Music genres task force/Article alerts/Archive 2
Minggu, 2026-05-31 12:16:22

NiftyyyNofteeeee on 24 Mar 2025 23 Mar 2025 – Draft:Cheeky Blakk submitted for AfC by 100W bulb was accepted to Cheeky Blakk by NiftyyyNofteeeee on 24 Mar 2025 24 Mar...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 March 20
Sabtu, 2026-03-28 11:06:21

trivial mention. Even if we consider word count, this source clearly meets WP:100W. The subject isn’t a passing mention. He is the main focus of the article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 September 4
Selasa, 2023-09-12 22:31:15

the book Pop Music and Easy Listening, where Johnson spends well over WP:100W (an essay, I know, but a measurement I find sufficient) discussing the "techno...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 January 30
Minggu, 2026-02-08 01:02:07

(talk) 08:59, 1 February 2026 (UTC) Whatever, but all refs are are giving WP:100W coverages about the subject person. I have covered WP:THREE with WP:RS. You...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 January 28
Kamis, 2026-02-05 21:45:19

28 January 2026 (UTC) This piece by The Free Press Journal also gives WP:100W coverage. So we have met WP:THREE. SatnaamIN (talk) 23:46, 28 January 2026...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 July 14
Sabtu, 2023-07-22 14:59:16

is a relative concept. For example, many of the cited sources meet the WP:100W bar; this one, for example, tallies at 170 words; this one and this on each...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 210
Senin, 2026-05-11 19:34:46

to defend as generally applicable to all subjects. Leaving aside the WP:100W opinion, one of the open questions is whether SIGCOV should be measured collectively...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 March 26
Jumat, 2026-04-03 21:29:36

notable artists and the collective WP:SIGCOV (I'm in support of the essay WP:100W as a helpful rule of thumb) from Vibe.com, Adweek, Konbini and more. CherryPie94...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2025 November 4
Kamis, 2025-11-27 18:07:47

Is this enough information to write an article? 133 words? That meets WP:100W. I call this debatable. Every other reference is primary source scrapping...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 December 23
Selasa, 2024-01-02 13:07:28

country? I read it as virtually meaningless, too subjective, and suggest WP:100W instead. SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:37, 25 December 2023 (UTC) What a strangely...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2025/Coordination/SecurePoll
Selasa, 2025-11-18 06:38:19

Gudlator@enwiki Thoriq1024@enwiki Atlantlc27Lol@enwiki JONOOBGAN@enwiki 100W bulb@enwiki The Black Revolutionary 2006@enwiki Flipstatic Energy@enwiki...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2025 November
Jumat, 2025-10-31 07:01:54

Is this enough information to write an article? 133 words? That meets WP:100W. I call this debatable. Every other reference is primary source scrapping...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 December
Kamis, 2023-11-30 07:01:27

country? I read it as virtually meaningless, too subjective, and suggest WP:100W instead. SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:37, 25 December 2023 (UTC) What a strangely...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 June
Rabu, 2023-05-31 07:04:36

don’t even mention the topic. The 28th reference appears good, but fails WP:100W (a very low bar, 100 words of coverage). I recommend WP:RENOM, and a better...

Click to read more »