Hi Quant analyst! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! William M. Connolley (talk) 19:31, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just to follow that up. Do please join the discussion at Talk:Breakthrough_Institute. If you have any general or policy questions, feel free to ask here William M. Connolley (talk) 19:32, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I'm writing here to ask you to engage in discussion at Talk:Breakthrough Institute, per Wikipedia Policy (Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle). You've made major changes to the page, and you have been reverted by two editors (including myself) who have gone to talk to discuss issues with those additions. You have engaged at talk briefly and then continued editing, asking editors to engage with discussions in edit diffs (example). This is not how the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle works. I come here to ask you to engage at talk one more time so that this doesn't continue. If you have issues with the page, then by all means, let's discuss it at talk, per policy, rather than courting an edit war.--Hobomok (talk) 18:22, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not recognise your (mis)characterisation of my contributions and would appreciate if you restricted your comments about the editing of Wikipedia content to the relevant Talk pages, as per policy. Quant analyst (talk) 15:20, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]