Hey Pipsally, I noticed that you placed a report for page protection. This seems like a transparent attempt to stop participation of an IP user in a legitimate content dispute diff. Moreover, this is the second time you have done so. The first time, you claimed that this user was vandalizing which an admin checked and clearly rejected that spurious report. This is starting to become a behavioral issue. I know my wikirights. Please lets not let this become a behavioral issue and instead lets apply relevant wikipolicy especially the three pillars of WP:NPOV WP:V and WP:NOR. Also, civility is not optional, it is a policy requirement of wikipedia.155.246.151.38 (talk) 07:48, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

155, what's the point of this? An admin will reject the request for page protection if it's not valid. ––𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲 talk 08:07, 6 August 2021 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

I think the point is quite clear: don't game the system. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:11, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd hardly say good faith PPRs classifies gaming the system. ––𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲 talk 08:21, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please show examples of where I have been uncivil. This has been reported again because the IP is ignoring the talk page consensus, and that on the OR And reliable source notice boards. Even if he thinks there isn't consensus he shouldn't be making these edits, but persists in doing so. It is disruptive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pipsally (talk • contribs)

Exactly. ––𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲 talk 08:35, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As you finally appear to have started to be collaborative and are adding sourced content rather than deleting things you don’t like I withdrawn the PP request. Let’s continue in that vein.Pipsally (talk) 09:21, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]