User talk:MRFS
Welcome!
Hello, MRFS, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your silly question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Bourgetalk 10:56, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Dear MRFS Let me thank You giving the link to the article - I am reading it (I can do it only in free time so it is not fast), and thank You again for Yours contributions.
What seems to me appropriate to do with the "proof section" 1 ) to make some explicit splitting of arguments which are quite simple and understandable like the ones you give in the section "Perron root" etc. and the arguments which are not simple (or at least we cannot find simple ones in the literature). And for those ones provide exact references.
2) To write some preface of the proof - saying: items MMM are simple and explained here, but for items NNN nor simple arguments exists (at least at textbooks like []...[]) So we provide exact references.
2a) At the moment I do not quite understand the fact that "r" is simple root of char. pol. - is there some simple proof for it ? Would You be so kind to comment on it ?
What do You think about such "splitings" ?
--- delete mail :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexander Chervov (talk • contribs) 17:56, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.