User talk:Ludorth

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Stationsation per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stationsation. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  asilvering (talk) 19:56, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
checkmark icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ludorth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

I got informed that I got banned, while I don't fully understand why I got banned. I declare my innocence from any wrongdoing. Please reconsider. Thank you Ludorth (talk) 03:57, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Accepted via other account. asilvering (talk) 14:19, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ludorth (talk) 03:57, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Have you talked to your roommates about it? -- asilvering (talk) 04:31, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I got a message from one, I didn't understand everything since it was midnight at that time, the other one isn't here this week prob Ludorth (talk) 07:50, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Can you tell me some more about what got you interested in editing Wikipedia? -- asilvering (talk) 14:52, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HAVEN. (June 4)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, ArthurTheGardener, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for music. The draft requires either:

or multiple published secondary sources that:

  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.
Most of the sources are about the AI controversy, not the band.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:HAVEN. to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

ArthurTheGardener (talk) 17:47, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Ludorth! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ArthurTheGardener (talk) 17:47, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.