A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Serene Day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Serene Day until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:06, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article BIIG Problem Solving Method has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable concept. Only WP:PRIMARY sources are available.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 22:50, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your concern.

According to Wikipedia policy, "Primary sources that have been REPUTABLY published may be used in Wikipedia, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them".

Source: http://pubs.sciepub.com/ijp/3/3/4/index.html

International Journal of Physics is a REPUTABLE source. It is OPEN ACCESS and PEER REVIEWED. Science and Education Publishing website has the following metrics on this BIIG problem solving method (http://pubs.sciepub.com/ijp/3/3/4/metrics) as of 10 Oct 2022:

19833 views. 13.27% of the article views LED to PDF downloads. Total Downloads: 17922

For a science education paper, it is significant and notable.

Therefore, this proposed page is acceptable and should be kept.

Thank you very much. Kugold (talk) 14:48, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, coverage in reputable sources does not make the concept notable where those sources are written by the originator of the concept. To be notable the concept must have significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the originator - see WP:GNG. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 15:21, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BIIG Problem Solving Method is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BIIG Problem Solving Method until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 15:09, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]