User talk:J2000ai

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katherine Elkins (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:NPROF) but presently it is not clear that it does.

As you may know, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. Please note that many of the references are not from sources that are considered reliable for establishing notability, including articles written by the subject, as opposed to articles about the subject. Additionally, the draft tends to read too much like a CV, which Wikipedia is not. The draft does not appear to show that the subject has any notability beyond the average coverage for similar academics (see WP:ROTM). Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject. It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:NPROF criteria #3, because XXXXX").

Once you have implemented these suggestions, you may also wish to leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cabrils (talk) 00:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, J2000ai! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cabrils (talk) 00:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katherine Elkins (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:
The subject may be notable per WP:NPROF if she has a full professor appointment. Can you explain whether or not that is the case? Please also remove any external links from the body. Best, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:41, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again for the quick reply. Yes, Katherine Elkins is a full professor at Kenyon College with the title "Professor of Comparative Literature and Humanities". I forgot to mention that she has been the Director of the "Integrated Program for Humane Studies (IPHS) for years although she has been on sabbatical this past year (2023-2024)
https://www.kenyon.edu/directory/kate-elkins/.
Here is the link announcing her elevation to full professorship by the Kenyon College Board of Directors:
https://www.kenyon.edu/news/archive/full-professors-2/
"Katherine Elkins is the Director of the Integrated Program in Humane Studies and co-directs KDH, Kenyon's Digital Humanities Collaboratory. Her research focuses on the role of memory and emotion in the embodied structure of experience, on the long conversation between philosophy and literature, and on the ways in which computational approaches can help us understand language and creativity."
I also forgot to mention that Elkins is faculty in Computing and is listed under the official Kenyon College Computing Program here:
https://www.kenyon.edu/academics/departments-and-majors/computing/computing-faculty/
I'll convert all the external links in the body to citations per your directions after sending this email and add the two salient facts I missed above (her "Director of IPHS" and position as "faculty in Computing"). J2000ai (talk) 19:35, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:41, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chief AI Officer (CAIO) (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Encoded were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Encoded  Talk 💬 20:51, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chief AI Officer (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:39, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
SafariScribe,
Just got back from family vacation. Thanks for the feedback as I learn the ropes on wikipedia.
I've studied the links your provided on Wiki manual of style including revising the writing to be more neutral and more encyclopedic (vs essay) in style. I also borrowed organizational and style tips from related existing wiki articles for CTO, CIO, CDO and CSO.
Finally, I've tightened things up a bit, dropped ~1/3 of the references (34 to 23) and cut ~ 1/2 article length for conciseness and clarity.
Best, Jon J2000ai (talk) 16:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chief AI Officer has been accepted

Chief AI Officer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sohom (talk) 13:49, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katherine Elkins has been accepted

Katherine Elkins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 17:48, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi J2000ai! The thread you created at the Teahouse, How to remove 3 issues with my first Wikipedia entry, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 16:23, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Human-centered AI

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Human-centered AI, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:36, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SafeWeb has been accepted

SafeWeb, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nighfidelity (talk) 12:24, 12 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
PS: When formatting sources, please use {{cite web}} and {{cite news}} instead. Nighfidelity (talk) 12:25, 12 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

COI disclosure — The Helix Center for Interdisciplinary Investigation

COI disclosure — The Helix Center for Interdisciplinary Investigation

I am disclosing a conflict of interest per WP:COI.

I am an unpaid executive committee with the Helix Center and volunteer submitting on behalf of the non-profit organization. I have a non-financial connection to the subject of the article I am proposing.

I am not editing the article directly. I am submitting it through the Articles for Creation process so that an independent reviewer can assess it.

I acknowledge the COI policy and paid-contribution policy and will not edit the article outside of the AfC/talk-page process without further disclosure.

J2000ai (talk) 02:49, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katherine Elkins (April 12)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Bkissin, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to be a duplicate of an existing article. Wikipedia does not permit multiple articles on the same topic.
  • To improve the existing article, please edit it directly at Katherine Elkins. If the article is protected and you cannot edit it, propose your changes on the article's talk page.
  • If you are writing about a different subject with the same name, ask the reviewer to rename your draft to distinguish it.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Katherine Elkins to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Bkissin (talk) 22:05, 12 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephen Kern has been accepted

Stephen Kern, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 12:22, 16 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jon Chun (June 1)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft reads like a resume or curriculum vitae. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a professional networking website or a place to promote yourself or your services. We also strongly discourage writing about yourself.

Articles about people must meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
The WP:GOLDENRULE does not appear to have been met here. A subject cannot create their notability, someone independent needs to write, comment or broadcast about the subject. And three such examples, ideally. At the moment the bulk of the sources either do not refer to the subject at all, some don't work, and others are just passing mentions. This looks like a LinkedIn profile, that may be the better place for this.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Jon Chun to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

ChrysGalley (talk) 12:05, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.