Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Nil NZ, left the following feedback:
GPTzero gives a score of 100% ai generated. I found the previous ref as well, which didn't mention this genus at all. I've replaced the refs with ones that actually mention it, but I don't trust that the LLM didn't hallucinate anything else in the main body.
Next steps
Edit Draft:Zaptyx to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Hello, II52tt52!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nilnz05:47, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Tauphaedusa fusaniana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Quxyz, left the following feedback:
Zaptyx: I'll focus on rewording obvious AI sentences. I personally see no problem in using AI to help writing articles as long as the original writing comes from the editor and AI just polishes it. We still need to scrutinise what it says, especially since it's prone to embellishing ("species-rich") and tautology ("complex taxonomic history with numerous synonyms. As a result, species within this group are frequently recorded under various synonymous generic or subgeneric names in scientific literature." - that's a lot of words for saying Zaptyx has many synonyms. And what gastropod doesn't have a complex taxonomy?).
I added some templates where a citation needs to support the sentence. Would be good if you found something, otherwise the statements need to be removed. Barbalalaika 🐌15:12, 23 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I'm so sorry for disappearing. Real life got in the way. You put a lot of work in that article! I'll do some more editing on Wednesday but I feel like you can submit it after I'm done. I'll let you know. Sorry again for disappearing Barbalalaika 🐌11:28, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I've added "general characteristic"s to Zaptyx as originally described by Pilsbry. This text is public domain and can be used in wikipedia. If you omit the section "description"(probably from AI), then the draft will most probably be accepted. JoJan (talk) 14:31, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@II52tt52 I reworded the distribution section and removed two stray links which were under the references. I ran into difficulty confirming the following references:
1. Minato, Hiroshi (1994). Clausiliidae of Japan. Wakayama, Japan: Minato. pp. 1–212 (it's supporting species diversity being highest in Japan, Taiwan, and Philippines)
2. Nordsieck, Hartmut (2007). Worldwide Door Snails (Clausiliidae), recent and fossil. Hackenheim: ConchBooks. ISBN 978-3939767077. (supporting how Zaptyx has numerous synomyms.)
I didn't find number 1 at all and I did find number 2 but don't have access to it. For both, can you provide the relevant snippets?
Regarding the references I used (Minato 1994 and Nordsieck 2007), they are physical print books. Unfortunately, there are no online versions or full-text PDFs available for either of them, which is why I cannot provide direct text snippets or links for verification.
It’s a 1976 paper discussing the anatomy of Tyrannozaptyx (a genus closely related to/associated with Zaptyx) from the Yaeyama Islands in Okinawa. II52tt52 (talk) 02:02, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. If you ever want to submit an article for e.g., WP:GAN, you'll probably have to provide the specific snippet supporting the claims (a photo/scan, or paraphrasing the section). I'll take your word. I'd say you can resubmit the article now! Barbalalaika 🐌09:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@JoJan That's not AI. I had written most of that section... I based myself off Pilsbry's original description and reworded for the lay reader. What could I have done differently so that it can be put back up? Barbalalaika 🐌19:19, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, an original description is a definition. That's the starting point. The slightest change or rewording may result in describing a taxon different but alike. One may polish the original definition by adding verbs and articles so that it becomes a fluid narrative. For this one can eventually use AI (but always check afterwards). The best thing to do is adding wikilinks in the article, referring to the article explaining the meaning of the word, as I have done with whorl, lamella, apex etc. JoJan (talk) 13:32, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of non-marine molluscs of South Korea, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: