Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4.

Thank you for the feedback that you provided. I made an effort to revise and edit in line with your suggestions. This is my first one so I thought I would write about a topic I was familiar with. I also removed the LLM suggested language. Please look at the draft and let me know if I am closer to a publishable article. NikkiAllen99 (talk) 00:15, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @NikkiAllen99: The draft is much improved! I think it's 95% ready. I added two comments. SocDoneLeft (talk) 05:19, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing the submission.

I have attempted to align the draft with Wikipedia's guidance by significantly shortening the article, removing promotional language, and limiting references to independent published sources where available.

The current version only includes information that can be supported by third-party coverage and avoids internal or self-published material. My intention was to present a minimal, neutral overview rather than a comprehensive biography.

In addition, I have added the required paid/connected contributor disclosure on my user page to follow the instructions previously provided.

If possible, I would appreciate any specific guidance on which sections or statements still appear promotional, or what type of additional sourcing would help the draft better meet Wikipedia’s notability and neutrality standards.

Thank you again for your time reviewing the submission. ShalhoubM (talk) 10:25, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		Thanks for taking the time to review several of my draft submissions. I really appreciate the work you do helping move articles through the process. LionmerterTHE (talk) 14:47, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Metro DC Democratic Socialists of America, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arlington was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:20, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SocDoneLeft. Thank you for your work on Los Angeles Democratic Socialists of America. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more secondary sources. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:19, 13 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Los Angeles Democratic Socialists of America, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Left was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:09, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Kwessel1 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Alexia Leclercq (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi! I think you helped review my article on climate activist Alexia Leclercq. I believe that I made all necessary changes based on your feedback by removing the one link to her personal website and adding more articles from Forbes, The Guardian, Washington Post, etc. Please let me know if I need to make additional edits or changes. Thank you very much for your help!

Thanks, Kirsten W

Kwessel1 (talk) 13:19, 18 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SocDoneLeft and thanks for all your AfC reviewing! I just wanted to let you know that I've tagged a draft that you accepted, Eiríka Krogsæter, for speedy deletion as a hoax. The creator has just been blocked as a sock of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tttg2, which is a sockfarm that has a history of creating hoax articles (including an article about an invented species by the same name). As far as I can tell none of the sources mention Eiríka Krogsæter, and I can't find any evidence elsewhere that she existed. Obviously you had no way of knowing that the creator was a sock, but please be careful to check the sources to confirm that a draft is not a hoax before accepting at AfC. Thanks! MCE89 (talk) 11:20, 19 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MCE89:: Thank you for letting me know! Sorry for letting this slip through. Is there any chance you could email me a copy of the article pre-deletion? I would like to see how badly I messed up in failing to interrogate the sources. SocDoneLeft (talk) 04:13, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, it happens! I'm not an admin so I unfortunately can't see the article anymore either. @Newslinger would you be willing to email SocDoneLeft a copy since you were the deleting admin? MCE89 (talk) 11:39, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem.​ SocDoneLeft, I have emailed you a copy of the deleted Eiríka Krogsæter article. Please let me know if you would like any additional information about that page. — Newslinger talk 14:21, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Newslinger: Thanks! Looks like two legitimate sources, neither of which mentions Eiríka Krogsæter. Very much my bad. SocDoneLeft (talk) 15:57, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Communist Workers Party is a defunt organisation. Or is it? An org with the same name exists, here's their website: https://www.cwp-usa.org/. Is it possible that you can add more information relating to this? Thank you in advance if you do and if you don't, well I understand you're busy. Jenkowelten (talk) 06:34, 23 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Communist Workers Party is defunct. The Communist Workers Platform is extant. SocDoneLeft (talk) 12:27, 23 March 2026 (UTC)::See also: User:SocDoneLeft/List of leftist organizations in the United States. SocDoneLeft (talk) 12:29, 23 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@SocDoneLeft, you have commented

Comment: Thank you for adding more sources. The subject is clearly notable. The article tone is glowing and just reports on Singh's successes. Please rewrite using WP:NPOV. SocDoneLeft (talk) 20:19, 4 March 2026 (UTC) SocDoneLeft, changed the tone to NPOV. Can you review it again? ~2026-15036-82 (talk) 10:45, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Waiting for your reply and next steps. ~2026-19713-62 (talk) 07:40, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SocDoneLeft, thanks for your efforts to reduce the backlog at AfC! Just wanted to share some concerns about your decline and comment left on this draft. The main purpose of AfC is to evaluate notability and verifiability; drafts shouldn't be declined because their references aren't formatted with {{cite}} templates, or because they lack categories or sections. If it's notable and referenced, it's better to accept and then apply the relevant maintenance tag. You can find out more about at WP:AFCSTANDARDS :)
Cheers, nil ^nz 05:11, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

About this aticle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kairos_Futura am currently making corrections you mentioned and i neede help determining how independent and reliable the references are? I checked them and I feel like theyre okay, what do you think? Pippiberyl (talk) 09:27, 15 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason Thielman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Thielman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Edittttor (talk) 22:27, 26 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SocDoneLeft. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of political assassination attempts in the United States, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 29 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Seattle Democratic Socialists of America Logo Tower.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 3 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I am aware that you've reviewed my draft for Anna Keyes Knowlton but I'd like to know if you'd help me write it because I am writing it with only primary sources, local legends, and some books on Thomas Knowlton because she doesn't have a book of her own and they usually only over her marriage and children, not her personal life. Thank you for reading!

From, Lily Weed Lily Weed (talk) 19:03, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SocDoneLeft. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of political assassination attempts in the United States".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 01:26, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Socialist Workers Party (United States), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:39, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I have been topic banned on the Communist Party USA. Am I able to talk with you about my topic ban here? CuckooCorey (talk) 17:59, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This probably isn't the most appropriate place to ask, but this is the only place I know where you are still active. I was somewhat of a fan so it was a little sad to see you disappear. ~2026-33687-33 (talk) 22:14, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:34, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]