Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — DaxServer (talk · contribs) 19:18, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Subhas Chandra Bose. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — DaxServer (talk · contribs) 09:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The editor seems adament on using a term that is highly colonial, and derogatory. When the whole world has moved out of colonialism, I don't know why changing British Raj to British India, or just Indian, will be disruptive. Please explain. Atanu4ever (talk) 12:22, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ScottishFinnishRadish. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:16, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Pinakpani. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sandip Ghosh have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Pinakpani (talk) 07:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Yuvaank (talk) 02:40, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Yuvaank this contributor has continuously attacked my content, without proper justification, and warned me of consequences. I would expect a clear response with the clear elaborated rationale behind reverting back the changes. I hope that this contributor will respect my requirement of a proper justification. Atanu4ever (talk) 02:47, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This is my last attempt to extract a response from this editor. I'll take this on social media platform as a paradigm of content policing if I'm not responded to with justifiable rationale. I would assume that this editor has reverted my changes as a tool of personal attack, as it was evident from his warnings, and hence a radio silence from his part. Atanu4ever (talk) 04:22, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]