Archives

1, 2, 3

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 30 days are automatically archived 2 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 5.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Sam Cooper (journalist) when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 03:39, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be some sort of disagreement on this page since a while ago, but why is the mention of TP-Link being Chinese American always being reverted while sources in the article already mention the two separate entities ? It’s… confusing somewhat. As you seem to be the only active editor I’d like to ask you (other ones seem to come here and forth) ~2026-21491-14 (talk) 21:10, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A single temp user making an unfounded complaint is not a good reason to start POV pushing sources out of an article. I am honestly quite shocked at this comportment. Simonm223 (talk) 17:47, 22 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It is not exactly unfounded nor is it the first time the issue has been raised on Talk:Social credit system. Happy to keep discussing it there. - Amigao (talk) 23:49, 22 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The POV pushing on China articles is becoming disruptive. Simonm223 (talk) 17:48, 25 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to discuss the substance of the edits on Talk:Social credit system. - Amigao (talk) 17:52, 25 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

What you are doing is escalating to edit warring. WP:STATUSQUO is quite explicit. I suggest you self-revert. I am tired of this. Simonm223 (talk) 18:33, 25 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to WP:AGF and re-read the first sentence of WP:STATUSQUO as it explicitly refers to status quo ante bellum, which is not what my edit pertained to. In any case, it's a moot point now. - Amigao (talk) 18:36, 25 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]