User talk:AdamsEdits

Welcome!

Hello, AdamsEdits, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Regards, Accurizer (talk) 00:15, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

City of Character

Thanks for your help. I left some notes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:City_of_Character#Criticism that perhaps you can consider and give some thoughts on how gothard should or should not be tied to the article. Reboot (talk) 18:37, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Reboot, thanks for the notes and the obvious research you put into them. I have posted a reply on the discussion page. AdamsEdits (talk) 21:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks and thanks for your help in balancing it. I have a few responses and also take a look at how I worked Hill and Gothard into the introduction to the article. I've watched all of the online videos posted by one of the members of CF/IACC (the IACC one is posted along with the rest), but it is mostly testimonial aside from the few facts I noted in the discussion page (that I plan to distill a bit more later when it sinks in).. I'd really like to add more to the program description (what is done, how it is implemented, who implements it, what benefits have been observed, drawbacks actually observed rather than hypothesized), but it is difficult w/o the specific materials. Right now my bias is still sticking out with a weighted "reasons a libertarianesque person might be a bit allergic to this stuff". The things should be mentioned (like the marriage license thing)...along with more stuff for balance... The video summaries will help I think once I finish distilling them and working them in, but I think if I were to actually buy the materials just to write a wikipedia article (as is my inclination) on them that my wife might medicate me for obsessive compulsive disorder :-) Reboot (talk) 13:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.