News and notes: Offline: Osama Khalid still in prison He has been imprisoned since 2020 for his Wikipedia edits. A fresh campaign is calling for his release.
Recent research: WikiLambda the Ultimate Does Abstract Wikipedia help fight "One ring to rule them all" solutions for knowledge access - or does it implement one itself?
In my early days of Wikipedia, I did a lot of vandalism reversion through special:recentchanges. I've come to do a lot less of that nowadays. I don't really focus on any one area, instead doing a hodgepodge of tasks. I focus a lot on academia (from universities to standardized tests), as well as doing some work in politics (although I've found that — not at all surprisingly — these are hotbeds of POV, bad faith, and even sockpuppetry). I still do a lot of vandalism reversion through my watchlist, but I also add in bits and pieces of information to articles, whenever I find a good source. Resources like Flickr and federal government websites have given me great tools to find acceptably licensed material to illustrate articles. I also do a lot of small tasks here and there, like fixing typos, finding geographic coördinates, and improving citations. I'm generally happy to help out if I can, so if you see something that needs doing, don't hesitate to drop me a line
What I'd Like to See More Use out of
Library and school databases. Wikipedia can only grow so far as its references. Lots of newspapers and magazines are unavailable through normal methods, especially editions older than 7 days. These databases contain largely untapped treasure troves of knowledge. Their search functions are usually pretty good, and you don't have to have a specific article in mind, you can just jump in and see what you find. You also don't have to separately jump from one newspaper's website to the next: it's all in one spot. You're school and public library probably provides you free access to these with your library number, so go to your local/school library and add a (properly cited) reference or two.
Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Raul has some laws about Wikipedia, one of which states, "For every one person who knows something about copyright law, there are at least ten who don't, and two who think they do but don't." I am not the first (but I'm learning!), and rather than attempt to be the third, I defer to those more knowledgeable on the subject than I. If you are someone who knows about copyright, your services are greatly needed. If you aren't, then better to ask before you make a mistake rather than after.
User:SuggestBot. Don't go looking for articles that need help, let this bot find the ones you will enjoy working on.
Userboxes
In approximate order of importance within their category:
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.