I am asking for a clarification. Nishidani has created with Marcasella the Crollalanza page, but he has added the same info to the Florian theory page and I do believe it might look a duplicate of the Crollalanza page. The Israel group named that problem. Also considering undoubtedly if we think being prolific and proficient. On the other hand, Gråbergs Gråa Sång, regarding the rose in the barber, has proposed to merge the two pages, because they actually contain the same pseudo info. I just want to ask for a clarification. Is it allowed? Or just shall I witness MI in the five? Thank you for any clarification. Vale.devin (talk) 03:05, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

The Italian news website Dagospia, which Politico named as a feared agenda-setter for the political elite, has published a few days ago a page about the events related to the Florian theory page controversy. But it is irrelevant to mention Giuseppe Gioachino Belli, a poet who worked as a political censor for the papal government and at the same time he wrote anti-clerical trivial and unimportant poems (nowadays it would be classified as a Stockholm syndrome case). The third-rate researches related to those works are extraneous to the great Italian literature. Furthermore Gioachino Belli censored works by William Shakespeare, Giuseppe Verdi and Gioachino Rossini. John Florio, in the introduction of his dictionary 'A Worlde of Wordes', was pretty clear about those notable Pirates on this our paper-sea, those sea-dogs, or lande-Critickes, monsters of men, if not beastes rather than men; whose teeth are Canibals, their toongs adder-forkes, their lips aspes-poyson, their eies basiliskes, their breath the breath of a grave. Nishidani But the love for Romanesco dialect is still alive today and Dagospia's editor is surely fluent in Romanesco and probably he would be opened to hear about the events related to the creation of the Scrollalanza page and the re-writing of the Florian theory page.Vale.devin (talk) 06:22, 15 August 2021 (UTC)