TheTechnician27

— Wikipedian ♂ —
Name	TheTechnician27
Account statistics
Joined	March 13, 2017
Extended confirmed	December 25, 2017
New page reviewer	February 25, 2021
Edit count	24,000
Userboxes
This editor is a Senior Editor and is entitled to display this Rhodium Editor Star. Content contributed by this user is released into the public domain. This user has reviewed 4 Good Article nominations on Wikipedia. en-5 This user can contribute with a professional level of English. es-2 Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel intermedio de español. imm This editor is an immediatist. This user participates in WikiProject Citation cleanup. This user participates in WikiProject Video games. This user participates in WikiProject Biography. This user participates in WikiProject Computing. This user is a participant in WikiProject Arthropods. This user participates in WikiProject Tree of Life. This user is interested in Mathematics. This user uses free software wherever and whenever possible. This user is vegan.  0.0013%  This user has created 96 of the 7,192,470 articles on the English language Wikipedia.

This user has publicly declared that he has a conflict of interest regarding these Wikipedia articles: PCSX2 member of the project

• My Wiktionary user page
• My Wikivoyage user page
• My Wikispecies user page
• My Wikiversity user page
• My Wikisource user page

I mainly do citation cleanup/improvement on articles, namely things like formatting, adding information, improving existing information, recovering dead URLs, etc. I especially like to combat link rot. Citations are one of the main reasons people can utilize Wikipedia in serious academic settings, and they function as the backbone of the entire article, but oftentimes these citations lead to dead URLs, contain minimal information that provides little help in finding the source, have wildly different styles within the same article, or are generally cumbersome to read, and seeing good articles complemented by good citations is really satisfying. Something I like about doing this is that I don't have to know much about the subject to clean up citations, so I can cover a breadth of interesting articles.

For the love of all that's good, please don't use MSN.com unless it's the original source; it goes dead within like a few months, and then we just have to find the original source anyway. This is somewhat similar with Yahoo! News, except that those typically at least stay up for some years.

More recently, I've started creating articles for species that don't yet have an article. I've found that every one I've come across so far has at least some literature written about it, and even if the article begins as a stub, the direct access to cited references and to other resources makes it useful.

I do new-article and GA review. Regarding new-article review, I predominantly do retro video games.

I sometimes help out at Wikipedia's Teahouse, which is an excellent resource for new and experienced editors alike.

Please see this sub-page for my public domain disclosure.