User:RigorMorticius
|
Tell us more about yourself This page is your user page. You are free to change it however and whenever you want. Just remember, it is your face towards the rest of the community and the world. You can always get back here by clicking on your user name at the very top of every page. |
Fundamentals Every one of Wikipedia's articles has been created by its readers. Click here to learn more about the basics of contributing and how easily you can help make Wikipedia better. As we say: Be bold! |
Personalize Wikipedia With your account, you can enhance your reading and editing experience by marking articles to watch as they evolve and adjusting your settings. |
About me
|
| Click here to add an image of yourself (optional). Important information for minors |
I mostly just make little edits like spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors in articles I'm passing, but currently my only interest is Wild Kratts. I'm also at TVTropes.com, after seeing a discussion about it and deciding to check it out. I'm RigorMorticius over there as well.
Also, I'm neurotypical, so I may not understand something that was or wasn't done. You'll have to excuse me in those cases; it's simply a misunderstanding.
Immature Behavior
Regarding Wild Kratts, specifically Martin and Aviva, the following points were outlined on the talk page:
- There is still no definitive proof, not by what Wikipedia considers proof. WP:NOR
- It is in fact biased. Newcomers to the page are not given the chance to watch the show and form their own opinion of the pairing. WP:NPOV
- The edit uses weasel words, which is another no-no. WP:W2W
- It often uses words like "seems" or "appear" in order to -weasel- (get it?) the reader into taking the statement as fact when it is unconfirmed.
The issue is not brought up because saying that they are not in a relationship will also bias the article, so it's best not to bring it up. If you post that info, I will revert it. If you add it again, I will simply revert it. If you put it once more, I will not revert it, but simply report it. I will not let this article fall into another edit war over this puerile issue. Consensus says that the edit and it's opposite (that they are not in love) are biased, and neither is allowed, which is why neither view is supported by the article. All evidence supporting either side is Original Research and Synthesis of Information. You should just let it go, because it's not going to stay on there as long as I'm editing.
More will be added to this, as right now, it's 500 AM. RigorMorticius (talk)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.