User:Noirtist
That's it, I'm done. I've had it. The Ian Stevenson article is simply too much hassle. Every day of my life now I am called a liar and it is claimed that I am misrepresenting sources. I have tried to improve the article but some editors are simply intent on making the article reflect their own view to the point of writing it in the style of a petulant 14 year-old. Every positive, or neutral statement has now to be qualified with something critical whether or not there is a source for it. I think the final straw is probably the misrepresentation of the RFC. If someone can claim that that RFC supports the use of the Encyclopedia of pseudoscience as a source then the argument is just not genuine. I cannot go on hitting my head against this particular brick wall. Bye. Noirtist (talk) 07:56, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.