User:Matt Kwan/Sandbox


At this stage was shown to be less than or equal to which is correct but if this is done the conclusion of the proof is:



will increase without bound if , so this method does not prove the general case that is bounded. (When there is a divide-by-zero problem as well.)


A possible although unwieldy solution is to replace k! with something other than . I propose a complete solution as follows:


(using as the ceiling function):



therefore:



is a GP, so using with as the number of terms and as the growth per term:



But for all :



So


therefore:



which is a bound independent of

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.