User:Libbs214/sandbox

Cultivation Theory

Cultivation Theory, is a theory founded by George Gerbner. The theory states that people who watch lots of TV are more susceptible to media messages and the belief that they are real. Those who watch lots of TV, are exposed to more Violence and therefore think the world is more violent than it actually is compared to someone who doesn't watch as much television.

Professor[1] George Gerbner founded the Cultivation theory in 1976 after doing research projects on how television affects viewers. He compared the socializing aspect of television that of religion and said since televsion has more violence it can cause people to develop Mean World Syndrome, meaning people think the world is worse than it actually is.

Process[2]

Gerbner and his research team designed a series of content analyses that slimmed down their focus from all forms of mass media to just television, saying that commercial television have both drama and news produced to the same viewers unlike other forms of mass media. Gerbner then went on to only focus on prime time and children's weekend morning programming shown on the three most popular networks at the time since they reasoned these programs had the largest amount of viewers. As research went on they slowly grew there topic of violence to looking gender roles, marriage, family etc while still staying within television entertainment.


While doing cultivation analysis, Gerbner's team used 5 key features[3]: "national probability samples, cross sectional surveys, assumption of stable TV viewing, focus on beliefs as cultivation indicator and categorical analyses of relationship between TV exposure and cultivation indicators".


The team while using Gerbners idea's did as one thing to the research by adding "constructs of mainstreaming resonance". Meaning using similarities between their viewing groups and having data from both real world messages and TV messages. They predicted these viewers would have a higher cultivation; resonance effect.

Assumptions

  1. Since [4]TV programs are mass produced and have a central role in culture, it is way more influential than other mass media forms
  2. Tv can't encourage violent behavior, it just helps form peoples attitudes and beliefs about society
  3. values and attitudes that already exist in society are just cultivated by TV and TV just reinforces it
  4. Watching TV for X amount of time will make everyone have Mean World Syndrome
  5. TV creates an alternate reality


Research Findings[5]

Some researches have found some common themes about heavy TV watchers and cultivation theory

  1. Magnified fear of becoming victim to a crime
  2. more suspicious of people
  3. Maximized perception of police activity


Year without TV and Cultivation Theory[6]

Teal Burrell a Journalist for the Washington Post wrote an article about how she went a year without watching lots of TV, she said that we as Americans are obsessed with television and spend an average of 5 hours a day watching television and that TV rules our lives. She states that although we spend lots of time with TV, we are repaid very nicely by television saying that people who watch lots of TV are more unhappy, heavier and worse sleepers, a fact most doctors tell us on the regular.


Studies have found children and teenagers who watch more TV have worse attention spans, lower grades, and different brain structures than someone who watches an average amount of television.


After feeling poorly and wanting to achieve some goals she had set for herself she decided to give up TV and make an experiment out of it as she found herself discussing the latest TV shows often with her friends.

Once giving up TV, she found that she was enjoying her weeknights more and about 3 months in she nearly caved after having a hard day and just wanted to watch Tv, she wondered does Tv give our brains are stress relief?


She did some research and found that Michael Grabowski, who is a media studies researcher related what she was thinking to the Cultivation Theory. The theory says if we watch things with more violence we develop mean world syndrome but if we were to sit down a watch a comedy it would likely distress you but more research needs to be done on this part of the theory.


Almost a year later, Burrell she was happier and more motivated to do things because of the lack of TV in her life. She wasn't being dragged down by violent or mind numbing shows that would make her thinks the world is scarier than it actually is.

Cultivation and Crime[7]

Gerbner when developing this theory noted at the time more than 75% of television dramas contained acts of violence and I'm confident that number has increased over time. Bryan Reber and Yuhming Chang wrote an article discussing the Cultivation theory and crime.

There article focused on a study done by Jane Stevens and Lori Dorman at Berkeley Media studies center and completed by undergraduate students. Each student was given a randomly selected phone number and had to complete 15 surverys. The Survey focused on how the cultivtion theory would play out in a small midwestern market.


The 3 research questions were

Do the findings support Cultivation Theory?

What do respondents want form their news sources?

Is there evidence of support for the principles of public health reporting?


Once the study was completed, the answer if Cultivation Theory had to be answered. The answer was that it was "modest". Among the more than 25 questions related to media only 2 directly had to do with cultivation and that the attention having to do with local crime was more about fear than what was seen on the television that was impacting how these students reacted to crime. As a result of this study, researchers did find out that the respondents thought media spends way too much of its attention of crime news.

Social Media and Cultivation Theory[8]

While there is not as much information on the effects of Social Media and Cultivation Theory, it is known that social media can have a negative effect on people's mental health. Since Cultivation means using the outside world and relating it to your personal world, it is possible that the cultivation theory could come into play with Social Media. But rather than seeing the world as more violent, people see others on Instagram, using filters and making it seem like they are doing all these amazing things with their life ex. taking exotic trips, going to cool restaurants even though most of the time that is not reality. People end up thinking that everyone on Instagram is living his/hers best life when in reality they are not. Similar to the Cultivation theory that there is lots of violence on TV, the world must be violent people on Social media thinks this girls is living such a cool life, most people are living cool lives also.

Sources

(IN order of how they were used, but split up into scholarly, book and new media sources.......sources at the header mean that was used for that whole paragraph)


Scholarly Sources

#2. W. James Potter, A Critical Analysis of Cultivation Theory, Journal of Communication, Volume 64, Issue 6, December 2014, Pages 1015–1036, https://doi-org.libdata.lib.ua.edu/10.1111/jcom.12128


#6 Burrell, T. (2017, Mar 28). My resolution: A year without TV. here's how it worked out. The Washington Post Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.libdata.lib.ua.edu/docview/1881354989?accountid=14472


#7 H. Reber & Y. Chang, Assesing Cultivation Theory and public healthy model for crime reporting. https://journals-sagepub-com.libdata.lib.ua.edu/doi/pdf/10.1177/073953290002100407


Modern sources

#1 Communication, in Cultural; Psychology; Behavioral Science (2010-01-14) “Cultivation Theory” Communication Theory retrieved: https://www.communicationtheory.org/cultivation-theory/

#4&#5 Cultivation Theory" Communication Studies Retrieved from: http://www.communicationstudies.com/communication-theories/cultivation-theory

#8 Cultivation Theory and New Media. prezi.com retrieved https://prezi.com/mmpy9dbokbqt/cultivation-theory-and-new-media/


Book

Global Journal of HUMAN-SOCIAL SCIENCE: A Arts & Humanities - Psychology

Volume 15 Issue 8 Version 1.0 Year 2015

Type: Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal Publisher: Global Journals Inc. (USA)

Online ISSN: 2249-460x & Print ISSN: 0975-587X

https://globaljournals.org/GJHSS_Volume15/3-All-you-Need-to-Know.pdf

  1. ^ Communication, in Cultural; Psychology; Behavioral; Science, Social (2010-01-14). "Cultivation Theory". Communication Theory. Retrieved 2020-04-21.
  2. ^ "E-Resource Login". login.libdata.lib.ua.edu. doi:10.1111/jcom.12128. Retrieved 2020-04-21.
  3. ^ Potter, James (december 2014). "A criticl analysis of Cultivation Theory". Journal of Communication. 64. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  4. ^ "Cultivation Theory". Communication Studies. 2012-05-05. Retrieved 2020-04-21.
  5. ^ "Cultivation Theory". Communication Studies. 2012-05-05. Retrieved 2020-04-21.
  6. ^ Burrell, Teal (March 28, 2017). "A year without TV. Heres how it worked out". The Washington Post.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  7. ^ "E-Resource Login". login.libdata.lib.ua.edu. doi:10.1177/073953290002100407. Retrieved 2020-04-21.
  8. ^ "Cultivation Theory and New Media". prezi.com. Retrieved 2020-04-21.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.