This ArbCom began as a legitimate attempt to examine some users whose actions might be harming Wikipedia content, at large scale. It was later expanded to include 7&6. They are two separate issues. The case against 7&6 is evidenced by many of the same who tried to sanction him at ANI in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1083&oldid=1073177252#ARS_Proposal_#2:_Topic_ban_for_7&6=thirteen October] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1085&oldid=1079615352#7&6=thirteen%E2%80%99s_behavior_hasn%E2%80%99t_improved November], but failed because 7&6 has the support of many members of the community, and the evidence was never strong. User:S Marshall [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1083&oldid=1073177252#ARS_Proposal_#2:_Topic_ban_for_7&6=thirteen earlier attempted to frame 7&6] for things he did not do (closed: "likely a good faith error"). User:S Marshall now says he takes "delight" in seeing 7&6 at ArbCom ([[Special:Diff/1093739354/1093743304]]). User:EEng has been an inveterate cynical commentator about ARS for years. During this ArbCom evidence phase he called ARS a "religion" ([[Special:Diff/1093919940/1093931066]]), which implies blind faith and not objective decisions. If we are sanctioning users for aspersions, start here. This [[Wikipedia_talk:Article_Rescue_Squadron#There_is_an_ongoing_discussion_about_AFDs|thread at ARS]] says it all, where he jokingly says he remains "subtle" about long running personal feuds ([[Special:Diff/1093594879/1093594962]]), though he originally said "I hide it well" ([[Special:Diff/1093594285/1093594879]]). There has long been direct evidence of anti-ARS dog whistling at Wikipediocracy, for example most recently related to this ArbCom case: [https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=12639&p=311773&hilit=7%266%3Dthirteen#p311773] ("the old-school ARSehole Brigade still left"). It is a constant thing at Wikipediocracy, with people disparaging ARS and its members whenever there is an ANI or contentious AfD. I picked two users, as examples, due to space constraint, though I make no direct accusations of off-site activity. Look, this case is strongest against the original three users: the question is if they are doing the right thing for Wikipedia ''at scale''. This is the evidence ArbCom should focus on; in the case of 7&6 some trivial involved-editor personal grudges have spilled into ArbCom with little scale impact.