User:Egaoblai
Contributions
pages created
|
pages rescued from deletion
|
Most of these just needed a quick tidy up. There are many draft articles that get rejected at Articles for Creation, and the writers lose their enthusiasm after constant rejection. this contributes to the massive drop in new editors. These drafts, because they are not in mainspace, don't get to benefit from community help in improving them and are often deleted en masse after 6 months because of a rule called "g13" which means drafts can be deleted. Many of these articles are rejected for borderline reasons such as formatting or tone and would never be deleted if they were in the mainspace. Also, many new users believe that if they write a draft they must submit it for review. This isn't true at all, you can add your new article directly into the mainspace without review. It still might get deleted, but at least this will be decided by public committee rather than one reviewer at AFC. You can help rescue good articles and promising drafts at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:G13_eligible_AfC_submissions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:AfC_postponed_G13
|
Common poor reasons for deleting:
- WP:AQU "this article is poor quality so we should delete it and not bother trying to improve it"
- WP:ZEAL "I deleted this page..I win!"
- Failure to WP:BEFORE "I haven't heard of this so let's delete it, I won't even bother checking to see if it's been written about."
- WP:TOOSHORT There is nothing wrong with a WP:STUB article.
- When in WP:DOUBT don't delete.
- don't throw the baby out with the WP:BATHWATER
- WP:VAGUEWAVE quoting policy without explaining why.
- WP:BIGOTRY prejudice against users and topics.
- WP:FENCE deletion nominators makes no attempt to understand reasoning for why people might find the page useful and encyclopedic.
- Use this tag for drafts##
 | An editor has indicated that this is a promising draft and requests that it not be speedy-deleted as WP:G13 and instead be nominated at WP:MFD. | .png){kind=small} |
 | An editor has determined that sufficient sources exist to establish the subject's notability. |
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.