User:Cryptic/recent U5
The most recent 50 deletions mentioning "U5" in their title, whose log id is divisible by 100 (to spread the sample out, between both administrators and time).
The "edits" column is a count of the owning user's currently-not-deleted edits to namespaces other than User: and User talk: that preceded the deletion. I didn't attempt to account for username changes: it's assumed that the name of the page at the time of deletion still corresponds to the user.
For Wikipedia talk:Speedy deletion#RfC: Replacing U5 with a primarily procedural mechanism.
| valid U5 | invalid U5; valid speedy under other criterion | invalid speedy |
| log | deleter | links | edits | comment_text | analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-03 10:13:06 | Jimfbleak | User:Amarni renee Banks (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | No: Not just plausibly but very obviously a draft, with the same subject as Draft:Amarni Banks though somewhat inferior to it. Autobiographical, judging from the username. —Cryptic 01:13, 4 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-10-02 07:23:46 | DoubleGrazing | User:Rizmehdi (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria U5, G11 | Partial: Not just plausibly but very obviously a draft, about the International American School of Warsaw. Likely LLM-generated, but didn't qualify as G15. G11 could have been cured by removing roughly the latter half; I'm not going to fault the deleting admin for not doing so, given its probable source. —Cryptic 01:13, 4 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-10-01 18:07:29 | JBW | User talk:Saima Antonius (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host & G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion | Partial: Not just plausibly but very obviously a (terrible, terrible) draft. Autobiographical, judging from the username. G11 entirely correct. —Cryptic 01:13, 4 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-09-29 08:28:52 | Jimfbleak | User:Trevor Anthony Aindow (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | No: Quite plausibly a (bad) draft. Autobiographical, judging from the username. Maybe a G11 if you squint. —Cryptic 01:13, 4 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-09-28 08:17:42 | DoubleGrazing | User:Fernandomersam/sandbox (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria U5, G11 | Partial: Not just plausibly but very obviously a (terrible) draft. Autobiographical, judging from the username. G11 entirely correct. —Cryptic 01:13, 4 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-09-26 17:56:49 | JBW | User:Quadri Salahudeen (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria U5, G11 | Partial: Not just plausibly but very obviously a (terrible) draft. Autobiographical, judging from the username. Likely LLM-generated, but not a G15. G11 entirely correct. —Cryptic 02:13, 4 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-09-25 23:37:20 | ERcheck | User:Mbinoupue22 (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | No: Very plausibly a (bad) draft, about "Digital Learning in Modern Classrooms". Reads like the sort of spamvertisement that I'd expect to end with a link to someone selling consulting services. Would never make it to mainspace, but without that spamlink, it's not a G11 by itself. —Cryptic 02:13, 4 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-09-24 07:50:07 | Jimfbleak | User:Mozxvane (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | No: Very painfully obviously a draft about Gomburza. Mildly unencyclopedic tone in a few paragraphs, maybe a fifth of the total at most. Likely wouldn't have been moved out of mainspace (let alone deleted) if it were created there, if it wasn't entirely unreferenced, and (obviously) if we didn't already have a better article for the subject. —Cryptic 02:13, 4 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-09-20 10:13:03 | KylieTastic | User:Pdisney (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | Yes: Blatant CV. U5 correct. (G11 would have been too.) —Cryptic 02:13, 4 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-09-17 16:59:38 | KylieTastic | User:Inderjeet Singh Sidhu (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | Partial: Plausibly a (terrible) draft. Autobiographical, judging from the username. G11 entirely correct. —Cryptic 02:13, 4 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-09-12 10:18:57 | Jimfbleak | User:Wodes.la/sandbox (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host: G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion | Yes: "How Payroll Services By Tax Accountant Can Help Your Business". Spamvertisement, significantly more clearly so than User:Mbinoupue22 above, plus this time with the spam links (multiple). Very likely spambot. G11 very clearly correct; U5 correct too, but it requires a much more thorough reading to establish that it can't be interpreted as a draft than it does to conclude that it's entirely promotional. —Cryptic 04:21, 4 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-09-06 17:19:19 | KylieTastic | User:Magikal Babatunde Kareem (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | No: Very obviously a draft, about a musician. Autobiographical judging by the username. (I don't mean to be this repetitive, honest!) The external links are objectionable in number and character, but otherwise it's only mildly promotional. —Cryptic 04:21, 4 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-09-06 09:07:08 | Jimfbleak | User:Armaan Singla (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | Partial: No question that this was a (very bad, autobiographical) draft of an article, too, about "an Indian digital content creator, fashion influencer, and lifestyle blogger". The sentence containing that quote, and the one following (which states his home city), are the only remotely neutral ones in it. I'd have G11'd. —Cryptic 04:21, 4 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-09-05 20:29:57 | JBW | User:William Tritt (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion | Partial: Not only written as a draft but correctly formatted as one, too. About as promotionally-written as it's possible to be short of saying "Buy my stuff!" with a link to Amazon. Or to Spotify in this case, I guess. Nauseatingly clear G11, and I'd have blocked after the first deletion instead of waiting for two more. —Cryptic 04:21, 4 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-09-03 07:18:58 | Deepfriedokra | User:It's your rana (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 4 | G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | Partial: Clearly a draft, clearly autobiographical (it was disclosed in an edit summary). Does have the effect of a CV, though the majority is formatted like an encyclopedia article and not a resume. G11 was reasonable, and while it was maybe curable by removing about 80% of the content, I'd have deleted it. I might not have if it wouldn't have been an A7 in mainspace too. —Cryptic 04:21, 4 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-09-02 21:58:18 | Deepfriedokra | User:MohdAqibTurk (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 6 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host: G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion in userspace | Partial: Another autobiographical draft, and not reasonably interpretable as anything but; complete with infobox and Career, Discography, and External links sections. G11 was correct (like it almost always is for pages containing phrases like "began his music journey"). —Cryptic 04:21, 4 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-09-02 10:33:19 | BusterD | User:PTOFieldBin (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host: G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion in userspace | No: Starts "{{UserboxCOI|Raymond Sherwell}} === Raymond George Sherwell === '''(Draft) Raymond George Sherwell''' (1935 – 2006) was an Australian innovator, entrepreneur, and community leader from Nhill, Victoria,"... Generally similar to Draft:Raymond Sherwell but less promotionally-written, with mostly the same refs (but here, none of them were linked to online versions). If it was LLM-generated like the draft was, it's a lot less clearly so. I don't think it would be a defensible G11, though I might be tempted on a bad day. —Cryptic 02:30, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-30 10:00:59 | KylieTastic | User:Bethelineke (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | Partial: Hey, look, it's another promotional autobiographical draft. (First two sentences: "[full name] was born in July [year] in [town], Ebonyi State, Nigeria, to Late Chief Elder [name] and Mrs. [name]. Growing up in a culturally rich and historically significant town, he was deeply influenced by the traditions, struggles, and resilience of his people.") Which makes it a G11, sure, but not a U5. —Cryptic 02:30, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-29 15:50:05 | Jimfbleak | User:Qhawedur (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria U5, G11, G15 | Partial: First paragraph of the last revision deleted (this time; it's the second of three deletions of this title): "[name] (born [year]) is a South African former professional soccer player and father of rising football talent [name similar to username]. Born and raised in Johannesburg, [surname] is widely known in his community for his powerful and accurate shooting ability, famously capable of striking the ball from his home yard all the way to the nearby local shop—a distance that became a local legend." The first revision after the previous deletion started "Got it! Here's a more realistic, soccer-themed wiki-style bio with those details:", so I certainly don't fault it being tagged G15 (in addition to U5 and G11). Maybe not technically a G15 anymore after that was removed (did we decide on that?), but it's way far into G11 territory. And it's way far into (horrific) attempt at a draft territory, too. —Cryptic 02:30, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-28 09:12:30 | Jimfbleak | User:Purnachandra Rao Jujjavarapu (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | Yes: Preposterously promotional autobiography. Maybe possibly interpretable as a draft if you're feeling generous - the first part is identical to the description of the user's youtube channel (click on the "...more" link) except the initial "Welcome to the official YouTube channel of" was removed. I'm not feeling generous. No question it's G11 material, even before you get to all the social media links. Also G12 material even besides the cut-and-paste from youtube, since it goes on to include the full text of this and this. I'll accept U5 as quite defensible here; the cases for G11 and G12 are unassailable. —Cryptic 02:30, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-26 00:52:21 | Explicit | User:AleksanderT/sandbox (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 2 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | No: Well, it's got an infobox, a lead (with a sentence fragment), and a Career section that's empty except for its one-sentence Birth subsection. But the subject is, I quote, "The Stupid Fucking Neighborhood Cat", and the infobox and prose are consistent with that. Not plausibly a draft intended for eventual inclusion in the encyclopedia despite the formatting, but not unreasonable as editing experiments. Y'know, the sort of thing the sandbox is for, learning markup and article formatting and whatnot. I don't think this is a technically valid U5, no more than it's a valid G3, but given its age (its only revision is from shortly after the user's two visible ones in mainspace), I don't actually have a beef with the deletion. This person has long since moved on without contributing to the project. —Cryptic 03:10, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-23 03:19:02 | Liz | User:WorkLInk/sandbox (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | Partial: Content was "[afc declination template] Work Link Indonesia [¶] Perusahaan tentang trasletor komik dan manga, perusahaan ini di bawa oleh Work Link Gramedia Indonesia, dengan CEO : F.Putra. Perusahaan ini dalam proses legalitas oleh pihak kami." Which google translate tells me is Indonesian for a very brief, not unacceptably promotional but not remotely significance-asserting, draft. It was six months to the day since its last edit, so G13 would've been valid. U5, not so much. —Cryptic 03:10, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-22 06:18:02 | Deepfriedokra | User:Genuinetruths (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host: G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion | Partial: Well, you can see the start of the page in the creation log, which is enough to show that it was clearly an attempt at a draft. The part that's not shown is considerably more promotional, and I'd have G11'd it too; it's also clearly LLM-created, but not a G15. Would've been if the emoji amendment had passed; this had the sort of emoji usage that does imply LLM creation, besides the other clear signs the page had. —Cryptic 03:10, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-18 15:36:46 | BusterD | User:Kenato123 (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | Partial: This was the first of two deletions of this title. You can see the start of the page in the creation log; it goes on "] (UECCC) since April 2024.[ref omitted][ref omitted] With over two decades of experience in investment management and development finance, Baguma is known for promoting private sector investment in Uganda's renewable energy sector." and continues with the "Early life and education" section visible in the second creation's log. I'd have G11'd this too, but think I might have had a hard time defending it if it were brought to DRV. It's very clearly an attempt at including this draft in the main encyclopedia, though, so categorically not a U5. —Cryptic 03:10, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-18 14:20:36 | ERcheck | User:Isaac Mupenda (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | Partial: Eight-paragraph long autobiographical (from username) draft in French. First pseudo-heading and paragraph translate to "<big>[full name]: An Inspiring Journey as a Congolese Author</big> [¶] [full name] is a Congolese writer and prolific author of several works addressing themes as diverse as spirituality, philosophy, education, and the humanities. His first book, The Return of the True Creator: A Guide to Spiritual Awakening, Volume 1, was published in Canada by Luca Productions and available on Amazon, paving the way for a promising writing career." It goes downhill from there. I'd have G11'd it without hesitation, but being in a foreign language doesn't make a draft stop being a draft. —Cryptic 03:10, 5 October 2025 (UTC)} |
| 2025-08-18 12:18:23 | Acroterion | User:Nobukojapan5050 (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | Yes: Starts "The demand for [external.link.to.commercial.site Japanese used cars UK] buyers seek has grown rapidly over the years, thanks to their reputation for quality and affordability." and just keeps getting worse. There was no attempt to translate this sales brochure into an encyclopedia article. Good U5; much better G11. —Cryptic 14:53, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-15 21:06:41 | BusterD | User:Serhii Muravitskyi/sandbox (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host: G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion in userspace | Partial: Start of the draft is visible in the creation log. On any given day, I might or might not delete it as a G11, depending on whether I felt up to a potential confrontation with the user; I'd certainly never decline a db-g11 tag. —Cryptic 14:53, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-15 14:11:31 | Explicit | User:Gsrtech2025 (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | Partial: Start's visible in creation log again, but that's the least draft-like part of this page. It is representative of the overall tone, and I wouldn't hesitate to G11 it. —Cryptic 14:53, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-15 11:29:35 | Explicit | User:Sell car for scrap (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | Yes: What you'd expect from the username and the creation log excerpt. Again, zero attempt to translate this sales brochure into an encyclopedia article; good U5, much better G11 (which, like many of these pages, is what it was tagged as). —Cryptic 14:53, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-13 19:15:41 | KylieTastic | User:Ebielezieanya (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria U5, G11 | No: Plainly draftlike. Very plainly created by an LLM, but not a G15 since the markdown amendment failed and only one ref (to a subpage on, of all places, the subject's personal website) 404s. Not promotional enough to G11, though if brought to DRV it's very likely it would get IAR-endorsed because the machine authorship is just that blatant. —Cryptic 14:53, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-13 06:09:05 | Explicit | User:Mohamedbhaiq (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | No: Not draftlike, which is in practice is the usual disqualifier, but it's not coherent enough to be "writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals". Would be a slam-dunk speedy as G1 patent nonsense if that didn't specifically exclude pages in userspace. Created in November 2011 and completely untouched since then. —Cryptic 15:45, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-11 20:48:06 | Deepfriedokra | User:Apurba03 (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 3 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | No: Not draftlike either (despite the infobox visible in the creation log), but squarely falls into WP:UPYES as "Limited autobiographical content". Total of four sentences follow the creation log excerpt, describing (with only moderate self-promotion, despite the grating mention of "academic journey") the subjects they'd studied and therefore the sort of things they might have edited if we had given them some guidance instead of deleting their userpage five minutes after they created their first draft. Draft:The Evolving Landscape of Technostress with the Influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) wasn't ever going to be acceptable, but it wasn't speedyable either short of invoking IAR. —Cryptic 15:45, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-11 19:32:37 | Significa liberdade | User:Lancegoa (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 2 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | Partial: Creation log excerpt is representative; it goes on for another four sentences. Easily draftlike enough to invalidate U5. I would not have speedied this as a G11 (like it was tagged) - only the last sentence crosses into pure self promotion, to my eye, and it could've been removed without losing any potentially encyclopedic content - but the intent was clear enough that other admins could reasonably have decided to do so. —Cryptic 15:45, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-10 13:03:33 | Jimfbleak | User talk:The Adarsh shukla/sandbox (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | G8: Deleted together with the associated page with reason: U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host, chatbot junk | Partial: This was just a WikiProject India tag created by AFC-submit-wizard, with the log automatically filled in from the deletion of User:The Adarsh shukla/sandbox (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore), so I'll analyze that instead.This was clearly draftlike - enough so that another user reverted the U5 tag with edit summary "? this isn't a valid CSD page". They put it back on with summary "nvm its AI slop", though, which is correct - that first hallucinated ref visible in the creation log is characteristic of all four. Not a U5, but abundantly clear enough to G15; that had passed only five days earlier, so I don't fault the deleting admin for not being familiar with it yet. —Cryptic 15:45, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-08 11:04:52 | KylieTastic | User:Milemin (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | Yes: First of four deletions of this userpage. And ow ow ow this hurts to look at. Representative excerpt: "Unlike traditional computing systems that rely on silicon-based digital logic, Gölge operates as a living material that thinks through its physical structure. The system introduces an entirely new class of computation based on 4D geometric principles, fluidic logic, and acoustic communication protocols, creating intelligent materials that can sense, process, and respond to their environment autonomously." But, while those two sentence superficially resemble (3×terrible) drafting, the page as a whole really doesn't, and not just because the extensive use of markdown makes it so difficult to read. Good U5, doesn't fall under any other criterion. —Cryptic 15:45, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-07 11:45:55 | BusterD | User:Skarthik.84 (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria U5, G11 | Partial: It's a verbatim copyright infringement of this (all three paragraphs, with nothing else on the page here), so of course it's a speedy as G12. G11 is also fair. Is it a U5? I don't think so; it would be indisputably draftlike if it had started with a definition instead of jumping right into its founding and its founding organization's founding. The single sentence written in first person could be cured simply by changing "Our" to "The". That it's worded promotionally enough to be G11able doesn't make it not be a draft; it just makes it a very bad draft, and that rules out U5. —Cryptic 23:21, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-06 20:36:09 | ERcheck | User:June Ellen Savage (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 1 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host & G11 - promotional | Partial: Twelve shortish sentences (loosely; I'm counting the line "June has Local Expertise. Global Connections." as a single mispunctuated fragment), 183 words total; written in the first person, and not at all draftlike. They're biographical in nature, and I'd interpret twelve as "limited" in the scope of "limited autobiographical content" in WP:UPYES. (That WP:UP#NOT forbids "excessive self-promotional material, especially when not directly relevant to Wikipedia" isn't actually relevant to U5, just the currently-proposed U7 (3A). I do have a hard time calling this excessive in length, though not excessive in degree.)I'd rate three of the sentences entirely anodyne and appropriate, two of them moderately promotional, and the remaining seven very promotional. Cutting out 75% of the content is enough of a fundamental rewrite to be a valid G11; but given that it's so short, I'd like to think I'd first try reducing it to the three nonpromotional sentences, which respectively state her birthplace, her hobbies, and a capsule description of her son, and are enough to form a coherent userpage on their own. —Cryptic 23:21, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-06 08:07:28 | Jimfbleak | User:Moshiur.Rahman209 (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 2 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | Partial: Full content was: "Hi, I’m [name], a Digital Marketing Manager at [website] with a deep passion for mobile technology, AI, and emerging digital trends. I closely follow the latest tech news, leaks, and innovations, especially in the smartphone industry. With a background in content strategy and SEO, I focus on creating data-driven, user-focused marketing campaigns. I enjoy staying ahead of the curve and sharing insights that help others navigate the fast-moving world of technology." That's reasonable to interpret as limited autobiographical content; it's also reasonable to interpret it as promotional enough to speedy as G11. Whether it's reasonable to actually speedy it instead of just calling it speedyable (but talking to the user instead) depends on their other contributions. In this case, I'd have fallen on the delete side. Possibly also a G5 considering the checkuser/upe block. —Cryptic 23:21, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-05 00:42:11 | BusterD | User:AAhearts (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host: G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion | No: The entirety of the content not visible in the creation log is "blending pop melodies with heartfelt lyrics. She is best known for her role as Jasper Jean Mariano on the web series Ang Mutya ng Section E (2025)." It's very obviously a draft (ruling out U5), and the promotionalism is limited to the last halves of two sentences and thus trivially curable (making it a poor G11). Was tagged db-spam an hour after creation with summary "Spam by a user with no other edits". This reads to me to be at least as likely to be a fan creation as an autobiography; we should have tried channeling their efforts to improving our mainspace articles Ang Mutya ng Section E and Litz (group). —Cryptic 23:21, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-04 15:46:59 | Jimfbleak | User:Bishnuchetry (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | No: Almost identical to Special:Diff/1304197133, which I just rolled back. This is draftlike despite all the bulleted list items substituting for prose. Not a G11 either - while it's clearly promotional in intent, a G11 speedy would require that it actually be written much more promotionally than this. —Cryptic 23:21, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-08-02 09:20:31 | Curbon7 | User:Manufacturer of dreams (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Blatant use of Wikipedia as a web host by user with no or very few edits (CSDH) | Partial: Four paragraphs long. The first three are about "a sports journalist who works as a senior assistant editor for India's premier news agency, Press Trust of India" who's apparently faced some backlash for his tweets, written in the style of a (very promotional) Wikipedia article. I'd rate only 2 of their 14 sentences as having any chance whatsoever of surviving unchanged in a neutral Wikipedia article, so it's an easy G11.The last paragraph abruptly stops attempting to be a draft altogether; it reads "Influential individuals or groups can tarnish reputations with their PR machinery, but justice prevails. May harmony and love forever reign in their families, that's our wish as devoted Kushan fans. Ultimately, the universe balances all accounts." That would be U5 material, if it were the entirety of the page. —Cryptic 02:26, 6 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-07-31 22:42:30 | Bishonen | User:TrueElite (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria U5, G11 | Partial: About a rapper who's been recording since 1990. It reads like the body of a longish and promotional draft; it has no lead section or any attempt at referencing (or indeed any links, external or internal, at all), but otherwise isn't too far outside of the norm. I don't usually action speedy tags on articles of musicians unless they're very, very clear cases, so I'll give the deleting admin the benefit of the doubt on G11 (which she added; it was tagged only U5). —Cryptic 02:26, 6 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-07-31 16:17:31 | Deepfriedokra | User:Wpsohelahmad (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria U5, G11 | Yes: A naked ad for a self-employed blackhat SEO so incompetent his resume on Wikipedia got tagged for deletion within three minutes of creation and speedied within fifteen. His only other edit (in draftspace) resembled a Wikipedia article even less than the resume deleted here did. —Cryptic 02:26, 6 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-07-30 11:10:36 | Explicit | User:Maszu0Man/Sample page (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | No: Full content was "this is a sussy baka imposter message". Even if you can't make heads or tails of that and weren't aware that we have a handy dictionary around here somewhere that (to my mild surprise) has an entry for the phrase as a whole too, U5 is not "patent nonsense in namespaces that G1 specifically excludes". Or even if you understood it and correctly interpreted it as an editing test, U5 is not "test edits in namespaces that G2 specifically excludes" either. Had only the single edit creating it (in October 2021), no speedy tag or anything. —Cryptic 02:26, 6 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-07-30 08:33:28 | Jimfbleak | User talk:Jerseylovebrand/sandbox (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria U5, G11 | Partial: There was a draft here, different from the one deleted at User:Jerseylovebrand/sandbox. It was actually better than that one, but that's probably because the one in User: looks human-generated and the one in User talk: is obvious LLM product (complete with citations to https://example-news-article.com/jerseylove-launch and https://exampleblog.com/jersey-love-review). The first two sentences were even reasonably neutral! Three of the remaining four decidedly were not, nor was the product list. G11 was correct. G15 would've been too, had that criterion existed yet. —Cryptic 02:26, 6 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-07-27 10:53:50 | JBW | User:Mohammadilhamyasin (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host & G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion | Partial: A terrible, terrible draft, but a draft nonetheless, as can be seen from the creation log. Remainder of the paragraph that was cut off in the middle of the log was ..."of Universitas Islam Malang with a GPA of 3.55, following his Bachelor's degree in the same field from the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education at the same university." Mere description of the author's education, skills, and current position doesn't make it a resume, however self-promotional; this was entirely prose, in the third person, that someone with no understanding of Wikipedia's inclusion criteria or internal style could very plausibly consider the start of an encyclopedia article. Blindingly obvious G11, though, even before I got to "Throughout his academic journey". —Cryptic 03:29, 6 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-07-26 12:38:13 | Jimfbleak | User:Exo da beast (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | Partial: This was plainly an attempt at drafting an encyclopedia article; it started "[name], better known by his stage name Exo Da Beast, is a Zimbabwean rapper and hip-hop artist. He gained recognition as part of the underground hip-hop duo Da Matrix Movement." I'll give the benefit of the doubt on G11 since I try to avoid acting on any but the worst articles about musicians, and this wasn't that. —Cryptic 03:29, 6 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-07-26 07:27:22 | Mz7 | User:Shaunseba (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 1 | Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria U5, G5. User: Shaunsebastian4 | Partial: A two-sentence draft with a two-line infobox. "[name] is a [location]-based technology entrepreneur and cybersecurity enthusiast who co-founded [company] in March 2021. His background includes a diploma in computer engineering and cybersecurity training, alongside founding multiple IT ventures dating back to 2016." G5 was correct. —Cryptic 03:29, 6 October 2025 (UTC) |
| 2025-07-25 07:42:44 | Jimfbleak | User:Ewe Evans Chinedum/sandbox (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria U5, G11, chatbot junk | Partial: "chatbot junk" is right, but I'm not going to go through all of those links to see if any make it into a valid G15 (which didn't exist yet when this was deleted anyway). G11 was correct. But was very clearly |
| 2025-07-25 05:57:53 | Spencer | User:Thisonespolish/sandbox (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore) | 0 | U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host | Partial: Superficially a long draft about a 27-year-old who had died a week prior. Reads like a middle-schooler's autobiography. So laden with in-jokes that I don't think it's credible, but if it is true, Wikipedia's not the place for a memorial, and certainly not a memorial that nobody but the subject's closest friends would have a hope of following. Not a G11 like it was tagged as (and I don't get the logic of tagging it {{db-spamuser}} either; the username has nothing to do with the content). Definitely in poor taste if it's just made-up editing experiments. I would have deleted this, but not cited a speedy deletion criterion; if pressed, I'd probably settle on G3 as being closest. —Cryptic 03:29, 6 October 2025 (UTC) |
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.