DOKUMEN123.COM

Appalachia: Peer review requested / Peer review underway / On review hold / Failed peer review / Peer reviewed / Past peer review results High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Appalachia, a collaborative effort to increase coverage of Appalachia and the Appalachian Mountains. If you would like to participate, go to the project page to see a list of related articles needing attention.AppalachiaWikipedia:WikiProject AppalachiaTemplate:WikiProject AppalachiaAppalachia

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	This article was nominated for a peer review from WP:Appalachia's Peer Review Department by an author on an unknown date.
	This article is currently undergoing a peer review from WP:Appalachia's Peer Review Department. Nominated by an author on an unspecified date Review started by a project volunteer on an unspecified date.
	This article is on hold as part of a peer review from WP:Appalachia's Peer Review Department. Nominated by an author on an unspecified date Review held by a project volunteer on an unspecified date.
	This article failed its most recent peer review from WP:Appalachia's Peer Review Department. note: this does not mean the article is low quality, only that it has room for improvement. Revision nominated by an author Article declined by a project volunteer on an unspecified date.
	This article passed its most recent peer review from WP:Appalachia's Peer Review Department. Revision nominated by an author Article endorsed by a project volunteer on an unspecified date.
	This article was marked as having previous peer reviews but no past results have been provided

This WikiProject banner template uses Module:WikiProject banner, a meta-template for easily creating and maintaining project banners. Please report any errors or feature requests to Module talk:WikiProject banner. Information or warnings about the template are below:

The 6 task forces and work groups will automatically collapse if more than 5 of them are displayed. To change this setting, set or update the |TF_COLLAPSE= parameter.
Automatic parameter checking is enabled and pages with invalid parameters can be found in the tracking category.

Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]

This is the WikiProject banner template used by WikiProject Appalachia to keep track of articles within its scope. All articles are categorised into Category:WikiProject Appalachia articles.

Basic usage

Place this on the talk page of relevant articles:
{{WikiProject Appalachia|class= |importance= }}

Full usage

It is usual to remove any unused parameters from the template call.
{{WikiProject Appalachia |class= |importance= |listas= |PR= }}

Parameters

category – set |category=no if, and only if, a banner is being used for demonstration or testing purposes, to prevent unnecessary or undesirable categorization. Otherwise, omit this parameter. This is unnecessary for vast majority of editors
listas – this parameter, which is the equivalent of the DEFAULTSORT sortkey that should be placed on all biographical articles, is a sortkey for the article talk page (e.g. for John Smith, use |listas=Smith, John so that the talk page will show up in the Smith's and not the John's of the various assessment and administrative categories. Similarly, for topics with titles beginning with an article such as "the" or "a" - e.g. for The Matrix, use |listas=Matrix, The so that the talk page will show up in the Matrix's. This is important because it is one source used by those who set DEFAULTSORT on the article; consider also setting the DEFAULTSORT for the article when setting this parameter. For more information about this, please see Wikipedia:Categorization of people#Ordering names in a category. It is not required if another WikiProject template on the same page has its own |listas= set, since it affects the sortkey of all banners and templates.
class – see #Quality assessment below.
importance – see #Importance assessment below.

Peer review

The PR parameter, when invoked, sets the peer review status of the article. An article's author or a major contributor can request a peer review, a process where a volunteer from our Peer Review Department conducts a thorough and comprehensive assessment of the article. That volunteer then assigns a peer review status to the article and comments on any inaccuracies or issues found. A confirmed peer reviewed article is considered by WikiProject Appalachia to be completely factual, neutral, and free from major flaws. This process is a great tool for any user preparing for a GA, FA, or FL review.

Parameter codes

Set |prr=yes, |prrdate={{subst:today}}, and |prrnom=~~~ to officially request a peer review. This parameter populates Category:Appalachia articles for peer review.

Once they accept a request and commit to reviewing the article, a reviewer can set |prr=ur, |prrreviewer=~~~, and |urdate={{subst:today}} to mark the article as being under review. This parameter populates Category:Appalachia articles under peer review.

To place an article on hold (to give the author time to fix small issues found), a reviewer can set |prr=rh, delete |urdate=, and set |rhdate={{subst:today}}. This populates Category:Appalachia articles on review hold.

To fail an article, a reviewer can set |prr=fr, set |frdate={{subst:today}}, delete |prrdate=, and delete |urdate= and/or |rhdate= if one or both exist. This populates Category:Appalachia articles with failed review.

To endorse an article, a reviewer can set |prr=ppr, set |pprdate={{subst:today}}, delete |prrdate=, and delete |urdate= and/or |rhdate= if one or both exist. This populates Category:Peer reviewed Appalachia articles.

Upon the conclusion of a review, the reviewer should add the parameter |oldid= and include the revision id for which the review applied.

If an article has had multiple reviews:

If the article will not be an endorsed article and this is not its first review, the reviewer should use the above guidelines. The reviewer should then set |pastreviews=yes then fill out |result1=ppr or |result1=fr, |oldid1=, |reviewer1=, and |result1date= and if necessary repeat for |result2=, |oldid2=. Only apply numbers for non-current results, the current result is only under prr and oldid. Currently, this program can only handle one current and three old reviews. Should this prove insufficient, contact user:Dionysius Miller.

If the article will be an endorsed article and this is not its first review, the reviewer should use the above guidelines. The reviewer should then set |prr=ppr and |oldid=. The reviewer should then set |pastreviews=yes then fill out |result1=ppr or |result1=fr, |oldid1=, |reviewer1=, and |result1date= and if necessary repeat for |result2=, |oldid2=, |result2date=. Only apply numbers for non-current results, the current result is only under prr and oldid. Currently, this program can only handle one current and three old reviews. Should this prove insufficient, contact user:Dionysius Miller.

Quality assessment

This project uses Wikipedia's standard quality scale plus non-articlespace content.


Input (not case sensitive)	Class	Category	Population
FA (review required)	FA	Category:FA-Class Appalachia articles	9
FL (review required)	FA	Category:FL-Class Appalachia articles	0
A (not in use)	A	Category:A-Class Appalachia articles	0
GA (review required)	GA	Category:GA-Class Appalachia articles	22
B	B	Category:B-Class Appalachia articles	118
C	C	Category:C-Class Appalachia articles	305
Start	Start	Category:Start-Class Appalachia articles	434
Stub	Stub	Category:Stub-Class Appalachia articles	102
List	List	Category:List-Class Appalachia articles	13
NA	NA	Category:NA-Class Appalachia articles	0
File	File	Category:File-Class Appalachia articles	0
Draft	Draft	Category:Draft-Class Appalachia articles	0
Category	Category	Category:Category-Class Appalachia articles	0
Redirect	Redirect	Category:Redirect-Class Appalachia articles	0
Template	Template	Category:Template-Class Appalachia articles	0
???	???	Category:Unassessed Appalachia articles	1

Importance assessment

This project uses an importance scale. Valid values are shown below.


	Importance	Category	Population
Top	Top	Category:Top-importance Appalachia articles	32
High	High	Category:High-importance Appalachia articles	52
Mid	Mid	Category:Mid-importance Appalachia articles	125
Low	Low	Category:Low-importance Appalachia articles	249
???	???	Category:Unknown-importance Appalachia articles	571
NA	NA	Category:NA-importance Appalachia articles	0

</noinclude>

The above documentation is transcluded from Template:WikiProject Appalachia/doc.
Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox and testcases pages.
Add categories to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this template.

Template:WikiProject Appalachia