Talk:Éric Joisel

Reliability of www.lexpress.fr with majuscule accents

There seems to be a problem with whether e.g. L'Express website qualifies as "best such source" "reliable for the statement being made" as per the Definition of "reliable source" on Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Lets see how the website does on Étienne, Émile, Édouard, Édith, Élisabeth per French orthography:

...seems that L'Express is pretty random. This illustrates yet again the problem of taking websites as authorities for spelling. This isn't a bad magazine, I used to subscribe myself many moons ago. Its news content is excellent. But it's never been strong on proofreading or consistent orthography. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 17:19, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Eric JoiselÉric Joisel – per Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/France & French-related, and WP:IRS preferring the cover of the book Éric Joisel, le magicien de l'origami "best such source" "reliable for the statement being made" over the inconsistent www.lexpress.fr approach to majuscule accents. Plus consistency with fr:Éric Joisel and other French Érics. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:37, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

support per nom.--KarlB (talk) 03:59, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.