This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Windows Me article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Start a new topic Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 4 months

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Microsoft (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft Microsoft Windows (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows Software: Computing Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination. Discussions RM, Windows Me → Windows ME, Moved, November 28, 2012 RM, Windows ME → Windows Me, Not Moved, December 17, 2016 RM, Windows ME → Windows Millennium Edition, Not Moved, January 16, 2017 RM, Windows ME → Windows Me, Moved, May 3, 2019

The information on system restore is totally bogus!

• 'System Restore caused a number of major problems' -- problems not major
• 'performance, which some regard as never being a Windows strength in the first place, was noticeably reduced' -- performance not impacted; system restore activities only occur at specific times.
• 'and because it automatically recreated previous system states on every reboot, it made it very difficult for the non-expert user to implement a desired change, even a necessary one such as removing a virus or an unwanted program.' -- Totally wrong. System Restore only restores things if the user selects it upon booting in Safe Mode or from the UI.

--- As someone who fixes computers for a living, I highly disagree with the above, and believe that whomever wrote that has never had to fix ME using SR (or in spite of it), and probably has has very little experience with ME in the first place. SR excels at restoring virii and problems; look on the web pages of Symantec and other AV companies where they explicitely instruct users on how to turn off SR. I definitely consider restoring a virus to a clean system to be a "major problem". Also, the "performance not impacted" claims depend on the SR activities happening only in idle times; this is, of course, an ideal that happens much less often then would be desired, and therefore adds to the the already painful slowness in the 9x series. This is without even mentioning the disk usage. The poster may have a point that SR should not be happening "automatically", but I've had calls where it seems to have done so (although I can't completely rule out user error) and therefore I, like all other professional IT techs, do not trust it.

The whole paragraph in question was worded too complicatedly and I couldn't make much sense of it. I rewrote it in a way which I hope is more NPOV. - Brian Kendig 20:04, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)

I think this is pretty senseless, since clearly MS DOS 8.0 is a fully functional version of MS DOS and a pretty remarkable one, too, as it is the very last version of it as well. The fact that it only came bundled with Windows ME does not justify negating it its own Wiki entry, as it can be used as a standalone OS as well. -- Alexey Topol (talk) 00:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MS-DOS 6.22 doesn't have it's own article, and that was the last version of MS-DOS sold in retail as a DOS operating system. If that's not worthy of it's own article, I don't see why a version of DOS that was buried in the least popular version of 9x should have it's own article. DoofusMcGoofus (talk) 00:55, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm no expert in redirects and I'm not experienced enough to be in complicated proccesses like XFDs for instance (since they're meant to be for extremely experienced editors who have a lot of knowledge about the rules in and out), but I think these should be sent to a discussion:

WINDOWS ME - Who types redirects in all caps? I typed similar things (WINDOWS XP, WINDOWS VISTA, WINDOWS 7, WINDOWS 8, and so on) and they do not seem to exist except for WINDOWS.

Windows Georgia - not mentioned in the article.

Windows 98 Third Edition - Not mentioned in the article, Me was never marketed under the Windows 98 name and branding.

LOADER.EXE - What is this? What's the point of this being a redirect. AUTTPEditor (talk) 08:39, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Great observations and suggestions, thanks! :) 海盐沙冰 _{/ aka irisChronomia / Talk} 13:30, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can guess, the Loader.exe thing might have been a redirect to sections that are once part of the article but no longer there. We should remove that redirect.

On Windows ME full caps, ...its existence doesn't make a difference anyways? I think modern Wikimedia software can resolve capitalization differences automatically...?

W Georgia: an unsourced forum discussion mentions the unconfirmed belief that Georgia being the development codename of some sort for ME. [1] 海盐沙冰 _{/ aka irisChronomia / Talk} 13:38, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

On the Georgia stuff: ...a belief which was thought to be erroneous in the discussion. 海盐沙冰 _{/ aka irisChronomia / Talk} 13:42, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]