Consensus per this RfC closure and this RfM closure is to use "the Beatles" mid-sentence.

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

The Beatles Low‑importance This Beatles-related article is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band The Beatles and related topics on Wikipedia. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.The BeatlesWikipedia:WikiProject The BeatlesTemplate:WikiProject The BeatlesThe Beatles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. To-do list: For WikiProject The Beatles A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects. Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Articles on each Beatle tour (Category:The Beatles concert tours). See: Missing articles. Expand : The Lost Lennon Tapes, notable radio series which has spawned many bootlegs. Apple Records See also: Adopt an article Stubs : See: Category:The Beatles song stubs Update : Pics/Graphics wanted: Kenwood. Verify : Beatle wives Other : Project: Add {{WikiProject The Beatles}} to the talk pages of all Beatles-related articles. Send a newsletter to members, canvas for new members and coordinate tasks. Enter articles assessed as stubs onto this list, also list articles needing cleanup and other work here. This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one? Songs This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

The song is confirmed to exist, as it has shown up in books about the Get Back sessions. In fact, here's an article about it:

http://www.beatles-discography.com/w.html#watchingrainbows

Is this really worthy of a Wikipedia article?! I'd be inclined to say 'no'. --kingboyk 01:07, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be inclined to say yes :) --Daniel11 11:09, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't these lyrics copyrighted?

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Watching Rainbows/CommentsTalk:Watching Rainbows/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 11:21, 15 August 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 10:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Watching Rainbows/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MarioSoulTruthFan (talk · contribs) 19:36, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article is quite well writen, minor flaws here and there (for the similarities → due to the similarities; the January session. → the same January session), missing release dates for songs, album and EP. I'm even surpised it has a reception section at all. The unpleasent truth is that I'm aware that it will be quite hard, if not impossible, to find information on this particular subject. As you wrote and can see the song was never released or included on any album, only bootleg versions are available. It fails the "Broad in its coverage" criteria, but instead of quick failing it, I'm going to ask you first if you have more information regarding this subject/article?

You have to be aware that not every article in wikipedia can be a GA. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:50, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MarioSoulTruthFan, because this song is not that well known, it is very hard to find information on it. I wanted it to be GA because I want more people to know about it DarklyShadows (talk) 15:04, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a good reason for a article to become GA, henceforth there are six criteria and that's not one of it. Once more, do you have more information? MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:07, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MarioSoulTruthFan: What do I need to add for it to become GA? I do have some more books, I'll do research on it. DarklyShadows (talk) 15:09, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good start, the article needs more information. By the way, just because it is a GA doesn't mean more people will know about it. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to say but I will give a week to start improving the article. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:56, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MarioSoulTruthFan, how does it look now? DarklyShadows (talk) 01:37, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep improving it. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:04, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]