This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Star Trek This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek

This is possibly the worst, most misinformed interpretation of relativity I've read, in both the History and Mechanics section. But I'm not trekkie enough to qualify re-writing this. Someone should, and preferably somone with basic knowledge of what relativity actually is.

Is it "warp core" or "warpcore"? --Fang Aili ^說嗎? 16:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going with what Memory Alpha says: "warp core". --Fang Aili ^說嗎? 16:37, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going with 125c, which is what the TOS scale is on. Not sure if this is correct or not. Not an Enterprise buff. That's what makes the most sense to me, though. —BorgHunter ^ubx (talk) 19:41, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The speed scales were changed bettween TOS and TNG, thus comparisons cannot be directly made. Also, Post TNG speeds above warp 10 are likly to be either based on a revised scale (likly due to the Sub Space effects mentioned in TNG: "Force of Nature")

(Writing this to explain what I am doing, and so I can gather my thoughts)

Under the original Cochrane Scale, ( ${\displaystyle {\sqrt[{3}]{v/c}}}$ ) Warp Factor 14.1 was the highest speed recorded.

Under the Revised Cochrane scale, Warp 10 is set at infinity, warp 1 is set at c, and speeds in between are scaled by power usage and equivalent speed.

I will edit the article later...