Talk:Virtual House of Commons

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:56, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(
)

Created by PinkPanda272 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • ☑Y Article is long enough (7427 characters), new enough (created 27 April, nominated 28 April), and article is mostly within policy (except issue highlighted below). Earwig copyvio says 16.7%, but the only text matches are on names of organisations, so no actual copyvios
  • Question? In the "In foreign legislatures" section, there is no source for France, Spain or the US lacking - none of them are in [8], the only source in that section. Please add sources for this information, or remove it entirely
  • ☑Y ALT0 and ALT1 are both interesting, short enough, and well cited (figures for ALT0 are in [9] and for ALT1 are in [10]. ALT2 is not at all interesting- people swear all the time- and ALT3 is less interesting in my opinion
  • ☑Y QPQ done
  • PinkPanda272 Please can you address the couple of uncited lines of text? Then will be good to go. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Joseph2302: Thanks for the review, I have cited the paragraph in question. It did include information about France, but the piece about the US Senate was taken from a different article that I forgot to reference. You are right about ALT2, it isn't as interesting as the others. PinkPanda272 (talk/contribs) 07:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lords

Are there plans for a similar article on the upper house's experience? Robin S. Taylor (talk) 20:19, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robin S. Taylor - I guess it might warrant an article in its own right, although currently most news coverage is directed at the Virtual Commons aspect. I am considering writing a 'List of Parliamentary responses to Covid-19' or similar to compile the various situations worldwide (or at least in Europe), so a section of that (if and when I get round to writing it) could be dedicated to Lords coverage if it doesn't warrant a separate article. PinkPanda272 (talk/contribs) 20:47, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:10, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.