This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance). Translation studies This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Translation Studies, a collaborative effort to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Translation Studies. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.Translation studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Translation studiesTemplate:WikiProject Translation studiesTranslation studies ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

It's strange to have an article about a file format without a link to the specification. Apparently LISA is insolvent and all content on the lisa.org website was deleted (for whatever reason - is there a law that forces insolvent entities to destroy their archives?). I found a copy in googlecache (scroll past the penile enhancement stuff) - that's not really a citable source. Is the spec hosted (and maintained) anywhere else now? Maybe the article could at least link to the Coverpages report on TMX, they have an older version of the spec.--85.75.162.159 (talk) 08:57, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Previous specification version 1.4a seems to be placed here: http://www.ttt.org/oscarStandards/tmx/tmx14-20020710.htm It claims "2011-06-30 – This document is reproduced with permission of the Localization Industry Standards Association. All emendations to the original text are indicated by striking through the original text and inserting new text in red bold face in square brackets."--- Miurahr (talk) 08:05, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Over the years, different people added to a list of tools related to TMX. Then, 25 april 2017, 22:33‎, MrOllie suppressed the section Tools without explanation. (I do not understand "rm spam magnet".) Later someone anonymously added some of these tools to External links. There should be a consensus over tools or not tools. The situation now is unsatisfactory. Because the section Tools disappeared, external links for tools look unrelated. If there is an agreement to refuse tools, then external links to tools should disappear also. -- Dominique Meeùs (talk) 11:23, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]