This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments

My name is Lindsay and I work for Thoughtspot. I'd like to propose a few changes to the page in compliance with WP:COI, starting with adding the 2018 new CEO appointment as follows:

In August 2018, ThoughtSpot appointed former Nutanix President Sudheesh Nair as its new CEO.^[1]

This would go at the end of the paragraph right before "In March 2019, ThoughtSpot" Linnoo614 (talk) 20:12, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I work for ThoughtSpot and would like to ask for some additions to the end of the History section, indicated in bold here. This adds some acquisitions, funding, and customers. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance and whether the additions are approved or not. Best regards. Pinging @Timtempleton: who helped me previously.Linnoo614 (talk) 16:18, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Linnoo614: I'll take a look. I don't mind helping, but you can ping others using the edit request template {{request edit}}. See Wikipedia:Simple conflict of interest edit request TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 22:53, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Linnoo614: I did most but not all of the requests. The info about the hiring in preparation for an IPO had the wrong year, and I don't like to include personnel info for anyone besides the chairman, CEO or president, unless they are otherwise notable (i.e. they have their own article). You can still do uncontroversial editing such as standardizing the reference date formats. If you also fill in the bare refs, you might be able to eliminate the hidden ref error warning that shows up during page previews. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 23:14, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtempleton: Thanks for reviewing my prior COI request above. I made all of the date formats in the citation templates consistent as an uncontroversial edit as you requested. I was also hoping you might be willing to review some proposed additions to the Technology and Recognition sections, as indicated in bold below. Linnoo614 (talk) 18:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Linnoo614: I condensed and edited the tech info. I think there was too much Snowflake info there. Also, I ignored the recognition items. None seemed important enough to keep the article from getting flagged for being overly promotional. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 23:40, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for reviewing! Linnoo614 (talk) 12:35, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Lead says: "based in Sunnyvale, California"
The infobox says: "Headquarters: San Jose, CA"
The headquarters was recently moved to Mountain View, California[1]%3Cbr%3E

I work at Thoughtspot and would like to request the headquarters be updated to Mountain View, California in both spots. Pinging @Timtempleton: who helped previously. Thank you in advance to any editor that provides assistance. Best regards. Linnoo614 (talk) 15:12, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Linnoo614: This is going to seem silly, but I can't find anything that says you moved, besides your web site listing the new address, and some job postings. Forbes, Bloomberg and CB Insights all have an old address. You should reach out to them to change the address. I'd prefer to not make the change until a verifiable source confirms the relocation. When they change it, or when your next piece of media coverage comes out and mentions Mountain View, let me know. Or someone else might not care about verifiability as much as I do. For future reference, I'm happy to help, but just another reminder that you don't have to depend on just me to make the edits. As I mentioned above, you can make a Wikipedia:Simple conflict of interest edit request here on the talk page, and that will alert other uninvolved editors. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 22:26, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtempleton: I appreciate your strict adherence to Wikipedia's rules, even while I sit on a zoom from NYC with teammates in Thoughtspot's HQ in Mountain View. You mentioned Bloomberg and CB Insights both still listed Thoughtspot's old HQ location, but I have now gotten both to update/correct our HQ. See CB Insights and Bloomberg. Is that sufficient to correct the HQ location in the infobox and the intro? Thanks again for all of your assistance. Linnoo614 (talk) 19:53, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Linnoo614:  Done And thanks for following the process, pain in the neck or otherwise. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 23:38, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The user below has a request that an edit be made to ThoughtSpot. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. Status: The request has been given an initial review and is awaiting further discussion or additional information. The backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 565 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies.

My name is Russell and I work for Thoughtspot. I'd like to request the changes indicated below with strikeouts for trims and bold for additions.

Explanation:

• Reduces the emphasis on individual product names and releases to focus on major pivots in the overall direction
• Makes the content more up-to-date with a summary of recent AI changes and venturing into analyst users
• Trims WP:NOPRICE and WP:CRYSTAL violations from discussing "plans" to integrate Microsoft Azure (these plans did come to fruition but ThoughtSpot has many integrations)

Rsd09006 (talk) 16:43, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Couple problems on my end.

1. You remove mention of certain product names and releases to "focus on major pivots in the overall direction" but then later go on to describe a specific product. Much of the info you propose to remove appears relevant. I understand wanting to describe the overall direction of the company but that's not mutually exclusive with describing relevant products. I don't support removing mentions of specific products its released in the past.
2. If the plans with Azure did develop, that part of the article shouldn't be removed. It should be updated to indicate their new partnership status.

Would appreciate feedback from another editor before implementing any changes. - Otherwise (Talk?) 20:30, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Mustbeotherwise:. I revised the request above to incorporate your feedback. The request now has no deletions/trims, except the redundant mention of BigQuery, which is already in the prior sentence. Let me know if you think that's better? Rsd09006 (talk) 16:16, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Rsd09006: I'm puzzled by this sentence: "As of February 2021, ThoughtSpot was working on integrations with Microsoft Azure in a joint development agreement with Microsoft." That's five years ago, surely "working on" needs an update?

Also, Ref [13] is dated Nov 2024, but the proposed text indicates a product launch in July 2025? Fiske (talk) 11:53, 7 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]