This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
I certainly have no sympathy for unaccredited, religious schools, but Rossnixon suggested, I believe, that the accreditation status of an institution claimed or cited as included in the educational experience of a biographical article can be obtained by reading the linked-to article. I think that's a good point and I agree. It doesn't seem useful and, indeed, it seems to clutter articles, if we list every unaccredited institution as such in articles about evangelicals. Christians, especially, have created some sort of cottage industry when it comes to creating unaccredited religious schools that are really just degree mills of some sort. The more I read these articles at Wikipedia, the more convinced I am that making a point of this issue over and over again is completely unnecessary, especially when we can go to the institution's page at Wikipedia and read that for ourselves. - Nascentatheist04:29, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Additional reference
I don't have access to this journal, but apparently Raymond O. Zorn reviewed Dominion Theology: Blessing or Curse? in the November 1989 issue of Vox Reformata (pages 52–54). gnu5705:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.
